clarkscottroger | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3 clarkscottroger | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- “… at present, our Adventurers are tied to be fit”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, constrained by a sentence limit (high and low) of six, there are worse ways to spend the remaining time you have on earth.

Previously, in our tale

Prompt word:

RUSH

“Do what I say and you will get out of this alive and …sane.”

Hate to admit it, but hearing Anya Clarieaux taking charge of the current situation inspired a brief rush of hope that I’d make it out of wherever the hell this was.

Anya possessed that quality found in great leaders, religious zealots and successful conmen, a palpable sense of conviction in their ability to deal with the world; though I gotta say, that her final coordinating conjunction linking ‘alive’ to ‘sane’ raised more than a few hairs on the back of my neck.

“Starting with Rosetta I want everyone to describe what you remember and what seems to be wrong with you right at this moment, go:”

Rosetta laughed an obscenity and said, “Nothing but managing somehow staying awake during your endless speech in the restaurant, that and I’m fuckin’ tied to this chair;

the Sophomore nodded, “You said something about regretting something and…” he paused and looked sidelong at his girlfriend, “there was a flash of light and then here, as to what’s wrong with me now… I’m thinking Rosetta is killin’ it with the bondage so I guess nothing’s wrong;”

Sister Aclima stared defiantly at Anya with her lips pressed into a keloid scar across her face… her eyes, were anything but passive:

Brother Lymphocytus, “Fock you, if you’d a let us go about our business we wouldn’t be tied up here and such, as for what’s wrong, the first thing I do when this is over is report you to the Guide Union… saints be praised;”

“Don’t ask me, I was doom-scrolling on my phone and next thing I know, I’m here in what appears to be the formal living room of an early 20th Century colonial house sitting with my arms secured and my ego anything but; that said, I have full confidence in you and the Omni Corp and don’t hardly suspect the scary hand of a certain businessman headquartered in Miami,” I looked around at the others, “ok a hint: his name rhymes with ‘St Loreto’.”

Anya bestowed her best ‘Don’t worry smile’ and continued, “Excellent, now everyone close your eyes… sorry, but seeing how you’re tied up, there’s nothing you can do about the sonic shock of the incoming stun grenades, but Omni Corporation’s Hostage Recovery Team assumes the worst.”

*

 

Share

Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

So, in yesterday’s Doctrine post, we said:

clarks tend not to tell jokes effectively? (Now, scotts! damn! that’s a whole post in and of itself.)

And Frank, he responded:

Regarding jokes, I imagine scotts would use them as excuses for inappropriate behavior, rogers would laugh and might even (witlessly) tell some good ones, but clarks would use humor as self-defense.

And who can blame us for responding to Frank’s comment with the obvious setup to use a vid?

…allow us to retort!

Where to begin?

Hey! Let’s borrow the counseling model/technique that made us* give up three-quarters of the way through grad school. At the time the newest counseling style totally embraced by the psych dept was that of Robert Carcuff. He brought the phrase, “What I hear you saying is…” to the world.

So what we key on (in our Reader’s assertion re: scotts) is the suggestion that scotts would place a value on (having): an excuse. For inappropriate behavior.

While that is a totally valid assessment for a clark or a roger, it would not be something a scott would given a second thought.

Damn! Not for nothin’ but Frank does have an ear for the Doctrine. Quietly frequently he offers a productive insight. In this case today, it is the most challenging aspect and the most useful aspect of the Wakefield Doctrine: acquiring fluency in (the language) of all three predominant worldviews.

So, for those still reading, sure we all get the Doctrine, with it’s surface description and Michelin guide book to the personal reality(s) of the Outsider (clarks), the Predator (scotts) and the Herd Member (rogers).

But the real challenge, just as in learning any foreign language, is to perceive the world from the ‘native’s’ perspective. Or, as they sometimes say, get to the point of thinking in the (new) language.

Hey! Frank! Thanks.

*no, didn’t make us… we were young and this way predated the Wakefield Doctrine

 

Share

Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

So…

Nope… not gonna take the easy(er) path of a RePrint post today. Though god knows there are few more Doctrine-instructional days of the week to incite a Doctrine post than Tuesday!

ok, lets keep it basic.

New Readers: (no better way to stay ‘on track’* to write a Wakefield Doctrine post than to address them/write to that ‘market’). Hey! This blog is about the Wakefield Doctrine. Which is an additional perspective on the world around us and the people who make it up. We admittedly indulge in the harmless conceit of calling it a personality theory. Mostly because of the word ‘personality’. Which almost all of us are conditioned to think: ‘personality types!’ ha! (the exclamatory ‘ha’ is there just to set us up for one of the fun descriptions of generic personality types, of the kind formally found in magazines and now(ish) online.

The set-up is: “Oh honey! Come here! I’ve just read an article about personality types. It has you down to a ‘T’. You’re a (fill in the blank with random capital letters or maybe some animal species or, if of high academic ambitions, verbs turned into nouns, ‘Driver’ or whatever (don’t forget to capitalize!). In anyevent, our punchline is: “Now Mrs. Gullible has a brand new mirror-shaped club!”

ha ha

Have we mentioned that clarks tend not to tell jokes effectively? (Now, scotts! damn! that’s a whole post in and of itself. Warning!! Be careful what you ask for. Not entirely complimentary to our Predatory friends. At least for the most sensitive scotts. (yeah, we know! as if).

Back to our thesis: New Readers: if you visit consistently you will see a certain pattern here. Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday are referred to a ‘Doctrine posts’. The Thursday post is a Six Sentence Story (a prompt based fiction bloghop). Saturday and Sunday, the TToT post.

that should do for today. (found my music vid in that last sentence, albeit a day late.)

*ok! congratulations New Reader!! You’ve demonstrated several qualities considered necessary to the full-enjoyment of the rhetorical, why-is-a-raven-like-a-writing-desk adventure that is the Wakefield Doctrine! No, we know you don’t need that explained, but for the benefit of the roger or scott looking over your shoulder we’ll say this: “The more enduring and consistent quality characterizing those who find the Wakefield Doctrine fun/interesting/useful, are flexiblity of intelligence and a ravenous curiosity.”

 

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to theWakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

While today is Monday, here in Oceania, it is a holiday. It is called, not without un-intended irony, ‘Labor Day’.

In that spirit, we will eschew any sense of (labor) and paste a random RePrint*.

* spin-scroll through the list of all posts while saying, ‘There’s a light…”

Wait! Before we spin ‘n print! Next week’s TToT will be special. It’ s an Open Audition (for Hosts/Hostinae). More later this week. Mark your calendars!

Monday Post -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘what?! did I read that correctly?!!!* whats going on here?’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)CSR

Quick, before it fades from my mind, ‘within yesterday’s memory are all the lessons I need to make today the kind of day that I would hope it might be.’

whew! damn, that was close!

No, serially! I was (deliberately) veering from the path I found myself on this morning and the forces of sameness were totally marshaling to get me back on track. ‘back on track’ aka in the same old rut. (Funny how the truisms of life seem to be dual purpose, isn’t it?)

Anyway, as Ellias McDaniels, (no fair looking the name up! If I’m going to all the effort and social risk of getting obscure, then the least you can do is allow me the pleasure of your response that you know the reference.*), would say…

So, why the Monday Post? Two reasons:

  1. I’m trying to side-step my internal critic (that part of me who knows the true measure of my abilities and is kind enough to not let me write anything thats not up to the standards that I should be living up to)
  2. I’m in self-improve-by-virtue-of-better-organizing-my-time mode.  (Tell me that thats not the single most aggravating aspect of your day!) Well, tell me that, if you’re a clark. Speaking of which, how long has it been since I’ve written a ‘hey! this is the Wakefield Doctrine! you wanna hear about the best personality theory you’re ever going to hear about?’
  3. thanks! whoever that was in the back of the room (metaphorically speaking) and speaking of back of the class… can anyone out there tell me the personality type who gravitates to the back of the class, the back of the lecture hall, the back of the crowd at the annual awards ceremony and the front of the car? I’ll give you some time. Hell! I’ll give you the rest of this morning to answer.

So, the Wakefield Doctrine is an approach to personality types that will allow you to know more about the other person than they know about themselves. With the Doctrine, you will no longer have ask the world, ‘how could I fall for that again! I really thought I knew them better than that!!’
With the Wakefield Doctrine as (an) additional perspective on life, (and that’s what it and every other ‘theory’ of ‘personality’ actually is, and I’m totally including the Oscar Myers Briggs&Stratton, the ‘what color is my vegetable’ (current fav on ‘the Facebook’) and Jung’s ‘What!?! No, I’m not saying that Fred and Wilma were real, I’m saying that archetypes…never mind!’) personality theories. With the Wakefield Doctrine you will be in position to see the other people in your life in a context that allows their behavior to make sense. And that’s all any of us want, isn’t it?**

Well, running out of time this morning, so the basics:

  • clarks the Outsider: the simplest way to describe this personality type (and to test yourself for clarklike tendencies) is that this person wakes up each and every morning thinking, ‘ok  the world and everyone is still out there, I know I can figure it out today’
  • scotts the Predator: the person most like to be voted: jeez! I’d love to be able to be like that,…. scotts will bound out of bed, ready for whatever is waiting, and they know there’s something waiting outside the bedroom door/at the office/among the kids at the daycare and that annoying woman who is so judgmental
  • rogers the Herd Member: if you got a little annoyed at the (numbered) bullet points because I clearly said ‘two’ and you have a certain confidence that everything that must be achieved in your day will be, if for no other reason than the fact that your list has the important things at the top; rogers don’t wake up thinking, they wake up planning, and they most assuredly do not bound out of bed, one could sprain an ankle being so reckless, and besides, there’s no rush, the schedule is simple and well established.

…gotta run (or walk (or stroll)) out into the world.

 

*totally a clark thing, if you respond, ‘yeah, clark, who do you love’ I will feel a surge of pride in my getting to hang out with people who are of a place that allows them to know a semi-obscure musical reference (and that’s that only hint you get!)

** yeah, that is a trick question

 

*

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Our first dog, Ola. She was the epitome of the German Shepherd breed. Large teeth, welcoming smile.

 

The is the Wakefield Doctrine’s weekly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. Each week those so inclined gather (in a blog-linkatory-way) and share lists of the people, places, things and events that merit inclusion in such a list.

It’s good exercise. Heart/Spiritualistically speaking, that is.

Our List for this week is:

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

5) so, a week ago we told the story of the rock and in the course of it mentioned granite. Hostinae cai followed up asking if granite was used in the construction of our house. We said no but promised to find and photorize some residences that did use granite.

Note: for all you geophiles out there, the photo below was taken in the community (actually more a fire district/enclave) of Shelter Harbor in Westerly, RI

6) * someone. but maybe it was in a comment in their own posts. Likely suspects: Misky, Reelika, Chris (though I wouldn’t put it past Mimi to mention bookcases.) In any event, please proceed back to the Present and Grat #7)

7) ok, this is not funny… serially. someone in a comment (somewhere)* mentioned ‘Bookshelves’. So, naturally, our first thought was ‘Hey! What a great Grat!’ (Go back to Grat #6… hey, nowhere in the Book of Secret Rules, aka the Secret Book of Rules does it say linear causality most be respected) So say what you will about grand books and fiction about the tragedy of aging such as Cervantes’s ‘Don Quixote‘ or cinematic delving into the effects of time on culture and the ordinary as inspired by great books like HG Well’s ‘The Time Machine’.

Once the center of our everyday homelife, at minimum serving as jealous guardians bracketing our ‘tele-vis-shun’ the bookcases in our home, have now been relegated to… the laundry room, (didn’t see that coming Mr.-451-Farenheit-Bradbury’ didja?). Below is one of our two remaining bookcases. The five others, required to hold our four-hundred forty-four other books is pictured in Grat #9 (We mean, serially, who doesn’t hear Ecclesiastes 3:6 – ‘A time to keep, and a time to throw away.’ (Not stepping into your turf, Frank, but had an earworm of ‘the Byrds’ totally sneak in the room between typety-types.)

8) something, something

9) our new Ba’al:

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

music vids

*gotta comment here. Sure it was among the first ‘music videos’ (no, not video as we know it today) but still! They’re the fricken Beatles and no one thought to control access to the filming session?!?! More than once, if you pay attention to the background (through the hedges), you can see people walking by and …and! around minute 01:00 you can see the guitar cases they forgot to move out of the shot. Still, for some of us, sure takes ya back, no?

*

*

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share