clarkscottroger | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3 clarkscottroger | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

‘you talkin’ to me?’ (see Grat #7)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. Foundered by Lizzie R in 1887, this bloghop has consistently topped the lists of ‘Ideas That Need To Have The World Catch-Up’. But the concept was the key. (Remind us to tell you the story of the very, very beginning of this bloghop and how the required time to create and post a TToT list was drastically altered.)

Below are a list of Ten people, places, Things and events that have triggered a grat attack since last we posted.

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Six Sentence Story blohop

5) follow-up photo on last week’s landscape project (an After-after)

6) speaking of landscapes and pine forests, we’re grateful for a woods that goes from ‘oh, how nice a garden‘ to ‘damn, hate to have run through this some night being chased by one of Nature’s scotts!

7) the photo at the top of this post is of a cow at Farmer Brown’s (not this Farmer’s ‘real’ name) We used to take Una for drives past the farm for her amusement.

8) something, something

9) Update on the frontlawn Meadow

ikr? a bit greener (which if put in the context of the last week or two of mid-March weather), I’d say that’s pretty darn encouraging

10) the Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules) specifically, Secret Rule 1.3

 

music vids

*

*

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Frydey -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

…the Wakefield Doctrine, besides being gender and culture neutral, is age neutral.

This is a very intriguing aspect of our little personality theory. Actually it, (the immunity to the effects of longevity on manifestation of characteristics), is not only interesting, it also serves to reinforce the basic tenants (lol… and tenets barum bump!) of the Doctrine umbrella.

To this point: since the Wakefield Doctrine’s division of all humanity into three personality types, (aka predominant worldviews), predicated on the character of the personal reality we experience, one might reasonably assert that we, all of us, have developed/acquired the perfect personality type… for the world we live in.

ed. that we’ve chosen a clark-centric RePrint in a post ostensibly about how the Wakefield Doctrine manifests at various stages of life, (aka growing, maturing and otherwise acquiring experience), is probably more telling than we’d like. But, what the hell, today’s Friday.

clarks -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘hey, I’m good enough for my friends…so the heck with what you think’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)...and the over-under on the game is what?

(As so often happens, here at the Doctrine, a phrase popped into my head that seemed to be a whole Post…provided I could put into words the feeling that were [embedded] in said phrase. When I wrote today’s Post subtitle, I immediately had two thoughts, a) Readers are going to misunderstand and respond by saying, ‘aww, don’t feel bad, we all think you’re doing great’ and 2) I really need to get back to this kind of post, one that is written to the clarks who are encountering the Wakefield Doctrine for the very first time. And, of coursec) my own re-appreciation of how much things have changed since I first started writing this blog… not the content and nature of the Doctrine, rather the nature of the readership and, even more germane, the changes the Wakefield Doctrine has wrought in my own self. So, what say I give it try?)

When I was young(er), I retained an unshakeable faith in two things: a) my friends and b) my capacity to endure and survive. Now I am no longer younger. More to the point, (of this post), I am now possessed of an understanding of my predominant worldview (clark/Outsider) and that enables me to see a lot more of the ‘why’ of my behavior and beliefs, actions and responses to the people and the world around me. This is an improvement. This knowledge, this insight into the way that ‘I relate myself to the world around me’, does not, in and of itself, change anything. It does, however, make any desired change much more attainable and sustainable. That is the good of the knowing of the Wakefield Doctrine.

The title today? (And the introduction above, that suggests that perhaps writing a Post to appeal specifically to the brand new clarklike Reader, might be more difficult than I think?) All of what underlies, and thereby giving rise to the sentiment manifested in the subtitle remains true in me, in all clarks. I still have the …. er…. not so positive self-concept that is the initial premise shaping the worldview of the Outsider, and I still, very much value the friends that I have. Most of us, (including rogers and scotts), will recognize, in the second half of the sub-title an implication,  a… ‘yes but’, a ‘hedge’, if you will, on the claim to being valued by others. There is something to the way the statement sounds that is a hallmark of the clarklike personality type. It’s necessary to a clark, this ‘hedging’ of a claim of self-worth or value (to others), a pre-defense defensive, if you will.

You want a physical example of what I’m trying to convey? (It’s also a primary characteristic of clarks.)

Watch a clark smile. Most of time, especially when ‘in public’ or not in a totally secure environment, which is pretty much everywhere except bed or the bathroom, clarks will smile by compressing the lips, putting a slight upwards motion to the corners of the mouth, while watching the other person very carefully. Hedging their bets. Being careful. Keeping the escape route viable. You know, as an Outsider, we’re all about interacting, all while keeping an eye on the door. Find me a classroom, I don’t care if it’s First Grade or Grad School, if the individual student is allowed the choice of seats, you will find a preponderance of clarks in the back row. Near the door. And while one might think that this choice is simply to avoid being noticed, one would be almost correct. It is, in fact, to provide the option to escape, to not be forced into the focus of attention.

That’s part of what the clark personality is like. Tomorrow we may look at scotts, ( ‘I think, therefore I scream‘) or perhaps rogers (‘there is no ‘i’ in herd, there’s only me and everyone like me’)

Since I’m doing kind of a old-style Post, I thought I’d include a music video, well, just because.*

 

*excuse me!! excuse me!!  because, well, holy shit!!  (lol)  you want to know the real, totally-honest-to-god reason why I find writing Doctrine Posts so ….so  incredible?  Ok, so I’m finishing up the final edit and I decide… sure, lets keep the music vid, because I love the song. The last thing I needed to do was to find the ‘cover photo’,  you know, the Post’s thumbnail that shows only on the landing page. Well I think, ‘lets look for an image associated with Grieg and ‘the Hall of the Mountain King’, (today’s vid)…at the top of the results page is a link to the wikipedia, so naturally I go to read it ( I’m a clark, remember?)  anyway, here’s what jumped out of the screen at me, it made me laugh:

The piece is played as the title character Peer Gynt, in a dream-like fantasy, enters “Dovregubben (the troll Mountain King)’s hall”. The scene’s introduction continues: “There is a great crowd of troll courtiers, gnomes and goblins. Dovregubben sits on his throne, with crown and sceptre, surrounded by his children and relatives. Peer Gynt stands before him. There is a tremendous uproar in the hall.” The lines sung are the first lines in the scene.

Grieg himself wrote “For the Hall of the Mountain King I have written something that so reeks of cowpats, ultra-Norwegianism, and ‘to-thyself-be-enough-ness’ that I can’t bear to hear it, though I hope that the irony will make itself felt.” The theme of “to thyself be… enough” – avoiding the commitment implicit in the phrase “To thine own self be true” and just doing enough – is central to Peer Gynt’s satire, and the phrase is discussed by Peer and the mountain king in the scene which follows the piece.( italics added)  (wikipedia.com)

…no!! really!! lol  man! do I love this Wakefield Doctrine!

*

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- “…meanwhile our three (or four) adventurers talk as they drive to Chicago.”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, constrained by a sentence limit (high and low) of six, there are worse ways to spend the remaining time you have on earth.

Previously…

Prompt word:

HELP

“Don’t know if this helps any of you, but I’ve had a number of dealings with Anya Clarieaux and, well, I’m still alive,” I left it at that, figuring any laughter or lighten-up humor would not go over well.

To no one’s surprise, Lou’s niece, Rosetta Storme piped up, “Big fuckin’ deal, Sherlock, that does exactly what to help me or the nun get through this increasingly Victorian sci-fi caper we’re some how caught up in?”

“Or me,” from the sound of it, the male voice was somewhere close to Rosetta.

The extraordinary fidelity of the three-way phone connection was to be expected whenever Anya and the Omni Corporation were involved, even for Sister Aclima, walking down a pedestrian-dense Manhattan sidewalk.

“I haven’t forgotten London, Mr. Devereux,” Sister Aclima’s words were that of professionals trading shoptalk over drinks at the Tavern on the Green, her tone was black-site rendition Twenty Questions.

“Hey, I just texted my uncle and he said to tell you he was at that Café place to meet his favorite author…. la Raconteuse somebody;” I was about to ask Rosetta to assure my admin, Hazel, that I was fine and on schedule, when Anya’s voice cut through it all,

“Cool your jets, children; you’re involved in something for more dangerous and consequential than personal grudges.”

 

 

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- “a Six Sentence Cafe & Bistro Six”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, constrained by a sentence limit (high and low) of six, there are worse ways to spend the remaining time you have on earth.

Previously in out current tale...

Prompt word:

HELP

The Six Sentence Café & Bistro is a semi-private bar/hangout/venue/midnight rendezvous that has been on every list of Best Place to: propose marriage or partnership/breakup with spouse/reconcile with a certain someone; with it’s single long bar, a row of alcoves along the exterior wall and a sea of small, round wooden tables, the atmosphere is intimate, private and very much the tabula rasa for those with both the Will and the Desire to find their way to there.

“Hazel… what the fuck are you doin’ here,” Lou Caesare’s interrogative was a discreet whisper, provided one measured its volume as a double digit percentage reduction of his normal speaking voice; before his words could bounce back off the far wall, he turned towards his companion and with the hint of anacoenosis that he favored when he had to make a second visit to collect on an outstanding loan, said “Diane, help me out here, what the fuck is she doin’ here?”

After a pause, both in the subtle background music and animated conversation from the crowd around them, all three began to laugh… the silence threatened to become a permanent condition, until Lou added, “Drinks on the house… provided someone in this joint can tell me where’s the redhead!”

Moving to the bar, Lou sat between Diane Tierney and Hazel Grover, their collective silhouette against the illuminated rows of liquor bottles was reminiscent of a landscape painting of Monument Park by Maxfield Parrish on mushrooms; addressing Ian Devereaux’s admin he provided the answer to an unasked question.

“I’m here tonight because I enjoy a good read as much as the next criminal mastermind; as to how I met Chris, funny story that, there was a book release here and your boy Ian insisted I put in an appearance, give the soireé a dash of the wild side, word on the street was the New York Times was sending a reporter, a real Upper East Side trust fund orphan by the name Naomi or Natasha or some fricken thing, I was here to provide a touch of criminal ethnicity if you get my drift. Fortunately she wrote a good review, it was all a tempest in a C cup, to coin a metaphor.”

 

*

Share

Wedndesdae -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘a quick Review and a (slightly more comprehensive) Preview

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

The Review (this week’s ‘Doctrine post’):

  • went to the archives for posts analyzin’ and dramatizin’ the three predominant worldviews
  • early descriptions were rich in visuals
  • detailed insights of the worlds of clarks, scotts and rogers
  • joyfully-hyperbolic
  • …and not just descriptions (or even insights) but real world examples: bicyclists on a Sunday morning roadway, spandex splattered with primary-color corporate logos wearing tear-drop-shaped helmets to avoid air drag and little, chromium mirrors projecting from in front of their faces (like a jeweler’s loupe except in reverse…the better to see the looks of admiration on the faces of drivers forced into the on-coming lane by the herd of rogers
  • …or scottian women who…well, basically show up (the dynamics are safely in the hands of evolution and Y Chromium imperatives / scottian men. like Excitement RNA diving into crowds of rogers and/or women, the echoes of their efficacy remodeling cultures, workplaces and friendships
  • or clarklike women and clarks wandering the world, like surprise off-springs of a mis-remembered coupling of Tantalus and Cassandra… they know what’s happening to everyone else.

The Preview (of this week’s Six Sentence Story):

 

A splendid time is guaranteed for all...

 

Share