Featured | the Wakefield Doctrine Featured | the Wakefield Doctrine

Teusday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

RePrint1 Tuesday. aka clark’s Day of the Workweek. It’s called this because the level of scrutiny* has declined from Monday and the get-settled-in Wednesday is a day away. (Thursday is, arguably, a clarklike day and Friday, well might as well hand the scotts some textbooks (to throw in the air) as it is, for our rambunctious friends, Weekend Eve.

Well, seein’ how we were gonna make this an easy Wakefield Doctrine post, lets find something for listening music (not excessively ear wormish, but, you know, hum-able aka ‘jeez those ’70s what did I do to my brain?!!?))

 

*every clark’s kryptonite and existential ‘Kick Me’ sign acquired during the endless two years spent at William Golding Junior High School. scotts and rogers can skip this poignant reference to an aspect of the formative years of most Outsiders because a) you can’t appreciate it (even with a raging secondary clarklike aspect) and 2) yeah, you other two do remember but, as every post always tends to subtext, “I believe you be. I remember it differently. (Little reward for Readers: mention the word  ‘achronologic’ in your Comment and we’ll totally include you in a Muse-link in tomorrow’s post.

it’s garbage day… no time to make up a new..er Post! the Wakefield Doctrine (hey…lighten the hell up!)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

The-9th-Gate-the-ninth-gate-16058026-960-412

“...the ego of a clark is a thing of subtle, yet supreme majesty. clarks walk the earth, desperately hoping that, as in the fables where a king dresses as a commoner (the better to know his subjects), they will be accepted into the homes and hearts of the people they meet. and they are, in part,  because the commoners, ‘the real people’  are not fooled by the clark’s attempted disguises. the joke is on the clark because the bosses/ the teachers/ the girl at the gas station/ the co-workers/ the lovers/ the friends/ the spouses and the people-we-really-can’t-seem-to-get-along-with…. everyone that a clark naturally meets in the course of the days of their lives, knows (or suspects) that clarks are not the king in disguise. and, even though they wonder why the clarks believe they need to disguise their true natures, most are happy to play along, choosing to accept us with our quirks, recognizing our innate good natures.” (the book of the clarks… Wakefield Doctrine)

*************

Hey!  lets do a re-print Post!!! (I fear I’ve said too much as it is),  from November 13, 2012…

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of personality that you get to enjoy with your friends and them, before it gets all famous and mainstreamy and everyone will know about it)

Question: If your husband is a roger and you are a clark, is it true that they never accept how much you have changed over the years, since you first met?
Answer: Too true1

(Welcome to ‘ya shoulda just asked Tuesday’! We will be presenting some common questions and the semi-comprehensive answers…along with a little commentary, mostly to let us get away with dividing the page into block quotes.’)

Question: My best friend is funny and fun to be with, but sometimes when we are around other people he gets like, mean even goes and picks on me. But this happens only with certain people, this big kid that (my friend) knows. What gives?

Answer: Chances are your friend is a scott and the person that, when they’re around, your friend starts acting mean?…well, that other person is a scotttoo, but they are what we call dominant (to your friend). So your friend, even though he is picking on you, doesn’t mean to hurt your friendship… it’s a pack2 thing, you know?
Answer: jeez, if you say so

(This question deals with the changing pack order (from the scottian perspective) and it’s effects on the behavior of a scott. Note: this question (and by implication, the experience cited), will most likely be posed by a clark. Do you know why that should be?)

Question: My fiancée and I are getting close to the Big Day. When we first got engaged, we both agreed to keep the ceremony and everything on the quiet, low-key side, but lately, ( the wedding is in 3 months), she has been talking more to her sisters and some of her old friends and it seems like the guest list is getting bigger and bigger. What gives?

Answer: She is probably a roger. Forget about changing her mind. It means a lot to her, in a way that you will never understand.  So relax! Sneak a couple of your friends that she might not have approved when the guest list was small, she probably won’t even notice now, and if she does make an issue of it, say the following to her (word for word): “I understand how important family is to you now. And even though I am not close to my family, you have shown me that my feelings3 of friendship with (fill in the names of you friends) make them like family. Won’t you let my family join your family …darling?

(And there are those who would say, ‘Hey Wakefield Doctrinaires! Sure you have a uniquely clever take on personality types, but what about practical applications? Huh, what about those?‘ Well, here ya go! Who cannot not identify with this situation? …not counting the rogers, of course!)

Question: My boss is nice enough, but it seems like he tries too hard to be, like my friend or something! Every day it is ‘how are you doing?’, “is there anything I can do to make your job easier?” I mean, all the time! I can’t get any work done when he is in the office, he is always offering to ‘help’! I might be able to deal with this, except that every time I do get some work done that he needs to sign off on, he always finds  fault! And if I come up with something on my own initiative (he likes to say that he wants me to try to ‘think outside the box’) he is either totally negative or acts like he is amazed that I actually did it myself!  Should I quite my job?
Answer: Probably.4

(This Question deals with a scenario that is all too common. And, although we do not propose that all bosses are rogers, we will say this, ‘If your boss is a scott you have: a) a good time everyday up until the day he decides that it is time to change careers or b) a lead pipe cinch of a sexual harassment lawsuit, so the day you get tired of her shenanigans, ‘it’s sayonara see ya in court’
If your boss is a clark, then we know the following: a) if your clarklike boss is female then her boss is a roger, if your clarklike boss is male then his boss is a scott!  and b) they (clarks) make great bosses, will stick up for you totally against all opponents, but jeez! enough with the leadership by consensus! Get a set, yo.

That music referenced in the Title of today’s Post? Totally weird. I’m sitting and watching TV and a commercial comes on and before I can hit ‘MUTE’ I hear the music in the background (of the commercial) and I’m off to the great and omniscient google… and here we are

1) rogers are about consistency, if they are about anything at all! The worldview of the herd (rogers) maintains that history, tradition, continuity…consistency is of the greatest good! The worldview is also one in which the individual’s relationship with the world-at-large manifests primarily in emotional terms. So when a (lasting) relationship forms, the details of ‘the other’ person are important, in a sense, manifesting the emotional investment. So, as time goes by, even though people change and grow and develop, the roger will still insist on seeing the ‘original person’

2) scotts, in the initial behavioral metaphor: like pack animals, i.e. wolves, dogs, lions and such. The social ranking in the pack is one of simple dominance, an alpha at ‘the top’ and everyone else in order of strength/prowess/capability downward from there. It is a primary characteristic of the scottian personality type to establish ranking when entering a new (social ) environment. Literally going from person to  person, figuratively pushing them on the shoulder in order to establish ranking

3) emotions! always play the emotion-card when dealing with rogers!

4) you could try to…nah, don’t even bother.  Maybe if you got to the Doctrine sooner, you might have learned enough to invoke your own rogerian aspect to re-configure your work relationship… but too hard, too frustrating, easier to get another job. But then again, most bosses/middle managers/supervisors/Principals are rogers!  so maybe you should be asking about the Wakefield Doctrine School of Self-Improving Oneself…school

*

1) ok, techinically a TrePrint

*

 

Share

Winter’s Dawn -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Seeing how we’ve acquired a number of New Readers since last we faced Winter’s Dawn, it is incumbent upon us to explain this view. While radical in terms of the conventional view of time, the year and its Season, we say, ‘Better get used to it.’

Having passed the Summer Solstice, each day grows shorter, at least here in the northern hemisphere. And it doesn’t take more than a sugar-rushed sixth grade debating class to see the weakness in the opposing team’s position: “But the calendar says ‘It’s the Start of Summer, not the End.’ Sure, and hard work and serious demeanor is always rewarded. (ed. ‘holy shit’. take a moment to peruse the search results to ‘Sayings about Puritan work ethic‘. … if you’re not back here by….now! you have our condolensces. We’ll leave a music vid for you at the bottom of the post. If you remember to return. It’s not your fault or failing. It’s the lack of a secondary clarklike aspect of a sufficient intensity.) “au revoir, binyons“.

You’re still reading?

Good.

The Wakefield Doctrine is an additional perspective on the world around us and the people who make it up. Predicated on the notion that there are three distinct, (yet subtly interrelated), ways to relate to the world at large. We, all of us, develop at a very early age a personality type that is best suited to the world, (and reality), as we’re experiencing it. We, all of us, become:

  • clarks the Outsider bound to the original sin of believing that everyone they see knows something that a clark does not; this knowledge is exhibited by their apparent comfort and affiliation with other people, despite the depth of association. the effect on the Outsider is to engender an eternal curiosity, an endless drive to learn what others clearly know that makes them collectively ‘a part of’
  • scotts the Predator bound, as apprentice to the original Tempter; scotts live in the paradise of the here and now, the simple, and arguably, more natural life of predator-prey. an eternal happiness measured by the next heartbeat, the day to be seized, the past un-begrudged and a future unlimited. a perfect lifeform of a god less insecure
  • rogers the Herd Member bound, unknowingly but to their credit, to the role of insufficient Creator, recoiling from the responsibility of the true craftsman who follows the edict: ‘A true craftsman stands by their work and accepts any flaws are their responsibility’.

We, all of us, learn the best strategies for surviing and thriving in the world as we experience it. Our individual personality types are, by this view perfect. While all live in a world dictated by one (and only one) predominant worldview, we have the potential, if’n we’re lucky, to have a secondary or even tertiary aspect significant enough to allow us, from time to time, to see the world as ‘the other two’ are experiencing it. These momentary glances into the world-we-did-not-grow-up-in can be dramatic and often a transcendent moment; more often than not under conditions of extreme duress. but still…

The ambition of the alternative perspective offered by the Wakefield Doctrine is, at it’s heart, an opportunity to identify with ‘the other two’ personal realities. Doing so, with practice, avails us of better appreciating the world as the other person is experiencing it.

 

*

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

the other half of this week’s Hypograt… don’t see this when we drive home, at least not today

This is our contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. Each week, those so inclined, write and link a list of the people, places, things and events that has caused them to experience gratitude. It can be those interactions with others in the course of the week leading up to now or a list of people who, at some point in the past made them think, ‘I really need to remember this when the finally 21st C arrives with the technology to usher in an Age of Information and Enlightenment.

For this week our list of Grats are as follows:

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Six Sentence Story bloghop

5) ongoing yard project involving bees and tree stumps and such (r. hendrix? a little imagery? ‘battlegrounds, red and brown’ (vid ‘Spanish Castle Magic’ below) current state of the conflict:

6) Front Meadow Update (the wheat is taking a beat(ing)) i.e. dog and rabbits

7) hypo-grat Summer’s End this weekend. (at least it hasn’t snowed…yet) lol for now of Phyllis’ cottage

8) something, something

9) ‘Tree-rat’s Morning Wudu

10)  Secret Rule 1.3

 

music vids

*

*

*

 

 

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Phridae -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Once again we are grateful to those who follow along with this here personality theory here and write Comments that are baby thesiseseses…

Mimi:

They pursue shiny objects, but have no intention of real harm. “I wasn’t going to eat it, I was just going to taste it a little!”

To which Misky (replied)

Quite so.
But curiosity? Endless bucket loads of it.

(oh, yeah… context!! This Doctrine Post from the start of the week.)

Two core concepts: 1) the Everything Rule and b) ‘How a thing manifests vis á vis the three predominant worldviews’ personal reality

Clearly both Comments are accurate and informed.

If you’re still reading we can assume nobody’s got a beef with the Doctrine’s insistence that there is a personal (as in ‘I experience this, you do not’) quality to reality.

So, why the extra heavy word ‘manifest’? Why not accept that reality is perception and let it go at that?

Because the Wakefield Doctrine isn’t merely a ‘hey! what if...’ alternative perspective on the world around us. It’s a tool. A tool to aid us in our efforts to appreciate the differences (in general) of reality as the product of three different ways to relate ourselfs to the world around us.

We, your Curator, are a clark (predominant worldview). Therefore when we ‘interact’ with a thing, we perceive it consistent with the character of our relationship with it (and the rest of the world forming the background of our little thought experiment). Since any relationship alters the object being related to, for us as an Outsider, we manifest the quality/thing/concept of creativity appropriately to our personal reality. Not for nothin’, but for our people, who are capable of believing anything, there is no limit to the ground against which this idea of new/novel manifests. This is why it is said that clarks are, of the three, the truly creative ones. That is not to say that scotts and rogers cannot experience and bring (to others) the novel, the unique and other attractive things*.

But here’s where it gets tricky. scotts for example, relate to the world around them to as do predators. their world is, metaphorically, one of hunters/prey, search and survive, fight or flight. They will therefore relate to the people, places and things/events in their life from the perspective of a sucessful predator. Which means: develop and practice the appropriate skills.

ok. that’s enough for this Friday.

lets simplify. to manifest in this context is to ask: considering the relationship a clark or a scott or a roger maintain with the world around them what’s important to them on the most fundamental level? that’s how they manifest a thing.

 

*see? see?!?! to a clark the novel, the unique they gold! (Wanna know why? As a clark. ok, ok… because central to the relationship a clark (the Outsider) maintains with the world, (and therefore Life), is the search for the knowledge that will permit her/him to become a real person.)

 

Share

Whenzdey -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

lets set aside the lesson plan for today and consider: random truth and spurious insights

Hey, so clarks, they’re like introverts, right?

How come we can’t be sometimes a scott and then, maybe certain things change and we’re like really pissed off but do the opposite, we’re being a clark?

wth! everything around here seems to come back to clarks… that’s not fair

no, really

if the three predominant worldviews got into a fight… which one would win?

how come you people don’t like rogers?

a girl walks into bar and there are three people sitting there: one at the far end, one at the near end and the third in the middle, which should she talk to first?

no way! you’re not gonna leave these open-ended!!?

right?  right?!?!

oh. that fishbowl

full of little strip of like fortune cookie…fortunes

real clever

 

 

*the clark*you remember round fishbowls in Saturday Morning cartoons*because clarks are the ones who actually need it*we don’t dislike them, they’re just very…triggering*sure we are*the clark again*thats not the way this works*no. no they are not*thank you*sure we are*correctomundo*exactly!

 

Don’t forget! Doors open at Denise’s Six Sentence Story bloghop promptly at 6:00 pm EDST (here in Oceania) Word on the street we can expect an appearance by Chris, Misky, Reelika, Frank and, of course, Mimi

Be there or acquire the characteristics of a four-sided figure created exclusively with ninety-degree angles yo

*

Share