self-improvement | the Wakefield Doctrine self-improvement | the Wakefield Doctrine

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

this week our list (of Grats) includes:

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine ’cause sine qua non, binyons, sine qua non

4) Quick Before (two months in the past) and After (an hour ago) landscapifying

5) Phyllis’ tomatoes!*  (she had the excellent idea of having a gardenette up on the deck, where the deers and rabbits would have to work for their free food.)

6) the Ocean (ain’t but twenny minutes away is all)

7) Hey! Surprise Grat… a sundog! or… maybe a sun halo (nah since I like dogs better than angels… lets go with sundog)

8) something, something

9) fellow Hostinae and Hosts! Mimi, Denise, Frank, cai, Lisa, Dyanne, Kristi, Andrew, Misky, KnitCat

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

*jeez Frank, a little decorum, arrright?!!? ;p

 

music

*

*

*

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

‘Open Book (oh boy!) Essay Questions (aww shit!) Doctrine Summer School Pop-Quiz’

Two assertions:

clarks are crazy, scotts are stupid and rogers are dumb

clarks are heartless, scotts are cruel and rogers are mean

(We good so far?)

For Readers who might claim AP status in these, the four Doctrine posts of each week, you will do well to consider if you can sense/see/feel the intrinsic harmony among the above pair of triplets.

New Readers? You have the advantage. You are not yet burdened with an understanding (complete/comprehensive or not) of the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine. And with that freedom, you are welcome to: lol, wtf?!?! ‘oh, I clearly made a mistake by coming here‘.

Supplementary Material (the Book in Open Book):

the three predominant worldviews are:

  • clarks (the Outsider) know they’ve missed a critical lesson of Life and, with just a hint, a partial list and/or inference, can re-assemble this information and use it to become a ‘real’ person. …before anyone important notices
  • scotts (the Predator) live to act and, in action, express themselves. it’s not what you do, it’s how loudly you do it
  • rogers (the Herd Member) confident in their understanding of the right order of life and the world, will, purely for extra credit, share the insight

Each of these three exist in a personal reality that conforms, supports and is natural to a certain relationship (between you and the world around you). Developing a social style/interpersonal strategy appropriate to the world, (as you experience it), you have the right personality type for what you’re up against.

Everyone does everything at one time or another. The world, (aka reality), is what it is…for you. If you know the world around you is organized and quantifiable, good thing you’re a roger! Otherwise you might forget where you put things or, worse, mix them up.

Question: Among the three predominant worldviews, why are the characterizations (above) different for each and what does that tell you about how they might experience: standing with you, across the street from a very popular and very busy restaurant at noon on a Summer’s Monday?

Compare and Contrast

Extra Credit!

Which do you prefer?

A) original version

2) if you don’t recognize the singer’s voice…. welcome Gen Z!

 

 

 

Share

2zd8 -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Frank has, as Readers often do, provided us with launching point for today’s post in the form of his Comment on yesterday’s.

I was trying to decide which of these personality types is the best, but I am glad to find out that “We all have (the) perfect personality type.” The one I have is perfect.

Someone’s been doing their reading! lol

As stated, ad astra, the Wakefield Doctrine holds that we, all of us, settle into one (of three) characteristic relationships with the world around us. We then proceed to grow up and mature. And, in doing so, develop those social strategies, perceptual biases, habitual preferences and stubborn resistances. aka we develop a personality in response to the reality in which we live.

To use ourself as example: we found ourselves in a (personal) reality that seemed to have a slight (just a little, not all the time, just occasionally), tendency to blindspot us. Nothing weird or crazy just that clearly to our very young eyes (and ancient soul) we were overlooked at times. Comparing our estimation of our role/status in the family unit, there clearly was a touch missing in the quality of our belonging-ness. It became obvious that most everyone in our single-digit-life experience knew something we did not. Not for nothin’ we were already being told that we lived, at least part of the time, in a world of our own, a ‘dream world’ according to parents and teachers and such. The only honest conclusion to a four or five year old was that we missed a class in ‘Being a Part of’  Not good. Naturally we began looking for the missing information.

For a person living in the world of the Outsider (clarks) that is a decent description of a perfect personality… (again with the ellipsisesses!!) given the conditions we found ourselfs in.

ProTip: if you already know your (Wakefield Doctrine) personality type, you can go back in your memory and see how your personal choices were geared and set to maximize your efforts to thrive and grow. (Unless you’re a roger. In which case nothing you ‘remember’ coincides with our little explanation. oh well, what’re ya gonna do? There’s always Briggs,Stratton, Oscar & Myers ERBW f system of personality types! lol)

 

Dovetailing perfectly with yesterday’s closing ellipsis

Which is not a bad thing provided you want to be able to…

increase your ability to see the world as the other person is experiencing it.

ok running out of time… Tuesday tend towards that

fine, nothing gigantically original in this:: our ambition/the Doctrine’s Mission Statement/walk a mile in another’s moccasins

we would submit that this sentiment, that of holding identification (with another) as the next level of the classic: ‘Do unto others as you would have them do unto you’

this because one is transaction, the other is not.

Tomorrow!! More of this what’s the good of considering the other person if there ain’t nothin in it for us?

 

*

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Lets review:

The Wakefield Doctrine is an alternative perspective on the world around us and the people who make it up. This perspective consists of three distinct, (but somehow interrelated), relationships one maintains with their daily, personal reality. While everyone is born with these three as potential(s), at a very early age, one, (and only one), becomes dominant. We then, as tiny babies, begin the process of learning, developing, practicing the wide range of persistent social strategies (aka personalities) for surviving, (and hopefully, thriving), in the world as we are experiencing it. Which insight convinces us of the following provocative statement.

We all have (the) perfect personality type.

The three ‘personality types’ of the Wakefield Doctrine are:

  • clarks (the Outsider)
  • scotts (the Predator)
  • rogers (the Herd Member)

Each of these three reflect a different relationship with reality, (and the world and people and such). None of the three (personality types) are bad. None of the three are better than. (As one non-specified of the three, you might consider the three as a continuum. As another of the three you’d seize on that notion as an opportunity to argue about the overall validity of our little personality theory.)

Here is the most useful apophthegm*:

clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel

*yeah, you could, if you learned the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine to a comprehensive enough degree, divine which of the three personality types would be inclined to use that fairly obscure word for ‘short, pithy saying’ But then, you’d be wrong.1

clarks are crazy, scotts are stupid and rogers are dumb

  1. because of  ‘the Everything Rule’ which is not a ‘Get out of ‘no!-wait!-what-I-meant-was-I-really-do-understand’ card. It is, rather, a reminder to refocus on the effects of the character of one’s relationship to the people. places and things that make up ‘the world’.

So learn the character of each of the three relationships. Become so familiar with the manner in which the everyday presents itself to the three predominant worldviews of the Doctrine (aka becomes fluent) and you will know more about the other person (your spouse, your friend, the girl at the convenience store…whoever) than they know about themselves.

Which is not a bad thing provided you want to be able to…

 

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Slow-typing Monday. Let’s not fight it, shall we? (lol)

Tool kit. Action Plan. Social Strategy

What is the value of the Wakefield Doctrine?

nah, too… Mutual of Oh Mama…let’s try this:

*explanations are to clarks as sex is to scotts and tradition is to rogers*

Better.

Got the patina of a morning-after Clearsil ya know? without being too ‘you can’t stay in bed all day’

(sad commentary when your Curator needs to warm-up in order to go looking for a RePrint post to brush-away all the white space on this Monday morning’s Doctrine post draft.)

ok…ok hold on (hey are we the only ones who have mornings when the ability to type vanishes like confidence when making a morning after telephone call?)

yeah…

here we go. (“Service Department, please. What? Sorry, wrong number.”)

Random Monday the Wakefield Doctrine (if this were organized like a real personality theory, you’d have to pay for it)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)images-119

So we (Cyndi and Denise and yours truly) were talking on the WDSLDR Call-in this Saturday. The topic was, superficially, about rogers, but in actuality, it was about clarks.

  • …because, the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them

we came to the conclusion that, prior to entering a new situation, most clarks prefer to know more (about the situation) rather than less. Sometimes this is a reasonable ambition, other times it is not. When it is notclarks tend to retreat into their heads, in an effort to ‘figure out’ their best approach to the situation. Of course, this tactic will result in our clark not actually participating in the actual events.  With this non-attentiveness to the reality we are in, our status of being the Outsider is totally assured.  So, as we discussed on Saturday, how do you properly prepare for events that lie in the future and are therefore not completely knowable? (We rolled down the windows and yelled and hooted at a car full of kids from school going in the opposite direction.*)  We were using, as the example of this principle,  the new work situation that Cyndi was facing at the start of the new year. Most telling was that it was ‘knowing the people’ that she was going to be expected to work with (and in some cases, direct and manage). While we (Denise and me) were no help with the particulars of her work environment, it did occur to us that:

  • …with the Wakefield Doctrine, you (or me) or maybe just Cyndi, already knows everyone she is going to be working with, even if she has never met them before that first day… they will be clarks or there might be a scott there (probably not two, at least not in the same work environment) and a whole bunch of rogers. so, ‘fear of the unknown?  not for this clark!’

We laughed, in part (or in whole),  at the realization that, even after years of study, the Wakefield Doctrine still had new insights to offer!

Our conversation continued well past the normal cutoff time of the Saturday Night Drive (8:00 to 8:45 pm EDST). So, if you are in possession of a telephone next Saturday Night give us a call! It’s fun and informative and you will benefit!

  • with the insights afforded by an understanding of the (principles) of the Wakefield Doctrine, you will never need find yourself saying, “How could they say such at thing? I really thought I knew them better than that!”
  • clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel
  • rogers organize parties, scotts are the most sought after guests and clarks find themselves there, despite their best efforts to the contrary

You know that old aphorism …or chestnut or,  ‘come here son, I have something about Life to tell you’,  thing about ‘if you have a job that you need done, ask a…’?    Well, the Wakefield Doctrine says:

  • if you need it done right as soon as possible and you don’t care how neatly, or carefully (or correctly) done it is………   ask as scott
  • if you need it done, don’t mind not getting credit for it being done and don’t care how long it takes to get done……….  ask a roger
  • if you need it done and you’d rather be doing something/anything else and you don’t care if it is completely done (better than you had hoped) or completely done…….ask a clark

*

Share