personality types | the Wakefield Doctrine personality types | the Wakefield Doctrine

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

From Faithful(ish) Correspondent Misky:

I require assistance in ascertaining which of the three this person might be. Here’s the scene: It’s 36C/97F, and I’ve waited 3 weeks for a new licence plate for my electric car (EVs have a green strip on the plate because we’re allowed to drive into cities without paying tolls). The first plates were lost by Royal Mail. The next set arrived on Tuesday, and so I drove to the dealership to have them fitted (holes drilled; screwed into the bumper; etc). The young man, not willing to work in the heat any longer than necessary, I assume, forgot the steel knobs required so the screws don’t rust. And then I discovered that he’d not removed the plastic protective film on the plates. I rang up the dealership and said, “It’s hot. I’m grumpy. And this doesn’t make me less grumpy. I’m driving to you as I speak, so you can fix this.”

Which of the personality types are happy to do a half-arsed job and consider it as a bloody job well done?

Thank you Misky.

Readers? To start us off, here is our (first) response to Misky (in a Comment/Reply)

the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them.

ed. as to the core question: which of the three would be ‘happy to do a half-arsed job and consider it as a bloody job well done?’

(come on…you know this one!)

All three of them.

The ‘answer’ to our Correspondent’s question is to be found in how they relate to her (if such a meeting might be arranged). They will reveal their predominant worldview by how they ‘defend’ their work.

(Hint: one will laugh, another will have a reasonable explanation for how, given circumstances beyond their control, it was not their fault and the last might simply apologize. But… (some of you are insisting) the question is ‘which personality type would not be concerned with the quality of work, insisting it was sufficient’.)

(Two word Hint: the Everything Rule. And, this is not quite what at least 2/3s of you are thinking it is. The inference pertinent to our discussion, not the actual Everything Rule, that is)

The actual and most productive answer to what sounds like Misky’s conundrum is: we can’t tell at this kind of distance. Were we there, at the dealership, it might be otherwise. “Wot? I was just about to enjoy a cuppa of Grey. And a scone, absolutely scrummy, they are. pip pip”

The shortest path to determining one’s predominant worldview is to interact with them in real time. First of all, the eyes:

  1. direct stare in return, (not necessarily hostile, but way not shy) maybe a disarming laugh; non-direct, constantly looking at anyone observers, or,
  2. failing that poster on the wall ‘The Customer is always Right (pip pip) or even
  3. subtle, but minimal eye contact but not shifty, and clearly not defensive or even critical other than to glance to the lower left, then up (NP fans will concur)

With a proper depth of understanding of the three relationships (with the world around them) of the Wakefield Doctrine, one can identify their personality type. And…and most germane to our discussion, by doing so successfully, be in a position to know more about our wayward mechanic than they know about theyselfs.

 

There is a saying in the field of ‘Decorative Word Arrangement and Proper Story-Setting’ that suggests the author ‘Show, Don’t Tell’.

Tune in tomorrow and we will.

(Question and criticisms in Comments below. (pip pip) And remember! “There are no stupid questions. Only your questions.”*

*  a joke lol, come on! ya got to have fun with this thing! besides 1.5 percent of Readers know it’s funny. …and an automative 15 points deducted for not

 

*

Share

Wednesay -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘…a simple question’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

What fun synchronicity can be!!

Below is the start of Wednesday’s post. It was written before we posted today’s post. Fine.

Friend of the Doctrine Frank was kind enough to include the Day’s Secret Word, achronologic in his Comment.

There’s a non-linear connection here, don’cha think?

 

Yesterday’s post got us a question lodged in our editorial/rhetorical head:

When looking at photos of people you know, why is it that the young version is easier to identify than the old version? Not to put too fine a point on it, we’re talking about early adolescents sitting around looking at photos of classmates from when they were, like, five or ten years old. (Hint, the eyes are most often the tip-off).

ok. we all remember doing that, like it was yesterday.

But now! Fast-forward to a fifty (ok, assuming your Curator is providing the top limits of hypo-youthfulness), lets call it a thirty-fifth year class reunion. Good luck identifying your classmates, yo.

There ya go.

And to tie this to Frank’s involuntary trigger of the past: ‘achronologic’ is the adjective most frequently associated with the Herd Member.

Why?

’cause rogers exist in the (personal) reality of emotion. and even a third grader will tell you, “emotion is ‘non-rational, man.”

(ok, provided this hypothetical 8-to-9 year old person is a clark)

Disagree? Have a different take on our conclusion? Feeling there’s another way to frame the question? Have at it. (Be sure to document your opinion to the pertinent elements, aspects or inferences found in the actual Wakefield Doctrine. Doing so makes it so much easier to retort, ‘What are ya. crazy??! Did you even crack the book?!! Cliff Notes we’ll even accept them as a primary source to support an assertion.”  (lol..jes kidding. your predominant worldview serves as an inviolable imprintatur, lettre de transit

 

Wednesday! Wednesday!! Wednesday!!!

The doors open on Denise’s Six Sentence Story bloghop! Stop in. Read. Enjoy. Comment. Tell us your favorite characters. and…and! there’s a way-big chance you’ll be able to enjoy the next installment in the ongoing Serial Six: ‘The Café and the Time Whorl’ *

*so you don’t have to click on the ‘when last we saw our characters’ of last week’s Six, here are the last entry from the writers:

yer welcome

Share

Winter’s Dawn -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Seeing how we’ve acquired a number of New Readers since last we faced Winter’s Dawn, it is incumbent upon us to explain this view. While radical in terms of the conventional view of time, the year and its Season, we say, ‘Better get used to it.’

Having passed the Summer Solstice, each day grows shorter, at least here in the northern hemisphere. And it doesn’t take more than a sugar-rushed sixth grade debating class to see the weakness in the opposing team’s position: “But the calendar says ‘It’s the Start of Summer, not the End.’ Sure, and hard work and serious demeanor is always rewarded. (ed. ‘holy shit’. take a moment to peruse the search results to ‘Sayings about Puritan work ethic‘. … if you’re not back here by….now! you have our condolensces. We’ll leave a music vid for you at the bottom of the post. If you remember to return. It’s not your fault or failing. It’s the lack of a secondary clarklike aspect of a sufficient intensity.) “au revoir, binyons“.

You’re still reading?

Good.

The Wakefield Doctrine is an additional perspective on the world around us and the people who make it up. Predicated on the notion that there are three distinct, (yet subtly interrelated), ways to relate to the world at large. We, all of us, develop at a very early age a personality type that is best suited to the world, (and reality), as we’re experiencing it. We, all of us, become:

  • clarks the Outsider bound to the original sin of believing that everyone they see knows something that a clark does not; this knowledge is exhibited by their apparent comfort and affiliation with other people, despite the depth of association. the effect on the Outsider is to engender an eternal curiosity, an endless drive to learn what others clearly know that makes them collectively ‘a part of’
  • scotts the Predator bound, as apprentice to the original Tempter; scotts live in the paradise of the here and now, the simple, and arguably, more natural life of predator-prey. an eternal happiness measured by the next heartbeat, the day to be seized, the past un-begrudged and a future unlimited. a perfect lifeform of a god less insecure
  • rogers the Herd Member bound, unknowingly but to their credit, to the role of insufficient Creator, recoiling from the responsibility of the true craftsman who follows the edict: ‘A true craftsman stands by their work and accepts any flaws are their responsibility’.

We, all of us, learn the best strategies for surviing and thriving in the world as we experience it. Our individual personality types are, by this view perfect. While all live in a world dictated by one (and only one) predominant worldview, we have the potential, if’n we’re lucky, to have a secondary or even tertiary aspect significant enough to allow us, from time to time, to see the world as ‘the other two’ are experiencing it. These momentary glances into the world-we-did-not-grow-up-in can be dramatic and often a transcendent moment; more often than not under conditions of extreme duress. but still…

The ambition of the alternative perspective offered by the Wakefield Doctrine is, at it’s heart, an opportunity to identify with ‘the other two’ personal realities. Doing so, with practice, avails us of better appreciating the world as the other person is experiencing it.

 

*

 

Share

Whenzdey -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

lets set aside the lesson plan for today and consider: random truth and spurious insights

Hey, so clarks, they’re like introverts, right?

How come we can’t be sometimes a scott and then, maybe certain things change and we’re like really pissed off but do the opposite, we’re being a clark?

wth! everything around here seems to come back to clarks… that’s not fair

no, really

if the three predominant worldviews got into a fight… which one would win?

how come you people don’t like rogers?

a girl walks into bar and there are three people sitting there: one at the far end, one at the near end and the third in the middle, which should she talk to first?

no way! you’re not gonna leave these open-ended!!?

right?  right?!?!

oh. that fishbowl

full of little strip of like fortune cookie…fortunes

real clever

 

 

*the clark*you remember round fishbowls in Saturday Morning cartoons*because clarks are the ones who actually need it*we don’t dislike them, they’re just very…triggering*sure we are*the clark again*thats not the way this works*no. no they are not*thank you*sure we are*correctomundo*exactly!

 

Don’t forget! Doors open at Denise’s Six Sentence Story bloghop promptly at 6:00 pm EDST (here in Oceania) Word on the street we can expect an appearance by Chris, Misky, Reelika, Frank and, of course, Mimi

Be there or acquire the characteristics of a four-sided figure created exclusively with ninety-degree angles yo

*

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s weekly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. It’s a growing trend among write-actual-words-ophiles of all ages, around the fricken’ world. Due in no small part to (the) Hostinae and Hosts sharing their experiences with gratitude (old TToT saying: ‘A Grat, once Typed, can wicked-often be shared’)

1) Phyllis

In the Before Time, the first year of Una’s garden

 

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Six Sentence Story bloghop

5) Doctrine Plant of the Week! Found in profusion in our side-meadow (this year), fresh and ready for the presses. Yes, we did have ambitions to host Oscar at a Winter’s Eve fête1 but alas, he is previously indisposed.

 

6) ever one’s favorite prehistoric plant

7) For reference (no! not a job reference, for academic reference (ok, maybe a job ref too (in which case, we’d be all: yo! Mimi, Dyanne*, Misky, Frank Hubeny**, Lisa, Kristi, Knitcat, Andrew, Denise and cai)))

8) something, something

9) the Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules). In recent ‘backstage’ conversations with Hostinae cai, she has been offering suggestions and thoughts on how we might increase the currency of this bloghop among the more broad (and men lol***) demographic of the blogosphere. Always good to remember that ‘horizons’ are meant to be expanded, as the old saying holds, ‘The edge of the 8.5×11 yellow pad may be the end of a page, and a ruler in a pinch, it is not, however, the final sheet.’ In any event, we had an opportunity to cite, (to cai), the Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules) which in it’s very Preface states: ‘…you can do anything you want when creating a TToT post provided two(2) conditions apply: a) there is [p]resent an unambiguous respect for the intent of the bloghop and 2) th[e] author cites the appropriate Rules for their Thankful (ibid ¶ 444 ‘BoSR/SBoR’ 2009-3233)

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

  1. First Day of Winter June 22. Sommer, we hardly knew ye

* well, yeah! ’cause though you don’t see her posting on weekends here as much as once did she, in Doctrine terms Dyanne (appears to be) of a predominant worldview best suited to have your back if’n you’re ever drawn down a dark alley (of course, it’s a better-than-even chance that it was her suggestion: ‘hey! lets see whats down there!’) So, yeah, put her down as a reference on your job app.

** Full Disclosure: totally gotta keep practicing the correct spelling of our newest Host’s name. While we don’t hold it as deficiency in our personality, we are loathe to have our Hosts and Hostinae think we don’t care enough to spell it write.( Matthew 7:12 ‘Therefore all things whatever you would that men should do to you, do you even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.’)

*** bar-rum…bump!

music vids

*

*

*

*

 

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share