Month: April 2012 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2 Month: April 2012 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2

Saturday at the Wakefield Doctrine, Blockquotes, non sequiturs and random thoughts. Hey, it’s the Weekend!

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

No theme, no plot and (sort of) no message1  just a quick Saturday Post.  Thanks, though, to Claire  for a message on ‘the FaceBook’ that kind of inspired me to write this particular Post.

Lets get right to it!

First things first!  Tee Shirts!  Apologies for the tiny print on the sample shirt, but the discussion will mostly focus on:  what color should the shirts be, what size (for the first run) and crew neck versus v neck?  For those who cannot get their computer to enlarge the above jpg, the front is just like the Wakefield Doctrine hats  ‘clarkscottroger’ in an arc over  ‘the Wakefield Doctrine’. And on the back of the shirt:  www.wakefielddoctrine.com
Pretty simple and straight forward, no?

Any Readers on the Facebook, stop by the Wakefield Doctrine page ( or wall or whatever the hell it’s called)  click here.  ‘LIKE’ the damn thing, if you can. Not sure why you should, but it seems like a good idea.

(Semi-serious topic)2

Was talking with Claire and some of the others about the fun we have here with these Posts and Contests and such, the topic meandered around but ended up with a discussion of the future of the Doctrine in general, and this blog, in particular and the matter of how the Wakefield Doctrine is explained to new Readers came up. I mentioned how I think that I have to improve my writing skills and/or find ways of explaining the Wakefield Doctrine that are less…. idiosyncratic..oddly entertaining…deliberately provocative and inflammatory. At least, when I think about how I would explain the Doctrine to a 6th Grade Classroom3  I tend to have a more difficult time doing it than when I am writing one of these Posts. But, then again, the point of this blog is to have fun with a cool idea (the Wakefield Doctrine) and interact with a bunch of talented people ( Claire and Molly and Nell and AKH and DS and the roger ) and others that come around here.

Having said that, and in conclusion, let us re-iterate:

the Wakefield Doctrine is a unique, useful and fun way to look at personality types. the Wakefield Doctrine is a tool for understanding ourselves and the people in our lives. With the Wakefield Doctrine, you need never again find yourself saying, “Now why on earth would they go and say a thing like that? I really thought I knew them better!”  (the Wakefield Doctrine maintains that):

  • there are three personality types: clarks, scotts and rogers
  • that we all have personal realities that coexist with the common reality that we all share
  • that these ‘personality types’ are the result of the reality that the person lives in
  • ‘personality’ and ‘personality types’ are not a list of preferences, they are reasonable coping behaviors based on the reality that is being ‘lived in’
(the Doctrine further maintains):
  • clarks are the way they are because they exist in a reality in which they are ‘the outsider’
  • scotts are scotts ’cause they grow up in a world of predator-prey… act or die
  • rogers are social because the world (for them) is a quantifiable place where people are meant to relate to something
So, if this does not make sense…. contact Claire   lol
Still, we did warn readers that today’s Post would be non sequitur-istic and random… check back here tomorrow… better yet!  Call us tonight! (on the Wakefield Doctrine Saturday Night Drive)….(the number is around here somewhere….

1)  lol  …”as if

2)  not really,  here, …watch this instead:

3) one of the more scottian of the Friends of the Doctrine, Alex used to be fond of saying, “When you are trying to explain things to a person, think like they are 6th Graders and tell them 3 times. Tell them what you are going to tell them, tell them and tell them what you told them” …kinda paternalistic, but you get the idea.

I don’t play the drums, but this particular song forces you to hear what a frickin genius Bonham was….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fzw67EzFmb4
Share

one Contest, three personality types and not a single ‘wtf’! that Wakefield Doctrine is so damn efficacious, at times it’s frickin’ scary!

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

The Wakefield Doctrine is predicated on the notion that we live in a personal version of the world, the world that, at the same time,  we all share in common. Trees are still trees, people can’t fly un-assisted and the ocean is wet…but while this is true in the common world, my personal world/worldview is one in which I am, a clark, an outsider.  And in this common world, I have one friend who is a totally and naturally social person in his (rogerian) world  and (we both) have a friend who is naturally aggressive, impulsive, you know…scottian!
(And so it began, years ago), when the three of us walked down the street, we saw the same blue sky and all the cars on the street had 4 wheels not 5 or 7, but when we happened to pass a girl, she always seemed to notice one of us first! As we walked along the sidewalk on that day many years ago..and when we needed to ask a cop for directions one of us would smile and get a conversation started and the next thing we knew, she would stop handing out parking tickets and take the time to help us…and when we were all kind of bored… well, it seemed that all three of us were very good at something and while these ways complimented each other, there was no overlap and therefore no friction and no competition.

You know, the Wakefield Doctrine ‘started’ with three people experiencing the world three basically different ways and yet still sharing the normal ‘everyday world’. So in the course of the day today,  if you think you feel like a scott when the teacher is really boring or if you are sure that you must be a roger, ’cause you can really focus on the details of a problem, thats because you are…all three. At some point in the day and at different times. You can see the world as each of the three personality types do, but in quick glances. Here at the Doctrine we call it  predominant type… the world that you wake up to…that is your world:

  • you know that you should be happy and you know that you aren’t un-happy but…. you look around and wonder ‘what the hell do they have to be so satisfied about’
  • you know that all this Wakefield Doctrine stuff is fun and all, but that’s just a distraction…the real world is real people, pushing and being pushed fighting and laughing
  • nothing is wrong with the way things are, everything is fine the way things are, nobody needs to change anything about the way things are…but still, there is something about that theory..
So look around today. At home. In class. At work.  They are there, those three friends who live in very different worlds and yet you would never know it to talk to each one of them, but talk to them as a group…
Pretty damn good Contestifying, eh what?
Totally want to thank our Ms Claire!  such a (secret) Judge she was, yo
And the Posts that were entered into our little Contest!
DS#1 is the soon-to-be-amazed-at-how-damn-good-a-movie the movie Grand Prize really is… please join us in a rousing round of one-hand- clapping for the Oracle of Ocala, the Seer of Smyrna… DS#1!!!
And while we are all enjoying this moment, lets remember ‘there are at least 899,999,993 people on the internet who do not yet know about the Wakefield Doctrine… lets get them to come here and Read and Comment and (ask for) a hat (for their damn heads)!! All good.
Progenitor roger, DS#1, Ms AKH, Molly and Claire great job!     There is no finer, more talented and twisted group of DownSprings to be found anywhere in the whole damn blogosphere!

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyZfQZBP-fc
Share

…the Envelope, please!

(shhh, she cleared her voice let’s settle back and read… the Winner is about to be announced!)

Dear fellow Wakefield “Doctriners” ^_^

I believe that this was the toughest and funniest contest I had to ever judge – although it was a first for me. I can tell you this, each and every one of your entries has diverted me exceedingly and each in different, yet completing ways. So before I come to the point, I’d like to congratulate YOU ALL for the quality of your writing and review (big word here…not so much the point).

THE CRITERIA were these:

Good – Fun to read – Clever – ‘How cool was that’… as a (secret) judge I assigned stars (5 max) for each criteria. Then, you got “doctrine points” for each comment & like/Google Share your entry collected because the reader is king/queen and has the last word in my world ^_^.

Roger: db(2)+ 1.5 ml He = db(2) – 1.5 ml Co2 (a dead balloon is a dead balloon)

You wrote a very interesting piece that first brought question marks all around my head (you were not the only one having this effect on me though ^_^)… this is a good thing by the way. As I read on, your tone made me think of the main character in a book that I had just finished and liked a lot (“The History of Love” by Nicole Krauss). So I read with a smile on my face all along… I have looked in my own mind to find the file of my own “particularly fond childhood memories” but I do not think it is placed behind my left ear… I could not say since I have not found it entirely yet – just bits and pieces that I wish were as rich as yours. In short, I smiled – even laughed a bit, agreed with you most of the times as I related and wondered about life – longer than my daily dose… I loved the journey you took me on.

Jennifer: What does “a dead balloon is a dead balloon” have to do with Personality Types? Nothing.

You got me laughing just with your title, which is quite unusual with me. What’s with the fear of clowns? I never understood it! I don’t particularly like them either since they never made me laugh… hmm… well, okay… maybe I do get your point here ^_^. Your entry was filled with the type of humor I am very fond of, so thank you for that and for your great choice of music video as an illustration. I loved that concert by the way!

DS#1: Through the looking glass where a dead balloon is (really just) a dead balloon somewhere over the edge…

I am such a fan of Lewis Carroll’s stories… I was ecstatic when I read your title and read expectantly your entry. I was not disappointed at all… no surprise here… that is brilliant writing, the kind that keeps you on the edge yet not over it. You created vivid images in my mind and your story had dogs in it which got me melting from the start. Thank you for the wonderful reading! I enjoyed every second of it.

Clark: while, ‘a dead balloon is a dead balloon’ the quality that gives life to the (non-dead) balloons is imperishable and therefore hold(s) out hope to all balloons’

Alright Clark… maybe you’ve got the award of the longest title in the history of writing contests ^_^. Your entry puzzled me in a very good way… which means that your intent of being both amusing and wry is reached, no question. Is information really the reality of Clarks? Yes… maybe, depending on how you define information… could philosophy be a type of information? I’d say that in my book at least it could be. I have to admit that I loved this sentence: “A ‘dead balloon’ is to a ‘live balloon’ as clarks are to scotts and rogers”… made me laugh for one and then think… “the space within and between permits life to exist”… interesting train of thought.

Molly: When a Dead Balloon is not just a Dead Balloon

Do you know how I react when I feel something bad or embarrassing is about to happen in a story? I fast forward to make sure that I am heading towards a good ending, and then I go back to the bit I could not read… your modern fairytale had such an impact on me, which is an extremely good thing. The quality of your writing and your storytelling blew my mind Molly. Beyond that, what you said was quite the message too…

The winner of the Doctrine’s First Annual Post-Writing Contest is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itAOGRiYRLI

Our very own Downspring#1 with 28 Doctrine Points for her great

‘Through the looking glass where a dead balloon is (really just) a dead balloon somewhere over the edge…’

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

^_^

*
**
***

/Your Friend of the Doctrine & Secret Judge, Clairepeek

 

Share

(you can feel the excitement in the air!! relaxing music will now be provided) …and the Nominees are! the Wakefield Doctrine’s First Annual Post-writing Contest, Friday the 13th Edition

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

(Hey!  Alex!!  yo  can we borrow some music? )  CLICK ME

So everyone, try to sit back and relax. The secretly Appointed (secret) Judge is poring over ( as opposed to ‘pouring over’ ) (yum, yum!) each and every one of the Posts!
Every Judgmental tool and instrument is being brought to bear; no expense is being spared in this process.  We gots (your) participle accelerator, (your) tonsil and adverb extractors we have even arranged for a very special and private room just in case there are any (‘specially irregular verbs) that need privacy for a conjugated visit. Don’t anyone worry about nothin.

 

The Nominees for Writer of the best/funniest/cleverest/’how-cool-was-that? Post (using ‘a dead balloon is a dead ballon’ in the Title of) are:

 Progenitor roger
One of the original Progenitors, 1/3 of the namesake of ‘the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers’, (the) roger hails from a small end-urban area in a state often referred to as ‘South Central New England’. His rogerian credentials include: ability to play the 12 string guitar without sounding like 2 mandolins having sex, deliberately (and without having to be threatened with a side arm) engaging in the “Pastime” of Civil War Re-enacting and being heard at a formal Dinner Party to reply to the offer of a second serving, “No, thanks, I think I’ll surpass on that!”

db(2)+ 1.5 ml He = db(2) – 1.5 ml Co2 (a dead balloon is a dead balloon)

 

Jennifer Wilson
One of the first of the second generation of people to come to the Doctrine, read and understand it and not say to us, “…if any of you people even think about trying to contact me again, I will have a restraining Order on you faster than you can say, wtf!” Jennifer is sort of the Fay Wray of the Doctrine, particularly in the context of this blog. Being a scottian female, and writing her own little Post ( “…ha, ha, he said Post!”)  Jennifer has a way of presenting the Wakefield Doctrine that is accessible and readable and the rogers, are drawn to it like rabbits trying to swim out of the Great White Shark Exhibit in Sea World.

What does “a dead balloon is a dead balloon” have to do with Personality Types? Nothing.

 

DS#1
…you know how clarks can be overly-rational, too analytical and emotional-devoid giant brains with little feet and long fingers (to type with)? Well, that is why we are fortunate to have DS#1 ’round here. So a clark, yet with a kindness and humanity that says to all the clarks out there, “hey! you can become as welcomed by the scottian people and embraced into the herd anytime you want! Just learn what I know and you won’t even have to shave half of your damn head”

Through the looking glass where a dead balloon is ( really just ) a dead balloon somewhere over the edge.

 

clark

while, ‘a dead balloon is a dead balloon’ the quality that gives life to the (non-dead) balloons is imperishable and therefore hold(s) out hope to all balloons’ 

 

Molly
Molly is, of course, one the ‘new generation’* of people here at the Doctrine and, as such, brings a certain perspective on our efforts that is quite crucial. In fact, this whole Post-writing Contest is kinda all her fault, lol she is the source of the semi-eponymous phrase that comprises the only requirement of  this first Annual Wakefield Doctrine Post-writing Contest!.

When a Dead Balloon is not just a Dead Balloon

So click on them links, Read the Posts then, (and this is very important), come back and Comment on your favorite Post.  The Contest remains open until 12:00 pm midnight.
If you would like to enter the Contest, send us an email to this blog (the Contact button’s on this page, somewhere) or write us a Comment, to the effect: “oh yeah? well read this, bunions!” and do not forget the actual phrase, ‘ a dead balloon is a  dead balloon’ must be in the Title.
Send in your link to your Post and you will be entered to Win! (Grand Prize will be awarded on the basis of Readers Comments and by the (secret) Judge’s decision.) The Winner will be announced on April 17th.

Share

150,3000 seconds left and the Countdown continues! the Wakefield Doctrine 3 personality types: who will succumb to the pressure first?

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

(Hello to all of our Hub Pages Friend! Glad you could stop by…yes, the Hub you read was correct, there is a big Contest and yes, you are totally welcome to enter to win a DVD! All the details to the contest have been explained in the last few Posts here, any questions? Don’t hesitate to ask us!)

Pressure? Did someone mention pressure?

“…In this context, the term ‘stress’ refers only to a stress with significant negative consequences, or distress in the terminology advocated by Hans Selye, rather than what he calls eustress, a stress whose consequences are helpful or otherwise positive.
Stress produces numerous symptoms which vary according to persons, situations, and severity. These can include physical health decline as well as depression. According to the St. Louis Psychologists and Counseling Information and Referral, the process of stress management is one of the keys to a happy and successful life in modern society. Although life provides numerous demands that can prove difficult to handle…

Many practical stress management techniques are available, some for use by health practitioners and others for self-help, which may help an individual to reduce stress, provide positive feelings of being in control of one’s life and promote general well-being.

The effectiveness of the different stress management techniques can be difficult to assess, as few of them have received signifcant attention from researchers. Consequently, the amount and quality of evidence for the various techniques varies widely. Some are accepted as effective treatments for use in psychotherapy, whilst others with less evidence favouring them are considered alternative therapies. Many professional organisations exist to promote and provide training in conventional or alternative therapies.”  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_management )

Well,  we know that the Wakefield Doctrine can and does address the question of stress and compensatory mechanisms as found in each of the three personality types. So lets just imagine a stressful life situation and see just how (each) of the three personality types will respond!

Situation:  you have  Post to write and 20 minutes in which to write it. You thought you could come up with a plausible/reasonably understandable scenario…you write the ‘set-up’ ….and…nothin!  Not a single life’s stressful situations comes to mind. You think to yourself ‘ok how about going to the doctors and waiting for biopsy results?’  and you immediately think, ‘ewww, this is supposed to be fun not awful‘ and then you think,  “alright, then how about being in Court, waiting for the Judge to speak words that may change your life?” and your instinctual reaction is, “what, are you fuckin nuts? who the hell would find that scenario engaging?! this is supposed to be amusing and entertaining!” In desperation you look at the pretend clock on the screen and think to yourself, “what the hell, this is getting worse…more….stressful?  Aha!”

So given the above scenario, how would each of the three personality types of the Wakefield Doctrine respond, if confronted with this stressful situation?

clarks:

scotts:

rogers:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH0tcfLZDOA

 

Share