self-improvement | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 52 self-improvement | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 52

-the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘the shortest Day of the Year? well, then here’s the shortest Post of the Year’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

venus-mars-and-cupid-crowned-by-victory-paris-bordon

Happy Last Day of Winter.

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘yeah, no….you’re right, it’s best that I write a new post instead of a re-print’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

dt.common.streams.StreamServer.cls

Well, I best get to typin

the Wakefield Doctrine is a perspective on the world we live in, the people we interact with, the life we hope to lead. the Wakefield Doctrine is a tool and it’s a toy, serving as a diversion when the world is acting out just a little too much and it’s very useful as a way to put the sometimes, baffling shenanigans of the people who make up our world in a perspective that helps us see that the world is, in a weird way, all about us. yeah, I know… the world does not revolve around me and the world was not put here today just to make my life: terrible/intriguing/puzzling/aggravating and the other ‘-ings’ that I find myself musing about in the course of the day today.

But it is.  all about me…and (it’s) all about you.

Hey! sometimes people say, so tell us why you seem to have some people coming around (which implies that this Doctrine thing isn’t total gibberish) and yet you don’t have, like, tons of people coming around (which says something about either those people or about the Doctrine)… huh, what’s up with that??
Whats up with that is that the one quality that is shared by the people you see coming around here and leaving Comments and reporting back their own insights and perspective on the use and abuse of the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers, is that they have the ability to imagine.  No, wait, I know that you have, hell, everyone has the ability to imagine, but the people around here have what we used to call, flexibility of intelligence. This term is an awkward way of saying that, they can imagine the world differently and then try acting appropriate to this difference. These people can play with the notion that reality is, to a certain extent personal and not universally consistent. Most importantly, the people who hang out at the Doctrine are people know that the world is a personal affair and that if they see something or someone acting in a way that makes no sense, they can (and often do) ask themselves, ‘what might it be that this person is experiencing that I do not?’

….back to the ‘the world revolves around me’   well, if it doesn’t revolve around you, who does it revolve around?  Just messin with ya. I don’t mean to say anything too outrageous. Oh, have we mentioned the fact that, from the perspective of the Wakefield Doctrine, you, each and everyone of you reading this, you live in the perfect world? Yep!

out of time!  But!!  Cynthia is around this week… be sure to stop by and say ‘Hidy!’ down at ‘the ‘tude’ and we were thinking about a mid-week get together. stay tuned! it’ll be fun!

Chapter 10 of ‘Blogdominion‘ is on the newsstands!  go read it! hurry before it turns into ‘War and Peace’ and you’ll think that it’ll take too much time to read the backstory. (If you feel that way, call on Friday or Saturday or write a Comment, and I’ll get you a personal Cliff Notes.  no! serially!

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘little in style, much in content’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

…and, I quote from the subject line of Phyllis' email with attached photo: "The tree fort ablaze with Christmas lights"

…and, I quote from the subject line of Phyllis’ email with attached photo: “The tree fort ablaze with Christmas lights”

Follow the Directions on our Founderess’s Blog, on how (and why) to participate in this here bloghop, and, in the words of a pretty amazing scott I worked with, years ago, “you cain’t never go wrong!”*

Cain’t indeed!

1) vidchat two words: zoe, Denise, Kerry, Lizzi, Val, Lisa, and, of course!   Kristi

2) treehouse (see photo above)

3) work (well, I got me this blog jones to support, ya know?)

4) Six. Sentences. Stories. Skills acquisition by the numbers.

5) Blogdominion. Chapter 9 (teaser: there’s about to be another oddly mysterious death, a certain computer component is getting lonely)

6) SBoR/BoSR (which leapt out of the TToT into the ‘real’ world last night, when Kerry, (an original member of ‘the New Friday vidchat’), asked about multi-purposing a Post and ‘our Ms. Rogers’ said very simply, ‘surely there’s a Dance for that!**

7) Phyllis (see photo above)

8) Una (totally looking forward to the days getting longer, next week. Our Friday ‘Walks’ are somewhat unreliable, due to the fact that it gets dark at 3:13 most afternoons.

9) Wakefield Doctrine (favorite Doctrine citation from last night’s vidchat: “sure them legitimate theories of personality, like that Oscar-Myers, Briggs and Stratton INF EIEIO gots Axeseses…. you want insight into introversion?  ‘clarks hate to be the center of attention but will not tolerate being ignored.’  now that’s insight.

10) SR 1.3 boom!

 

 

 

*Jimmy Johnson, was a Sales Manager I knew when I worked in the timeshare business. He was such an example of the force of personality that is inherent in the scottian personality type. (ok!  just one story, then I need to get to work.)

So I met Jimmy Johnson when I worked a timeshare resort in New England in the 80s. Marketing was simple, we sent thousands of letters inviting people to come and look at the resort and, for doing so, they would be given a very nice gift. (Yeah, that was us).  Now Jimmy Johnson was….. not from around here. He was from Georgia …or Alabama, some place way down South. He wore powder blue 3 piece suits with huge sweat stains and had very greasy hair (Brylcreem-greasy, not naturally greasy). He walked with a limp, his left arm didn’t quite work, (both, damage from a stroke), spoke with a drawl you could cut with the proverbial knife and….and! used incredibly bad grammar, replete with double negatives.
So picture the scene: a sales room, maybe 30 tables and chairs (1 sales rep, two guests) and this where the sale was completed (called ‘the backend’).  It was in this crowded and noisy room that Jimmy Johnson provided very crystal clear, unmistakable illustration of the scottian worldview. Now it happened that this particular timeshare resort was close enough to New York to mail to Long Island and, so most of our ‘guests’ were from that part of New York. [Visual] a roomful of conservative, well dressed and semi-defensive guests…with an attitude. When they saw Jimmy Johnson coming over to their table (remember, these people were from New York, they knew what he was there for, to Close the sale), more often than not, if you were looking you would see a look of relief on their faces. The relief was there because they knew that the guy with the sweat stains was clearly some poor rube, cluelessly out of his element. It was gonna be no contest. They were right, and they were so wrong. Jimmy Johnson would close more sales than any of the other Sales Manager, by a country mile. Space and time don’t permit a full recounting of just how Jimmy won over the much more sophisticated people in the room, but the thing is, he did not force them to buy. For Readers without experience in sales, it might be hard to believe, but he was not a ‘high-pressure’ salesman. He was a powerful salesman, which meant that the people Jimmy Johnson sold, did so because they found themselves liking him and the resort. That’s what scotts do. They’re Predators in every sense, (both good and horrifying), of the word. Go ahead, go ask a scott (if you’re too scared, which, btw, is not such an ill-advised reaction to this suggestion, you can ask me…. I know me a couple scotts)

**’Dance’ refers to the key to negotiating with the Seven Guard Virgins (SGV) who are the final Arbiters of any challenges involving the Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules)… zoe is the Danielle Webster of the occasional little SBoR/BoSR disputes, btw

 

Ten Things of Thankful
<a href=” https://summat2thinkon.wordpress.com/ten-things-of-thankful/ ” target=”_blank”><img src=” https://summat2thinkon.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/10thankful-banner.jpg?w=700?w=700″ alt=”Ten Things of Thankful” style=”border:none;” /></a>

Your hosts

Join the Ten Things of Thankful Facebook Group


Share

Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine- weekend in pre-preview

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

honestly, I have no idea what this image has to do with today’s Post.

First: vidchat tonight! 6:30 EST  (New Readers? we use google hangouts to hookup* put it on your computer or phone and either leave a comment here or go to clark scottroger on ‘the Facebook’ and you’ll see the link.)  It’s fun, you don’t have to dress-up (at least from the waist down… as Sarah will tell you), and there are these remarkable people there (I use the word ‘remarkable’ in the dictionary sense, you know (“…Worthy of being remarked or noticed; noticeable; conspicuous; hence, uncommon;”  our friends at wikitionary) And, of late, writing and other out-of-mind-experiences has been a topic of discussion…. and.  and!  we have people with accents!  (my lovely v-wife Laura has such a proper accent)

Chapter 9 Blogdominion  is due out this Sunday. (A month has passed since Sr Margaret Ryan returned from Chicago, when a FedEx arrives at the convent. Mother Superior calls  Sr Margaret to her office and we learn what’s in the envelope …and we learn a bit more about Sister Bernadine and her connections to Chicago in the 1990s. Did you know that one of the members of the ‘Hermes Consortium’ went on to become Head of the Orthopedic Residency Program at a teaching hospital in Ohio? Well, she did. Too bad about the pervasiveness of computers linked to the Cloud, isn’t it? Find out more Sunday! You can read the whole story here.)

No, you’re correct! There’s no way I can publish a Post with less than 300 words.  So, one quick Doctrine rant.

You know what really annoys me?  Unskilled scottian salespeople (no, wait, let me amend that…. unskilled scottian salesmen. scottian saleswomen, well  they’re in an entirely different category, but that’s not important now). The thing is, scotts are the natural salesmen, of the three personality types. I’ll get a bit technical and qualify that, scotts are the best Closers of the three. This Post is not about sales, but a sale is made when someone ‘closes’ someone. scotts love to sell. it’s a genetic memory of the days on the Savannah as the vast sea of meals (wildebeests and antelope and such) would cover the grassy plains and life was hunt and eat and provide for the pack and sleep and create a larger pack.  Anyway…. the way to identify a scott who is not good at sales is that they will use the following line:  “…what you’ve got to understand is….”

I had a vendor/contractor say this to me on the phone the other day. I smiled. I also let him go on (and on and on) because I was at my desk and was getting other things done. Yes, I could have hung up, but I needed the Bid he promised to send me. Anyway, if anyone has questions about the best approaches to scottian (or rogerian or clarklike) salesmen, let me know!

There! 489

See you all tonight!

 

*well, you know what we mean

Share

Six Sen T’en ceS tor y -the Wakefield Doctrine- (no, nothing significant, just playing with the title of the ‘hop)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

use this one

It’s kinda late tonight, (Wednesday), to get my non-blank-page entry established, so that when I get up tomorrow, I won’t face an empty screen. I know that the word prompt this week is ‘Standard’ and so, I begin the process. I looked up (alternate) uses of the word ‘Standard’ and came across:  “…standard, i.e. either a type of flag or an inflexible but mobile image,” this is a part of the definition of the ‘standard bearer’ and may, very well, be our starting point.

Not sure, but one thing I do know, I want to write a Six Sentence Story this week that is a little, less…. metaphysical, ya know?

The couple left the church, amid a downpour of un-cooked rice, waving over their shoulders at the well-wishers who would soon be celebrating with food and drink and music. Neither spoke as the limo pulled away from the curb, bound for their hotel suite, to usher in a life of two-made-one. She chattered incessantly, inanely and constantly, hearing her own words much as fish, swimming in schools, sense the change of position of the other fishes, she talked about the world that she felt changing, unable to accept that the change was within herself. He listened to her quietly, as he found, in her sounds and words, a distraction from his own internal dialogue, a quietly-shouted stream of drives and desires, forming conflicts and amplifying each new thought until the world seemed to become, a vast, silent and thoroughly judgmental audience.

They found their way to the bridal suite, each by following the other, each by distracting themselves, there remained only physical consummation, very much a standard with two bearers.

(yeah, I know,  ‘nice try’ I can do without the sarcasm   ….lol  next week for sure!)

Share