psychology of personality | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 28 psychology of personality | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 28

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Hey! Fun post here, yo.

Our friend, Ms. Avery, from the Six Sentence Story bloghop informed me that the interview is ready to go to print! (Well, not ‘print’ print, ‘print’ read is more accurate).

Damn!*

D. Avery, a most talent rhetorician** who has a site, SHIFTNSHAKE (Home-brewed Prose & Poetry) asked me a few weeks ago if I’d let her and her friends at this flash-fiction site, where she’s like a founder or mainstay or total core-group, called (the) Carrot Ranch, do an interview. And, I was all, like, ‘Well, sure?’

This being the Wakefield Doctrine I answered all the questions and such.

Here is the result of that process (and irrepressive evidence the Wakefield Doctrine is a hella good tool for self-developing oneself):

Saddle Up Saloon; Howdy Clark Farley

 

(Hey, do me a solid and click over there and, you know, write a comment and such… you don’t have to mention being denizens here in ‘Outsider Emporium’ and all lol Or, tell ’em ‘Yeah, I been been known to associate with dicey characters, alluring femme fatales and stream-of-consciousness gurae****)

 

* an expression of appreciation for others, mixed with a touch of the self-consciousness of the Outsider, (Outsider motto: “Well, I don’t mind attention from friends and (some) contemporaries…but reserve the right to feel slight discomfit prominence, which is, all too often, the precursor state to scrutiny.”) But I kid. It’s fun and, and!! New Readers? This is all directly attributable to the efficaciousness of one personality theory. (Hint: Rhymes with Wakefield Doctrine… lol)

** what the hell! I was going to apply one of my favorite jokes, you know, ‘not a ‘real’ word’ and, as I often do1 I looked up the word and it’s an actual, defined and listed in, like Mirriam-Webster and the fricken Oxford Dictionary!

**** pl. guru. example: you the Persistent Reader and them what identify with this crowd

  1.  being a clark, I have zero self-consciousness or such about looking up words… it’s not like I’m ever gonna be accused of being dumb or stupid, ya know? Crazy, sure, get that all the time, but the thing about being an Outsider, intellectual insecurity really isn’t an issue

 

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “…of waiting rooms, captured peoples and relating ourselfs to the world around us.”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Ask anyone. The fun of knowing about the Wakefield Doctrine is how much it enhances people-watching.

(Why, yes. That statement does give a clue to knowing the primary constituency of this here blog here. Good observation.)

Watcher Guide:

  1. clarks(Outsiders) they’re there… trust us. well, you’re not supposed to see them right away (or easily) (or unavoidably)
  2. scotts(Predators) lol… relax, if you make no sudden moves…or try to run away, you’ll be fine… eye contact? glad you asked… no, not ‘Avoid all eye contact’ and, not ‘Lock eyes’… somewhere in between… in the ‘boring zone’. ya know?
  3. rogers(Herd Members)… yeah, pretty much everyone you see. no it doesn’t mean they’re harmless… even though it’s made up of soft, fluffy snow, is an Alpine mountainside avalanche harmless? water is as easy to ignore as…well, water …until it’s a wall of saltwater thirty feet tall, moving towards you at sixty miles-per-hour and is studded with cement trucks and two-car detached garages… now would be a good time to blend in

Ok that should get you started…good luck and let us know how you made out

Report One: televisions on walls…out of reach…with a hand-written sign stating: Do not turn TV off.

Clearly aimed at the clarks sitting in whatever furniture provided

Share

TT-T -the Wkfld Dctrn- “whr wld w b wtht cnsnts? Fnny y shld sk.”

Wlcm t th.Wkfld Dctrn (th thry f clrks, sctts, nd rgrs)

N vwls!

Wht th Hll?!?!

Lckly r hst, Dynn, s bsy ths wkknd nd prbly wnt ntic…jst s lng Lzz dsn’t shw p nxpctdly

1) n

2) Phylls

3) th Wkfld Dctrn

4) srl strs: ‘th Whtchpl ntrld‘ nd ‘th Cs f th Mssng Fg Lf

5) th Sx Sntnc Stry blghp

6) th 20 Mnt Rl Stt Brfng (wht Phylls gnd, ths n ttlly lst!)

7) hy, t lst w ddnt ls r cnsnts!

8) smthng, smthng

9) (well, ok, if it really helps: A, E, I, O and U…. find the right space and your world will be made whole… but how grateful can a body be, what gets vowels restored before the end of the list, am I right?”)

10) Srct Rl 1.3 “…[w]hn dng n ntr TTT lst wth sngl hk…. bttr kp t shrt. p ct. bd”

 

msc vds

* A

* E

* I

* O

* U

* (for those so incline)

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

There’s an old saying, ‘Better to write poorly, than infrequently’*.

Writing is like life, if you don’t keep doing it, you won’t get better at it. I suspect that this is not original. Though it is true, at least for some of us here in the blogosphere.

In keeping with this, “No, you don’t need to run in the race this morning if you don’t feel like it, but, why don’cha walk down to those starting blocks and, just hang out, at least until everyone who’s there leave…in a hurry.”

So this post, (started yesterday, supplanted by a visit to Romania), is about WIP** aka Work In Progress. Well, at least, in the sense of characters created, (in not a few cases, characters are casted, based on their work in other stories).

The following is a listing of organized wordation. I’d wanted to use this as an excuse to work on the synopsis (synopsae?) for each story. I realize, reading as I type, here at 8:21 am, that is way unrealistic… wait a minute!! What am I saying?!?! I’m a clark….  and everyone knows, you can’t spell ‘unrealistic’ (ambition) without the ‘c’ ….and ‘l’ and…and! ‘a’  and……. the (hard) ‘c’ sound…. like in Klark!!!

Betcha we return to this post on days the Muse is sleeping in….

 

We have two serial stories running on alternating Thursdays, over at the Six Sentence Story bloghop:

Completed, but not yet final edits, there is:

  • ‘Almira’,
  • ‘the Case of the Missing Starr’, and
  • ‘Blog Dominion’ (a Sister Margaret Ryan story)

Started but not completed:

  • ‘Home and Hearth’ (a Sister Margaret Ryan story).

So, in the coming days, I’m thinking I’ll be ‘reprinting’ this post, as I attempt that worst of all writing requirements, the synopsis. Which, so far, for us, is, like, the apocryphal fifty page term paper on Russia that we all heard that one teacher in Junior High School always required. To that extent, this is more than a requirement to pass the course, its more a part of one’s resume… hell, it’s like not throwing up during the job-of-your-dreams interview***

Stop in and share you thoughts on the writing/publishing process.

 

* can I get a ‘WTF?!!’ from the New Readers?

** of course, thats the cue to music

*** I have no idea lol

 

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine- Advanced-followers post

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Why, ‘Advanced-followers post’ as the subtitle?

Because we want to reduce the incidence of cerebrospinal injury among causal viewers as we explain the photo at the top of this post.

It, (the photo), is of our tv* this morning.

It is an up-to-date viewer, so we have access, (through it), to the internet, in general, and YouTube, in particular. Cool, right?

So we’re into live web cam shows. There’s one we discovered that watches for the Woods Hole-Vinyard Haven ferry. The camera affords a view of Vinyard Haven harbor you can see it, (the ferry), come through the breakwater and dock. Another ‘local’ cam that we watch, with morning coffee, is in a boatyard and it scans the Westerly shoreline, mid-way up the Pawcatuck River, at a point where one can see the cemetery where Phyllis’s mother is buried.

I repeat, cool.

But that’s not what this post is about. Well, kinda, but not really.

It’s about practicing the Doctrine, or, since we’re talking to advanced students, its about developing our language skills. This is first and foremost about our ability to recognize how other people are relating themselves to the world around them. This is, of course, the first step to knowing the other person’s predominant worldview** because, otherwise, how can we know the nature of their personal reality?

There are a number of approaches to determining a person’s predominant worldview, ranging from the choice of words (in spoken communications), to the grace and power of their physical expression to their non-verbal communicationing.

So we found this live cam in Romania, outside the Pilvax Restaurant and Wine Bar. (Thats the screen shot above). And, with the time difference, we’re watching the cobblestone street at, like 1:20 pm or so. Live.

And, what makes this so amenable to our language lesson, we can see people walking up and down the cobblestone lane. There are shops and there is a restaurant. The view is close enough in, as you can see, to, not necessarily see their faces, but to definitely see their bodies and posture and… individual carriage***.

damn! This is fun.

Note: remember, the Wakefield Doctrine’s three types, the Outsider(clarks), the Predators(scotts) and the Herd Members(rogers) are predicated on how they relate themselves to the world around them. You cannot, for the moment, count on the other person introducing themselves as ‘err, hello, I’m a clark with a medium secondary scottian and minor tertiary rogerian aspect’. Someday, maybe if you’d tell people in your world about this thing and they tell… lol

We observe and we identify with the other person. We throw out the ‘no way type’ and then look for the distinctions between the remaining two. Are they slouching as they walk? Are they purposeful and alert to their surroundings. Are they wearing fun headgear(Doctrine Tip: male rogers and clarklike females)

So go find yourself some live webcams and practice you Wakefield Doctrine language skills.

Let us know.

 

 

* I know, no one calls it a tv anymore, other than those who remember the signal-enhancing qualities of aluminum foil

** New Readers? What people would, inaccurately, call personality types.

*** yeah, sometimes the odd words are the fun words

 

Share