Featured | the Wakefield Doctrine

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

May 19, 2025 By clarkscottroger 5 Comments

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

A rabbit, a fox and a Man walks into a freshly-mown backyard…

The rabbit eats grass for as long as it takes for the Man to get frustrated with a technology that reprises the adolescent fantasy of traveling in time to pre-technologic times and dominating the primitive natives with a fricken’ zippo, ‘cept the Man gives up as his own future fails to materialize, the rabbit dashes off the grass, out-of-frame and the fox? Doesn’t appear.

New Readers: Sure you could make the rabbit the clark, fox the scott and the all-seeing, somewhat un-capable Man as the roger and you’d be pretty close to correct. Which brings us to the Lesson of the Morning.

the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them.

Early on in this effort to describe the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers to the world in a manner that would allow anyone to understand it to the point of being in a position to apply it to their own lives, their world, their personal reality, we liked to make provocative statements, such as the ‘...you, not them’

Mostly because it was fun (to write) and also because, like so much of this thing of ours, in crashing common viewpoints (of the world) and everyday phrases producing a jarring effect. Cognitive dissonance and bananas for breakfast…yum!

… so the Question of the Day:

What is it they mean by ‘the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them.’

Pick up you pencils and begin….now

damn! talk about the power of the original version! and we’re not, like, overly fans of the King

Filed Under: Featured, Psychology, the Wakefield Doctrine Tagged With: relationships, the Wakefield Doctrine, Understanding Human Behavior

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

May 17, 2025 By clarkscottroger 6 Comments

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Thie is the Wakefield Doctrine’s weekly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. A weakly collection of emotional artifacs intellectual detris and other flotsam of everyday life, it’s fun and you should join in.

If you’re weird-warning lights are pulsing, we have some very talented co-hostinae who will be happy to walk you through the process (and past that room with the odd sounds and strobing lights). Give ’em a shout, you won’t regert it. cohostinae: Mimi, Kristi, Lisa, Dyanne, Denise and Misky.

For the Doctrine, the following list of ten(ish)

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Order of Lilith and the kind words of Misky last week. While it’s probably best to simply continue to write about the adventures of our characters as we did in one Six this week, in the interim we;ll do random chapters, like finding the next issue of a magazine in a dentist waiting room. So, from somewhere in the middle of ‘the Whitechapel Interlude we have this interaction (interest note: the characer of Count St. Loreto appears in other storues from the Wakefield Doctrine Serial Storues! A taste:. Click Here.

5) amusing photo of a clark’s solution to a problem. the ‘problem’ being: how to best document a broken pane of glass in a window. Interesting ‘language training’ in Wakefield Doctrine for our more advanced students! We see how an average clark would solves the problem. A better way of saying that is, ‘this is how the solution manifests in the world of the Outsider’ (lol read that last phrase again look at the photo…clarks will get it)

6) Hoku Smoje! We remembered to take a Before photo! (of course, this is actually a ‘Now’ photo. it does serve to set up the ‘After’ photo (once we’ve completed the clean-up refresh of Ola’s grave). Though it should be understood, the abandoned graveyard in the forest is a fun look as well. (scene: brushing away pine needles to show OLA 1991-2001 bracketed by carved-relief dogwood branches)

7) bloghops!! the Unicorn Challenge and the Six Sentence Story. Go there. Read. Participate. If you’re really daring, tell ’em the Doctrine sent ya.

8) Part of the required material for the renovation project is beach sand from Ola’s favorite beach. Below is a photo of the first of a number of trips to harvest said material.

9) the internet in general, the utube videos below inparticular. Warning! You must be “T^H^I^S _OLD” to know the references and enjoy the thing.

10) Secret Rule 1.3

music

First vid? No introduction….err possible. (damn! this internet does have a good side)

presto! no sharks!

of course we found a metal version!

Filed Under: Featured, Psychology, the Wakefield Doctrine Tagged With: personality types, self-development, self-improvement, the Wakefield Doctrine, Understanding Human Behavior

Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

May 14, 2025 By clarkscottroger 3 Comments

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

About to shift into the fiction portion of the week’s blogposts.

ha ha

Serially, the Wakefield Doctrine posts from Monday through Wednesday is no more fiction, when compared to the posts written for the TToT or the Six Sentence Story or, even, our participation in jenne and ceayr’s Unicorn Challenge than John Cage is often mistaken for Stephen King.

(We repeat: ha ha. You want rhetorica veritas, well, do ya punk? We’ve committed to that music-fiction writing analogic-reference without first checking utube to see if it ‘works’. Too bad. Too sad. We’ll just post a music vid below without checking first.)

That’s how confident….

Wait.

It’s a given around here that ‘an easy Doctrine post’ to write, (one that all Friends of the Doctrine and most New Readers) will enjoy is: the opposite of one predominant worldview to another theme.

Hell, as the founderess of the TToT ‘hop demonstrated so many years ago, if’n you’re a clark (or have a significant secondary clarklike aspect) not only do you ‘get the whole theory of clarks, scotts and rogers‘ you will begin to extrapolate the principles and identify characteristic …..err characteristics of each of personality types that have not yet been listed in this blog.

… but, a little trickier post is the one where we search for the ironic strengths of the three predominant worldviews of the Wakefield Doctrine. They kinda interrelate themselves to each other… ‘what a surprise! lol

This is all prompted by our saying we were making a joke that involved knowledge that we’re pretty sure is correct, i.e. the music of John Cage and writing of Stephen King.

The fundamental self-confidence, based on what they admire in one of ‘the other two’:

clarks (the Outsider) knowledge and it’s manipulation that results in appearing intelligent
scotts (the Predator) confidence and certainty that provide a persuasive effect regardless of the validity or sensibility of their central thesis
rogers (the Herd Members) universality of the presumptions they make and the degree to which others will subvert their own beliefs

ok…back to writing our Six for the week

Mr. Cage, if you will?

Damn! Remind us next week to discuss ‘the Slacker Effect’*

* the Richard Linklater movie that will totally identify any rogers in the viewing audience.

New Readers? They not only don’t like the movie, they get angry! Really!

Filed Under: Featured, Psychology, the Wakefield Doctrine Tagged With: personality types, self-development, the Wakefield Doctrine

Too-sdae -the Wakefield Doctrine- “for extra credit…the following question from a Reader”

May 13, 2025 By clarkscottroger 6 Comments

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Damn, must be getting forgetful in our old age! Overlooked a very good question in yesterday’s post (originally courtesy Misky)

So now I’m wondering if The Doctrine addresses clothing preferences.

It does.

But! A quick, short answer provided little of practical value. Sorta like asking, does this saw cut wood? Can I pound nails with that hammer. ‘Yes’ works. But if we change up the phrasing and make the object of the (first) question the subject and make the ‘clothing preferences’ our interrogative noun, we afford ourselfs of a far more useful question.

Without the aid of the slanting lines, but the ambition of a visual image of transforming (our correspondent’s) original into one that offers a wider, more comprehensive perspective:

~~So now~~ (I’m wondering if) How The Doctrine addresses clothing preferences among the three predominant worldviews -> clothing preferences -> as common (to all) how do they manifest in clarks, scotts and rogers?

Miz Cai? Would you do the class a favor and come up to the blackboard and diagram this new sentence? If you please.

(Crib sheet entry: how does this request, one that many if not most Readers have experienced in one form or another, manifest to a clark or scott or roger?)

Out of time, as common on Tuesdays. The thing about preferences of fashion (or any other personal affectation) is the simplest approach is to ask ‘How does (this) manifest in the reality of the Outsider, world of a Predator or life of a Herd Member?

The simplest answer: Well, what is consistent with the world around them (and the people who make it up)?

quick RePrint (blog version of smudging the pencil marks of a questionable answer on an arithmetic quiz)

Besides we like to think this Doctrine thing is a lot of fun. We might be talking about someone in the news and one of us will turn to the other and say, “Obama….what a roger!” or we might say to each other, “You know those Progressive Insurance commercials on TV? That Flo person, how much of a clark is she, huh?” So this is not just a website you go to and take a test and find out that your personality type is INTP/otter-with-malamute tendencies, hell no! We have fun because we see clarks and scotts and rogers out there in the world and they act just like the Wakefield Doctrine tells us they should act! And it’s getting like we don’t have to make any of this shit up anymore…the clarks and the scotts and the rogers prove that the theory is totally true. Try it your ownselfs!

Today I have copied a page out of the Table of Contents to show that the personality business is not all dry boring, reading stuff! Clearly we like to borrow stuff, here at the Doctrine. So it should not surprise anyone how we went an sort a used Jeff Foxworthy’s “you might be a redneck…” thing. But hey if it makes you laugh, then you will be learning the whole thing about which are clarks and which are scotts and which are rogers.

You immediately stop surfing the channels when you come upon a show that uses only black and white documentary photos and film…you might be a roger

You totally love Christmas lawn decorations and cannot imagine having too many lights… you might be a scott

You find a flier stuck under the windshield wiper of your car and you take the time to read it… you might be a clark.

You are asked a question and you start to answer with “in the beginning…” you might be a clark.

You are addressed by the wrong name and you answer to it without correction… you might be a clark.

You are building model cars/ships/planes, you always put the extra parts back in the box along with the re-folded instructions for future safekeeping…you might be a roger.

You think that Slacker was the greatest movie made in the 90s…you might be a clark

You think that Borat was one of the funniest movies of the year…you might be a scott

You think that the 107 episode, Directors cut, 15 DVD un-abashed edition of the compilation (with Writers notes (including what he had for breakfast) and voice-over reading of the credits by someone who knew someone who was a re-enactor who actually got hurt at an event) of all Ken Burns films, PBS episodes and commercials that last longer than most readings of the Iliad is the greatest film of all time…you might be a roger

You have any inclination to wear hats for a fashion statement (for male rogers only) or a ‘fanny pack’ (either male or female rogers), or any clothing designed specifically for riding a bicycle (branded or un-branded)…you might be a roger.

You happen to be at a golf tournament and feel that it is expected of the members of the gallery to yell anything (including but not limited to “get in the hole”)…you might be a scott.

You are contemplating a project of any sort; a new deck or a term paper, writing a resume or planting a garden and you:

…you look forward to making the list of things you need to buy/gather/acquire first more than anything else…you might be a clark

…you must know what your friends on the ’do it yourself’ shows have done, that is what you want…you might be a roger

…CONTEMPLATE? PLAN? I JUST FINISHED IT! FUCK YOU!! IT’S DONE NO THIS IS FINE THE WAY IT IS… you might be a scott

Filed Under: Featured, Psychology, the Wakefield Doctrine Tagged With: clarkscottroger, personality types, self-development, the Wakefield Doctrine

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “…of existentialism and re-ordering the books on a shelf.”

May 12, 2025 By clarkscottroger 8 Comments

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

A fair amount of items left un-checked on the yellow lined pad today’s beginning. Let’s get all bullet-point on this here post here.

the Wakefield Doctrine
the Saturday Night Drive (yeah, does kinda relate to Reader Question 1… damn! foreshadowing in a frickin bullet point list)
Reader Question 1 Answer (for New Readers)
Reader Question dos (tune in tomorrow!)

That’s enough of a ‘Hey! Welcome back, how was your weekend and there’s a list of stuff to do.’

The Wakefield Doctrine is one-half tool, one-third crib sheet and four-fifths alternate perspective. The Doctrine holds that we, all of us, are born with the potential to relate to the world around us in one of three distinct (yet not wholly disparate) ways. These relationships are:

Outsider (clark) never a part of. at least never to the extent that one can avoid: “Monday morning! Best get up and see what’s waiting in the world out there.”
Predator (scott) Monday ain’t nothin’ but a freshly-printed Menu. Somedays it’s all you can eat, others: “Be mindful of the… calories! Always hunt and eat/run and survive, seize the moment.”
Herd Member (roger) “A turn of the Wheel, another beginning. The better to feel the Herd in all things. The better to learn to appreciate the Rightness of the Herd.”

Good conversation on the weekly Wakefield Doctrine Saturday Night Call-in. Denise was on the call and at one point the topic was the importance of remembering the basics: learn the nature of the ‘other two’ predominant worldviews, practice and work on fluency. Fluency, in this context, means to cut down on the amount of unpleasant-time thinking: ‘Why would they say/do/forget something like that?’ and/or ‘Holy shit! That was pretty intense.’

The stated ambition of this blog is to help others to achieve a fluency in the three personality types to such point as to allow us: ‘To see the world as the other person is experiencing it.”

Reader (Misky) Question numero One:

Oh, and one more thing: Why is it called Wakefield?

Here is a parietal (lol) reprint from August 2013. There is, at least on old maps, an actual Wakefield, Rhode Island. Technically, it is a village in the Town of South Kingstown, RI. This is a historically semi-accurate depiction. We did often drive through Wakefield (and bordering Narragansett, RI) on a Saturday night discussing the meaning of life and other topics common to our demographic. [ed. Cast notes: Glenn is a scott with a significant secondary clarklike aspect; Clark went on to accept the position of Curator, donning the plubistically-monastic 3rd person pronouns)

INT. LATE MODEL GERMAN LUXURY CAR – NIGHT

Clark and Glenn are in animated discussion, it is clear that the topic is one they are both very, very familiar with and they are covering old ground

CLARK

Blah, blah blah…I know and you know and I know that the theory is valid and way, way more useful than most of the crap that you use for your trainings. When are you gonna incorporate it into one of your modules?

GLENN

Hey, I know its useful I been in this car listening to you for the last 15 years, haven’t I?

CLARK

So what’s it gonna take to do something with this thing…what do you need to take it on the road? Hell, I know you are already stealing parts of it in your presentations

GLENN

Credibility. Thats what it needs…If I go out there in front of my Board of Directors and say, ‘this new module is based on ‘the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers’ they will laugh…

CLARK

Yeah, but…it works… it is useful…

GLENN

…And it sounds like it came out of a dorm room…from the 70s. I work in a corporate environment…credibility, empirical…metrics…you hearin this?

CLARK

I get it, I get it…fine! then I’ll change the name…you want credibility?…from now on the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers is…the…Doctrine, the Wakefield Doctrine!

GLENN

Fuckin yeah!

[end of scene]