Featured | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2 Featured | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2

Lieday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Unicorn Challenge bloghop.

Hosted by jenne and ceayr, this photo-prompt bloghop poses but one threat: keep your story under 251 words.

 

Damn it, god!

“What?”

We agreed, no more creating beings in your own image at three o’clock in the ‘morning’.

“Yeah, but…”

Look, you created me to help you stop. You created me because you want to overcome your Problem. You created me because you have become as desperate as only the dying can be, right?

“…sure, but”

No. No buts

“(HA H…)”

Cut it out. No more. I told you last time, when you promised technology was going to give your Mankind a way to acquire perspective and escape the Original Sin of insufficiency. You remember your Promise?

“I”

Do. You. Remember?

“yeah”

What was it…

“come on, I said I was sorry… this statue was supposed to remind my creations to be more whimsical… did you see the lobstercat? wasn’t that great?”

That’s not what you promised

“alright, I get it! I So we’re not Perfect.

That’s exactly what caused the problem… the fabric of this ‘reality’ was dependent on your adolescent need to manifest Power and possess a race of adoring beings

“….”

…and what happened?

… speak up

“I created a subjective emotional loop of remorse Man assumes is an inherent part of being in My image and, as a result, he went and invented religion.”

You need to go to your Room and think about what you’ve done and how you can make it Right.

“aww do I have to?… but it’s not Fair

 

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s weekly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. Once a simple list-format, grat-themed bloghop, the TToT has thrived and survived since it’s creation in late Spring 1957. (photo at top of ’57 Strat*). So, now as we end our 35th year in circulation, ww invite one and all to come, read and, heck, write yourself a list of Ten things that inspire gratitude and link that darlin’ right on up. (If you have any question just go ahead and ask! We have six co-hostinae who not only will answer your questions but will, in all likelihood inveigle upon to accept a seat on the Board of Hostinae/um.

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4)  the curious empowerment of a specific and consciously-created myth, aka superstition (quick example in Grat Seven ‘Hey, we went long on the referential grat thing. Head down to #8)

5) the Unicorn Challenge. pick of the Week.

6) the Six Sentence Story. pick of the Week.’Introspection‘. by Denise

7) ProTip: sometimes people be all, ‘That’s a long list, suppose I can’t come up with Ten things? What then?” Well, then you’re a failure in life and should rip up your modem cert, ya know?” Ha ha. Look at what you made us do! We got so clever with that old-school device, ‘the ProTip’ schtick, that we stepped on our original witicisa, but, what-the-heck, there’s a better than even chance you haven’t made it this far down this post.

8) anyways… had we been more disciplined, we would have mentioned, germane to the image at the top, that we have not touched a musical instrument since hitting ‘Publish’ on the first Doctrine blog post. Won’t take the chance. A long story but, better safe than sorry. Well lookie there! Grat #9

9) something, something

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

* ‘ocaster not ‘ovarius (ha ha)

music vids

*

*

*

 

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [a Café Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, it relies on a single, qualifying characteristic: stories are precisely six sentences in length.

Prompt word:

BOND

“Walk with me.”

The surprising thing was not that the tall, thin man managed to stand in the doorway to the kitchen without being noticed approaching, nor was it the obvious fact that he was already walking away, out into the main public area of the Café, before uttering the concluding pronoun of his ‘request’. To the unsurprised Proprietors, (and Tom), gathered in the sterile light of the kitchen, that he had singled out Rosetta Storme was.

As the Bartender and Tom and Mimi watched, the manager walked out among the tables that spread in no easily discernible pattern or order throughout the open rectangular space; the long side of this part of the Bistro was centered by the small stage backing up against an interior wall that showed it’s structural DNA in the off-white outlines of mortar forming the traditional running bond design.

To a casual observer, the man’s path was as circuitous as a chatbot’s interpretation of Wyeth’s ‘Christina’s World’.

The silence, both bond and distinction, among the two Proprietors (and Tom) was accented by one, un-inflected comment, “Well, mes amis, this will be interesting.”

 

Share

Tewsosaurus Rex -the Wakefield Doctrine- “we are the metaphor we fear”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

here. a RePrint jump-start this bad-boy

Full Disclosure (and Dispensation) and Act of Faith (in the Wakefield Doctrine): Came across the below as the oldest post returning on a search of keyword; Tuesday.

We immediately remembered the post. But a number of reactions/responses on our part ensued:

  • though, ‘hmmm that one’
  • enlarged the font display
  • found ourselfs skimming (after all we wrote it, so…)
  • caught ourselves skimming, looking around, felt embarrassed
  • laughed with an unfamiliar sense of responsibility… to the Reader? ourselves?
  • read most of it word-for-word
  • finally, the challenge: to RePrint or not RePrint?
  • (New Readers? the advent of this blog is countlessly recounted in these pages. But the over-riding theme, (of the root inspiration), is serendipity. Not only was the decision to create a blog for the Wakefield Doctrine a gift, but with this gift (the whole-cloth of the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers), we were given something of a attitude decidedly non-clarklike i.e. freedom from the fear of scrutiny. For matters relating to this here personality theory here, at any rate. We wrote because it was our job to write and explain and illustrate and allow as many people as possible to come to know and benefit from this alternate perspective on the world around us and the people who make it us. (Can we get a damn!)
  • final challenge for us this morning: To (re)Publish or to not (re)Publish. It came down to asking ourselfs: Either we are the Curator (of this place) or we are not. If the former, then there is no question…’cause, ‘hey, this is what a Curator is supposed to do, right?’ If the latter? ayiiee! To claim creator-status that’s got Monkey’s Paw tattooed all over it! No thank you!
  • so here ya go, binyons.

oh, man…what is it now?

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine.
Sorry to dissappoint, but the Interview with the roger(Progenitor) is not complete and as such is nowhere near ready to Post. Sunday is a time when I try to get something/anything new in but was drawing a major blank until the name James Joyce flashed against my 3am brain and so we are going to walk to amateur experimental-writing land this morning. And by the way there is something weird about trying to write like this and yes I will tell you something you do not in fact know but the loss or surrender of most punctuation is really hard on the typing. Thank god for the occaisional period although I don’t know how many of them I have left but for some reason doing this Post the way I am I am mis-spelling alomst every third word I promise that I will spellcheck this thing and not put you throught that ordeal or misspelling everything in the name of an art for which I have no techniques be warned though I did look up EE Cummings before I started and at the first opportunity I know I will jam a reference to his stuff. My mother used to have an expression that went a little knowledge is a dangerous thing I think this is an example of what she meant although she died in 1979 and could not have imagined this particular form of acting without regard to justification. Although she (my mother) was a clark of the first order so I would bet that she would have no problem accepting the strangeness of this Post. We clarks are good at that we will witness the second coming and not show a reaction. But she was a clark in all the classic forms of expression you must allow for the time/culture she existed in which for my purposes and perception would be the 1950s through the 1970s. But as a clark she was the perfect selfless-to-a-fault mother and just in case there was any doubt about here type (clark, scott or roger) she has a 3rd grade school teacher. Hey no clark there. Anyway not sure how i got off on that tangent. Damd did i just lose capital letters? Oh well what can you do. so i was saying i brushed up on ee cumming because we all had the wednesday in spring 5th grade english class that started on the poetry and who did not like the phrase and the world was puddle wonderful? but the fun for me was that he did not need to use punctuation or even particularly spell things right and he certainly felt free to make up his own words. i never got much into that poetry thing then but like so much i am only now coming to appreciate things that i thought at a previous time i just did not have the time for. and maybe that is part of what this post is saying to me. while it is not uncommon to put things off, i am coming to an understand only now of how there is not a later for things to get done and as i look back i realise how much time i wasted. this is not a negative thought rather for me this realization produces in me the acceptance and will that whatever i might find of interest today i should and must invest all i have to invest in it now, not later. yeah, yeah i know kind of basic, mature adult looking at life shit. bear with me am filling up the page and can get out hopefully without a topic but no, i stayed too long. so i was talking with downspring glenn, who of course is a scott you saw his interview last week and we got on the subject of post writing and what to do when there is no topic. he is just a scott and as such is strongest in the here and now where all those people live but afterall all of us participating in this Doctrine thing are no more a pure form of our type than we are neither so as an evolved scott glenn is able and quite helpful in working on the development of the Doctrine at least as far as this current effort to bring it to the world. did I get off on a tangent? how the fuck could you tell? this stuff is probably harder to write than it is to read at least you can stop at any point an say yeah that was cute that was creative so when is there a point going to be made and maybe i will just check back in on tuesday or so. and btw i have no idea of what the appropriate music is going to be with this odd little post but if the cat smiles it will be what it needs to be. where was  i oh yeah, glenn and the discussion of topics for posts. he said hey why don’t you write about the differences between… and then a number of suggestions most sports as a vehicle for comparing clarks, scotts and rogers. i think he suggested baseball, football and golf i said sure that sounds like a good idea and then he moved on to compare the three stooges which he realized we had already done in person i think talking with downspring joanne who i want to thank for her efforts at working on the questionaire which no else is helpin on. damn i wish i still had itlaics. anyway glenns last suggestion was pick a person in the world that you really hate and tell them how much you hate them and why you hate them.  good idea. i hate glenn very much much and it is because he is so scottian at times that i don’t understand…ha ha got you going for a second huh? glenn it is strange how presentation changes everything. words are the point but how important is how they are arranged/laid out/presented/fuckin typed? apparently it makes all the difference in the world. so to complete this minor cycle in the overall arch of the post and my spelling is really going downhill, i hoep that this thing does not decide that spelloing does not matter as grammar and everything else seems to not matter. will do my best to hold on to the last shred of coherency  almost done. anyway since we always include some new information about the wakefield doctrine in every post. hey do they still do the prizes in boxes of cereal? i still remember the whole digging to the bottom of the box of frosted flakes looking for the prize that was invariably contained in some kind of white paper envelope that was sealed around the edges in a most peculiar way. the lesson? oh yeah hazel used to use that expression the oh yeah thing jeez what a not to be described yet total energy black hole that hole my hazel relationship thing was. even allowing for the first relationship effect which is cheating here because if you bring up a significant life event i don’t think you should try to control it by laying a in-retrospect i certainly understand what i …blah blah blah but it was the focal point of my existance while it was happening and for too many years after it was over. wtf where the hell am i? where are my caps, my parentheses, jeez louise it is a lot easier to get lost in this rather tedious technique than it is to get out. must find paragraph key…i now it is here somewhere none of the keys have letters anymore shit try something hit any k)y ok {? maye hit1234 nah numbers \Ah! I’m out! Thank you jesus! I am out of that, that, a lot funnier to read than to write, thing. Whew, man I thought that would never end.
Hey, plenty of white space filled in…maybe I can just tie up a few loose thoughts, find some music and put this bad boy in the category: ‘Keep one as Proptype, cancel production run”Damn, what little typing skills I had, seem a bit messed up by this little experiment. Alright loose end tying time, (in no particular order):there was a person by the name of hazel; my mother was, in fact, a 3rd grade teacher (quite a good one, but she was a clark); hey I gots italics!; golf is a clarklike sport; football is scottian and baseball is the rogerian sport.Alright. Now for some music….(man! I just ‘previewed’ this Post, jesus christ what a mess! am thinking of putting music first, be weird but that really, totally is a meaningless term at least for today.)  Nah…better put it down here, someplace for the Reader to run to:

So…

Will not leave without a Goodnight to our friends in Slovenia…hey guys…

*

Holy Shit!

Someone tell me, (and we are notoriously averse to dealing in anything relating to the ‘real’ world and will continue as such) that you do not hear something…odd in this song rendition. (ok one hint: enunciation) Damn! Our memory’s been lying to us. again!

Share

Monday (rainy Monday) -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

So, this curious psycho-artifact, this mechanism birthed by an archaic mind, what of it?

If we were to fashion a ‘mission statement’ (as we have over the past multi-years), it would he this(ish):

The Wakefield Doctrine is a tool to help us better appreciate the world as the other person is experiencing it. And, in so doing, (as well as perforce, subject to and, everyone’s favorite, sine qua non), we will come to better know ourselves.

If a person is speaking a foreign language and you want to interact with them, you can either insist, (to yourself, them or whatever construct-of-your-soul that is charged with making sense of reality), that they are simply mispronouncing pretty much every word of your language and proceed on that estimatory basis or you can read up on their country of origin, buy, prepare and consume as much of their ethnic cuisine as possible and, finally, learn as much as possible about that country’s culture, history and people. After which,  while you may never pass for a native, whenever you need to find a bathroom in a hurry, you are not overly at risk of being arrested and put on public trial for heresy and/or espionage.

So, if’n you are so inclined, read as many posts as you need to get a sense of the world of the reality of the Outsider (clarks), the world of the Predator (scotts) or the life of the Herd Members (rogers). It’s fun and it’s beneficial.

*

Share