Featured | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3 Featured | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3

Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Here’s something a bit of the different for a Friday post.

What your questions?*

 

*to the promising New Reader likely a clark, ‘Why yes, there is a very good chance that we will know which of the three is your predominant worldview on the basis of the question**

** New Readers are forgiven1 for asking the obvious question. No need to be concerned. One of the fundamental standards of behavior here is that no one has authority to publicly designate another person’s type without their clear and explicit permission. At least no authority that would carry any weight with anyone familiar with the Doctrine.

1) frequent rogerian Readers are not

Share

Wentdnesdag -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Heading into Wakefield today.

yes, the Wakefield.

damn! way late.

sure, I’ll take photos of Wakefield

RePrint

(We know what you’re thinking… but, wait! no! this is different!  this is a post from September 2 in 2015 and…and it fell on a Wednesday!! Hey, it’d be a crime not to use this post.)

-the Wakefield Doctrine- Wednesday and such

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)"...and you say this will inspire school children to learn?"

Just a quick, jot-down-a-list of things to pick up at the Cumberland Farms and/or other semi-important things to do on a busy day Post today.

Speaking of Lists!  Did you know that the concept of ‘a List’ are three very different things to a clark, to a scott and to a roger? Well, they are! (Want to thank Cynthia and zoe for their Comments re: Cynthia’s reference to Dale Carnegie and is famous self-help book, ‘How to Win friends and Influence People’.) The point being, that something as simple at that book will manifest differently for a person, depending on their predominant worldview. (‘manifest’ is the term we use in this context), because we want to be sure that we remember that we’re not talking about:

  • ‘how a person interprets the book’, or
  • ‘what a person gets out of reading the book’ and we’re so not saying,
  • ‘whether are not the person understands what Dale is trying to say’.

Nope! To say that this Book ‘manifests…’,  is to say that it’s an actual ‘different thing’ and,  …especially and!  (the concepts it presents) are different things, depending on the reader’s personality type.

Speaking of fun and challenging, zoe (Update!! Denise) has this week’s Six Sentence Story prompt up already! So, if you’re like me, you’ll want to go over there and see what the word is so that you can start the struggle early! (I’m just kidding. not.  There are some astoundingly skilled and talented people who join in each week and they produce stories that’ll have you saying, ‘how the hell do they do that?’ and they make it look easy. For example, take Dyanne (please! barum bump!) she has the gift of the Six Sentence Stories and they are quite good, as are all the others…. Why don’cha stop by and send in a Story!

*

Share

Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

The most non-confrontational day of the week.

Hey! There’s a topic!

Confrontation:from Medieval Latin confrontare “assign limits to; adjoin,” and confrontari “be contiguous to,

Well, who said “That Wakefield Doctrine! Those principles are like so inclined to write illustration of themselfs.”

(cue: the Everything Rule)

What might we learn examining the concept of confrontation as manifested by the three predominant worldviews of the Doctrine?

  • clarks (the Outsider) no way, nope. won’t do it. go ahead you can have the (football, boyfriend, bicycle, girlfriend-to-be*) …except when it becomes a matter of something important.1 (lol to the facetious examples of contested possessions)
  • scotts (the Predator) Hey I thought you’d never ask! lets dance… hurry up before someone able to wreck my fun comes by
  • rogers (the Herd Members) First, you asked for this. Second (wait, let me do a quick Herd assessment… ok, given your status, I think we have the necessary quorum)

There you have it. The social dynamics of confrontation as manifested in the three predominant worldviews.

Note: rogers only engage in active (one-on-one) aggression when assured of a sufficient size Herd. Fun Fact: when confronting a clark who just happened into the situation, a roger can ‘assemble’ a Herd from whatever bystanders or ‘trying-to-get-to-class’ random people available at the moment. If the clark has some standing, then more planning and logistical effort is required.

* applies to male clarks only, clarklike female very not so much

1) sorry, no quick description handy. if you’re a clark reading this, you know what we mean. (and woe betide the scott or roger who tries to mess with ‘it’.)

 

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

While we try to remember the (suggested) topic for the week’s first post, lets rummage through the Box ‘o RePrints, shall we?

…wait! stop the keyboard! we have a little video from our own Golden Years of video/audio Doctrine/Curator!

the heck with adieus

ok, a little backstory: for a few years, at the end of the First Decade of the Second Millennium, we had cause to travel on business, once (or twice) a year. For reasons, lost in the Fog of Bore, we decided that, on each trip, rather than fly directly home, we would do some clarklike* tourism at places that held an attraction (for us). One such trip included a drive through Mississippi to see the Crossroads of Robert Johnson fame.

here:

* so, for a clark, tourism is about what, as kids, we used to call ‘touching hands’** Point of Interest, drive there, get out of car, take photos or videos, get back in car and leave.

** i.e. scary old house, ideally with keep out signs all over the place, the dare was ‘touch hands’ which was not ‘go on the property or get there it’ rather it involved touching it (running away was permitted and encouraged afterwards)

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s weekly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop.

We’re glad you’ve joined us on this end-of-Summer weekend. If you’re new to this ‘hop, the theme is gratitude, the format is list (10+-). Care to join us?* It’s simple: write you a list of the people, places, things or events that elicited the grat-response, link it up and you’re home free.

For the Wakefield Doctrine, the following we are grateful for:

 

 

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Six Sentence Story bloghop  ad hoc the Special event this week: Grat #8

5) Co-hostinae cai, she wrote, last week: “I love the walking tours. Can’t wait to hear the story of the rock.” …and we’re grateful for the opportunity to present the story:

6) no denying it… Summer might be coming to an end! ayiiee.

7) Friend of the Doctrine Mimi, she writes: ‘Here’s a thankful, I ran into a rogerian expression “in the wild” so to speak. On the nextdoor app, a lady asked if local colleges have a dress code. She was saying if they don’t, they should, as these young people are beyond casual and let everything hang out, front and back. She said it “leaves nothing to the indignation!” Hard to describe the manifestation of this Grat. Anytime we see the Doctrine applied to the personal reality of anyone not us, there’s a feeling of, my god! this thing is real. (ok, not so hard to too describe) Thanks! M (wondering what this rogerian expression thing is? it’s a primary characteristic of people who have Herd Member (roger) as their predominant worldview. So… follow this link to the Doctrine page on rogers and, almost at the bottom is a list of rogerian expressions.

8) Denise and her ‘hop hosted the Six Sentence Café & Bistro Poetry Slam for 2026. grat for that and for Chris for totally keeping everyone focused on the date and, new-to-the-Café, Reelika as rookie-of-the-year (in terms of the SSC&B not blogging which she has been around a while, Frank for adding the audio element to his contribution and supporting the Poetry Slam effort and Misky who, as always participated in a manner that makes it all look easy while contributing to certain elegance to the event.

9) something, something

10) Secret Rule 1.3

*ok, just to reassure a certain percentage of visitors, as reassurance go see Misky or Andrew for a sense of ‘oh! ok, those grat people aren’t all slightly off

music vids

*

*

*

*

 

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share