Frydae -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Frydae -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Frydae -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Well, that was fun! …the Doctrine posts about the Herd Member, aka rogers.

So, here’s the thing:

Of the three predominant worldviews none are bad or better, good or grating, superior or substandard.

Regular Readers will take the next, painfully obvious statement with a grain fault.*

The three comprise an ideal.

proof?

What the hell are you talking about?!? Proof?? fuck you. All yer doin’ is demonstrating a lack of secondary clarklike aspect, which as everyone knows, is the ‘what not?’ gene found in clarks (and suppressed in scotts and rogers)… leave now. Not because you’re scoring points or holding up an alternative persopective in an unflattering light. …you’re wasting the time of everyone who is here because:

  • this is a harmless but oddly challenging view of the world
  • the notion of an alternative perspective is nothing if not a good thing
  • it’s fun to play with ideas, the more unlikely, the better
  • this theory of clarks, scotts and rogers has an element of insight among all the incidental congruencies and taking them in the spirit they’re offered can provide a better sense of how the other person is experiencing the world. which is, for some of us, fricken’ always a good thing

where were we?

oh yeah the clark (Outsider), scott (Predator) roger (Herd Member) which totally rules!!? lol

what we wrote in the early days (here’s the link to that page)

that plus! if we didn’t have rogers you would not want to have to fly from Newark to Biloxi in a plane designed and built by a scott!

  • jet airliners designed by scotts:  very fast with at least 5 or 6 engines (not necessarily required to get off the ground, but make them louder than frickin anything)
  • a part of the cabin has a basketball net/hockey/or batters box
  • the stewards would have to wear bathing suits… male or female  and they would carry those little air horn things (can of compressed air) to warn the unruly passengers or just in case they get bored
  • the flight deck would have windows that open, so the pilot could yell at passing jets

0r a clark:

  • instead of normal seats, there would be couches with pillows and quilts (that would have a disturbing tendency to slide around when the plane has to bank for final approach)

  • the stewardesses would be scotts and stewards would be rogers

  • there would be a bathroom-to-passenger ratio of nothing less than 1:2

 

*damn! we just caught a rogerian expression in the wild! For a more comprehensive list of these totally delightful aspects of the rogerian personal reality, go here and scroll down to the next-to-last block-quote for a fun list.

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Frank Hubeny says:

    The rogers do sound like the safest ones to design and build a plane.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      I really appreciate your wording. It is a post-prompt in and of itself. Next time we get on the subject of our Herdly friends will include it.

      (Preview: the product (of a roger in this case is, far and anyway, safer) however we would do well not to infer a motivation on their part. the reality of the Herd Member is that the world is quantifiable and measurable. They live by the concept is more is more (including definition and refinement) when celebrating the inherent predictability of such a world.
      Of course, there are scottian and rogerian engineers, aerospace and otherwise. But I would suggest these cases provide a good illustration of the role of a secondary aspect, i.e. an engineer who happens to be a clark (predominant worldview) has a significant secondary rogerian aspect. as with a scottian engineer (where else do Mission Directors come from? lol)

Leave a Reply