Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
On this week’s Saturday night (Denise and the Progenitor roger) were discussing a mutual aquaintance who happens to be a first order scott.
The statement was made, ‘Yeah he looks around (in a given situation, not critical to this discussion) and, seeing the prey, is consumed by hate.’ This from the roger.
As often happens, our reaction was… ‘Wait! Say that again!’
He said that again.
We were all, “That’s exactly what a roger would say.”
If we were in a film there would be an onscreen subtitle: Translation between the personal reality of one and an objective observer.
The fun thing, we didn’t even need to think, ‘Wait! What would you have said?’ It was clear to us that, from a roger, the depiction of the engagement of a scott with the world would be from the emotional palette.
(New Readers) Each of the ‘personality types’ of the Wakefield Doctrine exist in what can be best described as distinctly different personal realities.
- The clark (Outsider) is a part of a world of thought, logic and the analytical. This person is best described as manifesting their lifes in the medium of rational thought (hold up on your ‘Rational?!!? Then what the fuck is all this?!!?!) lol
- The scott (Predator) lives the day-to-day life of the Predator, all motion and action and reaction-without-hesitation. While clarks are thinking, scotts are running down the Prey (of the moment). scotts act (first and think about shit afterwords, subjective reflection as a postprandial snack only)
- The roger (the Herd Member) lives in the light of a cloudless sky over an endless savannah. Emotion is woven into everything, but especially in the fabric of others of like-kind. They know there is a Right Way and feel the solemn responsiblity to let others know how defined and quantifiable life is… irony is left at the door.
The take-away?
What we see/think/feel is not (necessarily) what the other person is experiencing.
So, maybe we should begin to say, ‘the Wakefield Doctrine’ is a a group of languages native to three characteristic personal realities. Become fluent in each and you will know more about the other person than you ordinarily would.’
ya know



Excellent post. I never tire of the reminder(s). As much as I was surprised by Roger’s response, I was hit with a sense of maybe I needed to go back as “a student to school there” (thanks be, The Lady, lol).
The manifestation of a single event through the lens of the other two (scotts and rogers) is fascinating. The manifestation of “events” in the personal reality of rogers? That is the greater challenge. But hey, what clark isn’t used to/up for a challenge.
It’s certainly helpful to keep in mind, we don’t all think alike.