Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “We interrupt this post about rogers with a video of a clark!! | the Wakefield Doctrine Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “We interrupt this post about rogers with a video of a clark!! | the Wakefield Doctrine

Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “We interrupt this post about rogers with a video of a clark!!

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Seeing how we’ve apparently gotten into a ‘Before They were Famous’ series of RePrint posts, let’s finish it up with an earliest post on rogers.

Damn! A lot of posts have our Herdonian brethren as primary thematic focus if not the clear topic/subject matter. Let’s go with this one, as we have a Six Sentence Story to ‘find’.

 

“Sing a song of Sixpence, a pocket full of rye…” what is it about rogers and the Past? the Wakefield Doctrine pauses, reflects and offers you Pie*

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

Sing a song of sixpence,
A pocket full of rye.
Four and twenty blackbirds,
Baked in a pie.*

* Many interpretations have been placed on this rhyme. It is known that a 16th century amusement was to place live birds in a pie. An Italian cookbook from 1549 (translated into English in 1598) contained such a recipe: “to make pies so that birds may be alive in them and flie out when it is cut up” and this was referred to in a cook book of 1725 by John Nott.[1][2] The wedding of Marie de’ Medici and Henry IV of France in 1600 contains some interesting parallels. “The first surprise, though, came shortly before the starter—when the guests sat down, unfolded their napkins and saw songbirds fly out. The highlight of the meal were sherbets of milk and honey, which were created by Buontalenti.
( source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sing_a_Song_of_Sixpence )

Well, didn’t they know how to have fun back in the 1600’s ? ( ” Hey, Ephesus!!  dude, yo  when her Majesty the Queen Mother sees the birds fly up from the table, she will surely impart a smile upon thee…dawg” )

Be that as it may, today we talk about the thing that rogers have for the Past.  Lets dispense with all the work of constructing a well-crafted narrative and get all Bullet Pointy on this bad boy! So, ‘The Past’ and the rogers? Welll…we’ll have you know that:

  • rogers live for the Past (as scotts live in the Present and clarks live for the Future)
  •  most ‘Historians’ are clarks and yet rogers are the people who you think of when you are interested in knowing something old, or out of date or archaic, what the hell!
  • the more involved the family tree, the more you need a roger, and not just because they love Yellow #2 Pencils**
  • in order to maintain a coherent history, you must have an internal consistency… rogers  love repeating patterns
  • the past is ‘a place’ that rogers know they can be alone and by themselves, at least for a little while
  • hey, it’s really rather simple! …the farther back in time a tradition or a practice or a dogma extends, the bigger the herd that has come to be associated with it and, like scotts…for rogers ‘more is more’! …following is the epitome of this ideal:
  • …Ken Burns…
This quality of the rogerian personality type is one of the most positive and essential, not only to the rogerian people, but to mankind as a whole. It has often been said that rogers are responsible for society and a (certain) continuity of civilization, without which we would all still be living on the savannah…darting down to the stream in the evenings nervously keeping one non-stereoscopic eye on the treeline, alert for the sudden movement of a scott!  As a matter of fact. I was talking to a rogerian friend, Valerie about the Doctrine and the positive contributions of her people to life and I put it this way, “Yes scotts are active and loquacious and really get things done, but would you want to fly across the country on a plane designed and built by a scott?”
I believe at that moment, Valerie understood and become proud of her people***
Tomorrow is Friday so get your ears out, it is Video Friday!!
** …and nice, clean, full-sized #2 Pencils! certainly not what you would find in your hands if you made the mistake of asking a scott for a pencil!! (think teeth-marks, stubby and prone to smudge)
*** which emotion, of course, was immediately transformed into a sense of  fervent righteousness and a total conviction of the deficiency of  all non-herd members

*

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Good post!
    “Self improvement tool”. Absolutely. Enjoyed interview 2nd time around, the two of you were most enjoyable, lol
    rogers “snorting”, that made me laugh…rogers and “unjustified disdain”. A concept difficult to explain to another clark even though on face value it shouldn’t be – re: disdain masquerading in “compliment’s clothing”.

  2. messymimi says:

    Disdain masquerading as a compliment, “She chose that stylish nail color herself, bless her heart!”

    Please do note, though, the “bless her/his heart” phrase can be used seriously to expess real sympathy. “He don’t know up from down since his wife passed, bless his heart.”

    And a further note, if he’s considered an eligible widower, the casserole brigade (widow ladies who are hoping to remarry and who bring casseroles to the bereaved) will be both saying the above and lining up.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      Hokey! Smoke!
      This comment somehow ties into a draft Six.

      My immediate stomach ache came as I reviewed this draft and remembered a couple of Sixes where, in the process of editing, I chose to move ‘un-used text’ to the bottom, in case I needed it. (You know what’s coming next….lol)
      I forgot it (the unused text… hit ‘Publish’ and sure ‘nough A Six Sentence Story with bonus words!

      can I get an ‘AYYIIEEE’ from the clarks in the reading-audience! lol

      So, the good news is that I don’t see that the draft Six snuck on-stage when I wasn’t looking
      the bad news is that I will complete it and post it even if it makes very little sense at all*

      Hey! Readers!! If you don’t like the newest Six Sentence Story take it up with Mimi…she’s the psychic one around here

      ;p

      * yeah, like knock the Reader over with a feather lol

      • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

        ok
        last word on this (lol)
        I actually took the half-written Six and shaped it up to post as a Six this week. But something made it feel a little too self-indulgent. But, since in my Reply to your Comment I mentioned it, it’s only fair to post it here for the fun of a little virtual synchronicity*
        Besides, hardly anyone reads Comments, much less replies

        ABSTRACT

        “Be careful.”

        There’s a truth, too-often denigrated ‘abstract’ that is embedded at this point in all relationships, one we all learn and promptly forget. It is found in the class of decidedly self-inflicted human conflict found in every-and-all cultures from the first to the present: (the) approach/avoidance conflict. We want it, for those of sufficient honesty or pretend to dislike like it (among those more inclined to see the world as an excuse). The unmistakable indicator of this Original Indecision is: those in the second class claim disdain rather than displeasure which is left for those falling in the first category.

        “You always have the option to simply not proceed; there is, of course, a third option in the old saying, ‘Those who seek counsel await confirmation, for denial is the true First Sin.

        *see!?! lol SOC is fun, but jeez!