Month: February 2023 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3 Month: February 2023 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3

Re-Print Tewsdae -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

First off, let us say, ‘Hey, this (reprint) it was written way back in, like only second-and-a-half year of writing this (or any!) blog’.

Second off, ‘We stand by the story.’

Third thing: ‘And that is the value of learning and applying the principles of our little personality theory’.

See, the thing is, we’re all experiencing the world around us and the people who make it up in one of three characteristic relationships:

  1. as the Outsider(clarks) relate themselves, apart from, non-definably different, and driven to learn what everyone else appears to know…while remaining (mostly) un-noticed
  2. the Predator(scotts) range the open world, chasing prey and being chased, living the day as much as possible with as little doubt or reservation (as possible)
  3. the Herd Member(rogers) while knowing that all they is experience is good and sufficient, there is a need to learn the Best Way and to share that at as many others as possible.

We act and react appropriate to the world we live in.

So to the ‘lesson’ at the top of this post.

As a clark, I would normally, (sans Doctrine), look at the old post and, while smiling in fond recollection of actually writing and posting it, cringe at the feeling, (you know, the tightening of the shoulders that comes when you realize others are watching), that maybe it was a little over the top, too childishly emotive and unsophisticated. The thought comes, ‘You’ve gotten so much better at your writing in the intervening 13 year… maybe keep looking for a different reprint’.

But the Doctrine, taken to heart, reminds me that there are other clarks in the world who would feel the same in a similiar situation. And, (the Doctrine), reminds us that, despite there being only ‘one actual reality’ I am heir to ‘the other two’. I then benefit by my reading and learning about the world (the relationship, if you will) the Predator and the Herd Member experience. How, if they were to come across an old post, they would experience it differently.

 

Outa time…. too bad, ’cause we were just about to tie it all together! oh well, guess you gotta keep readin’ and learnin’ and such

St Valentine was he a roger or was he a clark, the Wakefield Doctrine deals with the important questions of the day

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )( psst!  yeah, you!  anyone looking?  I’m supposed to be working on the Wakefield Doctrine book… I promised that I would stop with the nearly every day Posts so that I could apply what little energy I have to putting content down on paper. Long story, that’s not important now… what is important is today is Valentine’s Day!  And there is not a single person out there who writes a blog that can resist the obvious appeal of such a… a contrived, culturally supported, private interest initiated “holiday” as Valentine’s Day.  So a quick, totally self-indulgent Post and then back to work… if Ms. AKH or Molly asks… tell them you haven’t seen me….)

 

St Valentines is the worst, most contrived and cynical, gyno-centric guy-bait(ing), toy-with-the-emotions-of-innocent-bystanders, holiday on the whole damn calendar.  Of course we are all familiar with the origin of the holiday and the internet is positively turgid with countless blogs, and stories and articles that tell us all about Hallmark and the candy industry and the rest of the sordid tale of this day in February. I will not try to compete with these other more skilled and capable Commentators ( and -torinis), as I do not have the time or the ‘writing chops’ to do such a ripe topic justice. Instead, let me tell you about my most lasting memory of Valentines Day.

Third grade, parochial school (St. Imelda*) and a classroom of 25 students. The boys were required to wear blue shirts and blue ties with OLM printed on the front, fortunately ‘clip-on ties’ had been invented by this time, so easy-peasy; the girls wore the catholic school uniform, i.e. plaid skirts white shirt, socks.  damn, little did I realize at that pre-pubescent time of my life how potent that little Roman Catholic Church fashion dictates would become for me and countless other men at a later stage of life.  (In fact, I am feeling the tug on the cynical side of my writing-self, there is something about the whole, church-sexual-abuse-dress-the-children in outfits destined to become so hawt… lol sorry, again I lack the time or the writing skill to do justice to a topic like this… back to the story.)
So with much fanfare, Valentine’s Day arrives and we  9  year old boys and girls are told that in the afternoon, before the end of the school day, we would have time to deliver our Valentine cards to each other. ( The day before we spent ‘Art Period’ making little baskets out of construction paper and taping them to the front of our desks. These would serve as ‘mailboxes’ for the cards we would receive the next day).
The thing was, the horrible twist to this introduction to the world of love, relationships and rejection was that, the time when class stopped and we were allowed to get up and deliver our little cards was not the end of the school day! It was right after lunch… and it lasted 15 or 20 minutes…as in ‘ now return to your desks and we will continue with the afternoon’ classes’. To sit for 90 minutes staring at the contents of the container on the front of my desk… I will leave it to the Reader to decide the emotional landscape of that afternoon on a February 14th.

Anyone out there not comfortable with finishing the story, or satisfied with their conclusion of this little tale, write us a Comment! Regular Readers know that the rogers gave the biggest cards, the scotts received the most cards and the clarks delivered the most cards….secretly without the recipient ever knowing who the really fun card came from…

Now I better get back to work, before I get in trouble.

*who totally twisted my life… don’t ask

*

Share

RePrint Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

ok

first off, thanks to all Readers for persevering as I move through my Year-of-theTwo-Week-Cold. Lesson taken: it’s not so much what the tachometer says as the speedometer. Or something.

Speaking of Friends of the Doctrine, as always, the first thing we did this morning was turn on our electrical View-O-Scope, and what did we see? (Hint: the best part of writing this blog). Comments from Nicole and Denise and Mimi and Cynthia. They all spoke kindly of the Doctrine, but I thought I’d reprint Cynthia’s comment.

I love the biggest book and magazine  in the multiverse. That means more Doctrine reading for us all. Say…I was thinking while making dinner last night: I don’t have enough Doctrine paraphernalia. Might I make a Doctrine t-shirt for myself? You know…to promote it around the multi-verse?

Whaddya think?

Totally sounds like fun.

Yes, Cynthia, we would enjoy looking upon, (and, surely wearing), a DocTee that you might be moved to design.

Let’s close with the aforementioned Reprint.

(An excerpt from a post written November 11, 2012

Now, don’t misunderstand us! We are not saying that the Wakefield Doctrine will be the darling of the Paris runways next Spring (if  Jean Paul Gaultier or Nicholas Ghesquiere, call be sure to get a number ). But the Doctrine is about enhancing ourselves, if it’s about anything at all!

So, the topic/point of today’s Post:
the Wakefield Doctrine and Fashion for you and fun for the whole family! ( now about that fashion thing):

  1. clarks: are you serious? fashion? V and Nylon has nothing on a clark with a little time and a debit card full of next semester’s tuition!  the Doctrine is gender neutral, however fashion in the hands of a female clark is scary, wonderful, a startling thing….and if you are a roger, then just wait the 12 to 18 months for the rest of the world’s couture to catch up and buy the same look at your local mall
  2. scotts: if fashion is a tool of interpersonal expression then scotts are total ninja/WWE/samurai/trained-killing-machine(s). Watch the ‘fashion-show-runways’ in every: high school hallway, high-rise office corridor, factory floor passageway, city sidewalk, we guarantee that you will recognize the scotts!  Saying that a scott knows how to dress ‘for effect’ is like saying a DB9 is good transportation.
  3. rogers: these are the people who tell us what brand is the clothing that is fashionable. Interesting in that 80% of the list of best-dressed people will be rogers (or are wearing the clothing suggested by rogers). rogers can be counted on to take the creativity (of the clarklike female), offset the androgyny with the ‘in-your-….face‘ style of a scott and  before you know it, the next must have fashion line is here (at a reasonable price at your local mall outlet!

*

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

The is the latest in the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful bloghop. Established by Lizzi R in 1989 and running continuously since, it is a Gratitude blog with a difference. It is one of those differences that we will, with the indulgence of the Reader, advantage ourselves with this morning. We refer, of course, to the principle of ‘Good Intent over Good Writing’, to wit there are ten things in this list, this week. (Coherent? Sensible! Rational? …hey! the title up there, do it say TCSRToT? No, I didn’t think so.) So allow us:

1) Una

2) Phyllis

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the patience and (charitable) forbearance of my co-hosts and (most) Readers

5) the Six Sentence Story bloghop (for suggesting one of the vids below)

6) the most significant and direct benefit of the practice of the underlying principle of this ‘hop (although not the exclusive source of the insight and reinforcement) that allows us to find a positive even when still enduring a cold

7) Hypograt: the longer full-recovery time, back to ‘normal’ time is a hypograt when one considers a number of alternative possibilities

8) something something

9) the internet as the largest used book and magazine in the multiverse

10) the secret rule 1.3 that accounts for the last item in some lists

 

vids:

*

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [a Sybil Trainor Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrines contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted each week by Denise, the rules are simple, the stories are always a surprise.

(Previously in the story of Sybil Trainor)….

The prompt word:

BUBBLE

“No, not that I don’t like her, I mean its been two days since she created Chateau Disaporea… well, I have to laugh or I’d be sleeping in my car.”

The Fay House, serving as it did as the sole first-year student housing on the Radcliffe Quad, had the advantage of being a one-hundred-seventy-three year old mansion, and as such, was to modern dormitory living as was a live TikTok app to ‘Little Women’; it was perfect for subdivision into rooms to be shared by two young women/total strangers during a time in life characterized by triumph and despair.

“… not to worry, she’s out… for a girl from the Mid-West my roomie seems awful comfortable here in Cambridge, no, I don’t have any classes with her, thank god… just intense. Yeah, I’ll hold…

“…remember that American exchange student back in our senior year …yeah, except I’m thinking this one would’ve slipped the overdose to the guy instead of drinking it… <laughter>  you remember the picture of the orientation guy I sent you the day I moved in…well that afternoon, I no sooner dumped all my stuff on the bed nearest the door… and in walks this girl, tall, dark hair and without a glance to me, nodded at the bed on the far side of the room, and the guy walks over and puts a single piece of a fake-blue-marble Samsonite luggage on the bed, and, still not a word, they both walk out of the room, ikr?”

Asked his opinion of the influence of Victorian style on the still-developing architectural lexicon of the New World, a soon-to-be-famous philosopher said, ‘The intricacies of detail and (its) ponderous form speaks to a vision of heaven carved by a sinner hoping to win heaven or rule hell’; as much as a soap bubble is the epitome of short-lived beauty, the mark left by the dark-wood floors and shadowy halls of some older residences was often the difference between one longing for the past and seeking the future.

“Hey, Sybil I didn’t hear you come in… (くそ, gotta go…“)

*

Share

M2 -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This week, Doug is directing us to employ a fairly common convention in prompt-writing exercises, the classic ‘Finish the sentence’

Totally fun bloghop. Way clever, talented writers. And…and! they let us participate!  Click here to head over to ‘Min Min Prompt‘ (tell ’em the Doctrine sent ya)

(With nothing but utmost respect, we might suggest that our host should have been warned how extremely enticing this particular form of prompt is to those of us genetically-predisposed to the Stream-of-Consciousness approach to writing. That howling? Had I not spent the previous week, laid-low by a winter cold, I would’ve thought to send a note to ceayr by way of warning re: our effort this week, ’cause you know, rhetorical license.)

The world thought it had seen everything until…”

You read the bold-font, italicized prompt and smile. You feel what you believe are hints of stimulation, adolescent fingers lost in a forest of foreign clothing, as the possibilities abound. However, it is early and so, are not concerned with the mundane details of plot and narrative. The way ahead is non-defined, your position preliminary; no commitments have been demanded, nor promises made. Your smile grows, as buttons and hooks conspire to end an age.

‘It’s been a while…’ without thinking, as it has ‘been a while’, you realize two things: you’ve accepted Second Person POV status and you’ve added your own ellipsis’d sentence fragment.

And, in a fleeting return to the rational, realize while first-draft writing is refreshing, you’ve already used 123 of your 250 word allowance.

Your head swells up and your face falls as you realize the only way out is through the door marked: META- 2nd POV notwithstanding.

The metaphorical heat of the beginning, meant to be pruriently (if not adolescently) suggestive becomes the red-glow of self-consciousness as you approach the word-limit threshold. Above the abyss is a sign, red-shades of blue pencil letters: ‘Experimental fiction is a label championed by the undisciplined to defy the skillful’.

Watching the shreds of hope for a Hail Mary story-hook Coriolis down the drain, (in the wrong direction), you type:

“... they were tricked into reading this.

 

Share