Month: July 2022 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2 Month: July 2022 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [of the generic sort]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

It is hosted by Denise.

ed. This is one of those blog posts, more common to the earlier years of the Doctrine, prompted by a song on the radio. While one is tempted to derisively note, “A very old song,” it would be at peril of overlooking the power of the memory.

Prompt word:

COFFEE

It was still light when he woke up, a not-yet-painful glowing sunburn the only memory of the first two-thirds of a hot July day.

The kitchen table in the apartment was demonstrating it’s primary function and sole value: to serve as both a desk and, if Campbell’s Vegetable Beef soup, direct from the can qualified, food prep counter. While living on unemployment benefits can, if one has the capacity to resist the crushing weight of family expectations, peer pressure and the demands of society, be perceived as retirement-before-career, there was not an evening to lose. The nightclubs and bars, clinging to the summer shoreline like seaweed at low tide, were a thirty-minute drive, so his second stop was at a Dunkin Donuts; the first being the local package store.

‘Man does not move on caffeine alone,’ the young man smiled away the random thought that perhaps he might better spend the evening working on his writing, if not his actual resumé.

The girl, with her bare feet on the dashboard of the ’65 Bel Air wagon, interrupted his ambition with one of her own; he soon forgot all about the pain of corduroy against sunburned skin pressing against a driver’s side vinyl seat-back.

 

*

Share

Six Sentence Story3 -the Wakefield Doctrine- [a Café Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop

Hosted by Denise

(ed. So last week’s Six was host to a certain challenge among four of the participants. Instigated by Nick, choreographed by Denise and closed with a remarkable display of creativity by Ford it was, in a sense, a prompt within a prompt. (Nick does yeoman’s work laying out the rules for the Challenge Here.) Suffice it to say, Ford‘s Six was so good that my ambition dial got turned up to Eleven. The part of me that makes my virtual life simultaneously fun and horrible, whispered… “Hey! betcha you can’t write a Six to that song while staying in the story-world of the Six Sentence Café & Bistro… and! have some time travel in it, too!”)

ayyiiiee

Hey! Sixarians! I’ve requested and granted a one-time dispensation for breaking the rule of ‘One Six, One Post’. After the amount of work last night, I will no longer be tempted.

Hey! ceayr, sorry man, this Six? Makes some of my other narratively-ambiguous Sixes read like Hemingway playing charades. You’ve been warned.

Prompt word:

COFFEE

(early ’70s)

“When you believe in things
That you don’t understand
Then you suffer
Superstition ain’t the way, yeah.”

The Clavinet in the lead track of Talking Book, Stevie Wonder’s new album, resonating along key synaptic junctures was the perfect dance partner to entice the young man out of the half-asleep/half-awake state endemic in college dormitories during exam week.

The late Spring morning, with it’s moderate temperatures and unabashed sunshine, beckoned even the most determined end-of-semester student to rise early; the Sophomore came fully awake in a bed that seemed too narrow and a room that was, at once, normal while producing a feeling of the uncanny, like too much hashish or the memory of a lucid dream.

He was drawn back to the present by a knocking on the door that was possessed of an upward lilt that betrayed a shy enthusiasm, without thinking, he knew it was Cherie, who at the end of the previous night’s study session, promised coffee and a muffin first thing in the morning; despite this certainty, he called out, “Who is it?”

The voice that preceded the girl stepping through the doorway was that of Stacey Whitelaw, in both timbre and vocabulary,

“What the fuck is going on, where am I and why are you in a eight-by-ten room decorated with Jimi Hendrix posters;” the actual girl, now inside the room, couldn’t have been less a Miz Whitelaw, standing barely five-foot four, wearing worn blue corduroys, a Madras shirt with pearl buttons and a pair of gold wire-rim glasses.

The Sophomore felt his vision stutter, heart race and remembered a voice from his future.

 

(mid ’70s)

On a morning from a Bogart movie
In a country where they turn back time…
Don’t bother asking for explanations
She doesn’t give you time for questions
As she locks up your arm in hers.”

Rolling onto his side, the bed gave way to his left elbow and hip, while a split-second later providing a movement-facilitating push against his lower back and shoulders, the Sophomore’s head now closer to the stereo and Al Stewart; the sound of footsteps, ebbing and flowing as the staircase took at least two turns for each of the three stories of the tenement ended, and a voice, clearly without the patience for a traditional knocking strategy, filled the one-bedroom apartment.

“Open the door and tell me I haven’t climbed the stairs of a three-story tenement for nothing; I gotta say, I’m freakin out here and I hope the two times hitting my head on these fuckin slanted ceilings put me in a live-action coma,” despite lacking the sight of the owner of the voice, the young man closed his eyes in denial of the fact it belonged to Stacy Whitelaw.

Anticipating a rebound wave from the waterbed, the young man stumbled out of the bedroom, to the kitchen and stood staring at the too-often painted door, wearing only a pair of Jockey shorts and, like an elongated Ankh, a iron skeleton key around his neck, apparently the extent of the security features of the wood door; looking around the kitchen he considered remaining silent and, hopefully, unavailable.

His indecision was made moot as the door opened and a young woman, wearing a denim halter-top and dark brown hair long enough to play tag with a pair of cut-off jeans, who clearly wasn’t Stacy Whitelaw, stepped over the worn threshold and wrapped her forearms behind the young man’s neck; surprised beyond speech, he returned the embrace and their bodies insisted on moving them to the bedroom.

A timeless interval after the most timeless of physical interactions later, the dark-eyed girl locked eyes with the stunned and temporarily exhausted young man and, with a tone as sultry as her expression, said, “You know what I’d really like right now”, even as the embers in his eyes reignited, laughed, “A cup of coffee, I didn’t have time this morning.”

 

 

 

 

(early ’20s)

Never know how much I love you
Never know how much I care
When you put your arms around me
I get a fever that’s so hard to bear.

“Where have you been?”

Stacy Whitelaw gazed across the white-linen hills and hummocks of pillows at the Sophomore, the bed was as large as it needed to be to allow them to do whatever they wanted to do, individually and as a couple.

“Don’t you mean, ‘When have we been?'”

The young blonde woman put her hand to her mouth, a moué more of growing panic than disdain, even as the young man, his right hand on her left hip, felt the pupils of his eyes dilate as if sensing danger beyond his normal field of vision, he felt more than hear a distant roar, the sound of an approaching déjà vu-nami.

“Before we do anything, even have coffee, let’s agree to never ask each other, what the time is,” after a moment they laughed themselves into a horizontal embrace.

 

 

Share

RePrint Ruesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

What say, as a theme to today’s obviously non-original content, we go with one of the first encounters we all had, as children going to school, with fact that the world of adults was, at heart, misleading. We refer to the moment the teacher says, “Alright class, this time you’ll grade your own tests.” The soaring jubilation gets as high as a scottian boy’s rubber band launched paperclip, or a rogerian lad’s paper airplane.

It, (the process of being both the taker of a test and the judger of the answers) was not what some us inner, pre-civilized (aka pre-school) children expected.

what I meant to say is clearly not what you think you heard

Monday.
Get the hell up.
You know of the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) and you will recognise at least one roger or one scott in your world today.
You will not approach this individual or otherwise make them aware of your knowledge that they are just like we talk about here.
You will do your best to maintain your composure, unless you are reading this with a friend and/or friends, in which case, listen to the clark among you.
When you spot your first roger, it will most likely be in an ‘organised environment’, ie.e school or work or any other place that you are compelled to follow certain guidelines as to your own activity.
Make a note of your first sighting (being extra careful if you are spotting a scott, do not, under any circumstance allow the scott to see you taking notes.)
If you are a roger (yeah, right!) do not allow other herd members to observe you doing anything that is out of the ordinary.
Clarks…you will have no trouble…unless you start to think that this Wakefield Doctrine will win the love of the herd or the backing of the scott.
When you have spotted the first, the rest will be easy.
Expect to make mistakes initially deciding if a person is a scott or (an aggressive) roger.
Don’t be concerned, it happens to the best of us at the beginning.
You will notice, rather quickly, that rogers are using the personal pronoun way, way, way more than the scott
You will (then) notice that the scott has the attention span of a 3 month old puppy on amphetamines

Everyone ready?  Good.  We know you can do this thing.  If you have any questions or concerns you can always write a Comment (yeah, fer sure lol)

We here at the Doctrine will be standing by, both Progenitors and DownSprings to help where we can, but knowing about the Wakefield Doctrine (and seeing the world accordingly) thing is a lot like…riding a bike?…nah a bike is inanimate and while fun will not turn on you if you stray from the herd…or totally prey on you until something more attractive comes along, …like learning to play an instrument?…no way! playing an instrument has a set technique and therefore is totally predictable so that if you hit certain keys on a keyboard you will always get a certain sound/tone….like sex?….maybe…it sort of has the always the same almost always enjoyable and worthwhile, except when it is not and then the results are to be regretted for a life time…yeah sort of like that.
But all of us here, at Doctrine central, admire you as you got out into the world today, armed with a knowledge and a  power that is shared by 10s and 10s of people here and there around the globe.  Now you know how Noah must of felt…you gotta get out in the world and do something that you will be glad you did, but you better not let the neighbors get too close a look at your backyard…or something like that.

New Readers?  No rush, no hurry.  The above is directed towards Readers who have been here a while, for now you should just enjoy the videos, spend some time in the Pages (Table of Contents) or browse through some old Posts (Archive Read ’em and Sleep)…you will get the hang of this Doctrine thing pretty quick we betcha.

*

Share

Reprinti Miandondi -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘A Doctrine Primer’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

The Wakefield Doctrine is gender neutral, age neutral and culture neutral.

The Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them.

The key to the Wakefield Doctrine lies in understanding how we relate ourselves to the world around us.

From the perspective of the Wakefield Doctrine, we all have the perfect personality type: developed at a very early age and practiced as we grow and mature is in response to the world as we experience it.

No one can, with any official authority, tell another person which of the three (clark, scott or roger) is their predominant worldview; it is always left to the individual to discover for themselves the character of their relationship with the world around them and the people who make it up.

While everyone settles into (and develops their personality type) one and only one of the three predominant worldviews, we never lose the potential of ‘the other two’.

You can take a clark to a restaurant, but you can’t make them relax

You can lead a scott to water, but only if they don’t have any other plans at the moment

You can’t teach an old roger new ways to describe their world.

The three predominant worldviews:

  1. the Outsider(clarks) they’re there, around you like the name of your first dog/cat, just a matter of not trying too hard to see them. clarks live in the social shadows because they believe they cannot stand the light. However, they are not (necessarily) what people call introverts. clarks cannot stand scrutiny but will not tolerate being ignored
  2. the Predator(scotts) they are so not difficult to detect. they are decisive, impulsive, confident and immune to the ill-effects of subjective reflection, in other words, they are natural leaders. Mercurial rather than temperamental, scotts are fiercely loyal to their friend and lethal to their enemies
  3. the Herd Member(rogers) they are so there, all around you. rogers are the dominant demographic, the majority, the consensus and the will of the people. rogers know the universe is quantifiable and, as such, quantifiable, knowable and procedural; they know there is a Right Way to do things and it is their responsibility to make sure you know what that is.

All reality is, to certain, albeit small, degree, personal. It is not so much a matter of scale, as it is a matter of the tone of potential interaction.

The Wakefield Doctrine is not the Answer, it is a very useful Question. (The Question: what is the nature of the other person’s relationship to the situation we are currently experiencing?)

Employing the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine, one is in a position to know more about the other person than they know about themselves.

clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel

 

…well, it’s kind of a reprint! There two thousand, sixty-four other posts in this blog that, in one way or another, say what we’e said in this here post here. Only using more words.

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to Lizzi’s Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop, now entering it’s twenty-third year in the ‘sphere. Once a week, we stop and reflect on the people, places and things that’ve startled us into a state, (however transitory it might be), of gratitude.

1) Una (enjoying a Friday walk in July)

2) Phyllis (taking a photo of Una enjoying a Friday walk in July)

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) serial stories ‘the Whitechapel Interlude‘, ‘the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf‘ and ‘Tales from the Six Sentence Café & Bistro

5) the Six Sentence Story bloghop

6) work Here’s a video of a property we’re overseeing the renovation of; the pace of work is fairly slow, remind us to update this when we have something interesting to show.

7) This year’s Triffid garden. Caption (in Homer Simpson voice-over: “mmmm sunflowersss”)

Prehistoric-looking plant, all spiky leaves and, somehow, 'attitude' looms over a single sunflower

8) something, something

9) Hey! Quick show of hands. Wakefield Doctrine tee shirts? Anyone?  (from our 2014 collection:)

Friend of the Doctrine Cyndi Calhoun stylin’ in a Doctrine approved DocTee

10) Secret Rule 1.3 “…’cause surely the most enjoyable Rules are the Secret Rules.”

 

 

music

*

*

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share