Month: July 2022 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3 Month: July 2022 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- ( a Café Six)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise

This is a Tales from the Six Sentence Café & Bistro Six.

This week’s prompt word:

EXCHANGE

The tall, thin man smiled.

The final whisk of the broom in his right hand convinced the pile of dust, lipstick-tagged cigarette butts, crumpled cocktail napkins (smeary blue tears of rejected phone numbers, staining the ridges) and thin, if not superfluous, drink stirrers, to get into blue dustpan, without leaving even the slightest of residue lines on the floor. He remained still, the shape of his cleaning tools-of-choice somehow brought to mind Alice in Wonderland, with it’s improbable confluence of shapes and materials. The shape of the dustpan, at the floor-end of a vertical handle, wasn’t merely a half-completed box missing one side, there was a graceful ramp to ease the transition of material into captivity.

The man tipped the dustpan, with the practiced care of Five Star restaurant’s Head Sommelier into the white plastic container, taking care to not hit the sides of the plastic bag, lest the turbulence undo his efforts; the open space in front of the small stage was as empty as empty as a third grade classroom in July.

Preferring to exchange impersonal illumination of the overhead lights for the dim uncertainty neon, whispering from behind the bar, the man felt grateful for the other Proprietors (and Tom), who, completing the heavy work following the Annual SSB&S SOC Prose-off, left him to work alone; the dawn soon to tap soundlessly on the tall rectangles of glass and iron separating the outer wall’s brick support columns which bordered the sidewalk outside the Six Sentence Café & Bistro.

*

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [a ‘the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf’ Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is (one of) the Doctrine’s contributions to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Denise is the host.

We’ve decided to ‘visit’ with the MC in ‘the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf‘, Ian Devereaux. The last time we saw Ian was here. The last installment of the serial story, ‘the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf’ was here.

This week’s prompt word:

EXCHANGE

“Jeez, Mimi, I’d say “Love what you’ve done with the place, but… damn!”

The woman in the floral print dress sitting at the end of the bar raised an eyebrow, the last quarter of a summer lunar eclipse and I hastily added, “Pardon my French, tante M, too much time with the less-than-eloquent members of the underworld.”

Turning to face me as I drew nearer, she smiled absolution and said, “Boys will be boys; come sit and, if we’re lucky, Tom will fix us one of his remarkable BLTs.”

From the left corner of my eye I detected movement from the bandstand that anchored the club section of the Six Sentence Café & Bistro; being mid-afternoon on a Thursday, the illumination was, somehow, the all-consuming dusk of a late October day. What I thought was half of a ‘Voice of the Theatre’ pa system began to move, raising the hair on the back of my neck, then a beard and the red glow of a cigar appeared and the gestalt resolved itself and my childhood nightmares were banished.

“Hey, cher Nick, you’ve been working all afternoon cleaning up after the battle of the bands, come on over and set a spell and we’ll see about negotiating with our detective friend here for an exchange of labor for sustenance,” the smile in the woman’s voice was as much that of an old-fashioned lion tamer as it was a confident Proprietor.

*

 

Share

The Six Sentence Project -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

 

This is the Doctrine’s contribution to the weekly Six Sentence Story bloghop

Hosted by Denise

This week:  ayyiieee if idle minds are the devil’s workshop then this Post has got to be considered the back seat of Cthulhu’s ’57 Chevy on a Satyrday night cruise for hootch and babes. Make that the last third of the portion of that night that the car was rolling.

The prompt word:

EXCHANGE

https://youtube.com/shorts/PLIhB4j7e70

 

*

Forgive the uncontrollable loop. the other vids are totally random from somewhere

We will fix.

 

“Cut me! Nick Cut me… ” (thumbnail photo…lol)

Share

warm-up with cinematic allusions Day! -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

You remember how, when you were in high school, a challenge would appear and align itself with so much of your secret desires and less-then-private insecurities? Maybe it was a growth (ahem! hyper-hormonal activity) spurt or, very possibly, the girl who represented the ideal future, (but actualized nothing but the role of some in society to be cannon fodder in the battle for adulthood). Anyway, you knew you could do it!

So, with all the mature judgement of (any) adolescent male at virtually (any) time in history, when confronted with a crowd seeking recruits to wear an emblem and march off for the honor of god and country (and a shot at the maiden in the tower), we said, “Sure! A Six Sentence Challenge. Between and among participants in Denise’s weekly writing prompt bloghop, the Six Sentence Story. Sounds like fun What could possibly go wrong!”

I’ll tell you what can go wrong in one word: Nick (aka Spira) and Ford (aka the Atomic Mage… the Atomic Mage!!! jeez with a blog handle like that, what could we have been thinking? “Heck, it’s only a wrestling match, strictly intramural, here’s your opponent, Andre   …the Giant!) lol

But a challenge is a challenge. Strong force binding quarks? The force of gravity on an apple. pshaw! Nothing to peer pressure.

Anyway. Being a clark, we thought, lets go back and see if’n we can build any confidence by looking at the first of these writing exercises, you know, back when zoe ran the ‘hop. Below is one of the first Sixes we wrote, from July 2015

Though they weren’t around at the time, if ceayr and Doug and Keith (think: 21st C Marlon Brando from ‘the Wild Ones’ that crew) and Chris and Jenne and Mimi… hey! Tom!!  Or, for that matter Paul , if theys not already writing their own sixes, we’ll be out in the parking lot after last period. oh well, it’s only blogging

53401486

Today, is a Six Sentence Story, a challenging and enjoyable writing thing that Friend of the Doctrine zoe (aka Ivy) throws most ever week!

The tree stood for as long as Jennifer could remember, it was there when she left her small town to attend college, it was there when she returned briefly, to take those few things that she could not bear to have strangers pick through and sell, and here it (still) stood.  As she approached, on this wintry day, she gave more care to her steps, as if the passing of time made her linger, not for fear of falling, but merely to delay. Pulling at her coat, producing what her late husband would refer to as ‘the self-hugging of the well-tailored woman’, she smiled, despite the discomfit that she felt.

The time has come to remember and let go” she thought, as she stepped carefully over the protruding roots, in a one woman minuet, around the base of the tree. It was only in the last quarter of her circuit that she saw, carved in the trunk, the passing of time causing the names, to be absorbed by the growth of the tree. Rather than being erased, the two pairs of initials had become part of the trunk and so, a part of the living tree.

 

*

Share

RePrint Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

 

Like a Sunday evening book report, this is the Monday RePrint post… ‘written’ at 10:15 on the previous evening.

(Full Disclosure: Well, this is ‘accurate’ if you count Saturday as a pre-Sunday.  But we did write this intro section on an actual Sunday.)

It’s been said the Wakefield Doctrine is the best pleasure augmentation since (fill in the blank with your own funny: product/event/beverage/ointment/religion/political theory) … ok, since sugar on Raisen Bran*. And it is! The  first video in the reprint was no longer an active link. We somehow figured out what the classical piece was and found another version. The filmography is outstanding and we were mesmerized by the opportunity to study the members of the orchestra as they performed. ok… not earth-shattering. But if you’re one of those who enjoys people-watching and you have the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine, this music vid is an excellent practice. You know, trying to determine the predominant worldview of the musicians?

From July 11, 2010 (that’s 28 years in the past!) (yow!)

Yeah, it is Sunday again.  And no, there is no rule that we have to get all weird (alright, weirder) on Sunday Posts.  But the Doctrine allows for virtually anything, as long as there is something (in the Post) that advances the understanding of the Wakefield Doctrine.
The Wakefield Doctrine Lesson of the Day:  talking yesterday to a person who has recently encountered this blog.  She expressed some concern about knowing for certain which of the three (clarks, scotts or rogers) she was, which is appearing to be a rather common experience among new Readers and as such is important to us here at the Doctrine.  We want everyone to immediately get the Wakefield Doctrine and then conribute to the blog through Comments.  As to the un-comfortable part,  I suspect there is an element to the writing “style” of these Posts that imparts some kind of “you better get this right” vibe to the First Time Reader.  Damn.

Hey Readers, yo. (No you’re wrong, I am totally entitled to affecting any (writing) style, slang, patois, pidgin, dialect or any other form of projectile cool (including a delusional perception of sounding cool, inevitably limited to my own imagination) if I want to cause I am the one writing this Post and who is anyone else to say that I am not in fact a dreadlocks-sportin, surfboard-on-the-car drivin’, pants-worn-down-about-mid-thigh wearin’ scott or roger or, for that matter clark(except the part about the surfboard and pants and dreadlocks but otherwise, I’m there) Sorry, lost control of the parentheseses.  Besides, the job is open, anyone got a Post you want to write then step right up.  Let us know in the form of a Comment and we will be too damn happy to let you write one of these rascals.

Anyway, the important thing here is this:  the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and roger) proposes that all of us start life with the qualities ascribed to  three (‘personality’) types (clarks, scotts and rogers).  Further, at some relatively early point in life, we begin to experience the world mostly from the perspective of one (of these three).  At that point we can say we are a clark or a scott or a roger.  Having said that, we always retain the qualities/capabilities/capacities of the other two types; but except for you Readers, we all seem to forget that we have a rogerian side or a scottian aspect.
The reason you are reading this is that you have the intellectual flexibility to imagine that which is not. (Yes, I know what you clarks are thinking at this point, but let’s just keep that to ourselves for now, shall we?)
The short form (lol, as if) is this: you already know this shit.  The Doctrine is a productive, unique and fun way to look at the behavior of those around us and understand why the people in our lives act the way that they do.  Pretty simple, isn’t it?

So, New Reader…relax take a deep breath (not too loudly, scott) (not too dramatically, roger) (breath! clark, breath!).  There is no rush.  Since you are already all three, deciding for yourself which of the three you are predominately will take care of itself.
The most frequent experience of new Readers is to say, “Yeah, I get the theory, but sometimes I am like  one type and at other times one of the other two. Almost as if I am all three”.
To which we say, “Very good!  Many of us feel that way when we start, then we frickin read what is written about being all three and it being predominately one of the three and we get over it!”  Jeez…come on, people I know you have an extra capacity to understand new shit or you wouldn’t still be reading this, you would have long since moved on to crocheting-with-emily.com or wrench-and-sports.com.  Relax, trust your instincts and get over it.  Have fun! (clarks, see us after class and we can help you apply an overly long, convoluted, tail-eating definition with complete instructions on how-to have fun).

And write a Comment.  Win a hat (for your damn head).

You want pressure?  I give you pressure…watch the following music video and tell me (through a Comment) if the Conductor is a clark or a scott or a roger…(come on scotts, some of you must like classical music)…but the challenge is identifying the type.
Not easy, of course, but I don’t want anyone to feel that they should not submit an answer….there is a hat (for someone’s damn head in it) for the correct answer!

…put down your keyboards, your time is up…answers are in…remember what we say here at the Doctrine,  “there are no stupid questions, just your questions”

(Come on Readers, lighten up.  Take a chance, clark; don’t feel threatened, roger;  hey scott, you can do this)

 

* yeah, we agree, kinda lame, but …but!! when was the last time you had a bowl of Raisin Bran (with the top layer carefully soaked with milk) and, two brimming table spoons of Domino sugar, coating the top layer; one shiny crystal short of sinking the whole, now delicately dry, top layer?

Never let it be said the Wakefield Doctrine doesn’t commit to an allusion (or allegory or metaphor and synecdoche or whatever the cool term is, here:

Share