Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
Today’s reprint is pretty straight-forward (at least so it seemed, when I scanned it just now) and action oriented. So let’s get right do to it.
October 23, 2020
Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
At last! Friday! With all its pressure to make the cost of the weekdays feel worthwhile, and most of its promise to allow sufficient enjoyment to believe we are not all running on invisible hamster wheels.
New Readers (and not-so-new-Readers) Here is our challenge for the weekend:
- Find the clarks in your world and let them know that you know (but won’t tell anyone)
- Spot the scotts (there will be one among your immediate social circle and at least one just out there) Make them laugh at something/anything*
- Identify the rogers (to whoever said, ‘Like that’s gonna be tough, they make up 2/3s of the population‘, we retort: “Hold on, we’re not done with the assignment.”) Get within conversational range and compliment them, then leave before he/she can reciprocate.
Any questions?
Quick Guide to the three worldviews:
[Ed. Note: Yes, there is a correlation between the predominant worldviews of the Wakefield Doctrine and the three main characters in the Wizard of Oz. I mean, it’s as if the idea of a clark, scott and roger were, like, some kind of universal principles! lol If you’re trying to decide how to associate the three, remember, the Doctrine is about how a person relates themselves to the world around them.]
- clarks tend to dress in a way that doesn’t look quite right, but not in a negative way. There is always something creative to the fashion/dress of a clark (in our North American culture, females enjoy a range of sartorial expression not normally enjoyed by their clarklike brethren, so why wouldn’t one make of the most of the metal and lace palette and employ a palette of color visible only to lifeforms more comfortable in the fluorescent end of the spectrum). When you spot a clark, make no sudden moves or otherwise draw attention to them, or they’ll blend into the woodwork faster than a chameleon on amphetamines in a pile of saw dust. Best way to let them know you know: listen for the jokes they mutter, the two of you will be the only ones laughing.
- scotts ….well, scotts they’re there, thing is, its best (for the purposes of this assignment) that you spot them first**. In fact, the challenge in this….err challenge is to spot the scott before they spot you… good luck.
- rogers… ok, don’t have to look too hard… well-dressed, (by local conventional standards), friendly and at the center of a moving spiral of people (if there are enough people) Warning: if you are a clark, do not attempt the challenge if your target Roger is not alone or has less than four people around them….
* extra points for it being a scottian female
** there is zero question that, once you’ve entered into their environment, (social, physical, sexual…pretty much all the ‘als’ other than spiritual, lol), they will notice you and interact with you if, for no other reason than to establish ranking***
*** total, defining dynamic in the world of the Predator
*
Don’t forget! The Doctrine is not an Answer… it’s a perspective.. use it wisely
It’s all about how we relate ourselfs to the world around us and the people who make it up.
Fun post! Did I just say Fun?! Yes, yes I did. For the experiment IS fun. Operative word on this ‘nother Monday.
What can I say except it is all true. And…it can be a lot of fun(there’s that word again!). Interacting with those other 2, who don’t share in your personal reality. Can be a challenge but who’s not up for that at the beginning of a new week, lol….challenge accepted
🤔I’ll get back to you…
lol
( I try to always ask first)… do you mind if I use this comment as the starting point of a Doctrine post?
Not only do some of us dress just a bit, shall we say, off, the older we get, the less we apologize for it.
some benefit (of) the maturing process, no?