Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
Step .5 (Practise Exercise 1 the girl above is: a) a clark 2) a scott 3) a roger
Step .75 identify the celebrity:
I do realize that the first ‘Practice Exercise’ was a gimme… but time for the real Test!
Here you have 8 celebrities. Don’t be afraid of the idea that, ‘well they are actors or performers or singers, I can’t know the ‘real person’. The fact is you can…and probably do know. Remember Rule 33 ‘everyone does everything at one time or another‘ which means: if you are at the beach and someone gets in trouble in the water, riptide or something, then how you perceive, react and act to that situation will be different if you are a clark or a scott or a roger. And so with actors and performers, they have roles to play, maybe wildly different roles at different times, but they still perceive the role or the song or the interview from the perspective of: the Outsider (clarks), the Predator (the scotts) or the Herd Member (the roger). So go ahead! take a look at these guys and tell us how you think that each ‘relates themselves to the world around them‘.
(And totally don’t forget, you learn from trying each of the three worldviews and see which seems to fit the best… and, and! tell why you think they are the one you pick. We all learn from each other.)
( hey! an old song, but a good one )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWnBD6n9j74
(You do know that this is an ‘Open Book’ Test, right? it is recommended that you look for interviews as a method of inferring worldview and such. Good Luck)
OK!!! last 15 minutes!!! …here’s a little in the way of guidance-by-example Ben Affleck…. looking a touch judgmental? Robert Downey and Brad… watch the eyes…speaking of eyes Ellen, Ellen, Ellen those are camera lights not headlights!
* the sideboob thing? go ask Considerer or Jak or Dyanne**
** yeah, I thought that too!
Hey Facebook! the hell with you and your maximizing investor returns by enhancing ad revenue… Jen shouldn’t have to start a new damn FB page
About clarkscottroger
I am going to say that all of the above are Clarks, but that is just me and sure I am probably wrong!! Happy Monday Clark and got to love those sideboobs, lol!! :)
@Janine
…now Janine! don’t encourage them…lol
@Janine
thank you, Janine for getting the ball rolling. the clarks will tend to hold back until they have sufficient ‘cover’ if it weren’t for rogerian females in high school, I would never have had to square dance (lol… sorry old trauma, ameliorated by a rogerian sophomore who didn’t seem to care who was left in the bleachers)
I’m not telling! LOL!
@Michelle
Now Michelle, if I recall our Brunch… you (and Lizzi) bear some responsiblity here lol (hope I have most of the celebs we discussed) I agree…lets let everyone have the fun of trying to figure ’em out
Michelle
too late… thanks for the prompting to get us into the late 1900s and early 21st C with the celebs
The pic of the girl at the start of the post made me think of this other girl….such a clark lol
We’ll see if vid posts!
body language anyone?
ya think? LOL
And yet, Miyagi-san your OWN Golden Sideboob award remains undisplayed? Time to dig deep, friend, and break that characteristic which let me peg you as unlikely to display…
@Considerer
lol what a thing we have here at the Wakefield Doctrine! hold that thought/challenge/impudent student (at work, will be near a computer soon!*)
* yes! I realize that lol
There’s a good clark*
*taking impudence to extremes**
**careth not.
@Considerer
lol un-derserving is the teacher who does not learn from the student!*
* a bit much?**
** damn it! where is that rogerian aspect when you really need it?***
*** well, seeing as I gots only 2 aspects it’s a toss-up between the rogerian and the scottian and we all know what happens when you mention boobies anywhere near a scott! lol
Bwahahahahahahhaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Hey! Your site remembered me! Sweet! I guess I should have told it off sooner. :)
I can’t even believe it, but I agree. The first one looked like a clark to me. I guess some of this is actually getting absorbed by my brain. Of course, I haven’t begun the celebs yet…
@Christine
too late now! …once you have enough of the Doctrine in your head to recognize them from a photo you will start to see them in your world. I suspect (for scotts) the first one to spot are the clarks, then other scotts (which, by definition you do recognize… like the leopard passing the lion and her cubs in some wildlife animal preserve, not anything as simple as respect (that is inherent in it) more seeing another of your kind, knowing that there is no need to prove anything (unless, of course your pack needs something that the other one has…lol)
just as an audio visual aid:
Hey Christine! You know the single most obvious clue. Correcto mundo! The boots.
cliff notes for spotting clarklike females think…feet and head. the head being the trickier of the 2.
The celebs will be fun. Because of the interviews! Look at body language, where the eyes go or not, use of pronouns, and….
What say when everyone weighs in on what Brad et als’ predominant worldviews are let’s head over to that bar (let’s make it a club, yeah, cool, cool night club) I was hearing about last week. I’m feeling a need for updating my cocktail of choice 2013 style!!!
P.S. Anybody else leaning towards roger for Ms. Taylor Swift?
ok… for those of you who are a bit stumped by Taylor (as I am) here is an interview:
Considerer? if you would remind Readers about the best approach to determining worldview? ok. if Considerer were online, she probably would start by saying, ‘well get rid of one (of the three) right away and then compare the remaining’
…I don’t know about you, but I am not seeing a sign of Outsider anywhere in any of the interviews that I have watched (including the above)….so that leaves
Total roger. She’s far too….mousy to be a scott. And she fell RIGHT ON THE FLOOR when pranked by Ellen. And then LAID THERE! A scott woulda been up and fightin’!
But it’s interesting, because in the pic you have of Ellen, I don’t see the distance. Not so much.
I see three scotts, two clarks (and one I thought was a clark) and two, maybe three rogers.