the Wakefield Doctrine

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and roger)

(Allow me to indulge in a bit of egocentrism and simply say, “damn! the number of interesting, exceptional and overall cool bunch of people I get to meet writing this here blog here…very excellent job” This is nothing new to the more habituated Readers, but the Wakefield Doctrine is with some sort of weird personality-darwinism vibe, has the result of the people who manage to beat their way through the convoluted prose that oft grace these pages and understand what the Doctrine is and then,  and then step up and actually write to us. Yow! Be they clarks (well mostly) or scotts (we can see your eyes in the underbrush) or rogers  (like that Steve fella…) all the people we have met here have contributed to this thing in ways that we probably don’t yet fully appreciate. But, speaking on behalf of the Wakefield Doctrine, “glad y’all could make it!”

Which brings us to our newest DocTee-wearing-lifeform. From a land that seems to have more than it’s fair share of clarks, Jenny is a part of the ‘New Generation’ here at the Doctrine; this is the group of people who learned about the Wakefield Doctrine solely from the blog. People such as Molly, Claire, Nell Rose, Jasmine, Steve. We all know that to ‘get’ the Wakefield Doctrine takes a person with something we refer to as ‘flexible intelligence’ which is to say more intelligent than average but with the capacity to decide on the rules (for applying this intelligence) a quality not as common as you would think! Jenny is joining a great group*.

Let’s all say “ello, Jenny” to our newest Wakefield Doctrine-TeeDoc-wearing Friend of the Doctrine!

We first met Jenny back in June of this year when she stealthed-up on us  with a combined  Comment/test scenario ( “Essay Questions… “), with little fanfare, as gentle an exegesis as one might hope for, she be saying :

“Right, here we go then! I’m a Clark, definitely without question, so I sometimes may overthink things! I’m open to suggestions… “

As you can see from the follow-up Comments from the others, Jenny totally fit right in ( yeah, a clark…fitting in… go figure ). We are looking forward to watching the influence and input from Jenny as we continue our efforts to put the Wakefield Doctrine in a form that anyone can read, enjoy, understand and use! (Jenny also convinced me to sign up for ‘the Skype’ so there may be a transcontinental element to our Drives… or radio show! Looking forward to our exo-American delegation taking the Doctrine to the Old World.)

welcome, Jenny

* not to leave out those others…the skilled in ways that allow the appearance of casual un-informedness, only to find yourself backed into an intellectual corner…like a mouse being stalked by a cat with a secret Phd that would be DS#1 and Ms. AKH and of course, the progenitor roger

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

(DownSpring) Molly said something on last Saturday Night’s Drive that has stuck with me this far into the week. The conversation had found itself, somehow, on the topic of the Wakefield Doctrine book Project, and when I started to give an update of the progress I have made, I found myself hesitating. This reluctance immediately became the focus of the conversation. I offered that my hesitation was an expression of clarklike modesty, but that did not quite ring true. I offered that it is a quality of the clarklike worldview to avoid the appearance of willful self-promotion or self-aggrandization, saying that I find myself uncomfortable with the topic. Molly offered that clarks will, as a rule, avoid making pronouncements of goals and/ambitions (primarily) to avoid future disappointment. The scotts in the car could not, of course, identify with that attitude, but concurred with the observation of how it plays in the world of a clark.

(Yes, I know! you scotts and the rogers out there are saying,  “My god! where the hell is that phone number, I cannot miss calling in next Saturday night at 8 pm EDT”* )

How does this tie in with the Monkey’s Paw Effect? Once again, we must look to the Representative from the Large Square State in the Western US, and the context in this instance is ‘the Facebook’. Molly posted one of those ‘sayings things’… not sure what they call it over there, one puts up a photo or a saying or something and people stop and read it and comment on… (sort of like a blog, except there people actually do take the time to write a Comment). In any event, what she put up on ‘her Wall’ was the saying,  “Be careful what you wish for — you just might get it.”
Now this is a saying that totally resonates with clarks. My Comment (in return) included a reference to the famous story “The Monkey’s Paw” (W.W. Jacobs) but more with the emphasis on what is called the Monkey’s Paw Effect. Which, as we all know, is the result of the tendency of people to proclaim a desire for the seemingly un-attainable, without a proper consideration of the ultimate cost of satisfying their desire.

The Wakefield Doctrine  holds that all three personality types may suffer the consequences of (the) Monkey’s Paw Effect, but in markedly different ways, and as is often the case,  it is the context of one’s encountering the Monkey’s Paw Effect that is most telling. An unattainable yet irresistible desire:

• for a clark it might be something that would dispel the distance between themselves and the world, to become famous or rich or desirable
• for a scott it might be something that is pleasurable, enjoyable and would increase their ability to be alive and alert
• for a roger it might be something that will confirm the reality that exists for them, that there is an abstract good, a right way and it would bring all others into harmony

The Monkey’s Paw effect might then be that:

• a clark finds that by attaining what they desire, they have become the person for whom the desire holds little value
• a scott finds that to sustain the ‘joy of the hunt’ they must think of themselves as hunters/predators, which introduces the element of deliberation and self-awareness
• a roger confronts the fact that true homogeneity, though simple and desirable leaves no room for individual perspective, the essential element in appreciation

So there you have it! A simple story, a telling moral and three personality types.

Oh yeah!! Hold on, DownSpring roger is toying with the notion that getting Readers and Followers and Comments (from same) is a worthy goal for a blog writer… I know, I know!!  Hey everyone!! if we all clap our hands at the same time, maybe it will dispel this corrosive, self-destructive, funny-eating notion from his mind!  Lets all clap…   in any event go over to the Relentless Obsession and write him a Comment!

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and roger)

The Wakefield Doctrine’s Internet Radio Program Sign-up Sheet

Positions Open:

Producer

Marketing

Regional Reporter/Correspondents

North America:

• Western Zone (the larger, blockier shaped States)
• Middle Section ( those flat ones with straight highways and news footage of cows on roofs during flooding)
• “Michigan” (reserving one of the “you wanna see a really great lake?” States for Friend of the Doctrine Mel)
• Texas and down there ( …them states what know how a man’s supposed to live and such)
• Southeast (hey, anyone who wants to live there, deserves to be the one who reports from there)
• Northeast (why, I would imagine they are referring to the area where one might find Wakefield! how charming!)