Welcome!
Sunday Morning, and it is always an easy Post to write, cause it is (mostly) about last night’s Drive1
The Cast (in order of appearance):
downSpring glenn: as ‘the boisterous one’
Ms. AKH: as ‘the girl with the wild streak with an underlying sense of constraint’
Molly: as the one who is ‘constrained but with a hidden wild streak’
DS#1: as that woman you ask yourself, ‘how the hell does she know that stuff!’?
…and Jerry Mathers, as the Beaver
Today we present the First Installment in (what might become2) a new Feature at the Doctrine: ‘Things you will not see if you live in…”
Today’s Premiere Episode: Things you will not see if you live in: One of the Big Square States”
‘An un-identified fishing boat returning to the Port of Galilee in Narragansett RI, on a Saturday Night in February.’
Commercial Fishing and the Wakefield Doctrine? Funny you should ask! Lots of rogers and (an abnormally high) percentage of clarks…as for scotts? they are more likely found in a ‘sub-set’ of the fishing industry, i.e. lobstering mostly cause there is a more predator vibe to lobstering than there is in dragging.
1) Wakefield Doctrine Saturday Night Drive, of course….Hey AP! come on, girlie call us…it’s eee-zeee! yo
2) depending on Reader response! So come on, Readers, Respond!
About clarkscottroger
Note 1 I will think about – but not too much because I already have an answer.
Note 2 is a great idea! Is Ohio considered one of those square states? Hi Molly!! <3
lol, yes I think all of us geographically-challenged Progenitors and DownSprings will agree that Ohio is one of those square States*.
Unfortunately we have used up the one easy, “thing that you will not see if you Live in…” local feature, so we must now have to work at a) understanding the lifestyle of those living in square States and 2) find something in this locale that will never be seen in your square State place!
Hey, they don’t call this the Wakefield Doctrine for nothin! We’re all over that challenge!
(…er DownSprings. FOTDs? a little help here?) (lol)
* a square State that is “a little baby one, because they didn’t have enough land to create a big one”?
LOL….LOL …..”on the morrow in Pasedena”……
Yo! AP! “Note 1”? “Note 2?” Stop the babble and tell us your “answer”.
HA!!! Babble =)
OKay. Answers: I won’t call in on the phone because I am TOO shy. I know – hard to believe. Plus I am in bed for work at that time.
I love the idea of the “things you wont see if you live in…” series. I bet you could pick anything to do with the ocean/coast and it wont be seen if one lives in Ohio – we are buried between hillbillies!
AP…given that you are (getting) into the Commentation aspect of this here blog here, we will allow some degree of acclimating to the idea of the live call-in… (perhaps as a practice/warm-up)…you might consider doing an Video Friday Post! What an excellent idea!!
No hurry, no pressure, I ask Molly when she next happens by the Doctrine to give you a sense of how fun and exciting doing these (Video Friday Interviews can be).
But otherwise, the main thing that we hope to hear from people new around here is how they managed to understand the Wakefield Doctrine, which to be told has some parts that might be somewhat confusing… that sort of thing… so keep up the good work, Commentationaly-speaking, AP….
Funny you should mention hillbillies, I’m considering doing a ‘things you won’t see if you live in… Ohio’ for next Sunday
Fun is the first thing around here…taking over the world follows… (provided it is also fun*)
* You might want to look up the Post that explains the Right of Hat, (search Posts using: Treaty of Tordesillas) DS#1 is on the cover… it will explain a lot of the hats and the world domination and such.
See?! I knew you knew all about “babble”.
I believe you AP. Being shy is one of those clarklike characteristics….until, that is, we become comfortable with those around us and then….the adjective is no longer valid. “Comfort level” takes on unprecedented meaning for clarks.
‘Things you will not see if you live in…” Ohio sounds like a great place to start!
Unidentified? I THINK NOT! That is Gilligan and the Skipper, finally returning after the professor (a Roger) repaired the SS MINNOW!
Unfortunately, the Millionaire and his wife were forced to sign over there money in their will to the Skipper (who promised Gilligan and Mary Ann, who he was banging) for all their money or they would throw them overboard.
So, scared, they signed the document.
Bad move. Guess they’ve never seen The Soprano’s. The Skipper immediately gouged the Millionaire with a harpoon and threw him overboard, then ripped the earrings and ring off of Ms. Millionaire and pushed her over the boat. Gilligan hide behind Mary Ann and pleaded for the Skipper to cool down, he was willing to take 10% and stay quite. Mary Ann liked Gilligan because he didn’t insist on banging her (questions abound about ol’ Gilligan) and the Professor was needed to guide the boat, so that left the actress. The Skipper said she should satisfy him sexually or over the side she goes. She hasn’t seen the Soprano’s, either. After a rather quick BJ, the Skipper said “Gilligan – over the side with her” Gilligan said, “Why, oh why Skip” “Because, the Skipper said, she didn’t swallow.” So over she went. The Professor guided the ship into the RI harbor because he was VERY tired of wanking himself and needed some real action. The Skipper KNEW ol’ Professor was smart enough to not say anything and, like Gilligan, agree to just 10% of the Money.
Shortly after this video, the Skipper went to Maine to enjoy the finest lobster at a Restaurant called “Molly’s”. In a strange act of karma, the whore he was with slipped a mickey in his beer, they left, and her pimp ‘disposed’ of the Skipper, after the Skip flashed his wad (money this time) and Gilligan lived on the beach, in a little house, with 200 steps up to his front door, where he could smoke cannibis (until he got busted). Mary Ann got fat, and died of a heartattack. The Professor, who again, was a ROGER, started an aircraft mfg company and retired as a multi-millionaire. The moral being = most unidentified objects, upon investigation of real substance CAN and DO, in fact, IDENTIFY the unidentified and that ROGERS are superior. Thank you, the end.
Steve the Roger