Sunday Morning, personality types, the Wakefield Doctrine…in search of the perfect ‘Post Title’ | the Wakefield Doctrine Sunday Morning, personality types, the Wakefield Doctrine…in search of the perfect ‘Post Title’ | the Wakefield Doctrine

Sunday Morning, personality types, the Wakefield Doctrine…in search of the perfect ‘Post Title’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers )

Lets first satisfy the demands ( of some DownSprings)  that these Posts become more relevant and search engine friendly. They say,  ‘put the  keywords, like personality theory, self-development and Wakefield Doctrine in the first paragraph’. (Oh yeah and make that bold  if possible!) ..lifehack and life coaching, too! The validity of this advice, whether it is sound and/or worthwhile will have to be deferred to better minds, right now, this is a Sunday Morning Post, so lets just go along with their suggestions. Speaking of life hacking, did you know that the Wakefield Doctrine will soon be coming out with a book and a whole new site that offers services and advice to Readers? And that these services, all focused on self-improvement and self-development will be founded on the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine?  Well it’s true.

 

Now that we are out of the ‘first paragraph’, considered to be the ‘prime real estate’ from an seo-point-of-view, lets get to the interesting stuff.

Last night was Saturday Night and that meant there were people, Doctrines, German luxury cars, scotts and clarks on the air and in the car, all surrounded by Wakefield!  A very good time, ya shoulda been there. We had Ms. AKH and glenn in the car and Molly and DS#1 in the dashboard.
Topics discussed included:

  • new experimental writing (Molly),
  • watching tired old movies rented from the library and the permeability of timelines (DS#1),
  • the value of shouting and using words that will offend (and therefore attract Readers…) glenn ( great idea…dead horses belong underground, not paraded around like 65 year old rock stars trying to relive a past that is long gone),
  • the relative balance of energy in interactions with attention paid to the number of scotts to clarks ( AKH).

Your typical Saturday Night Drive.  Somewhere in the middle of the Drive, the question was posed to the group, “If you had the chance to change one thing about this Wakefield Doctrine blog, what would it be?”
Responses ranged from the predictable, “Say FUCK! …a lot! ( 3 guesses who that was, lol), to the useful,  “Reorganize the structure of the site itself and make it less confusing…. and paint it aqua!” ( Molly seconded by AKH )

Finally, in the last 20 minutes of the Drive, we discussed the differences between clarklike females and scottian females in situations involving  scottian males in the online environment. ( Hey, we said this was a fun Drive, didn’t we?) Actually this last discussion resulted in a provocative insight into the Doctrine and our understanding of the three personality types.  However, that is a topic that is best explored in another Post. Or!  …it can be explained by request!!  Anyone wishing to hear more about the stunning revelations about “How clarklike females are as powerful as scottian males in certain common social situations”  you need to write a Comment and we will provide you with the information. tre mercantile, non?

 

 

( God! Don’t you miss the 70s?  I mean  10…15 minute ‘solos’… whole album sides with one song. The only conclusion I find viable is that someone was messing with the rate of time-flow for most of the decade.  Seriously, nothing else makes sense… well yes, I suppose excessive drug use might be a reasonable inference.  You know how at live performances, the audience hoots and applauds when the band on stage plays one of their signature songs?  If you listen closely, the audience at the this concert are no different…they shout and applaud the song as soon as they recognize it…. 2:39  into the performance   lol)

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Downspring#1 says:

    Thank you Molly for saving last night’s drive for me:) Your parting contribution was somewhat serendipitous in that yesterday morning I was relaying to Clark an interchange I had with a customer on Friday in which he asked me “Where are you from?” I told him “originally from Rhode Island but moved here (to Florida) from Virginia (outside of D.C.). “I thought you were from somewhere else” he said. I laughed and said “Is that a good thing or a bad thing?” “A good thing” he replied with a smile. “You are reserved….you are always professional……”
    The parting nugget from last night’s Driveabout, about clarklike females and scottian males – your description of others’ perception of we clarklike females being “reserved”, very, very interesting. Until last night, I had not paid much attention to what you were describing as a particular dynmanic between scottian males and clarklike females…… hm……and validated on the spot by glenn, our own resident scottian male…..

  2. AKH says:

    I don’t think that clarklike females are necessarily or intentionally reserved. When I look back at working with and getting to know someone who is a clarklike female and is now a very good friend I didn’t think she was being reserved. Perhaps that’s why a lot of things didn’t make sense to me. Knowing now what I know about clarks I believe that when she would make a comment or we were just talking her moving on to something else was not intentional. As we know, clarks live in their own heads. So now it occurs to me that she was just moving on to something else that she was thinking about. I don’t even think she was aware of it coming accross as being reserved or even snobby. In fact, sometimes it came across to me as a way of showing that she was “smarter.” That anything I said she considered frivolous. But that was a long time ago and now I realize that she was just being a clark.

    So no, I don’t believe that clarklike females are intentionally reserved except when listening to a topic or coversation that they are perhaps uncomfortable with. But that’s a completely different ball of wax to expound upon here.