roger | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2 roger | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2

of clarks, scotts and rogers

With a basic understanding of the characteristics of each group (clarks, scotts and rogers), anyone can understand everyone else!  You will know how those around you will  act in virtually any situation. Finally you can understand what has never made sense to you about the people you work with, live with and/or are friends with. The answer to the question, ‘Why on earth would you do that/say that/feel that way?’

The Wakefield Doctrine is based on the premise that behavior is a response to perception. Within individuals, these behaviors tend to repeat themselves over time, resulting in a characteristic type of behavior, personality.

The Wakefield Doctrine proposes to describe personality on the basis of perception rather than the behavior that results (from perception).

The three characteristic ways to perceive the world are identified as: clarks, scotts and rogers. It is a given that we all start our lives with the potential/’tendancy to perceive’ the world as any of and all of these three. At some point we become predominantly one (over the other two).

We become clarks, scotts or rogers.

The goal of this Blog is to present the Wakefield Doctrine (aka the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) to the world in the hope that view of people and behavior represented by this idea will provide someone/somewhere  entertainment, education, enlightenment and the eventual modification of the world.

As will be immediately apparent, this blog is a collaborative effort and because of that (at least in part) the organization of the information is a bit, shall we say, casual? The posts are meant to be an introduction to the blog and the Wakefield Doctrine. The pages (listed above) are more specific to a topic, each of the three types of personality, an Overview and a couple of pages that are more of a blank canvas, intended to encourage contribution and participation of any and all readers.

So take a look. You might see a reflection in one of these pages. We welcome and invite comment, it will be appreciated as we continue to gather information and example, illustration and explanations, all with the intent of helping you, the reader, to see the clarks and the scotts and the rogers that are all around you.

And try to remember,as you read this blog, this is about tendencies, about being mostly one or another of the three types.

Share

aka clarks, scotts and rogers

With a basic understanding of the characteristics of each group (clarks, scotts and rogers), anyone can understand everyone else!  You will know how those around you will (tend) to act in virtually any situation. You will be able to make sense of what has never made sense to you about the people you work with, live with and/or are friends with.

So here we are, nearly a month into the project.

If you are reading this for the first time, welcome! This is (clearly) a work in progress, reading the preceding posts will help, as will the pages listed in the (right) sidebar.

The initial premise of this blog was to engage people of all three groups (clarks, scotts and rogers)  in contributing insight and knowledge to the understanding of the Wakefield Doctrine. But, as it is abundantly clear from this totally prolix and otherwise never ending sentence, it has been pretty much the clarks who have stepped up and put in the effort.

(Since it is key to theory of clarks, scotts and rogers that everyone has the qualities of all three groups, I am forced to try and address the scotts and rogers in a way that they can easily understand.)

HEY SCOTT(actually his downspring), CONTRIBUTE SOMETHING USEFUL TO THIS THING INSTEAD OF THE EASY YELLING IN CHURCH SHIT THAT WAS YOUR SOLE CONTRIBUTION.(LIGHT, DUDE, VERY LIGHT).

Oh, roger. You speak of having much to share with the vast herds of rogers that sweep across the prairie of the world, something that only a herd mind can hear. Share, roger share.

Share

how all people are either clarks, scotts or rogers

With a basic understanding of the characteristics of each group, anyone can understand everyone else!

If you found this blog and are still reading, you will come to understand that by the definitions contained herein, everyone is either a clark, scott or roger.

While the pages of this blog will go into extensive detail on the subject, lets  ‘cut to the chase’.

If you feel this all too familiar, just a another form of what you already know, then go to the clark page;

If you are (already) getting impatient, then get to the scott page.

If you are thinking that this would be better  if it had photos of famous people, or some other endorsement or reference, then go to the roger page.

 

 

Share