Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
You know, I’ve been so busy with ‘Almira‘ and, because of that and my odd belief in the limited daily supply of words, I haven’t been writing as many Doctrine Posts of late.
I think I forgot how much fun they can be, until tonight. (Yeah, 10 pm Tuesday, no less)
So I’m watching some last bit of TV before turning out the lights… ‘Back to the Future’ for the 17th time and a commercial comes on, naturally the sound is off, but still I watch, well…. here let me show you (for total effect you should mute it).
…I watch and then that last scene and I turn to Phyllis and say, ‘roger‘
I laugh and she smiles. (Una had already run off to bed). So, naturally Phyllis asks, ‘why?’ (do I think that the girl is a roger) and my answer is, “she has a look in her eyes, (starting at 0:23 to 0:25) that appears excessively determined and totally crazy. She”, (the character in the commercial). ” is acting like what she’s doing is important and valuable to anyone who might observe it. And more than, ‘important and valuable to them’, she knows that she’s giving a gift to the world.”
So, I thought, ‘hey I think I’ll write a Post’.
New(er) Readers: there’ve been periods of time, in the tenure of this blog, when I might write a Post every day and other times when I might go a week between. But at the base, the foundation of my enjoyment was to be inspired to write a Post by some seemingly random and/or inconsequential event or occurrence in my day. Always about the Wakefield Doctrine, of course, but only because I see the world through the perspective that is the Doctrine.
Fun! I’ll have to do this more. (If I don’t collapse in a corner from cool-words-depletion.)