Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
In the course of one of our Friday Night vid chats*, I mentioned that I thought a bloghop based on video Posts might be fun. As Readers know, I use video for maybe one Post every 10 days to 2 weeks, mostly as a way to give myself a day off from type-type, typing these here Post’s here. Well,… a lively discussion ensued. I recall (or choose to recall), that everyone thought it was a great idea, but there was a wide range of opinion as to how (a video Post) should be presented, in a video blog hop. We all agreed that they (the individual vid Posts of participating bloggers) would need to be short. All of us who have worked in this medium (lol “…look at the giant beret on Brad!”), have learned that attention span is more than fleeting and no one, among the participants, believed that anything more than 3 minutes wouldn’t be a waste of ‘film’.
In fact, most of the ‘fun’ of the discussion (of length) focused on how short the video should be… the primary advocates of very short vids, were, I believe Kristi and Starr. I got a sense of agreement with my position, ( i.e. ‘short is good, but long(er) is not bad’), from zoe and Tamara and Christine. Lizzi was reserving judgement as would any good co-host.
So here is my contribution to the First Annual Wakefield Doctrine bloghop, ‘the View idiotic’. Astute Readers and experienced blog-hoppers will notice that I don’t seem to have any mechanism for anyone (else) to participate in this ‘hop. Anyone with experience in such matters, who would care to make suggestion, I welcome any input. (I did try…sorta, the linky app that Lizzi uses, but got the impression it is designed exclusively for blogger blogs…could be wrong.)
The really important feedback is, ‘is there anything to this idea that is appealing enough to cause people to do a vid post and send it in?’
Doctrine Tip: we all live in one of three characteristic personal realities, aka worldview. And it is because we are in a reality that has a certain characteristic (that of the Outsider, the Predator or the Herd Member) from a very early age and have to develop coping strategies and ways of negotiating life that is geared to the characteristics (of the worldview we are in) that we have ‘personality types’ that we call being a clark or a scott or a roger. Here: if I grew up in the worldview of a Predator then I would most likely not be typing this Post… I would be out there eating/defecating/reproducing or… back here sleeping, simply because the challenges presented by the worldview of the Predator (a scott) required action, aggressiveness, minimal reflection on the subjective… scotts act! same for clarks and rogers we (the three personality types) represent the best effort to cope with the world that we find ourselves in… not perfect not inappropriate, just the best based on the conditions we face. ¿comprende?