the Wakefield Doctrine | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 9 the Wakefield Doctrine | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 9

-the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘a short-little Xmas post’ [a bonus Café Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is an early (by a day) Six Sentence Story.

Holiday post tomorrow am. Then this and perhaps another Six.

The tall, thin man sat behind the Office Supply Depot grey-metal desk, frothy Christmas music breaking against the office door, waves of cultural merriment relentless, but neutered.

The other Proprietors were in the public areas of the Six Sentence Café and Bistro, their voices, like tastefully-applied tinsel, effective as a group, yet each individually distinctive.

The voice of the Bartender moved lightly, easily determined if not constant location, in no small measure due to Tom‘s voice creating the slightest of reverb to her combination of hospitality and non-directive hostility

Chris‘s voice was a pool of quiet, rather evocative of her homeland, a life giving oasis in an otherwise predator-heavy environment; her laptop open on the small round table near the small stage, it’s display a wonder of multiple streams of stories, each independent yet linked in a way to include much more than a single narrative. Nearest the street-side door, now bedecked with a magic marker’d sign; Κλειστό για τα Χριστούγεννα Nick sat beneath a cumulus congestus bank of cigar smoke, smiling as Hūnga made his rounds, his species being the only true manifestation of the ubiquitous wandering figure of good will.

Mimi, sitting at the end of the long bar, turned her head ever-so-slightly towards the dark hallway and smiled, “Admission”.

*

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Doctrine’s season-appropriate contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. On this occasion of the 837th installment of the grat blog that no-less esteemed an virtual literary publication than “Bloggers On The Move” (1957 ed) said of the TToT: ‘Not only has the Founder (referred to as the Founderette for reason uncertain), this bloghop maintains an advisory board of hostinae (‘again with the spurious disregard for convention or Reason), that ranges in number from a high of Ten (10) and a low of six or five or something.

In any event on the evening of Summer, we offer our list of the people, places and things that have inspired, incited and otherwise not-leave-us-the-hell-alone state of grataciousness.

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Unicorn Challenge.  Pick of the Week:

5) the Six Sentence Story  Pick of the Week:

6) Hey! Summer is but days away! By the time you read this (and/or we actually complete and publish it) Summer arrives! *

7) * (new TT0T Readers/Participants: hey, we may lack something by way of logic and sensible narratives, but we’re very not new to the Grat Game. Hence the extra Grat Item to explain what you should already know: The essences of Summer is daylight. This weekend the days’ supply of said light begins to increase rather than decrease, (Certe hoc longe credibilius sonat1)

8) driveway markers in the ground this week.  good ole’ fashioned New England Winter juju

9) something, something

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

  1. And indeed we prefer to adhere to their opinion. (Hieronymus or some cool, but long-deceased guy in a bedsheet suit)

 

music

*

*

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [an Ian Devereaux Six]

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise it has but one rule: make it Six Sentences, binyons

Prompt word:

DIP

“Sidown.”

The two career-drinkers at the bar dividing the Bottom of the Sea’s Strip Club from it’s Lounge didn’t look up as I passed; opposite the bar a single row of booths ran down the street-side wall of  semi-opaque’d windows, tempting as it might be to think this was out of respect for the sensibilities of the stand-up folks walking by, all gainfully-employed, one would be wrong.

The owner, Lou Caesare’s office was the last booth on the right, to my left I could see through the shelving full of liquor bottles to the stage where a new stripper was giving a Kansas song, a markedly-odd musical selection, the ole college try; the result was visually more a fight between a meth-addled mime and first year jazz dance student over a liberal arts coed.

I paused, seeing the phone held to his right ear; I looked back towards the front entrance where Diane was now leading a billboard-famous personal injury attorney and his date, a girl who looked around the joint with all the confidence of a puppy at a drag-strip, to their table; hearing Lou say something into his phone that rhymed with ‘Motherfucker’, I remained standing as if it were the high point of my existence to simply be there.

You ever see a … not a tiger or crocodile, nobody sees those in person, lets make that a German Shepherd backed into a corner, not an excess of fangs showing, tail dipped low, no feinting motions, it’s the eyes that tell the story of violence without even the hint of negotiation, moderation or consideration of aftermath;

“You’re a standup guy, Devereaux, not a lot of the people in my… employ can lay claim to such status;” Lou leaned forward over the table between us while exhaling a cloud of grey-white cigar smoke and the story of the Flying Dutchman forced it’s way into my forebrain, luckily he continued, “The thing of it is, when you hold power in the world I exist in, there is never an end to people wanting to take you down, or at very least, try and get leverage on.”

“I’m telling you this because the job I asked you to do, watching out for Rosetta, is about to become a bit more interesting, so if you ain’t got the stomach for this life, I’ll understand,” this time he leaned back disappearing into the smoke, I couldn’t help thinking, ‘If the Buddha had a supply of Cubans, the Pope in Rome would be totally looking over his shoulder.’

 

 

 

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise it has but one rule: make it Six Sentences, binyons

Prompt word:

DIP

“Honey, wake up,” the man heard his wife’s voice as if from a distance, the part of his brain that controlled dreaming, the metaphorical oblongata stirred into action, words became a howling wind, a hand gently-shaking his shoulder now a boulder of tremendous proportion and the very familiar there-not-there-there soft mass of her breasts the inevitable avalanche of a glacier, with just a hint of suffocation.

“Wow,” the man turned towards the woman; her waves of sleep-conspired hair tumbling off his face, pooling on his shoulder, even as their years together made the nano-scraping of her eyelashes on his throat a simple, if not affectionate demand he provide an explanation.

“You remember how, last night, I said I had nothing worth publishing in the Sis Sentence Story weekly bloghop,” awake now, he avoided the punctuation common to interrogatives, the writer-who-would-be-a-character rushed onwards with what he hoped would be a soliloquy…

“Yes, you were all grumpy and didn’t want to stay up and said something about dreaming up a story,” his wife’s interruption had sufficient arch to convince him to let go of his resentment at the lost allegory or whatever the term in rhetoric might be.

“Well, I gotta say, I had a dark and restless night,” they each laughed to themselves, the better to propel the narrative, “and I had the most amazing lucid dream / fan-fiction mashup ever; I found myself in an episode of Community knowing I had to write my story so I ran around an elementary school screaming how I needed a pen and paper; Annie Edison (Alison Brie) was there and she offered me one, complete with that uber-cute head tilt thing, but every piece of paper she gave me had writing on both sides, I was starting to get a little crazy,” the man, trying to raise his hand to prevent a comment, found it was trapped somewhere between his wife’s breast and arm was resigned to having to go full-on stream-of-consciousness, “And the first and second graders were running around and laughing when Jeff Winger (Joel McHale) burst through these double-doors like to an auditorium or cafeteria, with an older-but-still-hot woman on one arm and pointing at me, said with a triumphant rise in volume, “We’ll see you there tonight and don’t forget to bring…” and I shouted, “a good dip!!”

The man, turning towards his wife, further tourniquet-ing the couple to each other so almost all he had available to ask the big question were his eyes, desperate for approval but willing to settle for permission.

Kinda meta,” the waterbed seemed to ebb an invisible inch of tide, “But I love the show so, I totally enjoyed your little story.”

 

 

Share

2sdae -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

As has been the case so often since this blog saw the 6500k light of its first virtual day, we have a Comment to prompt today’s Wakefield Doctrine post.

Damn! Sorry. Fell into visual mode there for a second. Kinda like the deep inhalations as one is pulled down under the waves, seeing how we’re about to go into beta reader mode. Agree to do this for a friend, ceayr from the Unicorn Challenge bloghop. He has asked me to accept the onus* of reading his current WIP. He’s quite the writer, his site (behind the link) has links to his published works. Check ’em out. (And don’t forget to tell ’em the Doctrine sent ya.)

So, Mimi commented yesterday:

That could be fun. I know a few of them, it would certainly behoove me to identify a few more.

This was in response to yesterday’s Doctrine post. We replied:

it is…fun and the thing is the more you spot, the better at spotting them you become (‘better’ means quicker and/or with subtler cues)
in fact, the coolest thing about the beginning of the blog, when we first came into contact with clarks that were not exposed to years of hearing me talk about the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers, a most wonderful thing happened: with the basics provided (fairly primitively presented) clarks not only were able to identify people by their predominant worldview but immediately began to extrapolate on the principles which expanded our ‘vocabulary’ of the three personality types.

New Readers! Don’t worry about identifying a person’s predominant worldview right this moment, at the end of your metaphorical first semester. We related the story of the early years of the blog to make the point that, with sufficient reading of these pages, one becomes capable of seeing identifiers (of a person’s predominant worldview) that may not be listed here in these pages. The fun is in applying the three perspectives (how a person relates themselves to the world around them and the people who make it up) and discovering which is the ‘clearest’ lens on the person’s experience.  And….and! quick Note: we’ve mentioned two ‘people’ here in today’s post. One of the first rules of the Wakefield Doctrine is that no one has authority to designate another’s predominant worldview. At least not with the expectation of it having any ‘force’. It is for the individual to determine. This is not to say we don’t have fun with ‘guess the worldview’ of people, usually prominent and/or famous folks. And even in this situation, the ‘hey, they are surely a...’ is meant for educational purposes (seeing how you better have some evidence to back up your claim and for entertainment purposes, i,e, Joe Pesci’s Nicky Santoro in Casino (the bar scene).

Damn! We’re out of time.

Don’t forget! The Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them.

 

* onus Deliberately using this word rather than, “Hey! I got a favor to ask,” or, “You’re a good writer, do a brother a solid and beta this bad-boy?” because we are a clark. No, not because it’s a slightly unusual choice (well, ok, a little because) of words. We used it because it offers an opportunity for insight into the world of the Outsider (clarks). As a people we take three things way, way…fricken way too seriously**: 1) responsibility (of the personal, i.e. person-to-person variety) and B) the opinion of others, specifically of us. Now we gots to get back to the post (already in progress).

** how about, instead of ‘seriously’, we type ‘to heart’ Now there’s a damn post waiting to be written! lol

Share