Psychology | the Wakefield Doctrine

(a ‘Pre’ Six Sentence Story) -the Wakefield Doctrine-

May 1, 2023 By clarkscottroger

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

So, having such a jones for virtual locations (the Six Sentence Café and Bistro and the Bottom of the Sea Strip Club and Lounge) and serial stories, we couldn’t resist Tom’s comment on last week’s Six Sentence Story. If you’ve ever gone over to his site, The Mansionic Perspective, Tom has this gift for characters, original plot and names (of characters). Don’t laugh! If you’re thinking, ‘What?! Names are just names!’ you clearly haven’t spent much time creating original characters. You should. He has.

Anyway, so last week at the Six Sentence Story, I mentioned a new dancer at Lou’s club (the aforementioned ‘Bottom of the Sea…’) by the name of Rue DeNite. Here’s that Six. Go down through the Comments and you can read our exchange in the Comments. That will provide the backstory of the following story.

Long Story Short: Tom wrote this Post.

I wrote the Post below.

(Hey! Vote ‘Hell yeah! and you may have further adventures to read in future Sixes and such)

‘Shit!’

A familiar sound-that-wasn’t-really-sound, followed by the sound of breaking plate-glass demanded Rue DeNite’s attention like a live codfish on the altar of a Catholic High Mass.

A quick glance at the table opposite the bank of security monitors added a slightly twisted, totally evil grin, the perfect accessory to one of her favorite dance outfits. Pausing at the vinyl-tufted door, Rue heard the sound of her mother’s voice, ‘You’ll always look taller if you pay attention to your posture. All the better to make the most of the one gift that God gave you: Surprise and Innocent eyes.’

The transformation of fear into desire, as familiar and trusted friend as any, prior to meeting Lou Ceasare, the dancer stepped into The Filigree Room of the Casino-on-Brickell-Street.

~~~~~

“Well, just for the sake of argument,” watching for the expected tell from her co-conspirator-to-be, Rue stepped down out of her white heels and, hooking both the index and middle finger of her left hand, extended them to the costumed man. A slight hitch in her upper chest masked by her bustier was the only hint at her urge to smile as he stepped closer. He squared his shoulders as she turned and walked to the chrome-on-mirror bar, his reflection absorbing something that looked like pleasurable guilt.

“Suppose you do tie me up,” adding an adjustment to her fishnet stockings, the stripper/PhD candidate, watched the pupils of the Apostrophe’s eyes flare like a black hole encountering a gas nebula. Repressing the ache of disappoint at the willingness of a man she once considered a potential friend, to betray her, Rue decided to double-cross herself.

Blinking with practiced naiveté, Rue DeNite pushed a Manhattan across the bar, the doubling of image immune to the irony and smiled, “Here’s to duplicity.”

Filed Under: Featured, Psychology, the Wakefield Doctrine Tagged With: Six Sentence Story, the Wakefield Doctrine

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

April 30, 2023 By clarkscottroger

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s weakly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. Created by Lizzi R. one breezy April day in a thatched-roof cottage in the village of Parsley-and-Sage; in the county of Cottage-Cheese, UK, few were surprised at how quickly it grew.

Following is the Doctrine’s Grat List:

1) Una

2) Phyllis

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) the Zombie Christmas Project: Chapter Sith (things are not looking well for our sacrificial fir).

5) the Six Sentence Story bloghop

6) agent rejection letter that was awfully well-written. on a whim, I sent a query letter for ‘Almira’ to an agent. (In part because his name was Farley. lol)

Dear Clark –

Many thanks for writing. You have an interesting story to tell and there’s a lot to like about your approach. But in the end I’m afraid I didn’t come away quite fully convinced this was something I think I’d be able to represent successfully. I’m sorry not to be more enthusiastic but thanks nonetheless for giving me a chance to review it and best of luck in finding it the right home.

Best,
Farley

Chase Literary Agency

7) Hypograt: Don’t get us wrong! The above is not anywhere near as fun to have read as: ‘Send full manuscript’. That being said, gratistically-speaking it does remind us of that famous story of the explorers and the tribe.

8) something, something

9) Una’s garden:

10) Secret Rule 1.3 …from the Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules).

music vids

Filed Under: Featured, Psychology, the Wakefield Doctrine Tagged With: clarkscottroger, personality types, the Wakefield Doctrine, three personality types

FoeToe Phridae -the Wakefield Doctrine-

April 29, 2023 By clarkscottroger

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

The proper, as defined as the creators, Jenne and CE, name of this bloghop is ‘the Unicorn Challenge?

Instructions are simplest: here’s a photo, what’s the story? TAT meets the Virtual Age (not to be confused with the Age of Virtue). Hey, look at it this way: you know that game of Limbo? This is exactly like that, ‘cept instead of a length of sugar cane, ya gots your inner editor, the lower you go, the greater the approbation (and the higher the unintended exposure.)

Two Hundred fifty word limit. In case of excessive psycho-biographical exposure, We trust Jenne and ceayr will distract the Readers with something akin to ‘Hey!! Look out the window, is that a unicorn?!?!?

Prompt photo:

The Sachem stood before the tribe and spoke, “As our ancestors remind us: when the seasons change the Wampanoag people move from the coastline into the forest where winter is lived until the sun returns and we gather again at the ocean.”

“We teach our children that as we harvest the fields; fish the rivers and hunt the animals of the forest, all are part of the world the Great Spirit gave us. We are as much guests as the creatures of the fields and land, forest and ocean that provide us with food and clothing.”

Around the central campfire, the young men nodded and sought the eyes of the bolder of the girls and the adults nodded in agreement,

“We are the keepers of this world and must share all the gifts we have been given.”

The sachem gestured, palm open in acceptance of the visitor floating in the bay.

“There,” the Captain of the heavily-mortgaged cargo ship, standing at the railing of the upper deck, extended his arm towards the broad fields rising from a sand-washed shore. The clot of men, women and draft animals, huddled on the main deck, followed the glint of their leader’s gauntlet with exhausted eyes.

“There is the reward for your faith in God and the Plymouth Company.”

The refugees crowded the railing, jostling aside the few sheep and cattle,

“The Old Testament’s promise in Genesis 1:26-28 made real. Take dominion over all and create a new life in a New world.”

Filed Under: Featured, Psychology, the Wakefield Doctrine Tagged With: the Wakefield Doctrine

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine- [an Ian Devereaux Six]

April 27, 2023 By clarkscottroger

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise, ruled by a single… rule? To use the prompt word and keep it to six sentences in length.

To get you back into the story, here’s where we left off : Previously on…

This week’s prompt word:

CONSEQUENCES

Walking away from the last booth on the right, I left Lou growling into a burner phone, “If you’re done with the bullshit excuses, I’m gonna tell you once, not twice, once, what you’re gonna do…”

Stopping at the hostess station just inside the entrance, I decided to watch Diane Tierney do what she was exceptionally good at, i.e. managing customers, specifically, a table of loud and somewhat rowdy Shriners engaged in the age-old contest of ‘who can get the dancer’s attention’; the clear front runner: an overweight hardware store owner twirling the tassel of his fez in perfect sync with those worn by the dancer on stage, Rue DeNite.

Diane, bending slightly from the waist, the better to dominate the seated men, smiled as she spoke to the group and their response was, of course, that of boys locked in the grip of Stage 2 pubescence, daring each other to risk the consequences of defiance; sixth grade boys on bicycles in front of a schoolyard full of eighth grade girls were to Michael Rennie accepting an Oscar as the over-stimulated businessmen were to the hostess of the Bottom of the Sea Strip Club and Lounge.

Backing away from the now docile conventioneers, Diane turned only a second before colliding with me. For a high-school-moment we stood face-to-face; the pupils of her eyes, already a deep blue, became bottomless; her arms softened from rigid defensiveness, hands rising into suggestive, yet not totally committed welcome and her shoulders moved back and slightly downward.

I resigned myself to living on as much oxygen currently in my lungs for as long as necessary.

Filed Under: Featured, Psychology, the Wakefield Doctrine Tagged With: Six Sentence Story, the Wakefield Doctrine

Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

April 25, 2023 By clarkscottroger

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

…we were referencing the concept of secondary and tertiary aspects (in the Wakefield Doctrine).

Early on in this blog, the effects of ‘the other two’ aspects provided a proper answer to those who would ask, “Most of the time my son-in-law behaves in manner very much that conforming to the personality type of a clark. But then, not often, but frequently enough, he gets all sentimental and… well, like one of those rogers. You know, very social, quite analytical. So which is he?”

So the thing about secondary and tertiary aspects: we have the potential, but unlike that fact that we grow up and develop our social strategies and style of interacting with the world, a significant secondary (or tertiary) aspect is not inevitable. Especially to a noticeable level, evident in the person’s behavior.

There are some people who manifest their predominant worldview with no sign of a secondary or tertiary. Poster-people for the three predominant worldviews.

The thing about secondary aspect, (especially), is that they (the behavior, attitude, traits and social style that are a person’s response to a given personal reality, i.e. the Outsider(clarks), the Predator(scotts) or the Herd Member(rogers)) tend to manifest only at time of duress. In a bad spot, nothing the person does helps, emergency behavior. Just a flash of behavior that is in contrast to the person on a day-to-day basis.

There is also the case of a significant secondary aspect that is aroused by something within the person’s life that is of standout value. I am an example of that.

Running out of time.

here, read this:

Hey! wait! wait a minute!!

the second topic should be, ‘Fine!! I get there’s a secondary and tertiary aspect. But, by definition (and future RePrint post) the ‘other two’ may be difficult to distinguish from each other. How do we do that?”

“Enough of the theory!” the Wakefield Doctrine “…the real world, tell how it does us any good in the real world, holmes”

November 20, 2013

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Alert Reader Denise writes:

“…Doctrine! It has provided me with much insight into rogers. In a nutshell: they will always be the ones to say no. They will do nothing to disturb the boundaries, the lines that frame their world. clarksneed to take notice of this. The sooner the better. I leave it in your hands, Clark, to explain to new readership the why. Maybe you need to write the answer in the form of a post.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And since we are talking about rogers**

Our Friend Zoe says to us in a Comment, she says:

“… my new roger is settling in to his new environment a bit too well… coveting my office…I loan my office out readily without reservation, but he made it very clear by saying ” I want that office… when are you leaving?” and has left telltale signs of his usage… I may have a rogerian twist and be a clark at heart… but never piss off my scott.“

Sorry. The ‘damage’ is done.

Not to ‘baby-coat’¹ our assessment, but you are witnessing a roger challenging your membership in the herd. How is that possible, you ask? The frickin guy got there 20 minutes ago and he thinks that he can include himself in the group? ( you say with not a little emotion). What gives him the right to try that? If you are in possession of any of these thoughts, I hate to tell ya, but you have just painted yourself a lovely shade of blue². It is totally ‘too late’.

Not ‘too late’ to make things right, restore the proper balance, achieve an understanding among the players in this little drama…. just ‘too late’ to avoid a ‘conflict’ with the roger in your environment.

If he had perceived you as another roger or a scott he would have:

presented his credentials, not to meet your approval but to allow him to ‘tune himself to the herd’ (you know how the sound of cattle and herds of cows are often presented as a single ‘MOO’ ? well, I think our Progenitor roger will attest to the fact that what is heard as a single MOO is, in fact, comprised as a harmony among the members… your roger probably started with presenting some of his history to everyone he came into contact with…to hear the pitch of his new herd)

presented his ‘soft-underbelly’ if he thought you were a scott (at least, a predominant scottian female)… but this observation is moot, because in that particular tango, the woman leads… (at least initially and to the extent that the average person is able to see

So… now you have yourself a roger feeling like he can enhance his standing in the herd by making you appear more and more the Outsider. Remember, a dominance move by a roger, in contrast to that of a scott is never made ‘alone’. While he may appear to be addressing the matter of use of the office space to you directly, most of his efforts are actually directed to the others in your environment. rogers always work in the context of the group, the herd. It is this ‘contexting’ that rogers will base their strategy on, that and, be on the lookout for (him) invoking referential authority. ( Hey, I know you love your space..I respect that, but we were talking about how, with the practice growing we all need to work together more…”)

All kidding aside. you now have a problem that, interestingly enough, can be seen as a manifestation of the trap that would appear to an inherent aspect of the desire for self-improving oneself. You rightly know that you can ‘over-come’ this person’s attempt to reduce the quality of your personal work environment. But at what price? The Doctrine states that we all retain access to those two worldviews that are not our predominant worldview. In your case, (we hear you say), ‘ a clark with secondary rogerian and tertiary scottian aspects’. but…. but! here is where the conflict begins to manifest. (If) you are a clark, then your personal reality is that of the Outsider…which makes perfect sense given your situation. You can access your scottian aspect and inter-act with this roger as would a scott, and as we have already said, if this were a scott-on-roger thing, none of the the above would be happening. So, you can dominate the roger rather decidedly. But then what? Will you trade your predominant (clarklike) worldview for a victory in a single circumstance? Or… is there a way to reach an understanding with this person? unfortunately, the Wakefield Doctrine says ‘no’.

Well, sorta. We’re playing with the words now. clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel. So, if you want to reach an understanding, you are out of luck. That is not to say that there is nothing you can do, but it should not be thought of as an understanding.

Lets return to a strategy we have previously offered: ‘love your roger‘ This is still the preferred strategy, but it will require a bit more….finessing. Yes, you should ‘love your roger‘, but that does not mean (as is all too often the case with clarks), you must allow him to do as he wishes. But, to love your roger requires that you relate to him on an emotional basis… more than that! you must regard him on an emotional basis. We’re using italics here to convey the idea that, if you are able to know him completely on an emotional basis you will be relating to him as a member of the herd. That’s right! trade that lovely azure coat for a comforting wrap of brown and white spots!

(will continue later today…. )

Wait a minute!! If you haven’t seen it yet, watch the scott and roger…. everything is right there. (the roger looking to left and right for the herd that is his context, his invoking referential authority, his offering of emotional currency…his love).

1) a rogerian expression of sorts… a fascinating characteristic use of language found only in rogers…here, go to the page on rogers down towards the bottom

2) a reference to the description of a clark in the context of a group, or perhaps it would be more realistic to say, ‘a clark in contrast to a group’ in any event, the term ‘blue monkey’ is a remnant of grad school days when we learned of (or came to believe that we learned of) an experiment in which one young monkey was painted (more likely dyed) blue and returned to his troop, you can imagine the result. In the Wakefield Doctrine we use the blue monkey image several ways, as a symbol of the innate outsider-ness that clarks exhibit when in a social setting, and it is also used to refer to (a) clarks self-sabotaging by make an extra effort to ‘contrast their differences.