Featured | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2 Featured | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 2

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Wakefield Doctrine’s weekly contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful. (TToT) bloghop. Each week, Readers, writers and bloggers visit and contribute to this exercise in the cultivation of the state of gratitude.

Following is a list of Ten people, places and things that have inspired, sparked and/or hit-me-in-the-face-with-a-dead carp creating a moment of gratitude. Not bad, given our starting point/baseline vis-à-vis seeing the world in a healthy, productive way.

 

1) Phyllis

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) Hey! New Hostinae has joined this band of mutants! Reelika Pedak. No! It’s true! Voluntarily and everthang. All kidding aside, we’re very grate…. what?!?! cha…ching! See Grat #7

5) the Six Sentence Story bloghop

6) Photo at the top of the post: been a quick Autumn… most leaves down. There is surely an old Swamp Yankee muttering about how this Winter will be snowy…way more’n last year.

7) The thing of it is, given how much time we’ve spent in the Grat Space. It’d be a surprise if we hadn’t learned a trick or two in creating lists (of Grats) and such. So, yeah seeing the company of talented writers and bloggers grow here at the bloghop that Lizzi created is so a grat!

8) something, something

9) oh yeah! forgot to chronicle the end of the summer landscaping at Phyllis’ cottage. (Before photos? Never remember those). But here’s your After photation:

10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

music

*

*

*

*

 

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Frisae -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Let’s wrap of a rather productive week of Doctrine posts with some old-school provocative statements, assertions and ‘wth-are-they-talking-about?’

the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them

essential concept 1: clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel

essential concept 2: the Wakefield Doctrine is gender, culture and age neutral

when it comes to couples (we had a long, engaging set-up for this assertion, but it’s Friday (creative post-title spelling notwithstanding): the Wakefield Doctrine is not intended for use as a mirror-shaped club

you can’t get the Wakefield Doctrine wrong (and you can’t break it)

a scott is to a clark as a roger is not to a scott as a roger is to neither*

a scott alone in a room, isn’t

a roger alone in a room, is sleeping

a clark alone in a room is free

the Everything Rule: everyone does everything, at one time or another

ok… reminder this was the height of humor, back in the early days of this here personality system blog when we thought, ‘What can we do to encourage Readers to comment and, even better, ask questions. Our encouragement:  “Just remember, there are no stupid questions. Just your questions.”

lol (Interesting inspiration for this joke. A quote from one of the giants of marketing, David Ogilvy, in the 1950s.)

Funny thing about comfort zones. We discover them on our own if we’re clarks, taught they exist by scotts and reassured that they’re not, completely a bad thing…by rogers.

Don’t forget! The Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop is recruiting Hosts and Hostinae… so send in your application or just go ahead and write and link one up now!!

 

Hey!! What’re we thinking??!! The TToT is live now! (Doors open 12:05 am Thursdays) Lets give some credit to them what don’t wait ’til the last minute to write and publish….

Cai

Aptivi

and…. of course, our frequent correspondent, Misky

They will be joined by the other Hosts and Hostinae over the coming days, stop in and say ‘Hidy’

 

 

 

*whoah! a new one… still true, though

 

Share

Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “…of Antipathy and Affinity inherent in the three predominant worldviews” Part 1

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

So you think you’ve gotten yourself learned (you know, ‘learn ed’) sufficiently as to the characteristics of the three predominant worldviews of our little ‘personality theory’. Let’s not start writing recruiting pitches, expositions, graphic novels or sermons quite yet.

If you’re comfortable imagining the world through the eyes of the three, you’ve also encountered a nagging sense of confluence (in the world as each experience it).

It should not come as a surprise (nor an opportunity… roger). After all, we’re not talking science fiction here. With the Everything Rule as a backdrop (or for that matter a drop cloth) consider the proposition:

Of the qualities of each of the three, which is most antithetical  (producing feelings of extreme, existential antipathy) in which of the others?

ok! let’s throw the threasus on the floor, and here is the worst thing ever for each:

  • a clark? scrutiny (from the rogerian personal reality, this is love transformed in torture)
  • to a scott? a world in which nothing is consistently reliable (from the nothing is really, totally real/everything-is-possible existence of clarks)
  • for a roger being alone and un-connected in the company of others (from the lone wolf world of scotts and, for good measure, the life of the Outsider)

 

…to be cont’d

Share

Tuesday/Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

ok, who, as you read the title of today’s post, thought, “Oh, boy! A RePrint post today!”

Well, there’s a good reason why everyone will tell you, “That Tuesday? Best and mildest day of the week!”

We’re glad you asked!

…forgot our point.

oh well,  New Readers? this is all about additional perspectives on the world around us (and the people who make it up). Your relationship to your world is one of three:

  1. the Outsider (clarks)  clarks think  the world is ‘out there’ and while sometimes an enjoyable puzzle, there is one piece missing but being blessed with an insatiable curiosity, it’s only a matter of time
  2. the Predator (scotts) life is now, prey to chase (larger) predators to contend with, action is more than a verb, it’s a way of life… there is no need to over-think it… scotts act
  3. the Herd Member (rogers) life is good and sufficient and quantifiable and connected and every other good thing, it is everything other than cold, distant and un-relatable. there is a rule (among many) and that is to learn the Right Way and comes with a responsibility to make sure everyone has an opportunity to also learn that rogers feel

the Wakefield Doctrine is gender, culture and age neutral.

 

Tuesday Morning: how the 3 personality types of the Wakefield Doctrine respond to this ‘mildest of Weekdays’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine ( three characteristic worldviews determine the 3 personality types: clarks, scotts and rogers )

Almost too easy. But we must be considerate of the New Reader! No telling how many people have arrived here at the Wakefield Doctrine this very Tuesday morning, driven by an insatiable curiosity, a little free-time at their computer at work/school or simply an annoying friend/co-worker (“...yeah, no! just go there! don’t try to read the About page, just read this Post! it’s about these people and these worldview things and…the thing of it is they are so right and I can’t stop seeing these scotts and clark and rogers…rogers!! do you have any idea how disturbing it is now whenever I drive past a bunch of guys riding bikes, wearing the kind of spandex that made Pat Benatar such a star… and  just go there and let me know when you understand how any of this is going to be useful!“)

We all know that Tuesday is the day of the week that is most clarklike, right? The clue was right there in the Title, right? And by the associating of the word ‘mild’, you know have a spot-on assessment of the clarklike personality type, right?

Wrong.

Well, right about the ‘Tuesday is the most clark-friendly Day of the Week’, but t-wrong about the assessment of the clarklike personality type as being ‘mild’. Moderate?, fair… temperate?, sure, why not? even-tempered?, now you are straying… easy-to-get-along-with? getting colder… flat-affect, overly rational? ok…warmer… driven by a disconnected emotional aspect to find the way back home… yow! boiling !

Tuesday is the easiest-going Day of the Week. Rivalled only by Thursday on the lowered expectations scale, Tuesday is the day where you can believe in the promises of the work/school, even commit yourself to giving all to making the week a time of great accomplishment. Without the threat of an Exam (Friday) or even a pop quiz (Wednesday), Tuesday is the day where:

  • clarks relax
  • scotts wake up
  • rogers begin to get annoyed

If you were looking through the eyes of a clark…on a Tuesday morning…and the newspaper headlines read: ‘Meteor to Strike Earth on Friday, Extinction of all Life Certain!’ your reaction would be:

  • relief because the mess you made of your first serious relationship would finally stop bothering you (…hopefully)
  • excitement because now you don’t have to worry about having enough money to pay the mortgage
  • amused because you had a dream in which you felt loved and cherished by all and when you woke up you had a genuine emotional conviction that you were ‘a part of the family’
  • a sense of vindication because you knew that nothing really mattered
  • regret as you finally realized that people did not really care about how strange the inside of your head is, they only wanted to believe that you liked and appreciated them
Well, that was …interesting!
If the rogers and the scotts would form an orderly line (yeah, right) we will register each and every one of your objections to this Post.

*

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

We’re gonna start the week’s Doctrine post series with some AP Wakefield Doctrine insights, courtesy of our diligent correspondent, Misky. In a comment at last Tuesday’s post, she say,

…which leads me to a person that explains a problem to the electrician in 200 words when 12 would do the same.

New Readers! the question our friend raises goes to the heart of the Wakefield Doctrine. It’s primary conceit, (in the good sense of the word), is to afford all those with the intellect, curiosity and desire to add to their respective realities an additional insight into the acts and behavior of the people around us (and the world that makes them up*). The Wakefield Doctrine offers and insight into three distinct ways to experience reality, as a:

  • clark (the Outsider)
  • scott (the Predator)
  • roger (the Herd Member)

Through the pages of this blog are a buncha descriptions of the characteristics of the above three predominant worldviews (aka personality types). Spend the time learning. Today’s post is designated as AP level as we are considering the Everything Rule.

ok! back to Misky’s Conjecture as to how verbosity relates to personal reality. Our invocation of the Everything Rule brings into play a key concept: manifestation. Specifically, how does giving instruction (to a trade or other non-related individual.**), manifest in the personal realities of clarks, scotts and rogers? As with the standard process of determining predominant worldviews, Misky has, in effect, thrown out one, (of the three), leaving us with a comparison to two seemingly identical actors.

btw: a scott tends to be less …loquacious than ‘the other two’ if for no other reason than in the world of the Predator, ya don’t need too much filigree on: Run! Run Away! Eat! Reproduce! Sleeeep! lol

As to verbosity in clarks and rogers:

  1. the Outsider (clarks) are eternally curious. their lives being a search for the information that might enable them to become ‘a part of’. As such, all information has value. Combine this view with their tendency to want to share with others (yeah, half-thought-through protective coloration lol) and so will in our scenario provide more (information) rather than less. just ’cause
  2. the Herd Member (rogers) are concerned, first and foremost, with the Herd. Everything in their world is connected (to the people and elements of this) and so, in the process of giving direction to an electrician, see no reason to leave out: the electricians that they have known, the people who have had bad experiences with the work under consideration and the fact, that as a person, all of this puts them in a position of being… well, a peer, to the expert they are now directing.

ain’t this Doctrine fun?

 

*lol a little reversal of our standard, ‘…the world around us and the people who make it up.’

** yeah, if related? way different conversation lol

 

Share