Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Here’s something a bit of the different for a Friday post.

What your questions?*

 

*to the promising New Reader likely a clark, ‘Why yes, there is a very good chance that we will know which of the three is your predominant worldview on the basis of the question**

** New Readers are forgiven1 for asking the obvious question. No need to be concerned. One of the fundamental standards of behavior here is that no one has authority to publicly designate another person’s type without their clear and explicit permission. At least no authority that would carry any weight with anyone familiar with the Doctrine.

1) frequent rogerian Readers are not

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Frank Hubeny says:

    I like the part of the Doctrine that “no one has authority to publicly designate another person’s type without their clear and explicit permission”.