Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

welll, we are finding ourselfs, looking to draft the Wednesday Doctrine-post with ‘an embarrassment of riches’

Frank, he say:

Today I will wear the clark glasses.

There was, in the early days of this here Doctrine here, exploration of (any) relative anathema/inherently antagonistic relationship among the three predominant worldview.

There are. As reported by each of the three:

• • A clark cannot imagine being comfortable (read: illusion of control) living in the personal reality of a roger
  • A scott would run away from the notion of being stuck in the life of a clark
  • A roger could not live (and remain sane) as a scott a world devoid of shared tradition and the comfort of association

Pretty simple, isn’t it?

Fine. One hint for each:

1. for a clark there will always be an element of ‘difference from’ that makes being part of a Herd impossible
2. scotts are of the here and now, the rules of existence are as simple as it sounds: live act eat sleep*
3. rogers are not merely ‘of the Herd’ they (collectively) are the Herd and cohesion requires shared values

there ya go, Frank. Good luck with the clark glasses today. And don’t forget: precise focus isn’t everything. lol Here, try our quick worldview quiz: How much is 2 + 2?

That takes care of the careful and incontrovertible Wakefield Doctrine posts for the week.

Tomorrow? Poetry Slam @ the Six Sentence Café & Bistro. Be there or be square.

*M? remember you’ve earn a (probationary) Wakefield Doctrine poetic license… relax, everything is not (quite) about you lol