Wedneszdae -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Wedneszdae -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Wedneszdae -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Well, yesterday was fun. More fun, in fact, than might be apparent. Stemming from the Comments of our Readers

While we did not get back to respond to them in the course of the day, they certainly are worthy of another look.

Pardon us for being ‘all over the place’ in this post.

(If we must blame someone, let’s agree to blame Mimi)

Why? Why not Misky or Frank or even Reelika?

Because she has that capacity to …not stop the room. …not say a thing that inspires one (and then 66 percent*) of the individuals in a crowded room to say, one decibel short of a shout, “My god! We’ve got to get out of here! Now!!”… no.

(You know the thing we say about how one of the three predominant worldviews manifesting true creativity and how the nature of that (creativity) is to bring into existence something that simply was not of the world before they did what they did? Well, the thing about that is that that ‘place’ where they got it is/was not bound by any rational metric. It’s here and now, not there-over-here. And …and it’s non-chronologic. Bottom line, others of this particular predominant worldview feel the echoes when one of their kind is hurt or in pain (however for-the-moment) even if they’s not aware of the person or their creation. ya know?)

and so we have two music vids that share something and the result is two-out-of-three Doctrine personality types muttering, ‘Well, guess we know who has a lock on this month’s  John Cage 4-33 Post Writing Award.’

So, in closing, embrace chaos up until it begins to unravel your next to last inner sweater.

Don’t forget! Tonight is  Six Sentence Story Eve.

For a special treat check out the ensemble(ish) Six that Chris started with her Six Sentence Story last week!

* there is an accepted ratio of clarks to scotts to rogers in any given population** 66 represents the rogerian component

** remember! The Wakefield Doctrine is gender neutral, culture neutral and any other subdivision of humanity free

 

*

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Stopping a room is not my long suit.

  2. clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

    Not, speaking only for myself, in the ‘OK, everyone! This is a stickup’ way which more common (at least among those who fancy themselves as being capable of commanding attention).
    no, it, speaking only for myself, is the simple statement that flashes a light (for the very small number of people capable of making sense of it. It, this statement is a light and finger pointing to the multiple possibilities that exist.

    Full Disclosure: borrowed (well, maybe para-worded) it (‘to stop the room’) from one of my favorite authors, Carlos Castaneda. He would talk about how it is possible (and in some, special circumstances) ‘to stop the world’
    What he meant, I believe, was the internal dialogue some of have in our heads is mostly about describing the world, consistent with what we were raised to expect it to be; stopping the world is to cease the running description and look at what is… an artistic/literary way of saying embracing the here and now

    or something