Twosday RePrint -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Twosday RePrint -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Twosday RePrint -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

sure, we got a last minute reprieve from the Dentist (wrong day… god’s way of smiling on his more intractable creatures), doesn’t mean we don’t need to post a Post today.

from the Archieves

Too(s)day the Wakefield Doctrine ( “I think Tuesday is the cutest (of the) Workdays! …like a 2nd date, so full of promise, yet such a potential source of suffering!”)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)images-37

so, yesterday we wrote a Post that was built on the following promise:

So here’s what we’ll do: I’ll write a couple of hundred words about the value and use of the Wakefield Doctrine on a typical Monday morning. I’ll stop writing, take a quick shower, get dressed and start my work day2. After an hour or so of work, I’ll come back here and ‘re-write’ this post. Let’s see if this ‘oh-my-god-can’t-you-see-how-incredibly-useful-and-fun’ theory of personality accounts for any change in my day.3

Fine. I’ll tell you about my day and the (principles) of the Wakefield Doctrine. I won’t attempt to re-write yesterday’s Post, for the obvious reasons. (Actually all I want to do is try and come up with something clever (and a touch risqué ) about the character of Tuesday). But promises are promises (unless they are threats, and then you need to be more careful of clarks than scotts or rogers by a long shot!)

In the middle of the day yesterday, I had occasion to interact with people I had never met.*
I walk up to the front door, (noting that a person was coming towards the house from across the yard), and knocked on the door. a scott answered. I knew she was a scott from: a) her eyes** and 2) she smiled and stepped forward at the moment of introduction,  ‘Hello, I’m clark from….’  ( I laughed to myself and thought, ‘god! I loves this Doctrine’ …and increased the volume of my voice, shortened my sentences and cranked-up my (level) of eye contact.) The meeting went well.
The person I noticed walking across the lawn towards us? (who I ignored because I needed to establish a relationship with the dominant personality)  another scott! (he was there to help with the move…) he had no legitimate role in the interaction. Thing was he kept coming back into the room where I was talking to the scottian woman.  lol ( you ever watch a bunch of puppies playing as a group? one is always trying to establish ranking***)  That’s what this guy was doing. He walked into the house, didn’t introduce himself by name, (because he was a member of her pack and therefore not alpha), but nevertheless was trying to see if he could establish dominant ranking on me,  (which would have enhanced his relationship with her, of course).  I mean you could see the energy as he walked, pretended to be a part of the conversation, walk away and then come back in…. I did not allow myself to be distracted… it was fun to watch.

Anyway…. that was my Day-with-the Doctrine.

Tuesdays… your favorite Day of the Workweek?

 

* it was a meeting with transitioning tenants. I was there to make sure everything was being left as it should (by the parties leaving), so, not necessarily an adversarial interaction. That said the potential was there, as I was representing the interests of the owner of the property and the people I was dealing with were representing their own…

** new Readers?  not such an impressive deduction… a primary identifier of the scottian personality type is in the eyes, ‘the gaze’ to be more succinct  (read more on the Page on scotts… suffice to say, ‘a scott is never not paying attention to what’s going on around them’.

*** another primary characteristic behavior of people who live in the world of the Predator… the drive to ranking, striving for dominance, but not attaching importance to being the alpha, as much as it is necessary to know where one stands… the pack social order

 

^

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. They just gotta know where they stand.

  2. Misky says:

    Would a Clark-like person ever arrive at someone’s door without an appointment?

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      depends on the character of the relationship with ‘the someone’

      clarks can exhibit rather high levels of assumption (upon a relationship) if it (the relationship) exists with sufficient integrity in their mind (first, before any action)

      remember, not only is it that ‘clarks think’ but a remarkably large percentage of the world they exist in exists first in their mind.

      • Misky says:

        Interesting, considering that a scottian reacts (and then pretty much laces up their shoes and moves on).

        • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

          unless they’re hungry or bored lol

          the interesting (and informative) is the other scott… when the alpha is engaged the others in the pack know to keep a respectful distance (not from the ‘prey’ but not to interfere with the fun the alpha is having)

          and then (to continue the discussion of this case file) there is the nature of relationships between clarks and scotts which, to put it in most rudimentary terms (for any New Readers wandering Comment Hall) is somewhere between that of scotts-scotts and scotts-rogers to a scott, clarks often appear to be rogers (hell, to a scott everything appears to be rogerian, especially when hungry lol) but then, in the middle of this pairing a clark may stop and cuff the scott roundly (visual: puppy tumbling over backwards with an expression of surprise then delight and bouncing back to continue the new game)… one thing immediately clear: not another scott ’cause those conflict-interactions do not end until one submits and so, in this case should continue the contest and 2) not a roger, well because the character of resistance was far less a splash of A1 sauce on oneself to make the grappling more difficult
          lol
          New Readers!! We did warn you, imagination is king and metaphor rule, however there is a consistency prevailing in our exapmples