Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
Why do clarks always (seem) to hedge-their-bets/hold-back/not-embrace-the-present/pay-the-price-but-leave-their-purchase-at-the-fufilment-center*.
The answer is at the heart of why clarks (and scotts/rogers with way too much secondary clarklike aspects) enjoy the Wakefield Doctrine.
The answer** lies in understanding the predominant worldview of the Outsider, aka clarks.
[Ran out of time. Need to work on Six. And go to work. Comments are always fun.]* an actual word for the place you go (or used to go, pre-internet) in any sizable department store to gather up your purchase and toddle off home with a new portable entertainment center or Three-Speed SunBeam mixer
** we trust some of you have started waving your hands in the air like Prince and shouting ‘There are no Answers in the Doctrine!!’ ‘There are only additional perspectives… and, well ok, if you must, a few Rhetorical Questions, such as:
- they say that clarks abhor being the center-of-attention, but will not tolerate being ignored
- if they’re so curious, why don’t more clarks look into their tendency to procrastinate, at least on things that involve others
- …what do you mean, ‘That last bullet point makes no sense?!’
- of course it does… but, this post notwithstanding, the attitude remains: offer the tools to self-understanding yourself and let the Reader decide how to proceed
- …no, we don’t think that this approach to what is, purportedly, at-least-in-part, a self-improvement system is a wee-bit on the laissez–faire
- sure, and it might seem to some to be the equivalent to the Captain of the Titanic directing his crew to slide notes under the cabin doors of all the passengers informing them that ‘Skiing, rock-climbing and competitive Ice-Water-Swimming has been added to the ship’s athletic program…
- no, we’re not goings to keep this up
- yes, there is a coherent answer:
- clarks, as Outsiders, tend to avoid accepting (things/people-who-seem-to-want-more/events that represent the culmination of a deliberate effort) because then others would be in a position to know us
- …. we have to spell everything out?!?! ‘Know us without an allowance for a ‘makeup effort’ There is always something of a mystery about clarks and we are good with that because if everything is stated and we don’t measure up (to whatever standard) what’re we gonna do then?
*
(yeah, like Prince wasn’t no clark1)
- similar to Hendrix in the contrast between stage persona and… personal (at least in interviews and such). Even more (than Hendrix) in the contrast with lyrics and music…
About clarkscottroger
https://youtu.be/KME3hR-cyds
very good (citation)
(too bad you don’t know her personally, you could aim her at the Doctrine. there is no imposter syndrome* in the perspective of the Wakefield Doctrine, there is the influence of secondary and tertiary aspects, i.e. extra-high creative drive clark with an amped-up secondary scottian aspect. lol)
*that said, excellent labelling**
** we’d be halfway to identifying Lizzy as a clark on the basis of her embracing that particular term
If i don’t ever finish, i don’t have to worry about a grade…
ikr?
Very good (and valid) point, Mimi. Hadn’t thought in those terms.