Month: September 2021 | the Wakefield Doctrine Month: September 2021 | the Wakefield Doctrine

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Hosted by Denise

Crashed by ceayr (ok, with some egging on by management, but only along the lines of ‘You’ve been an appreciative audience. You have a certain proclivity for this flash fiction, we encourage you to practice your art.’) Go take a gander over at his place. He be doin a walk-on.

For our part, a bit of an aside: While we’re determined to move the plot along in ‘the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf’, whenever we invite another Sixarian to do a ‘walk-on’ we inevitably succumb to the temptation to ‘riff off’ our guest. Although ce yr promised not to get too close to the storyline of either of our serials, the About page at his blog says he’s from Scotland. Well, one thing naturally lead to another and, so, this, the latest installment in the Ian Devereaux serial.

Cliff Note for our Six. One of our favorite characters, Anya Claireaux, is based in Chicago where she runs the Omni Corporation. (Her official title is Executive Administrative Assistant. But, then, you know how she can be about exerting power.) She does a voice-only cameo.

Previously, in the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf…

The search for clues, a trail or anything that might reveal the identity of those who orchestrated the death of Dr. Leanne Thunberg’s ex-husband was arduous; understanding their rationale, near-hopeless. Ian Devereaux only recently embraced the conviction that the future was, at best a dead-end and, at worst, a false hope.

He decided to call Germany. The woman in Chicago decided on Edinburg.

 

Prompt word:

HANDLE

“Hey, why don’tcha get the Insulting Detective here to play us a tune,” the bartender at the All Bar One GeorgeSt watched the small crowd spread itself out according to desire and ambition; couples gravitated to the window booths, sharing their excitement with random pedestrians, solo patrons towards the bar, mostly silent, awaiting good fortune.

Joe Bell V, seated at the pre-War Steck and Welmar baby grand, looked up at the mostly affectionate nickname and accidentally caught sight of his reflection in the mirror behind the bar, that of an old ghost who’d finally let go of rattling chains and deathly howls, reduced to a furrowed brow and a menacing stare.

He smiled at the nickname, an off-hand tribute to his great-great-great grandfather, who despite not sharing the fame of a certain fictional detective, managed to acquire a fortune that would endure into the 21st century; the Joe Bell at the piano was required, when reaching his majority, to learn an instrument and establish a career as a physician or detective; half a medical degree from the Edinburgh Medical School made the latter unavoidable.

“I’d pay the devil whatever he’d ask, if only I’d get this damnadh Handel waltz down,” the dim lights in the corner of the All Bar One made reading difficult, only ‘Waltz in C Sharp Minor’ was visible; Joe supplemented his income by entertaining the patrons of several New Town establishments with light pop and old standards; unfortunately he maintained an unhealthy obsession with the classical repertoire.

The cell phone next to his Scotch and cigarettes began to glow and displayed a number from the area code ‘312’, which was unexpected, but not nearly as surprising as the sound of a woman’s voice from the as-yet unanswered phone,”You got yourself a deal, Jo… expect a visit tomorrow from Sven Stuveysant, the finest remedial piano teacher on the Continent.”

Not bothering to touch the phone, Joe stopped playing and heard the voice, at once lethal and playful, continue, “As to payment, your family history has something of value to me, I’ll be calling again very soon; and Joe, that’s Chopin, not Handel, leannan.”

 

 

 

Share

Reprint-Monday Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Surely there is a post, (in the metaphorical cardboard boxes and among the string-tied stacks of old issues of National Geographic, orphaned computer keyboards and abandoned high school year books), that’s standalone-readable as to not requiring a wordy intro…

too late!

(from 11/10/2011)

scotts, prey drive and the Wakefield Doctrine (‘Mr. Gorbachav, feed that dog!’)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine. If you are looking for a self-improvement tool, or a easy-to-use system for self-development, then you have totally stumbled on to the right ‘place’!
The Wakefield Doctrine  has a thing about looking at people, you know, how they act and stuff?  …we guarantee that if you got the smarts to understand this, (and not everyone does),  then you will know more about that other person than they know about themselves.  Pretty frickin cool, no?  But if you’re looking for one of those,  “Six Ways to get any Boy to Like you” or  “Satisfy the Woman in your dreams!! ”  or ” How to get your Boss off your back!”  self-improvement things  then stop reading. Right now.
This Wakefield Doctrine thing is so not that kind of personality theory.  (Not saying that you won’t be able to ‘satisfy the Woman in your Dreams’ or ‘get your Boyfriend a Job’), just that what we have here takes a little more….  flexible intelligence. So.  Read already!

No, the Wakefield Doctrine is not like those other self-development books….the Wakefield Doctrine is fun and it is useful and it is fun…

Today we are going to talk about scotts!  (Want to get a quick overview of the Doctrinego here and read….be sure to come back!)

scotts, scotts scotts!  where to start?   … hell, it’s Thursday, lets take the easy way out just to get the ball rolling, so to speak.1

Some bullets points relating to the nature and character of the scottian personality type:

  • scotts are totally emotional but in a way so very different from rogers,  mercurial is the right word for the emotional characteristic of scotts
  • scott   in a band?  the ‘front man’ every time  (don’t believe me? go look at the photo of the progenitors, click here  those three mugs were in a band together (yeah, I know!) and can you tell me who the front man was?…hell  you know which one is the Progenitor scott without anyone telling you, don’t you?)
  • at a party scotts will  introduce themselves (…..to everyone)
  • when confronted with a threat or other fear-generating situation, a scott will choose to attack rather than flee
  • scottian females can be ridiculously sexy or quick witted, …hardly ever both.
  • (female) scotts can be spotted because they have prominent throat tendons (go ahead….ask us why)

Seeing how the scottian population is of late growing here at the Doctrine, lets cater to the their totally famous short attention-spans  and use a video that shows us a scott doing what they do best!  Watch and learn, binyons!

How scottian was David Caruso’s character? how clarklike was DeNiro’s character?  and the cop that backed down to the scott?, not too rogerian !  Hell! he was the only one in the scene to have a hat on his damn head!
So lets review:

clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel.    scotts are often wrong, but never uncertain.  scotts make good leaders, (at least when decisive action is required…when long-term objectives take precedence over short-term victory…not so much).     scotts are ‘the life of the party’… scotts are the best of joke tellers and are natural mimics.  scotts will feed on rogers and enjoy the challenge of clarksscotts will give you the shirt off his back/ the use of her boyfriend but will not tolerate being ignored… they are un-selfish and short-sighted… ingenious and stupid…  emotional and shallow… sexy and predatory… endearing and dangerous…  get the picture?

1) that’s a joke for the scotts reading this

*

Quick note on the vid: What an exciting time (the early years) for this blog. I stumbled across video clips that perfectly illustrated the Wakefield Doctrine, seemingly all at ‘the same time’. The first was from the movie ‘Casino’, then the one above and a third from, ‘Wolf’ (a scott and a roger).

What is it about the world? This example, (of finding video clips for Doctrine posts), seems very much a manifestation on the old saying, ‘When the student is ready, the master will appear’. Our energies, (focused on explaining the Doctrine), must have been at such a pitch, the universe couldn’t help but throw some help our way, if only to get us to quiet down. lol

ayiiee! What does time do with all the excess energy we have?

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Ten Things of Thankful(TToT) bloghop.

Lets go with pitchas an music.

(No subtext for either!*)

1) Phyllis——————-⇓ (Una and Number 6)

2) Una

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) Six Sentence Story the place for flash fiction story-ettes new ones ever Thursday

5) excellent comment by Mimi to yesterday’s Post about ‘the Everything Rule’

6) TED Talks

7) internet, it’s own damnself, with all it’s faults and flaws (surely there were monks lead by St. Cuthbert marching in small, tight circles with signs carried by multiple monks (all that gold ink, ya know)  protesting Gutenberg, ‘Moveable Type is the Devil’s… err technology!’

8) Serial Stories: ‘the Whitechapel Interlude‘ and ‘the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf

9) something, something

10) Secret Rule 1.3 (from the Book of Secret Rules aka the Secret Book of Rules)

 

* yeah, right. If, by ‘subtext’ we’re using the according to (the) Online Etymology Dictionary definition: Latin subtextere meant “to weave under, work in below.” then, no fricken way

 

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Perfect illustration of the three predominant worldviews. (Photo by Jude Domski/WireImage)

 

Friday! Surely the most anticlimactic day of the workweek. (Yeah, the weekend is in a class by itself, lol)

And how we reference ‘the Everything Rule’ so often in discussions of workdays and the three predominant worldviews?

What?!! We haven’t been citing this very essential aspect of the Wakefield Doctrine? Why that’s preposterous! ‘the Everything Rule’ is as esstential to advanced application of the Doctrine in day-to-day living as…as rubber bands were to setting the neighborhood bicycle speed record! (Or whatever it was that preadolescent girls did with their time, while waiting for the Third Biggest change in Life, prior to taking over their chrono-appropriate worlds).

damn! We’d best set things back on a more reasonable basis.

(oh, yeah. Before we start, the reference to boys and girls above? The Wakefield Doctrine is gender-neutral. ….whole ‘nother post. Want to hear about it? Mention it in the comments below. However, if you’re a self-identified* predominant clark, you need to proffer your thoughts on the topic as part of the comment.)

On to the topic of ‘the Everything Rule’, which states: ‘Everyone does everything, at one time or another’.

Class dismissed.

ha ha

In a ‘nutshell’: we’re all born with the capacity to experience the world around us, (and the people who make it up), from the perspective of one of the three predominant worldviews. At a very early age, we settle into one, (and only one personal reality), and grow up and develop our strategies and styles of interacting with this world, aka our personality type. However, we never lose the inherent capacity of ‘the other two. In fact, many of us have fairly significant secondary and tertiary aspects. Often to the extent that it is observable in certain circumstances. Example: I’m a clark with a significant secondary scottian aspect. Otherwise I doubt I’d be writing post number 2370 or whatever. (This is not about indications of secondary or tertiary aspects. Suffice to say, they appear mostly at times of duress).

This is about ‘the Everything Rule’. Which, in the simplest of terms, reminds us: clarks, scotts and rogers do not live in isolated realities with unique properties to our respective worlds. The Doctrine isn’t that weird.

But what the Doctrine is, is a perspective on how people relate themelves to the world around them. But it’s a common world. (This insight usually shows up with New Readers when, after getting the description of the Outsider(clarks), the Predator(scotts) and the Herd Member(rogers) down, come up and say, ‘I like this (activity/profession/deviant act) is that a scott thing to do?’

Damn! Running out of time.

Short(er) answer: scotts make great cops, rogers are the ultimate engineers and clarks, well, where would we be without elementary school teachers. That said, ‘the Everything Rule’ reminds us that there are clarks on police forces (probably end up dispatchers) and scotts can study and become engineers (and gravitate to sales or, maybe start ups) and rogers can be found among the ranks of Grades 1-8 (there to inspire future authors and writers and such).

The point is, how each of the three manifest the qualities/skills/personal attributes of professions, (or activities/deviant acts), is a function of the reality in which they exist.

Have a ‘great’ Friday.

(Yeah, we did kinda get off topic. oh, well. Don’t forget, document your questions and Comments)

 

* well, what other way can an effective system of personality types ever hope to be useful, practical and beneficial than to be the result of the individual’s choice and decision-of-application?! This rule (small ‘r’) is one of the first to appear in these pages: ‘No one can, with any claim-to-authority, tell another which of the three, clarks, scotts or rogers’, they are.

That doesn’t mean we can’t talk about other people’s apparent worldview for educational or recreational purposes. Totally can do that! Best way to illustrate the clues to how, (another), person appears to be relating to the world around them. Just can’t claim that one’s opinion has any power over another’s, lest we forget, ‘the Doctrine is for us, not them’.

 

Share

Six Sentence Story- the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Each week, Denise invites all to link their prompt-centric sextile-sentoid stories so that we might enjoy a good read. And, speaking for ourselfs, improve our skills by consorting (and figuring-out-how-they-did-that) with writers of no small breadth of style or depth of imagination.

Previously, in the Whitechapel Interlude…

Like most above average, (in intellect if not social standing), young adults, Anselm and Sarah viewed novelty as the only essential condiment to the banquet of life. As the morning carried them towards noon and their meeting with the mysterious Count St. Loreto, the dimming of the sky was too-easily dismissed as the gathering of tree-cloaked mountains to either side of the road north to Brașov. For some, fortunately rare people, darkness is both noun and verb.

Hey! before I forget, we have a ‘guest’ this week. ceayr commented on last week’s Six Sentence Story post and there was something in his comment or maybe it was his writing style, that reminded me of a friend in high school. Anyway. I said to ceayr, I said, “Hey! you wanna do a walk-on?”

He said, ‘Yes, it would be my honor.’ So head over to his place (after reading this Six first, of course)… see what the damages are. I’m looking forward to it as he promised a Six not constrained by ‘any rule’.  (lol)

In the past, ‘walk-ons’ have ranged from direct offshoots of the narrative of a specific post, as Pat Brockett and Valerie did very effectively a number of years ago, to more recently, a parallel universe-take that Ford concocted, creating a character that left no doubt in the Reader’s mind she was very familiar with the Whitechapel section of Victorian London.

*** Hey!! Sixarians!! Looks like there was a mis-manifestation of projected realities! (yeah, like that ever happens to clarks) But just swapped electrons with ceayr and he’ll have his walk-on Six rolling out next Thursday… 09/30/2021 Be there or be square***

Prompt Word:

Method

“Sire, all is ready for your guests.”

Count Cyrus St. Loreto, a muscle and sinew embellishment to the carved stone chair that served to anchor night sky battering at the glass dome of the grand hall, relinquished his hold on the woman, and with a flick of a wrist, acknowledged the demands of the day ahead. With the deadly grace of a panther, Evangeline stepped out from his embrace, crossing the great room and into a vestibule under an arc of gold-leaf letters on the lintel: ‘Modis in Insania

The whispers of servants and staff stirred the quiet air along passageways and empty rooms, like the internal soughing of the circulatory system, lacking only the muffled syncopation of a heart to assure visitors there was a difference between the surrounding mountains and the castle.

Cyrus stirred from dreams of a Garden and endless daylight, suspecting there might come a time when regret succeeded in leaching the passion out of avarice; the irony of the true curse of the apple of Eden, the need to satiate the insatiable, brought a smile to his lips, a vestigial gesture of a lost humanity.

Rousing himself, he recalled a time in the Far East when, in the midst of a night of debauchery, he confided, in a voice loud enough to cut through the din of the crowded tavern, to his companion, a humble monk he’d taken pity on, “Gautama, my friend, take it to heart, all of this,” waving at the guests, concubines, waiters and money-lenders, servants and cooks, “These trappings should forever remind you that the indulgence of desire is the root of all suffering in this death-ridden world.”

 

 

Share