Month: June 2021 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3 Month: June 2021 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

It is hosted by Denise.

It has but one rule: use the prompt word and wrap it up, all nicey-nice in exactly six Sentences.

[Back in 2018, wandering down the almost-mouldy scented aisles of the world-sized used book and magazine store that is the internet, I encountered an article on the infamous prison, Parchman Farms. It made such an impression, I had to write a Six using it, (as it was in the early 20th C), as the setting. And, as happens, if we’re lucky, the real-world place and the fictional characters grew in realness. Not surprisingly, there followed additional Six Sentence stories grounded in my imagined Parchman Farms. For those of you who find the following Six enjoyable or, otherwise engaging, here are links to some of them: Polish;  Release. and Legend]

We will be returning to our regularly scheduled serial stories, next week.

Prompt word:

QUARTER

Lurking behind a bank of pre-dawn clouds, typical of Mississippi and June, the sun sent sapper raids of fog-cloaked light down the endless rows of cotton as the prisoners of Camp 8 moved down the lane at a pace that neither welcomed nor denied the day’s labor in the fields of Parchman Farm; the sun stalked the men throughout the morning’s labor, at times when light breeze faltered, raged down threats of worse to come in the afternoon.

Cageboss Roscoe Williams, seated on a sorrel quarter horse that put him above his manacled charges in every possible way, called out, “The State of Mississippi insists that y’all have a lunch break, the Warden insists that I get as much work as possible the rest of the time, so, back to work, the fields have more rows than you’ll ever finish, at least today.”

The old man, who spent his lunch picking at his gruel and, like an unlikely shipwreck-survivor, holding the wooden cross that rested against his chest, smooth light-brown wood on leathery and age dark brown skin; even as he staggered up into line with the other men, the thought came that he felt the way he had the first day on the line, only he was fifty years older.

Two things happened: his lungs got into a fight with his heart and his vision turned into featureless light; sitting back down, he was saved from falling like a dead man by the sycamore that supported him through the noon rest;

“He cain’t move and I don’t think he can see so good, Boss Roscoe,” Billy Tulene stared down and let his voice find the only person with the power to do anything.

“Tell you what, you boys pick his share along with your own, I won’t make a fuss,” as the line of prisoners moved out of the scant shade into the relentless sun of the fields, they didn’t see Roscoe Williams slow his horse, and throwing his Stetson down at the old man, say in voice he’d deny to God Almighty, “Think about the old hound dog in hell’s August heat, breath in through your nose and let it out through your mouth; I’ll fetch my hat if you’re still here at day’s end.”

 

 

Share

Re-Print Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Gonna appropriate an old metaphysical chestnut* and say:

While you may not be able to teach an old dog new tricks, nothing says that re-reading the ‘old tricks’ book won’t reveal something you didn’t realize… back when both you, and the dog, were young.

…and, to the original chestnut (the one with the asteroid**),

When the student is ready, the teacher will appear, except in the case of when the teacher never left, but the student looked around at the classroom they believe they know and say, “When did that appear…”

what the hell are you talking about?! the Wakefield Doctrine has 3 personality types and one is not better than the others!

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

e9acce1c6f84de8787831405ba93e6e71695481096-1301552225-4d941c61-620x348

Here’s the thing about the Wakefield Doctrine:

  • it’s not for everybody!  easy assessment test notwithstanding, you have to engage your mind in order to use the Doctrine to ‘know more about the other person than they know about themselves’…worse! you have to use your imagination!!
  • the Wakefield Doctrine is a tool… it is not ‘an answer’  you want to know if your boyfriend is cheating on you?  the Wakefield Doctrine sez: “..go frickin ask him!”  (now before you hit ‘delete’… the rest of what we would say is, “then come back here and we’ll show you how to know if you should believe him or not’!)
  • we are all born with the potential to live our lives as clarks, scotts or rogers; no one knows (yet) why one person will end up in the personal reality of the Outsider (clarks) or the exciting world of the Predator (scotts) or grow up belonging to the Herd (rogers)  we just do… early….say  age 3 or 4 (not later)…in most cases, and that becomes our reality
  • we all have one predominant worldview but we retain, to one degree or another, the capability…the capacity to see the world as do the other two… we call these our  secondary aspect and tertiary aspects
  • these secondary aspects?  no, that does not mean you are a ‘combo-clark’ or a ‘hyper-scott/roger’ (well the hyper scott…lol goes without saying) and you are not some kind of roger-with-a-gift-for-disguising-yourself-as-the-other-two, sorry…don’t work that way. one predominant worldview, potential of the other two (will explain later why that’s important)
  • you want to know why it’s important to remember you have only one predominant worldview? one word  ‘personal reality’  the Doctrine is about the reality you are experiencing…right now while you read this. We don’t care about the list of likes and dislikes, turn ons and turn offs… things that make you hot and why you think that  some people are awful… we don’t care.
  • the Wakefield Doctrine is about one thing: by observing behavior, correctly inferring the reality that (the person) is experiencing… you know that old saying, ‘walk in the other person’s moccasin’ thing? this is that..on steroids …. that’s why we say that this is simple but not easy
  • on the plus side!  if you understand the worldview of the other person (or yourself) you will know more about them than they know about themselves …how cool is that?
  • …very cool
  • well, for starters, scott: you will understand your prey way, way better… you will find yourself bored (fate worse than death for your people) far less often;  rogers?  you know how yours is the right way to do things and it’s just a matter of explaining it to people?  the Doctrine can be of assistance, plus you will learn much about the history of the other person  and  clarks?   lol  yeah, I know…. how could this not be good?

That’s it for today, yo.

I will provide the link to the Pre-dominant Worldview Assessment Test on one condition:  before you go clicking over there I need you to take the url/link to this page and paste it on one other page:  clarks?  anywhere you think that, once you have pasted it, you should click the hell out of there; scotts?  ‘the Facebook’  rogers?  I know you have blog friends who are like in the 400 to 700 visits-per-day class… paste it there

Done?  alright  click here

 

* eww?!

** there was this person I interacted with a long time ago, he was a scott. He was miss-stated the name of a restaurant, ‘Astors’ as ‘Astro’s’. That does not make him memorable. What makes him memorable, (damn, near immortal), was the other thing he said, “Now, clark, quote me if I’m wrong.”

And, I have been, ever since. (Yeah, a scott, if anyone is guessing. (Remind us to discuss in another post, the distinctions in forms of malapropisms among the three predominant worldviews.)

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Created by Lizzi in the Summer of ’82, the Ten Things of Thankful bloghop is the reflection of the best of the potential offered by the early days of the blogosphere while, at the present time, showing it’s capacity for charity in the quality of some of the work to be posted there, i.e. the best-effort by a child’s work on the refrigerator door, determination to find a common link between their loved ones and the light that shines within, overcoming the temptation to give up, and persisting despite the drumbeat of rhetorical standards….

what?!! oh, this thing on? lol

Dyanne is the host. Mimi and Pat and Lisa are the co-hostinae. Stop by for a read. Send in a post for the common good.

1) Una

2) Phyllis

3) the Wakefield Doctrine

4) Daylight summertime

5) the above, taken heading west on the Galilee Escape Road, was, at, like, 8:13 post-fricken-meridian! Can I get a “Daylight Save-me Time!

6) the Six Sentence Story bloghop

7) all (well, some of) God’s chilluns got chlorophyll* (from the side yard, aka ‘the Secret Garden of the Triffids’

8) *remnants of a mind… I got the spelling of ‘Chlorophyll’ (in Item 7) on the first try! Didn’t need to google it or nothin.

9) serial story writing (serial story writing motto: “Well, sure they’re all part of you, where else can fictional characters come into the light; but the less you insist they conform to your expectations, the more the Readers will enjoy the story.” ‘the Whitechapel Interlude‘ and ‘the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf

10) Secret Rule 1.3 (from the Book of Secret Rules, aka the Secret Book of Rules) in part: “…[i]n the time of long days and short(er) nights, one’s allotment of the silly and frivolous is increased in direct proportion to one’s serious and well-meant efforts to the contary.”

 

music

*

*

*

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Denise is the host.

The rule is simple: six sentence limit to a story involving the prompt word.

This week we have the next installment in our serial story, ‘the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf

Prompt word:

PRESENCE

I hate it when I start to get scared.

“Anya, be careful; this woman is not all she appears to be,” my sudden protectiveness for Anya Claireaux must surely rank right up there with King Kong and Ann Darrow, Taylor and Kanye, for relationship mismatches.

And it’s not the feeling, or emotion, or whatever the term for the chilly inner scalp, that rides ahead of a growing threat, like an old cartoon cowboy, forcing his horse to an abrupt stop on the dirt, sand and excrement-filled street in the center of town, trail of dust immediately billows and, for a second, obscures the fact that there is now a chance of escape.

The thing I hate the most about getting scared, is the amount of time I spend trying to talk everyone, including myself, out of the undeniable fact of confrontation; it’s never the threat of physical harm that convinces me to to go all Neville Chamberlain on the people around me, it’s my own desire to maintain whatever it is that a part of me doesn’t want to destroy.

In retrospect, the truly disturbing aspect to what I believe I know about myself, is how willing I am to ignore the reality of the situation around me, as if I were an actor and, if I didn’t like the way the scene was playing out, I could always call for a re-write; when I was young I used to admire this tendency as being a capacity for strategic detachment, lately I haven’t been quite so sure.

“Both of you stop talking,” Sister Aclima’s green eyes flared as the distance between her open palm and my cell phone began to grow, and Anya, who was still confined to the display screen, began to smile, which, in normal people, is a decrease in threat; “I’m getting a little tired of the dramatics and what I’m sure will totally be a Battle of the Wills Second-to-None, so I’m altering the narrative trajectory by asserting my admittedly, less-entertaining presence.”

 

 

 

 

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘If I don’t remember writing it, it’s new content, right?’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

I’m currently on a self-improvement jag. Gonna exercise, final edit my serial, ‘the Case of the Missing Starr’ and do something about finding and agent* and so, I figured, reprint!

(Really weird experience getting this post. Remind me to tell you sometime. Kinda has to do with time being like those moving walkways in airports, only traveling in all sorts of directions and velocities.)

Momentarily Monday the Wakefield Doctrine …(self-limitations and insights)

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

images-85

DownSpring Lizzi has this thing she does, from time to time, where she writes provocative and engaging story that seems to be about herself, only to inform the Reader, at the very end, that ‘this is fiction’.

Today’s Post is sort of like that…except in reverse (or maybe, converse). The story that follows is real enough, however the ‘point’, or ‘lesson’ or even ‘moral’ of the story may not be immediately apparent.  And,

Yesterday I had a property that had a heating air-conditioning system emergency. An air-handler in the attic malfunctioned and water (condensate from the ac) was leaking through the ceiling into the bedroom below. I tried, without success, to get the plumbing and heating company to answer my calls to make a weekend service call, unfortunately they were nowhere to be found.  Staring at the water dripping off the hardwired smoke detector in the bedroom ceiling I realized that I had to do something. I decided to turn off the power in the house, as  house was on a well,  at least I could prevent any additional water from adding to the problem. The air-handler sat in a metal pan, in order to contain any condensate created when the system was in cooling mode. The pan was overflowing, the source of the water dripping through the bedroom ceiling. My plan was simply to empty the pan. Access to the attic was by a pull-down staircase. I took a plastic drinking cup and a 5 gallon bucket, climbed the stairs, flashlight in hand, and starting bailing out the water. There was a lot of water. At least 5 trips down the stairs, with a full bucket. Now, the thing about pulldown staircases is that they have normal shaped steps from the bottom to about 3/4s of the way up, where they, (the steps), become more like ledges. You can put your full weight on them, you just can’t stand on them the way you normally do with stairs.

The operation took about 45 minutes. It was successful, provided the definition success was, ‘less water available to leak through the ceiling now than there was before I started’. I left the property and returned to my office. Getting out of my car at the office I felt my legs do that ‘tremor’ thing, you know, over-exertion total muscle exhaustion. (Like when you were a kid and someone dared you to do 50 knee bends as fast as you could?).  Mind you this was the first time, (that morning), I felt that way. Each of my trips up and down the attic ladder, flashlight providing the illumination, with 5 gal bucket in one hand, were anything but tremory. In fact, each step I took was very deliberate as I did not underestimate the potential of slipping and falling out of the attic of an empty house.

But as I walked across the parking lot,  I felt like I had run 8 miles. And I laughed (I am, after all, a clark). I laughed because I could see how effectively I limit myself.

Like most Readers, I try to stay healthy. I understand that exercise is a necessary component to a healthy life style and I make periodic efforts, in good faith and with sincere intentions to stay in shape. Nothing unusual there. (And) when I am in exercise mode, I will work hard, striving ‘to feel the burn’, whether it requires 30 minutes on a stationery bike or, of late, my two mile ‘run’, I am trying my best to exercise my muscles. Yet, prior to yesterday, I can’t remember the last time I felt that my legs were made of rubber. Tired out, winded, tight feeling in back of legs, sure, but rubbery? no. Clearly I have been nowhere near the limits of my physical strength/condition/capacity in a long, long time. And I was not aware of it.

That was the insight that made yesterday’s work adventure worthwhile.  What we tell ourselves, about ourselves is, by and large, intended to maintain the status quo. The insidious-ness of this is that not only can I have ‘good intentions’…. (stay healthy-exercise! learn more-study! find romance-take showers!)  but I can ‘take action’… (run 2 miles- boy that was tough! get a B- hey my studying paid off! find true love-I can get used to a person who uses double negatives!).  All without knowing my true capability/capacity/talent really.  Because of the tales we tell ourselves.

 

 

 

* how simple is the Secret of the Universe in terms of self-improving oneself when employing the Wakefield Doctrine as a tool? pretty frickin simple.

Votre attention s’il vous plait. Up at the top of this post, the first line? The first, type-don’t-think, version ended: “…and try to do something about finding an agent.

Can I get an ‘Ayyyiiee’!?

My compliment to you Readers: I will say no more.

Share