Month: June 2021 | the Wakefield Doctrine Month: June 2021 | the Wakefield Doctrine

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

Denise is the host, and informs us, the only hard and fast rule is the total number of sentences. Six.

Blame Ford for (his) recent Sixes, written in the key of creepy, combined with our own penchant for matchcover-academia, which left us spending far too much time reading up on ‘the Unreliable Narrator’. We trust we’ll get it out of our system straight-away and return to ‘the Whitechapel Interlude’ next week.

We think.

(No, the image at the top of this post has nothing, as far as I know, to do with the following Six. It was, just that, when I first came across it yesterday, I was all, “Where have I been, this story, I haven’t heard, already!”)

 

Prompt word:

ƎVITAИЯƎT⅃A * ALTERNATIVE

(Let’s see, last week we posted the next installment of ‘Anya Claireaux, P.I.‘, that means we need to continue our historical-fantasy serial, Eve’s Étude, how difficult can that be?)

Sister Abbott looked at the mound of homespun blankets, the shape of the body hard to distinguish, the bloodstains impossible; the memory of the terminal whimper of pain, earnest supplication to no avail, brought a smile to her lips. Like the endless subvocal howl of the birth of the cosmos, the echo of momentarily-sated hunger lightened her step and heighten her senses, now moving through the dust-cloaked streets of Tangier, alert for a certain sign on the pisé de terre wall at the dark end of Rue le Jour.

(Wait a minute… where’s the sense of the, hidden-in-plain-sight, atmosphere surrounding Abbott and her cohorts, maybe it’d help to have another caffeine cake and some water; too much time last night with The Rhetoric Book, seeking the secret of the Unreliable Narrator; still, there’s a disturbance in the Force, that makes all this feel…somehow, subversive.)

“Inspector Anselm, fancy meeting you here, in the Medina; we know you have him in one of Scotland Yard’s safe-houses, hand him over now and all concerned will fare better, well, except, of course, for the good Professor Egmont,” Sister Abbott, in an apparent nod to Islamic influences, wore a kirpan hung from a belt of amber beads, cinching the waist of an otherwise flowing robe.

(This is really not going anywhere, and I still haven’t plugged in the Prompt word, better check the dictionary, maybe get some inspiration,

al·ter·na·tive
/ôlˈtərnədiv/

adjective: (of one or more things) available as another possibility

noun: one of two or more available possibilities

…uh oh.)

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Today:

 

Of clarks and attachments

(‘… on being an Outsider in a world of furniture with slipcovers and shelves of un-read books’.)

We all know that clarks, in the scheme of the Wakefield Doctrine, are the Outsiders. The term most-often misapplied is ‘introvert’. This does little justice to either personality type. In one case, it condemns the person to passive restraint, (in) the other, deprives them of an attribute that almost makes it it all worthwhile: genuine creativity.

That said, what sets the Wakefield Doctrine apart and, in turn, sets the bar so high for those who would take advantage of the value of the additional perspective it offers, is the notion of personal reality. When we talk about predominant worldviews, (of the Outsider(clarks), the Predator(scotts) and the Herd Member(rogers), we are talking about reality, as experienced by, (and limited as such to), the individual. (Note: nothing terribly original or shocking here. The notion of the ‘vivability'(lol) of subjective experience of the world has been thoroughly documented, (if not under-appreciated), by generations of experimental psychologists, aka rogers). (lol)

Seriously. The value of the principles of the Doctrine only begins to make itself available after you’ve accepted that the world, and the people who make it up, are subtly, (but significantly), different for everyone.

Which brings us to the other quality that sets the Wakefield Doctrine apart: everyone has the perfect personality type. For the characteristic reality/predominant worldview, they faced as a very, very, veriest young human. (Imagine, back to the world before language, consisting of motion and force, light and darkness, hunger and fear surrounded us.)

The point is, if you grew up and developed your social strategies, (aka personality type), in the personal reality of the Outsider, or the Predator or the Herd Member, you would fit the profile as defined in this personality system. (Lots more to this, including secondary and tertiary aspects, but need to get back to clarks). Suffice to say, the world you experience is real and your reactions and responses are appropriate.

What are we to make of the subtitle to today’s Post?

clarks are people who go through life making the inanimate live and the secretive submit to discovery, revealing what the investigator wants to learn.

We’re Outsiders. Our primary motivation is to learn what it is that, (nearly), everyone around us, from since before we remember, have been taught. The secret of being a real person, the formula for belonging.

(btw Pro-tip?  clarks are afraid of nothing but are ultimately fearful of scrutiny.)

The reason is simple. We can’t understand why it is we are Outsiders. We had no intention to be apart from the people around us. We just discovered it to be true. (Hint: remember that thing about personal reality? 99.99% of people don’t quite believe that this thing, personal reality, is real. Sure, they’ll allow, it’s real to the person as part of their belief/delusion, self-deception, but there’s only one reality, the real reality they’ve experience uninterupted. Unfortunately, this deprives them of the flat-out, super-power, of perspective. To know that the world can be many things.)

Anyway.

As a consolation prize and to keep us hoping that, if we don’t succeed in learning what everyone else has known since childhood, we are creative.

…maybe if we come up with something everyone wants, they’ll let us join them.

 

…to be cont’d

 

 

 

 

*

 

Share

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘Lights, Camera …Bactine!’

Welcome to the Wakefieldl Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

 

Today, being the weekend*, means this post is the Wakefield Doctrine’s contribution to the Ten Things of Thankful (TToT) bloghop. Which, given our enjoyment of writing being the equivalent of running around in a dog park (on four legs), in contrast to the quietly sophisticated reflections on life in plentiful exhibition on the pages of the others writers, a new Reader can be forgiven for believing they’ve finally found the answer to the nagging question: “Who in the world seeks employment as a department store Santa Claus, cast member at Chuck E Cheese3 or Kindergarten Teacher****

Anyway… we have a host, Dyanne (see footnote) and cohostinae, Mimi and Pat and Lisa who keep the table-cloth on this picnic table, every weekend. So far be it from me to dawdle.

1) Una

2) Phyllis

3) Friday Night Walks (see previous two grats) (New Readers: Maximum Velocity 9 mph, passenger side window three-quarters down… in the olefactory world of dogs, surely these walks are the equivalent of a human, (ok, a human from Y Chromia), being the alone on the couch, in front of the Smart(er) TV and as many remote controls as possible, without looking silly.)

4) Writing serial stories: the Whitechapel Interlude and the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf

5) Six Sentence Story bloghop. cause sometimes you want to read a short, short, short…. did we say ‘short’?, story. This is the place to go.

6) Non-Winter Season. All though, over even as it began, the summer season is pleasing. It is a time of simplicity of interaction with others, vis-à-vis, the weather. btw, the answer to the archetypical question is always, “Why no, no it is not.”

7) technology and the ‘reach’ into an increasingly large and diverse world it affords those so inclined.

8) face masks… while the original rationale for wearing one has apparently diminished in many places, they have proven quite beneficial when working in the yard/woods during pollen season. And, seeing how sport-coats and jackets hold on to them, like Kleenex in a mother’s purse, they are available for special occasions. Last evening, at social gathering, (where masks are no longer required), I ran into an old friend who was finally getting out into the public-gathering scene. She had a mask on and, as she came over to talk, I found that I had one in my pocket! (Being a clark, naturally, I put mine on for our conversation. It was only polite.)

9) something, something.

10) Secret Rule 1.3 from the Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules). ….. just ask.

 

 

 

 

* ok, we all know what, ‘the weekend’ designates, at least, in terms of specific days of the week. But, and we’re sure someone out there knows the answer, or, at very least, given the standards of scholarship that prevails, here at Wakefield Doctrine U** they can contribute a credible answer to the question: “Sure, Saturday makes perfect sense, but Sunday? It’s not as if, in the row on every calendar in the world the first day is Sunday! What gives?”

** yeah, Cynthia’s most excellent hoodie

3) hey, interested? Here ya go (never let it be said the Wakefield Doctrine doesn’t actively seek readership in the demographics that, asked if they know what a cordless phone is, would hold up their cell phone hand and be surprised it  was not the correct answer) here some help in vid form:

**** no, you’ll have to ask out host why that is appropriate (tell her you know the Fire Fighter story… just don’t let on where you heard about it)

music vids and such

*  thanks out to jenne49 over at the Six Sentence Story for prompting this music vid selection… it’s a long story but I went from Peer Gynt to Jacques Loussier….

 

*

*

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter

Share

Six Sentence Story -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

It is hosted by Denise. (She requests we use the week’s prompt word and make the sentence count come out to Six.) (Hence, the name.)

This week we check in with our reflective detective, Ian Devereaux.

Previously, on the Case of the Missing Fig Leaf

As with virtually all detective agencies, large and small, Ian Devereaux’s cases resolved into one of two categories: those successfully executed leaving a satisfied client or an unhappy client disappointed by the lack of the desired, (and paid for), outcome. To date, none had ended with a dead investigator.

Despite a beginning that included first class travel to Europe, the finest of hotels and interaction with lesser-known aspects of ancient European culture, Ian now found himself on the wrong side of an unmarked doorway, peeling paint-glued to an abandoned storefront, in the Whitechapel district of East London; where he now sat, bruised and battered, most of which merely physical trauma.

Feeling very much the 21st century version of a medieval Knight Marshal, Ian Devereaux stood between Anya Claireaux, easily the most capable woman he’d ever likely encounter and Sister Aclima, a member of a religious Order that, if he chose to believe her, was the best that some of the kids could do after the First Divorce.

 

Prompt word:

SEASON

“Here,” I held out the phone in Sister Aclima’s direction, the display blanked, only the built-in speaker to make it seem less like a loaded gun ready to go off and kill the wrong person; for the record, I had no idea who that was, as usual, my life, professional and otherwise, was filled with incomplete equations, like the blackboard of a sixth grade math class at 3:01 in June.

From her cellular perch, Anya addressed anyone in range of her voice, “I just gotta say, whatever you’ve done to mask your location and block the video feed, well, between you, me and your local confessor, it’s kinda turning me on, you know what I’m saying?”

Satisfied to have me hold the phone, a deacon with a non-smoking thurible appeasing nameless gods, Sister Aclima replied in a quiet, but not the, ‘Oh, that’s good, she’s not upset,’ kind of quiet, voice, “I seek information, unfortunately Mr. Devereaux has not provided anything useful, so allow me to tell you what I need, after which we can discuss payment, which, as Ecclesiastes 3:1-8, provides in one of the Bible’s genuinely useful insights, to everything there is a season;” I noticed two things about my captor: a wisp of dark brown hair flirting with her eyes, which, in turn, like emerald eyes in pagan idol, made me think of serpents and apples.

Anya laughed, Aclima frowned, and I decided that being a commercial fisherman had a lot going for it; then decided to laugh, figuring when it came time to pick sides, the devil I owe is better than the devil I don’t.

“That you would believe my interest is in your… baubles, tells me you need to get yourself a new staff down in whatever passes for opposition research at your convent or coven or whatever the correct term;” Anya’s laughter subsided, the phone’s display flickered into life, a view clearly from a skyscraper, the vast blue of Lake Michigan made incidental by the intelligence and insatiable Will that raged in her eyes, “Before I let you go, let’s plan to talk again, ’cause despite our differences in motivation, we’re both determined to find the esteemed Dr. Egmont’s Time Mechanism.”

 

 

 

 

 

Share

Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Hey, New Readers? Don’t hesitate to ask a question in the Comments, if something doesn’t seem to make sense in this (or any) Post. The others will be happy to help, if we do not get to address the question. (Bonus on this, though, as we do not hesitate to copy/paste comments that raise issues or frame perspectives in a novel way. And, how cool would that be?*)

Today’s post we need to rant.**

And, before we start, allow us to state, unequivocally that there are no bad personality types, here at the Wakefield Doctrine. All three have strengths and they have weaknesses. But that is easy to accept, seeing how, underneath it all, the Wakefield Doctrine is predicated on the idea that we, all of us, are born with the potential to experience life from any of three perspectives:

  1. clarks(the Outsider) a person who has been defined as not a part of the world they believe they see others living in, and, like a person who believes they’ve opened a fortune cookie intended for someone else, lives a life characterized by privacy (as opposed to secrecy) and endless searching for the thing that everyone else appears to have learned. clarks think
  2. scotts(the Predator) a person as god had intended, if he/she hadn’t been distracted by someone/something and threw in self-consciousness, scotts live as close to a natural life as possible without being put in jail or an institution; the moment is the basic, (and only essential), unit of life; unburdened by excessive doubt or introspection they are free to do what they want, until someone or something stops them. scotts act
  3. rogers(the Herd Member) in all likelihood, these are the people the Outsider bases their assumption of being lacking in understanding on; living in a universe they know is quantifiable, they live to discover better ways to express the Rules and enhance their membership in the company of others; really, what else could be the reason they know they belong. rogers feel

Finding ourselfs in one of three, (and only one), reality, we develop our social styles, strategies of interacting and getting by in life among others. We learn to be clarks, scotts and rogers. (Bonus concept: if one accepts this premise, we are each possessed of the perfect personality type, given the reality in which we live.) And, triple bonus! We live in one of the three personal realities, but we do not lose the potential of the other two.

The rant?

Damn, almost forgot! lol OK, didn’t almost forget. clark here, remember? But I saw a example of a manifestation of the rogerian worldview that has me wanting to rant two days later.

So, we’re channel surfing this Sunday. There was so much not worth watching that we paused on a high school academic contest-thing…. you know, like Jeopardy except the contestants, (teams of four from two schools), didn’t have to frame the answer in the form of a question.

Alright, we can live with that. Further, the contestants appeared on the screen in two grids, side-by-side. Sorta Hollywood Squares, except without Charles Nelson Reilly. Still good. So we watch. The moderator explains the way the score is tracked. We’re paying too much attention to listen, ’cause this game is based on information and, being a clark, we can’t wait to kick some adolescent, AP, 3.9 GPA butt.

Funny thing happens. We’re crushing them, (of course), and we notice that when the, ‘Time is Up!’ while most of the squares show a green border, some show red.

Wait a minute. We try to remember the explanation of the scoring. Luckily for us, there was a roger in the house.

… Multiple choice question is asked. Contestants enter their selection. Their respective square lights up green when they are correct… and. fricken. on. the. screen red when they are wrong! And, just so no one can escape…if they don’t answer at all, their cell, (the one they’re sitting in that their friends and their families and the kid that they hoped, seeing them on TV would be so impressed they might have a shot).. light up in grey. Grey!?#@?#?@ Grey’s not a color!!

… ayieee

New Readers? While we don’t have tests here at the Wakefield Doctrine we enjoy figuring out what the predominant worldview of a person is****

I need me a music vid to rinse the rant from my head.

 

 

* sure, we know some stuff about ya already, such as anyone who comes back and reads down to here is either a clark or has a significant secondary clarklike aspect.

** What? No, no one said that getting and understanding and employing the princioples of the Doctrine in our lifes will have you ripping the sheets off the bed to wear instead of street clothes and not needing shoes, ’cause the path we walk is smooth as child’s compliment.***

*** Well, gotta qualify this a little… we mean the intent, not necessarily the delivery.

**** and, for the record, no one can tell you which of the three you are, at least they cannot with any Doctrine-sanctioned authority

Share