Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “Today only, yesterday’s grammar-free post continued!*” | the Wakefield Doctrine Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “Today only, yesterday’s grammar-free post continued!*” | the Wakefield Doctrine

Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- “Today only, yesterday’s grammar-free post continued!*”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Extra credit for anyone objecting to the affirmation (in the subtitle of today’s post) that ‘today only’ does not conflict with the assertion that it is, in fact, a continuation of another post. What credit is being acquired? Will only say, if we ever do hats or tee shirts, you on the guest list.

Characteristics of the three personality types (with valuable insight into their respective realities) in no particular order:

  • clarks are the product of (an) upbringing in the reality of the Outsider and, thus, their scars are considered beauty marks as often as they are deformation
  • writing a post at 4:30 in the morning, following a night of dreams focused on attempting to escape a world of insane irrationality, at a walking pace, probably has not exerted any lasting effect
  • (lol)
  • scotts don’t get scared, they get excited
  • when rogers get scared they draw together within the local Herd, much like the non-intuitive strategies of World War II bombing raids that entailed flying in formation over enemy territory (sorry, still don’t buy it)
  • but then, we’re not a roger
  • the primary goal of, (the application of the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine), is to become fluent in the language of ‘the other two’ worldviews.
  • the simplest technique in determining the predominant worldview of another is to immediately toss the ‘no-fricken-way’ worldview and then take note of preferred pronouns
  • a scott alone in a room, isn’t
  • a roger alone in a room closes their eyes and feels the company of the Herd
  • a clark alone in a room, surprisingly, gets bored quite quickly
  • the social demands of responding to, contending with, and enduring the pandemic: angers scotts, annoys rogers and delights clarks because, ‘essential tale-tales are obscured, Herd-size is restricted and one’s face is effectively obscured, respectively
  • having even a small degree of fluency in ‘the other two’ worldviews provides us with the early warning to: stay alert when encountering a scott, remember who you’re dealing with while interacting with a roger and take the opportunity to relax, when in the company of a clark
  • the Everything Rule reminds us there is no exclusive claim, by any of the three personality types, on any occupation, avocation, hobby, interest, infatuation, part-time job, profession or ‘the-club-that-everyone-else-was-invited-to-join’
  • that said, sometimes it helps to go with ‘the natural’, scottian cop, rogerian fire fighter, clarklike elementary school teacher… (to name a few)
  • the Wakefield Doctrine is a tool for self-improvement and it is an additional perspective on the world around us and the people that make it up
  • the Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Good post today. No, within context (as later referenced in post, to pandemic), excellent post.
    And it reminded me that, while I’ve found it to be helpful for years navigating my relationships with the world and all who make it up, it is more useful now in these extraordinary times. Quite.
    Thank you. The theory of clark’s, scotts and rogers, to those open to the perspective, is invaluable. To this clark, anyway.
    Have a good Tuesday!

  2. But am i ever really alone in a room? Somehow i don’t think so.