Month: May 2020 | the Wakefield Doctrine Month: May 2020 | the Wakefield Doctrine

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Lizzi: “Clark, it’ll be easy, just look for things that you feel thankful for and write ten of them down..each week…”

 

This is the Ten Things of Thankful bloghop.

Created by Lizzi back in 1805, it is a gratitude bloghop unlike pretty much all others. It is, as some friends might say, ‘freedom hall’. No rules or requirements and interrupting others is permissible, provided it is with the intent of adding, (as opposed to subtracting, negating or otherwise being rude.)

This ‘hop has been going on, by current estimates, since we were all young people.*

It’s traditional on these anniversary affairs to relate some anecdote about things and events that occurred back at the beginning. Lots of things come to mind. I found an early post and have the link down there at Item Seven.

As to amusing and/or insightful insights, I’m drawing a blank.

I will, however, say this: in the very beginning of this thing, when I first met Lizzi, (we both participated in the Finish the Sentence Friday bloghop (hey!! Kristi))… I started hanging around ‘the Considerer’, her own blog. Because of this I had the privilege of witnessing the creation of this here bloghop here. Few people in this virtual place that have made me say, “Damn!” Lizzi is one of them.

What makes me say, ‘Damn!’ is that she created this long-running, very successful bloghop at a time she was getting two or three comments on her posts at her blog. There were no medallions or linkysys connections or Facebook groups or nothing. Just a woman determined to not wait on someone else to change her life. Through her efforts to find the path, she came across reliable sources insisting that gratitude was a key to positive change. So she began to post a gratitude list on her blog. Day after day. Week after week.

Two or Three comments by way of support.

That is how you build a bloghop that can last this long. Do it because you benefit from the effort, not because you have tons of followers cheering you on. Create something of value and they will come. Theres a classic choice in marketing strategy, two very fundamental rationales: Attraction or promotion. What Lizzi did was create something that attracts. ‘way better.

1)  Phyllis ↓

2) Una                                                                 ↑

3) the Wakefield Doctrine   ‘sine qua, y’all, sine qua’

4) Lizzi   a credit to her people.**

5) “…of new gardens and lawns with thistles about, a flag that waves from a tree-house redoubt”:

6) Josie Two-Shoes and Kristi.  Josie picked up the baton first and Kristi has been maintaining a place that is. at once, entertaining and supportive for all who would join in this weekly exercise.

7) Technology and such. Here is a post, from the before time This TToT post

8) Having a job/profession/business that a)according to the definitions of the State of Rhode Island is essential so that 2)I have been allowed to wander the streets in my car, at an unprecented time, where highways are too big for traffic and people are (or were, in the early days of the ‘demic), polite and kept a clarklike distance.

9) THIS SPACE AVAILABLE try it out! send in a grat in a comment, I’ll totally post it here.

10) SR 1.3 from the Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules): “…when your thoughts begin to take on a Times Roman rigidity and show the typographic frivolity of italicization, as you pass Item Five (or maybe even Item Seven)… that feeling of ‘Whew! Made it one more week!’ is totally entitled to be designated Item Ten …X …10 go ahead close that decade.”   er… ibid, op. cit.

music vids:

*

*

*

* I would put my own effective age upon arriving as somewhere between thirteen and “Why the hell is AARP sending me this stuff?!!” We washed ashore (this space for your preferred metaphor) and met others of like mind. And did stuff.

** this kind of statement always takes me back to the early days of the Wakefield Doctrine blog… oh, the fun we had  (New Readers? no, nothing bad, but ya gots to do your reading if’n you want to maximize your enjoyment of this blog.)

You are invited to the Inlinkz link party!

Click here to enter


Share

Six Sentence Sentence -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

This is the Six Sentence Story bloghop.

The host is Denise.

The rules state: using the prompt word, write a story of exactly six sentences in length.

This weeks prompt word:

RIGHT

“What you’re telling me is that all you have to do is write six sentences and include a certain word,” straightening the lapels of his bespoke suit, the man glanced around the bar, disapproval showing like the face of a 2.0 GPA undergrad anthropologist in the field for the first time.

“Right, that’s all there is to it,” the unkempt man sat on the far side of the round table, a positional geometry made possible only by the other’s disdain for their surroundings.

“I guess you have every right to try and learn the craft in whatever manner,”  his words, tripping over a congenital sneer, naturally italicized, “you think is right,” looking down at the dried-liquor veneer of the table top, stood with the jerky grace of a life-long germaphobe surrounded by Petri dishes.

“Well, I had no idea how difficult this would be, or how unprepared I was, but two wrongs don’t make a right,” his spirit buoyed by confession, elevated his natural slouch; with the unsophisticated enthusiasm of a child on his first visit to the city zoo; he felt at home.

“I’d offer you valuable advice, however, even though it is your right, you’ll probably ignore it,”  the older man nodded a curt goodby to his former student.

“Right on,” tipping back in his chair, the writer-to-be tossed a smile to a girl two tables away; she wore a patched army surplus jacket, had a Bic pen holding a pile of chestnut hair off her shoulders and a steno pad in her hands; waving at the departing teacher but looking at the girl, he laughed, ‘You’re bloody well right.”

 

 

(who didn’t see this music video from a mile away?)

Share

Wednesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

 

To paraphrase an old saying, “When the teacher is in need of re-energizing, people will ask questions’

Friend of the Doctrine, Mimi, had a question in her comment on yesterday’s post…(the one that was, actually, an eleven minute video of me talking about a doctors visit and the Doctrine (of course)

Mimi: “Do Scotts get easily offended that other people have different opinions? Is that part of conquest, to make everyone think the same way you do? If so, that would explain a lot about a person i know.

Good question for two reasons: a) the basis of understanding of the above is true of scotts requires appreciating how they (scotts) relate themselves to the world around them and, 2) the answer will enhance (your) facility at identifying the three personality types in your everyday world.*

In a sense, the best answer to Mimi’s question is ask, are we sure they’re a scott. This (question) is the foundation of good Doctrine practice. And, to try to keep this ‘answer’ intriguing, I will add ‘the reason this is good practice is because applying the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine is a lot like playing a musical instrument (including voice).

All people have the power to do things that will offend others. Which is almost the same thing as saying, ‘Everyone can take offense at the action of others.’**

(btw: my favorite approach to a quick read of a person’s predominant worldview (i.e. Outsider, Predator, Herd Member) is: eliminate the obvious, no-fricken-way-theys-a-clark/scott/roger right off the bat. The resultant, side by each comparison, simplifies the process, thereby speeding it up.)

Seeing how its rare that, after eliminating the obviously-not personality type, we’re left with a clark and a scott, lets assume you gots a brother-in-law (or whoever the putative scott in your question is) who might be a scott or a roger. Comparing the scottian worldview (Predators) to the rogerian worldview (Herd Members), what are the big differences? For rogers in a social interaction, everything is personal but not necessarily important; for scotts every interaction is important but rarely personal.

Being the Predator, a scott is ever alert1 to the people in their environment2 Now, lets say there’s one person who is standing out from the crowd, offering high volume opinions. This is where the fun of the Wakefield Doctrine really is,

…imagine the African savannah… maybe its mid-morning. The lion is in the shade of a Acacia tree. A slow-moving herd of antelopes passes by, a dusty flag signals their leaving the watering hole. The lion has fed her cubs, who are now dozing. Suddenly there is laughter in the distance. Hyena!! The lion notices and watches. The hyena is young, hungry and not too bright. The lion and lioness mate drop soundlessly to the ground, and step out of the shade, in clear view of the approaching animal. The hyena’s friends convince him to back away quietly. The lion and lioness return to the shade.

So! The answer is: ‘No a scott will not be offended (if by offended you mean, ‘take it personally’) at virtually anything anyone says.’ They, (the scott), might, if they’re bored enough, engage the person, you know, to have a little fun with their clearly outrageous opinions. This serves two purposes: its amusing and might cause one of the crowd to step out into the open… you know, the chase is everything.

The Everything Rule says: ‘Everyone will do everything at one time or another.’ Turn that around and say, a scott might encounter a person who offends them. The difference between a scott and a roger or a clark is that, by and large, offense is much more personal for them than it is for a scott.

 

* Mandatory Wakefield Doctrine User Warning! Experience has shown that once you see the clarks, scotts and rogers in your world, you may become unable to not see the clarks, scotts and rogers in your life.

ya know?

** who said that? Cynthia? Denise? Lizzi? …. “The Everything Rule!! The Everything Rule!!” You are all correct. Mimi is asking the question, lets let her come to the conclusion on her own, thank you very much.

1) one of the easiest and surest identifiers is what we refer to as the scottian gaze, the way all scotts have of being aware of their environment, they are never not paying attention

2) handy tip for identifying the scott(s) when you’re at a gathering of people you really don’t know: the scott will, interact with everyone there, will be confident and will ‘push everyone on the shoulder‘… figuratively (mostly lol). A primary drive for scotts is to establish ranking (their social ordering being that of a pack) wherever they are, even if they’ve been there before… the shoulder pushing (or comparable challenge) is how they accomplish this

 

Share

Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘they say podcasts are the new encyclopedia,* check this out’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

NEW YORK, NY – MAY 08: Alton Brown, Giada De Laurentiis and Bobby Flay attend A Night With The Stars of Food Network at 79 Crosby Street on May 8, 2012 in New York City. (Photo by Jude Domski/WireImage) You know them better as a clark, a scott and a roger (very much in that order)

So, I was going through old video posts and I came across one that I actually enjoyed listening to. No, really! And I thought, ‘hey if I were into the podcast thing, this would totally be there.’

Well, here it is. I trust the blog can support the file size, we’ll find out. It is eleven minutes or so long. (One thing, the sound volume is a but un-even, but it immediately comes back. Besides, I’m a clark and you’re probably used to that… uneven sound quality, aka mumbling.)

 

 

* I don’t know! They, everyone… most people…you know…rogers!

 

 

Share

Monday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Monday?!! An actual, non-sponsored by Hallmark/the car dealers of America/Friends-of-three-day-weekends holiday?!

Well, there was a time when the days without a new Wakefield Doctrine post were the noteworthy exceptions. The most remarkable thing about this blog, (and the Wakefield Doctrine itself), has been its ‘low overhead’. It, (both this blog and that Doctrine), has never ‘been a chore’, or, for that matter, work. Better to say, the energy (benefit/enjoyment/pleasure) we derive has, consistently been more than we’ve had to expend. Even a semi-spontaneous post like today’s.

Lets finish up where it all began.

One October morning in 1984. (Or, perhaps a September afternoon in 1983. Definitely not a May morning, like this one, but possibly during the early afternoon of a day that did not include: excessive cold, snow, rain, or months with more than seven letters and a ‘Y’.)

One day, I drove to Pawtucket, Rhode Island to visit my friend, Scott. He worked in a small music store located next to a large music store. (Before the rise of Chain-Everything stores, the large store was Ray Mullins Music. For reasons lost to the passage of time, we called the smaller music store next to it, Tony American’s. Pretty certain that wasn’t its real name. But, if you’re a regular visitor to these pages, that comes as no surprise).

In any event. Scott worked as salesman and repair guy. The building, an extension to an Art Deco office block, (you know, lots of plate glass, brass handles on the doors which were mostly glass; there was even a transom window over the entrance.) The interior was a single open space. On the left, instruments on display, to the right, a glass counter running from the front window, and taking a 90 degree left, along the back wall. The repair department was the counter along the back wall.

The morning, (or early afternoon), I walked in, the store was empty except for Scott and one customer. They were standing at the counter, ‘in the repair department’. The customer had arrived only a minute before, as I heard him say, “Hey man, this thing my uncle gave me don’t work no more.” With that he placed an electronic component on the counter in front of Scott.

Catching Scott’s eye, I nodded and held back, pretending to look at guitars. Now that I think of it, here, forty or so years later, this was an uncharacteristic choice, i.e. to not get involved in their conversation. From where I stood, I had a view of both men and the counter top. Being as small, (and empty), as the store was, I had no trouble hearing the conversation that followed.

“He gave it to me for my birthday. I used it fine for a while. Now, it don’t work.” The customer repeated, somewhat redundantly.

From my vantage point, I could see the electronic component was what some called a, ‘dubbing deck’. Basically a cassette tape recorder with two recording heads. A person could put a pre-recorded cassette in one side, a blank cassette in the other side and copy the contents of the first to the second. The device had volume and tone controls for each of the two recording heads. There was a single Master Volume control, (a wheel-type dial, set nearly flush with the surface), in the middle.

Scott looked at the dubbing deck. Reaching under the counter, he brought out a roll of black electrical tape and tore off a two inch piece. Making certain the Master Volume control wheel was up as high as it would go, he put the tape over it. All without saying a word.

“Here you go, good as new.” Scott pushed the component back across the counter. In answer to an unasked question, Scott plugged the recorder in an outlet, the customer put a cassette in both sides and, after testing all functions, grinned broadly and, with a “Thanks, man!” left the store.

My world changed.

And, (how odd this may sound), my life changed.

I was not directly aware of it, (the nature of the change), just that something happened that was significant.

As best as I can express it today, thirty-six (or maybe thirty-seven) years later, my reality now included the ‘fact’ that we all live in a reality that is to a small, but very real degree, personal.

(While it took another twenty years before the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers coalesced into what gave rise to this blog, that day, in a store that is no longer in existence, I was given a gift of perspective. Scott’s solution to the customer’s problem was incontrovertible evidence that his personal reality was different from my own. That his solution to the problem reflected a world, a reality, quite distinct from the one that I inhabited.)

cool

 

 

 

 

 

 

Often the choice of music to accompany any given post is a matter of feel more than (any) historical significance or congruity. This is an example. From 1968. Still in high school, two years before encountering the progenitors

Share