TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- “…a tale of parts and the whole.” | the Wakefield Doctrine TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- “…a tale of parts and the whole.” | the Wakefield Doctrine

TToT -the Wakefield Doctrine- “…a tale of parts and the whole.”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

‘Black dog on a milk chocolate couch with a nougat quilt’ (Jigsaw that, Phyllis)
(Landscape orientation)
Una is sitting in the middle of a leather upholstered loveseat that is in backed-up to the front picture window in our living room. The window itself is not in the photo. The effects (of the location) and the wear on the loveseat’s location are.
The top edge of the back of the couch are washed out by the light coming through the un-seen window. The cushions of backrest nearest the camera are indented and crushed out of shape, as if a weight had been placed on the top of cushions. Looks to be a weight of about fifty-four pounds, squeezing the top edge down to the middle of (the cushion).
Una is sitting facing the camera but looking to her left (the camera’s right). Given that the only thing to Una’s left is the crushed back cushion and the picture window, it would appear that she is thinking that there is something outside that requires barking at.
Una is sitting in the classic sphinx position (two front paws straight out in front of her, hind legs bent and folded in the back and her head aloft and alert. Her snout is point towards the camera and, as we mentioned, her eyes are looking to her side and we only just noticing, one of her ears is aimed in the direction of her eyes. No, seriously. Her right ear if a slightly-rounded black triangle, we can see just a hint of lighter colored hair in her inner ear. But her left ear is a wedge shape. The open part of her, at right angles to us appears a flat plane and the wedge is the concavity of her outer ear.
Her ears are independently aimable.
As implied in the title, the leather is a soft, milk chocolate and the comforter thats draped over the back is like, a light butterscotch. An anemic yellow, if there is such a color.

Given the subtitle that showed up this morning, experience has taught me to keep it moving. Hey! Josie, thanks for the invite and keepin the old clubhouse all ready and available. We all appreciate it.

Item (1) the Wakefield Doctrine. ’cause, well, sine qua, right?

Item (2) the virtual world. it’s not like the Doctrine wouldn’t exist without it. because there was a ‘theory of clarks, scotts and rogers‘ from, like 1984. it’s just that I get to meet so many more people ‘in here’ than I would ‘out there’1 And, with the numbers, the odds of meeting remarkably talented and caring people (not always qualities found in the same person) increases, exhibitiously.*

Item (3) grateful for the fact that those who come here more than once, on purpose, are those possessed of the kind of mind that enjoys the occasional ms from more far-flung realities.

Item (4) go back… three is/was a double

Item (5) the underlying theme today: self improving oneself and 15andmeowing. (Wait! This will make sen…. well, wait anyway). We all know that the Wakefield Doctrine is, among other things, a particularly useful tool for self-improvement. (Hint: while we all live in one and only one of the three characteristic worldviews, i.e. Outsider, Predator and Herd Member, we retain the potential of the other two. Thats not to say that I can pass for a roger just because I feel like it. That is to say that sometimes, under duress, I will look like a scott in how I react to a situation, or as if I were a roger. What all this means is that I already have within me the ‘improvements’ that I seek.)

(…ok, I’m getting to it.) So 15andmeowing, on one of her posts a while ago, had a link to one of those online jigsaw puzzle sites. Kinda fun. She mentioned her time (to complete the puzzle)  uh oh.… so, naturally2 I tried again. And, equally naturally, I found a site and started playing. I mentioned this to Phyllis (Item (7)) and she started to play as well. She immediately became better at the game than I was. I thought, not surprisingly, ‘What does the Doctrine say about this?’3

Anyway… the self-improvement part. I find that when I’m trying to assemble a jigsaw puzzle, whenever I just move pieces together, without thinking, I am very much quicker. The lesson? Don’t think, trust the self. aka, ‘get out of your own way’.**

Item (6) Una. My role model. To live and act in the here and now.

Item (7) Phyllis. A roger with a significant secondary clarklike aspect.

Item (8) THIS SPACE AVAILABLE! (Now, this is usually meant as an option for anyone not yet ready to post a full-on TToT but would like to get their electronic toes wet…. (eww some how creepier than I would have thought).

In any event we have a Commentation situation developing with our hostinae, Josie. Who hasn’t felt that sinking feeling after writing one damn fine comment and seeing some lame-ass computer generated message about how ‘You can’t do that’. Josie emailed her comment, which we are proud to present, uncut, unedited, in its entirety, in the our little BLOCKQUOTE Theatre.  (Be sure to get over to and make sure she knows we got her back, commentistically-speaking.)

Thanks, it is my pleasure to be able to provide a place where we can meet up and exchange our thoughts on gratitude each week, it must be one of the most positive web addresses that there is!

I love stopping by your blog, it is always an experience in another reality that challenges my mind to keep up and makes me smile.  I suspect that at times you are smiling as you write and annotate too!

This is such a beautiful photo of Una, perfect blend of colors for us to see her well, and you are right about dogs (and cats) teaching us to live in the now, not stressing about yesterday or tomorrow, accepting life as it comes, and accepting us with all our faults and flaws… that’s a big one, something people find much harder to do!

The virtual world is my favorite place to hang out, all my friends live there, and what an eclectic bunch it is!  I think that’s the fascination and satisfaction of the experience… meeting people in far-flung places and discovering that we are more alike than different. 

The Doctrine is a very cool thing that is indeed useful in putting things in perspective. I loved the commentary on Clarks and puzzles… right on target.  We really can’t just take anything at face value and the boring order of routine, so it takes us longer as we toy with possibilities.  Finding new apps to try and to share is one of the things I love about the Internet. We get to try new things and improve skills on old ones.  Who would have thought we’d one day be doing jigsaw puzzles online or creating pottery late at night as Zoe and I sometimes do with the pottery app she found.  It’s all fun, and it’s all a step toward self-improvement, as is the efforts we put into our writing.   I also play “Scrabble” much better now than I did when I first started on Words with Friends, it’s great for exercising my fuzzy brain.

As always, I smile when you refer to the infamous BOSR or SBOR in your posts. It takes me back to a time when SSS was quite a social hangout and the drive to come up with that tenth item was strong enough to inspire creative ways to accomplish same.  I think all facets of life should have BOSR’s that we can add to and imiplement as needed.  If there must be rules, why must they be inflexible?  Hence my determination that “my blog… my rules” and I shall use an ex word for the X post in the A-Z Challenge.

Thank you for faithfully sharing here each week and giving us things to think about, you are an original and I like that a lot!

Item (9) The Book of Secret Rules (aka the Secret Book of Rules) which states, in part, ‘…a participant, cognizant of and amendable to the imposition of the rules pertaining to presenting a List of Ten Things of Thankful, may [p]rovided the words ‘Thankful’ (substitutions of grat, gratitude or ‘landscape orientation’ permitted) in said list, can use pretty much anything that wanders into their awareness, like a child into their parent’s bedroom at midnight…op cit, ibis. (ed. 2018)’

Item (10) Secret Rule 1.3

 

1) hey! think you might be a clark but not sure? (and really crossin your fingers…please come out scott or…roger) try this: you wake up in the morning and the world takes shape around you and you think, ‘ok we can do this thing… lets get out there and deal with the world’ good morning, clark!

2)  not to say that only those of us from Y Chromia see the mention of a completion time as red a flag. it’s just that part of my genetic code (‘AGCTGGCAT’, to be precise) lol says ‘You better do better than that!’

3) rogers will always be better at jigsaw puzzles than clarks (and scotts) because the reality that they (rogers) exist in is a reality in which everything is related. If everything is already related then all they need to do (playing a jigsaw) is remember how the pieces go today. A clark, on the other hand, sees that parts all spread out on the screen and tries to use the parts to create a picture.

*  my modest attempt at a rogerian expression

** kinda advice for clarks, as opposed to rogers and scotts, ya know?


Music Vid

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Oh no! I just wrote an entire comment and it vanished when I hit publish and said something about “invalid security token”? But my previous comment on your blog published fine just a few minutes ago. SIGH, seeing if this will post before I begin again.

  2. Hmmmm, it just did it again! I wonder why it accepted my earlier note and my longer one on your last post. And did I think to copy the text before pushing Post? Well of course not. :-( Taking a short break then will write my comment in Word to paste here, I will not be defeated! :-))

  3. May says:

    As always you make me laugh out loud as I read. So, number 8 where this space is available? I suggest YOU! And yes, the self-improvement. The positivity of this group and the support and encouragement you offer me through the Gravity Challenge both mean more to me than probably anyone else knows. So, yes. You, my friend, fill that space that is available!

  4. No idea what is going on, any attempt to post even a portion of my comment results in “Invalid Security Token”. I even tried using my old Google address. Guess I will just email you my comment for the time being and try again tonite or tomorrow. Wasn’t having any problem with your blog earlier this morning. Weird!

  5. valj2750 says:

    My mind said, no, exponentially until I read the * Love the advice** – get out of your own way. And here’s my own ***. Scotts won’t take any advice from anyone – they don’t need to.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      no, no they don’t. (of course if they listened to advice on action, they’d be depriving themselves of the opportunity to act, which I would submit, is the only time they live

  6. Sageleaf says:

    Okay so I *do* like to put together a puzzle every now and then. :) You know…sit down with 1000 pieces and plunk away at it until it’s finished. BUT, I will say that I’ve noticed how the rogers seem to want to keep the puzzle intact. You know…by gluing a background to it and then putting it on display. I’ve noticed this more than a few times. I don’t really care. The goal got done and then it’s on to other things. Hehe. But that’s just it with clarks, isn’t it? Mission accomplished? That’s nice. What’s next? Rogers with a mission accomplished? CELEBRATE! Revel. Make a trophy or memorabilia. Hang it in the living room. Tell others about it. lol
    Anyways, back from traveling. Got in late last night after driving through that winter storm for two days. haha. No problem. ;)
    Hope you’ve been well!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      (Phyllis laughed in acknowledgement of your correct understanding of her people… lol)
      Sounds like an amazing adventure. Look forward to reading/hearing all about it.

  7. Funny how i find myself in my own way most of the time. Wonderful list.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      thanks Mimi… yeah the thing is while I know (to get out of my own way)… I’m always forgetting to remember that advice!

  8. Pat B says:

    Well, by process of elimination, I cannot be a Roger! I am horrible at doing jigsaw puzzles, nor do I find it enjoyable to sit for long working on one, but someone dear to me claims I am definitely a Roger. Hmm. I may be a combination.
    Good job, coming to Josie’s rescue.
    That first line of describing your photo of Una made me want a candy bar. I wonder why that would be. LOL
    You really deserve some kind of reward for the terrific description of the photo.
    Getting “electronic toes wet” sounds like a shocking experience.
    “Anemic yellow” may be a new paint color, or maybe not. LOL

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      the thing about the Doctrine is that when we talk about a person being a clark or a scott or a roger we are actually referring to the world they live in (and especially) the world they grew up and developed in…and even though we only live in one world (most of the time) we have the potential to experience the world as do ‘the other two’.
      Example: I’m a clark with a significant secondary scottian aspect, Phyllis is a roger with a significant secondary clarklike aspect. Someone dear to you is a roger with a strong secondary clarklike aspect (lol)*
      So everyone is a ‘combination’ but that doesn’t really alter what your predominant worldview/personal reality is; the secondary and tertiary aspects aren’t ‘alternate personality types as they are a predisposition to access the view of the world that the other two allow.
      Better example: Phyllis is very much a roger. Her world is quantifiable, it makes sense (even if she doesn’t agree) everything is related and she ‘belongs’ to the ‘Herd’**. But having a secondary clarklike aspect allows her some additional perspectives on the world that a roger with no significant secondary aspects would have. There are such unfortunates, people with virtually no expressed secondary or tertiary aspects. You tend not to see them around here. I was said that everyone who comes to this blog more than twice on purpose is either a clark or has a significant secondary clarklike aspect. Without going into ‘the Everything Rule’ for the moment, lets just say that world for a roger or a scott is already perfect. They generally-speaking do not have a lot of need for the Doctrine… no, serially! Ask any roger or scott: Whats the thing about yourself or your reality that you most want to change or improve…. then sit and watch how long it takes them to come up with an answer! lol (We used to say, if you had a crowd of people in, like an auditorium and you needed to get a quick check on how many clarks are there, then ask over the PA system “Anyone who think it would be fun to be someone else, raise your hands”…. (‘one clark, two clarks, three….lol)

      *while others can help find the ways to determine your predominant worldview, it is always up to you to decide.
      ** the Herd a roger belongs to can be any context by which one person identifies with others it can be tiny and abstract or it can be the population of a continent… it is the belonging that makes it rogerian. Belonging means (in this case) a part of beyond and question or challenge to (one’s) belongingness… (not a ‘real’ word)