Friday Quickie -the Wakefield Doctrine- “as soon as our scottian readers stop laughing, we will begin” | the Wakefield Doctrine Friday Quickie -the Wakefield Doctrine- “as soon as our scottian readers stop laughing, we will begin” | the Wakefield Doctrine

Friday Quickie -the Wakefield Doctrine- “as soon as our scottian readers stop laughing, we will begin”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

CSR

You wanna know one of the most fun things about the Wakefield Doctrine? A post like this. Which is being written because I was sitting around this morning, after shoveling the driveway and talking to Phyllis about something that I had to do at work. I made the statement ‘clarks live with fear, in a reality characterized by fear’. ok, fair enough (and accurate, as well). Then Phyllis, who is a roger with a significant secondary clarklike aspect and is very well-versed in the Doctrine, said, “and rogers worry.”

We both laughed that special laughter that celebrates co-discovery of something new and good, not funny laughing but ‘yeah! you see it too?’

…and I said, “scotts live in panic

And the Doctrine insight was complete, ‘clarks exist in fear, rogers worry and scotts live in panic.’

Ain’t it cool?

(New Readers: word about the insights afforded by the Doctrine. The core element to the Wakefield Doctrine being an effective tool is that it’s all about perspective. We maintain that perspective is, for all intents and purposes, reality. Further, we say, if you can accept that and then imagine the world as the other person is experiencing it. then you have one more perspective on life and the world than when you started. And more perspective is better than less. The rest of the Doctrine is the real fun. Think of it as describing the world to another person by singing metaphors. the words are not important, the literal definition totally does not matter, just the fact that it feels right when you say it. And…and!, the other person can pick up the ‘tune’ and follow along, or as happened with Phyllis this morning, as has happened in the past with Friends of the Doctrine, she picked up the melody and found the next phrase.)

Try it.

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Excellent! And I could not have better described the moment of mutual “self” discovery of yet another aspect of personal realities.
    Does not the Wakefield Doctrine RULE!

  2. I love the metaphor you used😉

  3. Sageleaf says:

    Fear. That is a very fitting word for a clark. Can paranoia be classified with that? I say that from personal experience. LOL

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      two questions: when you are concerned (about the thoughts and actions of others around you)… are you concerned about their agenda or about the chance of ‘being found out’?

  4. valj2750 says:

    Pass me the Xanaz.