Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘hey, it’s mess-with-people’s-heads-without-letting-on-thats-what-you’re-doing Day!’ | the Wakefield Doctrine Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘hey, it’s mess-with-people’s-heads-without-letting-on-thats-what-you’re-doing Day!’ | the Wakefield Doctrine

Friday -the Wakefield Doctrine- ‘hey, it’s mess-with-people’s-heads-without-letting-on-thats-what-you’re-doing Day!’

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

top-ten-luxury-brands-sexy-ads-2_thumb300x200

Remember! Accept no substitutes!  The Facebook seems to be trending to postings of life-outlooks that seem suspiciously familiar…. in a half roger, half scottian way. Which is as it must be, it being Facebook, (Facebook motto: ‘remember the last day of high school and how you went around trying to get everyone else to write something in your year book and even the people who would make fun of you would write something, and it wasn’t always bad‘), well, just be on the look out, ya know?

Hey  had something clever, (and a little cutting), to say about the way people think they understand the Doctrine and all the other kinds of self-improvement tools, but lets be more mature and positive than that, here’s a partial post partial reprint:

So a quick review of primary characteristics of clarks and scotts and rogers. (from 12/12/2013)

clarks: quiet, tend to mumble and are on the “brainy” side (not geeks, who tend to be rogers) but clarks are the ones who are living in their own heads. If you want to know about anything that normal people don’t have the time to learn about, clarks are the people you will go to… there is one in your life, close but you just haven’t noticed them. clarklike females will dress from the “androgyny fashion collection” mix and mix, especially shoes [special bonus 2015 insight: they treat the components of fashion as if it were their own private serial novel, “this is how I want you to see me now, but don’t be surprised if I change the premise entirely without warning,” gender identity for a female clark is as subject to their whims and decisions as everything else in a clark’s reality lol] … the clarklike males will be grey(with a splash of beige) and have virtually no eye contact when speaking to you, which if they do, will consist of strings of incomplete sentences.  [clarks are the ones who demonstrate the quality of aggressive self-effacement…lol]

scotts: never stop moving, never stop talking, never fuckin stop…sports fans to a person…your scott is the one who introduces themselves whether they are entering a situation where they are the stranger or there is a stranger entering the setting where the scott already is…when you move to a new place, the neighbor who comes to “welcome you to the neighborhood” that’s your scott…always helpful as long as “completing the task” is not the priority…scottian females…always attractive/seductive/commanding/demanding depending on the context, scottian males…always in charge…the person best described as “not always right but never uncertain…”

rogers: the most social and accommodating person you know, the roger is, in fact, most likely your family doctor, your family lawyer, your family accountant, emphasis on family…the person who knows the family history and insists that you come to the family reunion that’s your roger, the one who knows how many forks should be on which side of the plate…there’s your rogerian female…want to have a long conversation?…talk to a roger, they make it so easy to talk about yourself…the rogerian male will be well dressed and if you want to know if ascots and large briarwood pipes are still worn and/or smoked you will find the roger when you see either of them and if you want to imagine settling down and raising a family with a beautifully decorated home and be a member in all the right clubs and organisations…then a rogerian female will be near by.

Hey! Don’t forget!! Friday the tomorrowth 7pm EST Wakefield VidChat

In other pre-weekend news:

Vidchat tonight 6:30 EST come join me and my delectable v-spouse, Lizzi R. as we affect to speak with every goloss in our bag of tricks… a little George and Martha (yeah, sure, I do mean the Washingtons) to Scully and Muldur to Jane and George to…. of course, Rob and Laura   (someone be sure to remind me to ask writing questions early on, I have to leave by 8:30 at the very latest.)

And…. Chapter 10  Blogdominion  is scheduled for release this weekend!  …in which we find out: a little more about Sr Margaret Ryan’s life before showing up at the door of St Dominique’s with a single suitcase in her hand and why the decision to help her Mother Superior comes at such a (potentially) high cost and we drop in on Tom Fearing, who is really coming into his own (finally!) as he talks on the phone to his faux collaborator Ed Willoughby, and what news is Cherie Fearing so excited/fearful about telling her husband and… and, we’ll learn why the heck Maribeth Hartley doesn’t feel the need to wear clothes at home!  All that and more in Chapter 10  (so yeah better get over to jukepop and get caught up on our story!)

(been listening to Joe Jackson of late. The guy is simply great. Here, listen)

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. jny_jeanpretty says:

    frist!

  2. jny_jeanpretty says:

    PS: there is nothing more uplifting than a good sports movie: here are 3 I can think of, right off:
    1) Million Dollar Baby 2) Invictus and 3) Cinderella Man. For any good sports movie, think directors, first and foremost. Thanks!
    PS: The day they make a good tennis sports movie…it’s impossible to picture. And I love tennis. Go figure.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      Hey! Jean! we have a vidchat going on tonight! stop by if you have time (will post link in the facebook)
      good to ‘see’ you

  3. Denise says:

    Excellent post! Excellent descriptors!

    Hi Jean! Long time! Yes, good movies but I didn’t see Invictus.

    I love Joe Jackson!

  4. Loved these damned descriptions. :D
    You’re so right about the wardrobe thing…and the eye contact? Holy crikes I HATE looking at people while I’m talking to them. And our intense-eye-contact culture drives me completely nuts. They say people become suspicious of you if you don’t maintain eye contact.
    And the scott thing? Oh man…here come the holidays where for days and days we’ll be in close contact with my scottian brother-in-law. We always have to prepare to be talked at…and in no uncertain terms, he WILL BE RIGHT. HA!

    As for the part about shoes and clarks…I’m taking my Christmas money and ordering a pair of flowery Doc Martens. Just saying. ;)

    PS – We’re going out with the family to dinner tonight. We’re meeting at 7. I anticipate being finished by 8:30. If that’s the case, I’ll call in then. :)

    • Aw, scratch that. They bumped our reservation (for J’s b-day) to 7:45. Might not be able to make it back in time to call. :\
      Ya gonna do a Christmas call-in? Inquiring minds want to know. :P
      Or perhaps there should be a Christmas special this week. I’m NOT at work. :D

      • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

        Hey! BB to JC!! Yeah we’ll be on the air…. “surrounded by Wakefield” as the nice lady says…hey being off work (and Denise is off this week) lets try a vidchat ‘on location’ put the google on our phones and take it to a pleasing locale!
        let me know what days are the best of days… being in the work that I am…I can surely adjust my schedule!

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      whats the term I’ve been fond of lately…aggressively deferential for clarks being so determined to stay the Outsider…. but, as we know, it’s not simply matter of our actions and style of interaction, it’s the character of the (personal) reality that we wake up to ever morning