mid-week, true Autumn morning -the Wakefield Doctrine- only 40 days left ’til Spring! | the Wakefield Doctrine mid-week, true Autumn morning -the Wakefield Doctrine- only 40 days left ’til Spring! | the Wakefield Doctrine

mid-week, true Autumn morning -the Wakefield Doctrine- only 40 days left ’til Spring!

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

BeFunky_photo-3.jpg

As we teeter on the mid-day of the workweek, I’m tempted….

(ha!  I’m sitting here at my computer this morning at 5:58 am and I hear a slow cracking sound from somewhere outside. The sound builds up speed and volume, sort of like a reverse clap of thunder …. breaking wood (and the sounds of tree limbs brush other limbs, only loud) and finally a ‘crack!’ and a sound/feeling of something really big hitting the ground. Naturally I laugh and say, (out loud, of course, since Una is half-asleep by the bedroom door), “I heard that!!”    …never fails to crack me up.)

Where were we before the metaphysics interrupted us? Oh yeah, Cyndi’s Comment from late last night. Excellent Comment and a totally appreciated prompt to get my Wakefield Doctrine on. It seems that with time shrinking and my side projects growing, I’ve been neglecting the mission and purpose of this here blog here. And that, (new) Readers, is to present the principles of the Wakefield Doctrine in such a way that anyone can read it once, smile and later that same day find themselves thinking, “hey! that’s one of those rogers that blog this morning was talking about!” or “god I must be such a clark, sitting here remembering what I know I’m still going to forget when the time comes…” or even… “lol those scotts! how do they keep it up and more, how do they stay out of jail!”

Well, Cynthia’s Comment, while specific to her own direct life, offers a good illustration, not only of the way that clarks experience the world, but offers us a real life context where we can take an admittedly difficult concept (of the Doctrine) and hang some regular words on it, make it more relatable, ya know?

Actually the Comment/Question/’so-what-does-the-Doctrine-do-for-us-in-this-situation was very basic, at least in the worldview of the Outsider. (And it is germane to the experience of scotts and rogers, it’s just not as pressing as it is for clarks.)

“…does the roger remember that moment forever like a clark does? Does having the “watch yourself” (but I said it in a nice way) speech with a roger warrant that they won’t try to “walk on you” again?”

hey! I just re-read the question and realized that I only half-answered the question! (what?!! a clark rushing through a situation, acting on one element (a valid element, mind you) but missing another?  never frickin happens!  lol)

In my defense, it was like, 11-way-late last night, when I read this… what I overlooked was the really practical aspect of her question, i.e. should she expect to have to go through the some thing with the person at another time? wellll! that’s a whole topic in and of itself.

It’s a matter of dominance…. which, if we remember our ‘Everything Rule’ is manifested differently in the three worldview views.  For scotts, (where the matter is dealt with most simply and transparently), dominance is a function of one’s role in the pack, never a personal/qualitative matter, dominance is simply ranking. And, for a scott, dominance is not static, as is abundantly clear as we watch a scott enter a social setting, the very first thing they do is challenge everyone in the area… figuratively, (and sometimes, literally), pushing people on the shoulder to see if they push back and, if they do, how hard. As we said, simple, direct.
rogers on the other hand, function in a reality of emotion, (as opposed to the reality of action,as do scotts) and their basic group structure is that of the Herd.  Lets reflect on the immediate visuals you get with those two:

  • pack of scotts  tousling and wrestling, together for the fun until the contest between two becomes too close to call and all the scotts except two, back away as these two get more serious about their contest…. pretty impressive sight and they’re not holding back, no way! Eventually, one establishes dominance over the other and, (the other), submits to the dominant one and they both go back to normal life in the pack, you know, walking to the head of the lunch line in the cafeteria, sneaking out of study hall to smoke…. the other visual you’re probably getting when you think about a pack of scotts is a single line, quickly, silently running through the night, as the scent they’re following tells of a tiring prey
  • a herd of rogers… what?! there was a center over there a minute ago!  wait a minute!! that black and brown one was definitely leading the group to the side pasture…no, wait that was a different  one…. lol  sorry, having fun and the Doctrine is fun. The thing about dominance in the worldview of rogers is that, as individuals, rogers look to enhance their value to the others in the Herd. It’s not a direct, ‘Hey! I have my teeth on your throat! I am dominant!”  it’s more, “Why yes, you’ve heard my name from others, I do have connections to many, I am, at this moment, the center of the Herd!”

Hey! where’d the time go!?!? I’ll get back to you later today…. sure, ask questions! Thanks Cynthia!

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. valj2750 says:

    What?

  2. valj2750 says:

    A silly question, that, for this is a well-written piece on perspective of worldview. I was just kidding, which of course, you know. You might remind your readers that JukePop is where you vote, Blogdominion is where you can read.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      ah good point! (thank you…. I need to remember that it’s ok to remind everyone that I would like if…. lol I will stop talking ’cause my clarklike aspect will surely try to undo all the good of your Comment)

      HEY! What Val said!! yeah, you better do what she sez…. link to Vote (read each of the total 5 Chapters)… feedback would be nice too,

  3. christine says:

    Ha! Nice little detour to the tree falling in the woods. That cracked me up, too. :)

  4. Looking forward to the next installment, lol. HAHA.
    I get a “holiday” today. Kind of glad. Interestingly, my rogerian employee me sent a heartfelt message of apology. A small victory of Cynthia. A giant leap for clarks everywhere. ;)

  5. Denise says:

    It is fascinating to watch “group” dynamics among scotts and rogers. (I never tire of it!)
    As you’ve pointed out Clark, scotts are about the dominance/ranking thing. rogers on the other hand are more concerned with their place or position within the group and look for opportunity to enhance (elevate) their position (or appearance of position) within the group.

    It sounds as if Cyndi’s situation might be an example of a roger “asserting” themselves within the “group”. rogers are very much aware of the jockeying of position whether in a social setting or the workplace. Order. rogers need order and they need to know where they stand in a way different from scotts.

    Aha! Is that why Cyndi received a heartfelt message of apology from her employee? Because, now they (the employee) knows “where they stand” (within the group)?