Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
When uncertain as to what to write and time is running out try:
- Cynthia’s most recent Comment
- the 4th Comment in the 7th Post, 11 months ago
- …just frickin write about the Doctrine!
- …and hey!! you (no, not them, you), as the invisible narrator and writer of this here Post here, I am personally inviting to join us on the Adventure of a Lifetime… the ‘Hurry-up and Weight Gravity Challenge’!! everyone is there, come on!! it’ll be fun!
Lets do the hard one first, followed by 2 and then number 1 on our little bullet list, ok?
3] The Wakefield Doctrine is a perspective on behavior. Ours, yours and their’s. The Wakefield Doctrine is not ‘the Answer’, however, the questions that it would have us pose, (to ourselves), can be very, very helpful in understanding the people in our lives. The Wakefield Doctrine is for you, not them. While most ‘personality theories’ and quizzes and surveys and questionnaires, prompt most of us to think how we can help/change the other people in our lives, the Wakefield Doctrine does nothing more than offer an opportunity to see the world as the other person is experiencing it. All the Doctrine claims: if I am able to appreciate ‘how you relate yourself to the world around you‘, then I will understand you better. What I do with this insight, that knowledge, is entirely a different matter. However, since we all have the potential to experience the world as does the Outsider (clarks), the Predator (scotts) or the Herd Member (rogers), then it’s easy enough to see how I might: a) become a better person, b) develop into a more efficient hunter, c) better appreciate the ways that life can affirm the individual. Plus, the Wakefield Doctrine is fun.
2] ” zoebyrd says:
August 11, 2014 at 5:53 pm • Edit
yeah, okay….whatever. ”
….yes, lol (hey, I don’t make the rules!… well, sort of, but you’ll have to ask zoe what she meant in that comment on the 7th Post, 11 months ago)
1]
What I wanna know is how the hell you’re so good at figuring out all the clarks, scotts, and rogers. Granted, you RUN the Doctrine, but…
In my office, I’m still not that good at automatically ID-ing everyone. Most of the are rogers, I know. I can tell that I’m probably the only clark. I think the admin assistant (who pretty much runs the place) is a scott. I think. I think. She’s intense. And I don’t wanna piss her off. LOL
PS – closing tomorrow. It’s been a friggin’ harrowing journey. Originally scheduled for Friday. Then the lawyer screwed up. Then scheduled for 11 am . Then the mortgage officer screwed up. Rescheduled for 4pm tomorrow. Sheesh.
Lets all think positive HUD RESPA thoughts for our friend Cynthia!
Well you cant take it out of context …. ya gotta tell em that you said the following statement first! oh and speaking of first… FRIST! “…don’t laugh! having someone with a secondary rogerian is quite valuable, at least to the extent that I can say that through a comment because then I can’t see you say, ‘yeah, sure whatever‘”
what if youre just pale and sickly? Will sucking on seaweed help me too Mr. Atlas?
lol FRIST and yes, the context does seem to contribute to the transferrable transparency of a given quote!
Oh my word, old, non-PC ads crack me up.
…and! ‘Posed by A Professional Model!’
Hurry up and weight = NOT fun
is so…. is so
Perhaps not, but we suffer together, Dyanne…AND you get a little “wakey wakey” ping from Clark in the morning as a bonus!
(yeah! what she said!)
lol
And now it’s Wednesday. I’ve survived the closing process. :P
very cool!
… and now the photos! lol
saw the photos on facebook , congratulations!!!!
yeah… they gots themselves an excellent front porch, no? (I would tend to use the somewhat redundant-sounding, but more descriptive term: covered porch
I love the porch but man its a STONE house! How cool is that?