Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Tuesday -the Wakefield Doctrine-

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

As a tool for self-developing oneself?

The Wakefield Doctrine offers one more way to approach self-improvement. Which manifests, in the three personality types, as:

  1. clarks(the Outsider)… bring it on, where do I sign? No, no, wait… lets not start yet, lets consider what it is that I totally know I need to change about myself….hold on! Give me a minute… lol
  2. scotts(the Predator)… you know people who are interested in self-help and self-improvement? where are they, no! Its better without introduction, you know, lets surprise them, there’s nothing about us that they really, actually need to know first… I’ll help them understand what they want to be… yum, yum
  3. rogers(the Herd Member)… why, that must be terrible for you, I’ll be glad to help, no, no need, I have the list in my head, where do you want to start? Me? whatever gave you that idea? …well, to be completely honest, I wouldn’t mind getting better at explaining things…. you know, how they’re supposed to be? You’d be surprised at how quickly those other two would improve once they realize there’s a Right way to do things…. are you writing this down?

lol

A little fun with our three personality types.

But seriously.

All clarks and those scotts and rogers with sufficiently significant secondary clarklike aspect*, will be saying, “I’m listening. What’cha got in the way of tools, methods or approaches to making me an even better version of myself?

More to follow… provided a Comment with a question appears that is not written by Denise or Mimi or Cynthia**

 

 

* it’s long been established that if you’re here, reading this and it is your second visit, then you are probably a clark or, if you are not, then you are a scott or a roger with a significant secondary clarklike aspect. You know, ’cause of the no-practical-return-necessary curiosity.

** the question, not the Comment. Comments from all Readers contribute to our understanding and use of this here Doctrine here.***

*** ok, Denise and Mimi and Cynthia can write questions into their Comments… but….they have to me multiple choice!

lol

 

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. Multiple choice questions in a comment? No problem! Why, my people can endlessly project, postulate and configurate any number of possible solutions to a problem/question and or offshoots from a problem/question. Multiple choice?! Ha! 😆

    That aside. Good post. Tools are intrinsic to survival; to living a comfortable life.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      of course, when was the last time you met a clark who expected a comfortable life