Another. Attempt. At. Six. Sentence. Stories. -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine Another. Attempt. At. Six. Sentence. Stories. -the Wakefield Doctrine- | the Wakefield Doctrine

Another. Attempt. At. Six. Sentence. Stories. -the Wakefield Doctrine-

July 9, 2015 By

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Saint-Christopher-by-Konr-001

Taking a cue, (and exhibiting the remarkable secret-ego of the clarklike personality type), from Lizzi, (who writes with a skill and youthful abandon that I can imagine, yet know that I have too many years of practice being careful to even think about attempting), I will again charge zoe’s bloghop with quixotic relish.

“…I’m sorry, but six pounds.”

“Yes! the test was done 3 times and …and! the answer remains the same: six pounds.”

“No, at this point, there is no reason to check a 4th time. Ontologically, there is no basis or grounds for hope of a different outcome.”

“No, there is nothing that can be done. The standard of deviation in matters of this…. nature, is no more than .7 pounds, and even that is when one is in a state of rest that statistically, most of us can only dream of attaining.”

 

Related Posts:

Share
Filed Under: Featured, Psychology, the Wakefield Doctrine Tagged With: , , ,

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. dyannedillon says:
    July 9, 2015 at 9:28 am

    I had to look up “ontologically”. Nice story, Clark! I want this to be about a brain, a man brain, but I don’t think a brain weighs that much.

  2. Sandy Ramsey says:
    July 9, 2015 at 10:21 am

    Dyanne’s comment cracked me up. So is it, Clark? A man brain?

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:
      July 9, 2015 at 10:52 am

      “In later decades, men show greater volume loss in whole brain volume and in the frontal lobes, and temporal lobes, whereas in women there is increased volume loss in the hippocampi and parietal lobes. Men show a steeper decline in global gray matter volume, although in both sexes it varies by region with some areas exhibiting little or no age effect. Overall white matter volume does not appear to decline with age, although there is variation between brain regions.” (our friend at Wikipedia)

      • ivywalker says:
        July 9, 2015 at 2:24 pm

        I find it shocking that the hippocampus is the area that volume loss in women is most prevalent … ask any Y chrome and they are complaining that the Xs never forget anything! ahhahahahhaha….. a little neurophysiology humor! Nice entry , Man! Thanks for linking over! AND I REPEAT ON THE wt challenge… ARE YOU INSANE!?

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:
      July 9, 2015 at 10:57 am

      wait!! almost forgot to ask!!

      hey come join us at the Hurry up and Weight Gravity Challenge at 2 Mile Run!!

  3. valj2750 says:
    July 9, 2015 at 9:36 pm

    Without a doubt, Ivy’s perception made me laugh. I NEVER forget anything about certain things, if you know what I mean. There are, however, some things that have to be pounded into my brain, likewise.

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:
      July 10, 2015 at 6:27 am

      yeah… that odd fact, totally (seemingly) inconsequential event in the 3rd Grade… how does that even happen!

  4. oldegg says:
    July 10, 2015 at 2:33 am

    It is not the size of the computer but the ability to function satisfactorily that counts. However I must add I have lost a lot of memory from mine! please do not suggest re-booting.

  5. Kristi says:
    July 10, 2015 at 12:27 pm

    If only the scale could take pity sometimes.

  6. messymimi says:
    July 11, 2015 at 8:09 pm

    What a thought provoking take on the word prompt!