Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
(I have mentioned that, everything I do, related to the Wakefield Doctrine, results in a new/better/enhanced-even-just-a-tiny-little-bit understanding of myself, right?)
(…and I’ve surely related how the Wakefield Doctrine and my efforts to present it to others, is, somehow, self-motivating and I’ve never feared the blank white screen of an un-written Post, correct?)
Good.
Our Thursday series, (the) Guest Post Thursday’s Guest Post (series) has been a resounding success. Unfortunately, I am totally out of rogers (might have a scott or two somewhere, and a handful of clarks), but not a single, (yeah, right as if they are ever in singles….even when they are totally alone, rogers are never single lifeforms), grow-up-develop-coping-strategies-appropriate-to-a-reality-based-on-being-a-member-of-the-Herd.
‘what the hell?!’ (you may say), ‘hey!! they’re all over the frickin place!!’ (you are, no doubt, yelling), ‘jeez it should be so easy! to be rid of those life-sapping managers at work, …but here at the Doctrine they are not so …. difficult‘ (many are thinking), ‘are they talking about me?…. what a concept! of course they’re talking about me…. wait just a minute!! are they laughing?!?’ ( some are feeling annoyed). But the truth is, we are out. For the moment. Which is kinda too bad, as the rogerian Thursdays have been very popular.
…damn! I just now realized what I have to do (yeah, this here blog is kinda ‘self-development in-the-round’, lol).
I need to get us some more rogers.
…shit
[New Readers: the Wakefield Doctrine is, among a lot of other things, a tool for self-development. If you have always wanted to change certain things, get rid of bad habits or un-healthy appetites, but have found only limited success with traditional approaches ( or worse, changed as you hoped, only to find yourself backsliding to the old way), the Wakefield Doctrine is for you. The key to the self-improvement value is found in the belief that, while we all live in one of the three personal realities (worldviews), we never lose the potential of the other two. While I am a clark (growing up and living in the reality of the Outsider), I have a significant secondary scottian aspect (to see the world as does the Predator) and a pretty weak tertiary rogerian aspect (the life of the Herd Member).The cool thing about the Wakefield Doctrine, (as a tool for self-improvement): if I want to develop my own-damn-self, I don’t have to unlearn anything and I don’t have to bring in anything overly new. I simply have to look to my secondary and tertiary aspects. It’s all there!]
so… this business of continuing the GPTGP series. I need to do something about the lack of rogers around here, (i.e. my scottian aspect), rather than think and talk and, worse, try to hope that someone else will do something.
…ok all set.
About clarkscottroger
Oh man. I’M, FRIST at the Doctrine?! GO ME!
..and everything you said. There. Up there. Later.
Go Girlie, Go Girlie, Its yer birthday! Its yer birthday! ***chanting ineffectively Im sure***
LOL You make me smile Zoe.
Yeesh I walked alllllll the way over here expecting a full-fledge roger in its unatural habitat and what do I get? …. hahahha…. I missed you this week … I think…. Nice to see you too , Clark even if I was expecting a Roger…
So let me get this straight: you wrote a guest post for your own guest post series?
almost
(I wrote) a Post to tell people that I did not have a Guest to write the (rogerian) GPTGP, in the process of the Post (that was not a Guest Post, but was not a regular) Post, I proposed that the Wakefield Doctrine will be demonstrated in my efforts to get us some more Guest Writers for future GPTGP… ya know? It (the Doctrine, not the Guest post that I did not write as a Guest) is easily the most effective, efficacious, useful and fun way to self-develop oneself. The only problem is: clarks, for the most part, are the only ones of the three who recognize and/or admit to the desirability of self-development. scotts (such as yourself) and rogers, generally speaking feel that they are ‘pretty much all set with being the way they are’ so my question is, ‘in the purview of personal self-development, what would do you change about yourself, if you thought it could be achieved without a) years of time invested 2) tons of money spent on programs and seminars or c) messing with the way things have always been
hey, let me know!