Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
First things first!
Congratulations to Friends of the Doctrine, Lizzi and zoe and Jean and Dyanne for completing the ‘What the hell was I thinking?!?! A-2-A Challenge! (and the final Posts are):
A-Z April: Zany
AtoZ LEARN SOMETHING NEW EVERY DAY*** Z – ZEN WISDOM
A TO Z CHALLENGE: THE LETTER Z
Dyanne will be joining us in just a bit…time zones, doncha know
great work, guys!
So, that about uses up our time this Wednesday morning.
Do me a favor. In Comments ask me two questions.
- Question: something that you wished someone had asked (in print) when you first started hanging around this here Doctrine here, you know, the one where, when you heard the answer, you were all, “Of course!!!
- Question: something that you really would like an answer to, but you think that the only way to ask it would come out sounding like, rude or adversarial or like that.
If you do that, I will make every effort to answer your question on a vid post, very possible to run tomorrow!
Seeing as we borrowed a part of today’s Post Title from Led Zeppelin (yeah, how appropriate…I swear it hadn’t occurred to me, lol)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tdYMWng9lM
frist
Jim is listening to Dazed and Confused, and I am looking at all those feathers!!! Nothing like a hot Greek myth!
Thank you for everything clark! You are in MY blog today!!! jean I will write more in a second
Jim is not doing air guitar bec. Page is using a bow right now!!!!!
damn! nice ‘get’ on the Zeppelin detail!
I will ask these questions but I need to think about them frist
Question #1. if I were new here: if I gave you a list of famous people, would you be able to tell what sort of person they are (or were),really fast? For example, Paul McCartney? And how about that Clippers owner who just got banned?
Question #2: What if I told you I don’t LIKE asking rude or adversarial questions? What are you going to do about that, eh? WELL?
yes/roger/have-to-see-a-vid*, laugh**
* have only seen one still photo of the guy (the basic approach to determining predominant worldview that I recommend is: eliminate the ‘no-frickin-way’ and then watch videos or read their words if possible)
** tomato tomahto lol
good examples of ‘watch the celebrity and infer the way that they rlate themselves to the world around them:
Jimi Hendrix: clark
Prince: clark
Joe Pesci: scott
William Hurt: roger
Kathy Bates: roger
Tom Cruise: roger
Angelina Jolie: scott
Kristen Stewart: clark
David Caruso: scott
like that
cool! now: Mozart and so on. “I see dead people” ;)
you rock!
if you insist! lol
hahahahaha!!! great!
1. Why will a clark keep giving and giving and giving, getting nothing in return, and STILL refuse to call it a ‘toxic’ or ‘draining’ relationship (side-note of which, how deep *is* the clark wellspring for this?
2. How come scotts can COMPLETELY switch off their compassion to make fun of other people, in groups?
Lizzi
excellent questions! (will resist the urge to answer them here)
So, with Jean’s questions I have some material… perhaps 2 segments:
Lizzi’s
the psychotic un-selfishness of clarks and the (nature) of the worldview of scotts vis a vis making fun of people
Jean’s
How to spot worldview in celebrities
how to deal with a scott (who seems to be feeling like maybe that darn pack ranking could use a little adjusting lol)
sound good?
so far so good :)
on a totally unrelated note: I have all but finished the final assignment for the final paper for the semester. Only minor editing and actually submit it have kept me from proclaiming, I’M FREE, which I will do, soon.
But I had to stop by: husby and I were enjoying some wine on the porch, discussing jobs (which the school where I’m at suddenly gave me an OFFER OF FULL-TIME employment, but we were also discussing – no kidding – clarks, scotts, and rogers. And how much we love the doctrine. How husby is going to wear the Doctrine shirt to work, how I’m going to wear the sweatshirt and we’re going to see how many people comment about the Doctrine. And we’re having dinner guests over on Friday night and…we think the wife is a clark and the husband is a roger-scott. HEHE. We have them all figured out and know what to do/say before they even get here.
I will try to call in on Saturday night though I have to catch up on my life…so I’m not sure. Must share all these good things.
PS – there is a Doctrine surprise in the not-too-distant future. Stay tuned. You’ll smile. :)
Congratulations Cyndi! On completing the semester. What about that job offer?! I thought they didn’t have room for you full time?!
Very popular combo, the female clark/male roger:) Hope you do call in.
Doctrine surprise…hm…what could it be…..
very cool!
hey ho! so we’ll start hearing from the SouthEastern* Chapter of the Wakefield Doctrine? excellent! you know, that somewhere in the future there will, if I have any say in it, a First Annual Wakefield Doctrine Pic-a-nic** right?
very good to hear about the rest time coming… we’re always on the phone on Saturdays (‘surrounded by Wakefield’)… call whenever you can
*geography a bit fuzzy lol
** (reference Hanna-Barbera cartoon character, Yogi Bear who demonstrated an extreme penchant for stealing food from visitors to Jelly Stone Park)