Poll Closes 4:44 pm today, 12.17.13 the Wakefield Doctrine ( Tick Tock!! Christine….Tick Tock ) | the Wakefield Doctrine Poll Closes 4:44 pm today, 12.17.13 the Wakefield Doctrine ( Tick Tock!! Christine….Tick Tock ) | the Wakefield Doctrine

Poll Closes 4:44 pm today, 12.17.13 the Wakefield Doctrine ( Tick Tock!! Christine….Tick Tock )

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

french-revolution

(ok…ok…let’s all quiet down.  Lizzi whatever you’re doing back there that’s making you smirk, please stop doing… Christine? let that mouse go free and pay attention up here! no, I don’t believe that ‘rogers like it when you swat them every now and then’ and there is definitely no need to let them think they’ve gotten away and are safe before you pull them back in…and would some one please tell me where Ms Campbell is, she asked to be excused 35 minutes ago! What? yes thank you zoe please go find her.)

Before we get down to the serious business of voting for the person with the best Collective Noun for a group of bloggers, we need to refresh ourselfs on the Rules and such. The Rules of the Contest are:

  1. you can vote multiple times but only for a person who is not you (clarks will be the most comfortable with this Rule)
  2. you can vote by getting someone/anyone else to vote for you, the only condition is that this person must be instructed to cast twice as many votes as the one they have been instructed to cast, but must divide these extra votes evenly among a minimum of 2 other entries…this is for the scottian electorate ( ok!  an example:  lets say Candidate ‘AAAAA’ has several people willing to do their bidding and they says,  “Go now! and vote for me 6 times!!  …What are you still standing around for??!  Go!! Vote!! Vote my little minions!!! Vote!!!   in this example they may cast 6 votes but must vote for two other entries 3 each… got it?)
  3. all voting will be final, whatever is the outcome the people (who when sharing common worldviews, prefer the term: ‘herd’) have spoken. It is no longer a matter of opinion it is an expression of the referential authority that is manifested in  the rogerian worldview and as such is impartial and above reproach    ….loser

Alright the Field:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Let the Contest Begin!  All entries will be attributed to Contestants (although it is possible for non-Contestants to contribute Entries and Assign them to anyone they choose.) We will continue in tomorrow’s Post. Enter Soon and Enter Often!!

Due to popular Command, the Voting Period has been Extended until 4:44 pm today, the 17th of December.  so Ladies and roger?   click them things!!

Lizzi: an Outwriting of bloggers  and  a braveness of bloggers

Mrs. ‘Town’:  a Hump of bloggers

Mrs. Always Random:  a rhapsody of bloggers  and   a chuffed of bloggers

Stephanie:  a groggers of bloggers

Lizzy  (from Muddle-Headed Mamma):  the evocative    a Harem of Happy-makers

Sandy:   a mosaic of bloggers   (nice… )

the progenitor roger: A postendium of bloggers

Kristi:  a chatter of bloggers  the competition is so heating up now!

Michelle:  a chorus of bloggers

zoe:   a Possegrat of bloggers; a Graterie of bloggers; ‘a Congregrat of bloggers; a collective of bloggers

Denise:  ‘Purveyors of Perspicacity’

Christine: The Positive Posse; A league of lovely listers; The Grateful Gang; A Band of Bad-Ass Bloggers; The He-Man, Woman Hater’s Club, Unless Those Women Are Making Thankful Lists (That one’s for Rich.)

Kristi ( www.findingninee.com ):The nitwits of nonsense and knowledge; Best Blogger Bullshitters; Bloggimatrixes; Famous Fuckwits; Masters of Mastering; Bodacious Bloggers; Bloggers for Bueller

 

You can see how the election is going by clicking on ‘See Results’ at the bottom of the Poll  good luck!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Alright  the Poll!

 

Ok stay tuned

Share

clarkscottroger About clarkscottroger
Well, what exactly do you want to know? Whether I am a clark or a scott or roger? If you have to ask, then you need to keep reading the Posts for two reasons: a)to get a clear enough understanding to be able to make the determination of which type I am and 2) to realize that by definition I am all three.* *which is true for you as well, all three...but mostly one

Comments

  1. zoe says:

    Wow….that shot everybody up. They must all be sleeping it off from last night

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      where did you come from? lol

      I’ve been staring at a totally dead polling booth for most of the morning, wrote that last Reply to (the Bedlam reference) came back (after a too inconsiderate client insisting on interrupting my work…lol)

  2. lrconsiderer says:

    Damnit. It won’t let me cast the rest of my votes :( I want to spend two on one person…

    • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

      try again or send me secret message (the Facebook should work) and I will cast your votes without telling myself who they are

      (of course I can do that, I’m a clark!)

      • zoe says:

        Piece of work….wow….its all about the rights of representation I guess…I just woke up and expected to click into a hullabalooo….

        • zoe says:

          Wow…is that view accurate? Should I be worried about some scottian assassination / conspiracy plot ?

          • clarkscottroger clarkscottroger says:

            zoe

            ..always

            lol but you have the blindingly pure light and power of the Wakefield Doctrine to guide your steps and protect you from scotts dropping out of the canopy as you walk to the oasis or their brutally efficient attempts to catch an un-suspecting outlier as the hear tries to cross the stream (your rationale being that you could hitch a ride with are more bovinistically-centered semi-bretheren).