Month: November 2010 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3 Month: November 2010 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3

“But if it be a sin to covet honour, I am the most offending soul alive…yo” (or) “…just give me some of that old-time Doctrine, an I’ll be yours”

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)

Warning! On a number of occasions we have made a point of saying that, try as we might, writing a Post over a period of time exceeding ‘one sitting’ results in nothing good. One sitting meaning, turn on computer, go to page where Posts are written and start. This process can take as little as one hour or as much as 4 hours, but always it ends in hitting Publish and sending into posterity the Post. It is these, ‘more than one sitting Posts’ that spell trouble.
In any event, I usually will do a strike-through on the old content and keep it, while following it with the ‘new’ Post.  Hey! Wait just a darn minute, the Wakefield Doctrine recycles!! How Green is the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers!! Now why don’t we get picked up my the major blog networks for that? Easy enough to imagine the Headlines:

Wakefield Doctrine goes GREEN, first blog to be awarded the LEEDS designation (Uranium level) for eco-conservo-litera-savism work. The Institute for the Responsible Recycling of Words, Ideas, Premises and Inspiring Thoughts is pleased to announce the awarding of  this coveted designation to the first blog to apply responsible word-use. Showing a dedication and discipline to not only make responsible choices in the use of adverbly nouns but also complying with the responsible use of Sustainable Prepositional Phrase(s), the Wakefield Doctrine,  is blazing a trail (responsibly) for Readers and showing us the future of the blogosphere.”
(This newstory would then go on to quote people responding to the event), 
Well, it seemed like the responsible thing to do“, stated the author of the Wakefield Doctrine when asked by this reporter, ” after all we all have our things to do and this was…the most…responsible”. 
“Hey wait!”,
a person identifying himself only as I-was-at-old-mountain-field-too-you-know, “So why don’t you interview me too!, Look at my face, listen to my voice, am I not comforting?”  (“Hey!!! Fuck you!  Fuck everyone! You do notice me right“?, was heard coming from across the street).
This reporter made an effort to interview other Readers of blogs, “Well, I would agree that if they can have sustainable buildings and recycled food packaging, it just makes sense that those blog-writer people get on board.  Mother Earth is not getting any younger and it is about time to get these writer-people to give up the breastfeeding and go sit at the little folk table and eat by themselves, like when I was young and learning things in the wheat fields of Wisconsin“, stated a bystander wearing an apron and draggin whiteboard-on-wheels behind him, “hey got an idea?, maybe a extra childhood dream? come on mister! can ya spare me a premise“?

 

What? or yeah, but that is just a daydream. This is a Post so we better get to it, yo.

(If we are real quiet and not make any sudden moves, we can look in on the Post that was started last night. A retrospective/reflective sort of thing, the idea was to bring in the Exchange Students at Millard Fillmore High and have Principal Clark and (possibly AKH and glenn) reflect on the past year or so that the Wakefield Doctrine has been out in the blogosphere.)

(…”You newer exchange students were not around in the early days of the Doctrine… ) ( …Miguel Aiyee! que el principal miedo Clark, parece ser que quieren Tak o nosotros … Sagrada Madre de la Cassarole, es de esperar que no voy a hablar mucho tiempo …) ( …well to tell you the truth, it has not always been so much fun! No, kids in the early days here at Millard Fillmore High most of those subtitles were out of context quotes from long dead writers…the thinking was that with enough cleverness and literary allusion, the world would beat a path to the door of this fine institution!…but those were more simple days …) ( … why look!  its the newest addition to the faculty, Ms. AKH!! ask her what it was like back in the early days, when the Wakefield Doctrine was still an elective course… ) ( …Hey Miguel!  Se pierda AKH el maestro nuevo caliente, usted ha dicho que pediría su salida. Nows su oportunidad, vaya por delante a hacerlo! El principio desea ella a hablar con nosotros )

Ms AKH!, some of our exchange students here were wondering what it was like to be a student teacher here, back when the Doctrine was new. Can you come over here and talk to us a moment? Is that Mr. Miller with you? Please! Come over and talk to our Exchange Students (from the Autonomous Region of Madrid), tell what it was like in the old days!  ( …Aiyee Miguel, que hace el Sr. Principio hablar? No veo a nadie! Vamos a decir una oración a la Virgen de Cantalope … )

Ms. AKH:
Mr. Miller:

I remember the early days of the Doctrine, you were quite the find, Ms. AKH so much energy, so much enthusiasm…could barely restrain you…
Mr. Miller:
That will be quite enough of that, Mr. Miller I still have a record of your little Career Day talk you gave to the class!

Glenn: Find something to like and admire about every one of your subordinates—Hard for a scott.  But totally necessary. 
(Janie?  Already know what I like and admire about you.  Yes.  I will be available after class for..questions.)

Leadership can be lonely.  Scotts are lone hunters, but also pack animals.  So, when you assume a leadership position in an organization you will LOSE your former relationships with your colleagues.  For a roger, this can be devastating.  Membership in the herd is everything to a roger.  But if you hold a position in which YOU decide who gets promoted, who gets a raise,  Etc…you can no longer be a friend.  It just doesn’t work.  You may find yourself left out of conversations.  The room goes silent when you walk in.
For a roger, this is the most difficult adjustment following a promotion.
For a clark—the room already goes silent when you walk in. No adjustment needed.
For a scott—the silence means they respect (and maybe just a little fear) me.  That’s a good thing… 

Glenn:  oh..alright Jimmy? …  how to deal with your coach…why you are not on the starters bench?  You are not a starter because …you suck, frankly.  Sports is a very scottian world.  If you could help the team win, you would start.  If you are a scott, you would accept this and enjoy knowing your place in the pack.  If you are a roger, you will feel hurt and victimized.  If you are a clark—you only play sports that are played by one person.  (Teams do not interest clarks.)   

Yes, Britney?   How kind of you to say, Britney… You’re right, BritneyPrincipal Clark is a dedicated protector of decency and good taste…He’s not much fun, but he does “police” this environment and stamp out indecency every chance he gets—the prick.  Did I say that out loud or just think it?  No, age is not really a significant factor in the application in the Wakefield Doctrine? oh sure, ask him the question directly…

What’s that Britney?  Yes, I have noticed Janie back there.  Yes.. Uh –uh.  Well I’ll tell you this…The second thing that comes to mind is that she probably ought not to wear such a short skirt in school.  The first thing?  I don’t think Principal Clark would like me to answer that question.

Principle Clark:  Okay!  Class, let’s all thank Mr. Miller for his time and expert opinions.

My god! They actually went and copied the content from an old Post and displayed it in green! Do these people have no shame at all?

No, no we do not.

Lets call it a wrap. Cute idea, losing interest…again!  But we wait for Ms. AKH and glenn to send in their contributions to our on-going conversation, “What was it like in the early days of the Doctrine?”

Mr. B?

Since we are in music appreciation mode, attend:

Share

fun? you want to have fun here? wtf?! this is some serious psycholicious shit, here

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine, (the theory of clark, scotts…blah, blah and blah)

Remember that Post last fall with Robin Trower?  (“sun don’t shine, the gods look down in anger“) well the fact of the matter is that (that) whole Post was generated by a morning that looked a whole lot like today. And you know how we keep talking about trying to let new Readers find out how much fun this Wakefield Doctrine thing really is? Well, that’s the kind of morning it is, here at Doctrine Central  ( …Miguel de Aiyeee ¿qué es esta doctrina central? ¿No tenemos los documentos de derechos? ¿Se vienen y nos hacen volver a casa?… ). If memory serves me, that Trower Post was where AKH was starting to really participate in this thing of ours. So let’s just sit back in whatever form of support you are currently entangled with, listen to some music and maybe a quick Lesson of the Day. Sound good to you all?

Hey! someone go get glenn, (lol) he’s probably down the corridor making fun of how someone talks to compensate for how much he hates the previous video ( …¿Que se burlan de cómo algunos pueblos hablan? ¿Quién es este hombre, no creo que como él tanto, Miguel!… )

Ok before we lose all our new Readers,  (…”what do I mean, new Readers”…very funny AKH) let’s get some Doctrine learnin done, so’s we can watch another video…(You know,  it just occurred to me, does a person become a perfect clark, scott or roger just before they die or would they become as they were before, back when they was chillun? Great question!)

Wakefield Doctrine Lesson of the Day. (Actually this is more of a study of the current body of knowledge of the Wakefield Doctrine than it is a Lesson). Let us all consider the question: what does the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) tell us about the end of life?
Well, we know certain things; a) everyone is born with the potential to experience the world as a clark or as a scott or as a roger; 2) at some point early in life (say around 2-5 y.o.) we all settle into one of the three and therefore begin to experience the world as a clark does or as a scott would see the world or the herd-society of the roger and c) we continue along life, not knowing that other people ( clarks, scotts or rogers) were experiencing a slightly different world even as we lived/loved/hated/fought/worked with/were devoted to them from our own personal perspective.
So what happens at the end?

I propose that we devolve back into whatever that original person was, before the “choice” was made to live in (the) world of a clark or a scott or roger.

(What? music? what do you mean the gloomy day outside the window is not going to last?…alright Mr. B. Seein’ how you the resident roger, you make a selection)

OK!! OK!! Recess over.  Come on now, if this is a Lesson we need to be certain. What happens to us when we get to that last stage? Do we go back to the beginning or do we go out as we spent our lives or maybe we combine all three…damn, there’s a concept. You know I am not sure…any Comments?  (lol)

(Hypersonic whistle) Hey boy! here girl…good doggie!

Come back!! Post is not over yet!  (Actually I must be honest with you Readers, this is an ‘afterthought’ part of this thing, as in …later that day)

So, while I will stand by my position about what happens to us as we face our death, let’s back this badboy up and ask another question entirely. What is the characteristic style of death for each of the three types?

clarks:  suicide or sacrificing their life for another, but in a quiet un-assuming way….
scotts: pretty much any of your violent, makes-a-good-front-page-photo-story (provided the publication in question is the Police Gazette or the National Enquirer) death big n loud
rogers: slow and annoying (annoying to the people being left behind, the roger would be totally in their glory…these guys like hospitals!!?!)

So there you go, binyons. Cradle to frickin grave! The Wakefield Doctrine has it all!! Tell me I’m lying.

Share

yeah, I write most of these…you got a problem with that?

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers).

Today is the start of the First Annual Wakefield DoctrineReader/Membership Drive-athon-abration!!

We start with a word from our most excellent DownSpring, who is also our current speaker-for-the-scotts, lets all have a round of applause for Ms. AKH! She is the authoress-ette of her own damn column, the “Hey, a scott is talking! Thats the one in the middle of the homepage, sort a center column.

Damn, please excuse the above strikethroughs, while the sentiments expressed are sincere, (more about that in a bit), the thing that prompts the harsh language ( lol, frickin glenn) is the difficulty I have had since creating this blog, which is an inability to write a Post in anything in more than one ‘sitting’. The section above I started last night, it read well for an opening of a Post and I left it thinking, ‘ok, sound premise, those others are working really hard on this Doctrine thing, never hurts to remind that passive bunch of Readers that the Wakefield Doctrine marches on, yo’. (I actually thought the word “yo”  and took the time to laugh to myself as I shut off my computer and left the office… “you are such a clark“,  I said to the dark and empty office, laughing, I went home.)
But then I woke this morning, pulled up the draft Post and stared at the screen. “Goodness gracious“!! I snarled at the computer, it has happened again!! The words were there, the sentiment was still proper, but I did not have a sense of what comes next. So I did what I suspect most writer wannabes do, I went to read what the Friends of the Doctrine blogwriters have written on their sites. Over at the Recession Accession, the Progenitor roger had a decent piece about writing and aging, admired one ‘tie-in’ lick that he did (…All right. I admit it. I am not the brightest bulb in the shed…Well, must run…got to go to the store. What to wear??).  Then I went on over to ‘the Spatula‘ see what Mel was up to, something about a new show on TV. Well written as usual, but that got me off on a tangent about this fuckin awful show that I saw the commercial for, “your Fairy Jobmother” and for whatever reason the music in the background was a most excellent Audioslave tune,  and I was off and running.

So… Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine. We have something for everyone!! And considering the fact that “everyone” consists of three types of personality, that is not such a hyperbolic statement, is it now?
The Wakefield Doctrine says to you,  “Hey!! people experience the world in one of three ways. When you are born you have the potential to see and experience, react to and respond in any of these three ways. For one reason or another we all settle into one of these three ways of experiencing/seeing the world. Once we do this, our actions and reactions, perceptions and decisions are all based on this particular way of seeing the world. We settle into one of the three ways very early in our lives, so everything we do, our interests, our talents our likes and dislikes, our loves and our hates, our friends and our enemies are shaped by this choice. Here at the Doctrine we say, hey!! you don’t practice acting a certain way and that becomes your personality, here at the Doctrine we say,  depending on how you experience and see the world and everything in it, you act in a way that is the only reasonable way to act. Your “personality” is a result of the way you percieve the world not some genetic predispositional, my parents made me act this way. No way, the choices you make in reacting to the world, in living your life, these choices are the only ones reasonable. We call these ways of seeing the world, we call it being a clark or a scott or roger.

Know how you chose to view the world when you were just little and you will know how you will respond to the world when you are very old.
Know how your spouse/friend/enemy/co-worker/total stranger views the world, know if they are a clark or a scott or a roger and you will know how they will react in any situation.

Pretty simple, isn’t it?

But not so fun sounding that you are reaching for your keyboards to send in your Comment: “Hey! Count me in!! I will send in my thoughts and oberservations, I will share with you all what I see today in terms of those ubiquitous rogers and those ravaging scotts and those darling clarks. Please tell me how I can get a nearly free hat (for my damn head) and I will send back a photo of both against a backdrop of the part of the world that I claim (by right of hat)! I can’t wait, yo”

We recognize this “fun-gap”, the enthusiasm deficit that seems to be holding you back, dear Readers. That is why we are grateful for DS#1 and Ms AKH both of whom contribute to Posts. Read them and tell me you don’t think this Doctrine would be too, too much fun. Go ahead, tell me that.

Time to leave for today. Go read “hey! a scott is talking“! and then go back and read “…a piece of the action“… and don’t forget Mel and the roger. After all, these people (real or imaginary) must be good for something!

Mr. B? some music that we might enjoy this fine, fine November morn?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKv_vJks2gM
Share

Gimme a “S”, gimme a “C”, gimme an “O”, gimme…screw that just pay attention

Ok, I’ve given you plenty of time to find your “eureka moment.” But I have yet to hear from anybody. Come on people.

What? You’ve been too busy?!

Give me a break. Why wouldn’t anyone want to take just a moment to read something that would change their entire view of the world and the people in it? It’s not rocket science for crying out loud. Forget about all of those left brain right brain, enneagram  nine personality types, briggs myers, Jungian personality theories.

They are confusing and quite frankly useless. You have to take a frickin’ psychology class to understand them.

Unlike those “oh look at my blog, aren’t we smart with charts and graphs and the rest of that rogerian crap”. Screw that! Here at the Wakefield Doctrine there are no personality tests. We’ve made it  fun and easier than ever to understand.
What do I have to do to get you to take a quick look?
You know that once you do you’ll be hooked,  amazed at how simple it is.  When you finally get around to checking it out, you’ll be thinking,  “Why didn’t I take a look at this sooner? I can’t believe what I’ve been missing out on. What a refreshing and useful way understand and even predict the way everyone behaves.”

So get over to the Wakefield Doctrine. Go ahead, take a peek. Yeah, I can just hear you now… “whoa… this is a lot to learn. I don’t have time for this…”  The beauty of the Doctrine is that you don’t have to read absolutely everything to get it. Just take a look at the summaries of the three types (clarks, scotts and rogers) and read a Post or two.
You’ll be on board in no time. Oh, and don’t forget to share your thoughts. Your Comments, as always, are welcome and are a key part of the Doctrine.

Share