Month: October 2010 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3 Month: October 2010 | the Wakefield Doctrine - Part 3

“this from another part of my life and today I remember much of that time… a time you know you will never get back… what good is it to feel this way?”

Okay!  Welcome? to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers). Today we may have a guest writer in the form of some odd corner of the mind. But do not worry!  ( …Preocupación? Miguel por qué hace ssay que no se preocupe … y así es que habla portugués?…). As Regular Readers know, sometimes these Posts lurch off on a decidedly eccentric track, but (almost) always come back on track. And the track is….let’s all say it together…is the Wakefield Doctrine! (can he use the word ‘track’ more than that? come on! get this thing on track).
The Doctrine that holds the answer to your questions and questions the answers you hold true…
The Doctrine will let you know more about the people close to you than you really should know….
While ‘mystery’ is sometimes referred to as the “vinaigrette of the relationship salad”, the Wakefield Doctrine is…the extra virgin…(no…) it’s the balsamic….nah it’s the after dinner sorbet?… ( …Miss Sullivan? you have any idea what the ‘mystery’ of relationships is…really?…)  Rose Soda (Water) and Lavendar Drink ?  ( …Popular in Europe?…Middle Ages….I see. And you have the recipe?… no, no of course you do!  Thank you for sharing that with us… )

Rose Soda / Lavender Drink

Adapted from _The ‘Libre de DiversisMedicinis’ in the Thornton Manuscript (MS. Lincoln Cathedral, A.5.2)_. Edited by Margaret Sinclair Ogden. Published for the Early English Text Society by Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press. Amen House, E.C. 4. England. 1938. Text circa early 1400 CE.

 1 part rose/lavender petals

2 parts water

2 parts sugar/honey

 Soak a number of  petals in a pitcher of water holding twice as much water as petals for one night. Press, but not squeeze, the water from the petals and reuse them as needed. Mix into the water enough honey or sugar as to taste, and serve cold
(courtesy of  HL Rory McGowen)

Alright, alright I seem to have cleared my head… Sorry for the tangent, actually I am not sorry… for the tangent, that is. But for the curious Reader,  following is the video that for whatever reason,  prompted the initial “mood” of this here Post here.

Now the odd/interesting thing about this music video is that it is not the style of music I was a fan of,  back in the day, this song would have been a little too, greaser/old  kind of music. What triggered my reaction was/were the Comments that followed the song (on the youtube), they were, somehow oddly evocative. No doubt I encountered this (particular version of the) song at some point in life and it hooked to some emotional event and so on and so forth…( sorry, lost interest in my own train of thought). Funny about that.

What I had originally intended for the Wakefield Doctrine Lesson of the Day was: the Three (3) types of jobs.  ( ...Puestos de trabajo? Sin embargo, somos estudiantes y María no consiguió una visa, que nos enviará a todos a Alaska … aiiyee de San Telmo de la cocina! … )

Yes, yes there are! Three jobs. In the world. Every damn job/occupation/avocation/inspiration/calling/profession/obsession/position/post/that’s-my-name-on-the-door/title, what you do for money… in one of the three categories. Really.
No, I am not making this up.  Actually, if the Progenitor roger is in the audience, I would call on him to Comment, as he was there and gets at least co-creator credits for the Three Jobs concept. Hey!! roger, yo…get your increasingly stubby fingers off the keyboard…the Great American Novel can wait a few minutes…Treasure Rd, dude!  Cast your mind back.

The Wakefield Doctrine, Three (3) Jobs: Scientist, Salesman and Machine Operator.  Am thinking Contest here…yeah!  Free Hat (for your damn head) for anyone* who can correctly link the type (clark, scott or roger) with the job ( scientist, salesman or machine operator).
Not as easy as it looks. And we will need some justification of the choice you submit. So,  come on down!

Mr. B! After you find the Exchange Students ( I think they are under the bleachers, back by the fire alarm panel) and get them settled down, take us out something upbeat, if you don’t mind!

LOL…ok…scott!! come back!! lol…Hey, Bonus Contest!!  Of these two lovely ladies one is a clark ( yeah, no shit) but the other is not!  which is which, yo.

Out, everyone out!

* Sorry Progenitors and DownSprings are not eligible to participate.

Share

come on now, sorry folks but it is time to move along, time to go home…time to go on

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine, the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers.

Show of hands, who out there visited the Doctrine the first time in the last week or so? That many?

Well, if you visited here and saw the dvd of Bella and stayed to read the Doctrine, I suspect there may be questions. And as for questions, (those) we do very well here. Answers, not so much. But we try.  And we are aided by the Wakefield Doctrine, which if you read and consider it’s basic premise, the Wakefield Doctrine provides a resource  (of answers) that impresses even me. And god knows, clarks are difficult to impress.

In any event, we thank DownSpring Phyllis for sharing her DVD of Bella with us. There is a ‘human element’ to the rogers among us that seems to lend a certain ‘accessibilty’ or, (if I may attempt at a rogerian expression) rogers have a certain ‘congenital warmth’  in how they relate to others that is un-mistakeable. This is a characteristic not shared by clarks, or scotts for that matter. Although, when it comes to communicating with the others, our scottian friends make up in volume what they lack in warmth and sensitivity. ….oh, oh…do I hear a Wakefield Doctrine Lesson of the Day off in the distance?   ( … om madre de dios, que es otro examen sorpresa, y no he estudiado!… ).
So, here is the Lesson of the Day. If clarks, scotts and rogers were at an athletic event and were waving pennants and cheering their team, what would it look like?

clarks: (2 possibilities):  A) a bunch of rogers with $5.00 bills sticking out of their pockets would wave a “Go! clarks” pennant 3 times, look around, start talking to their other rogers and forget they have anything in their hands and “go clarks” end up under the bleachers…to be found later by a clark, who would gather them up quickly so that no one would see them and get embarrassed; B) among the rogerian banners and pennants being waved from the full bleachers, in the upper left corner there is one pennant that says “go clarks….

scotts: they don’t need pennants, or if there is someone near with artistic skills, the scotts will have them (probably a clark) write words on their faces and chests in body paint. Mostly, “Kill”, and “Go Team! (KILL)” but for the most part the scottian element at the game will be happy shouting, “KILL (other team name here)” or “Get in the Hole”!!! or ” eee haaa” or similar ‘inchoate-high-volume-noise-meant-to-designate-a-perceived-freedom-to-act-in-any-manner-that-occurs-to-the-scott-in-question’ ( … aiiyee, Miguel! esta palabra, ‘incipiente’ ¿Qué quiere decir?… ).  Guess it is kinda hard to put into words, but then again, they are scotts

rogers: you know that  ‘wave’ thing that stadium goers do? Stand up and sit down in sequence?…rogers!   And the thing where the crowd holds up black or white cards that, when seen from afar (there is a hint right there) the whole half of the stadium appears to be spelling out the Pythagorean theory complete with proof and citations …rogers!   Hell, for that matter, every marching band in the western world… you know, the ones who insist on doing an arrangement of “I Feel Good” (James Brown) complete with choreography and solos by the horn sections and everyone, including the overweight tuba-playing guys, doing the splits at the end?…rogers!  Real simple concept here, if it is complicated to the point that you lose track of the original reason for doing the thing and requires a level of coordination that would make a school of albacore blush in shame, then you are talking about rogers

So, there you have it! In time for the football season, you now know how to identify clarks, scotts and rogers at the (high school/college) football games.  (… yes? Britney? you have a question?  the female clarks, scotts and rogers?  Why of course they are there!! The Wakefield Doctrine is, after all, gender neutral!  Let’s take the easy ones first…. {very funny Jimmy, besides the scottian girls…} the cheerleaders.  Not counting the male cheerleaders, who are rogers to a “man”. The girl cheerleaders will have the rogerian females on the ground-level of those formation things. Can’t afford to have anyone lose their focus and wander off, the rest are little scottian girls being thrown into the air by clarklike females (with the extra sparkle-things on their showlaces and their hair a little weird).

I am sure there will be questions…that is why we have a Comments section right below here.  Go ahead. Are those exchange students finished writing yet?

Mr. B? Something to wake these students up! They all have gym class next!

Share

the Wakefield Doctrine aka the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers).

A little unusual Post today (which is no small feat, if you have read any of the preceding Posts), however this blog is based on there being Progenitors and DownSprings. And as such, these people are important to this thing of ours.

We will simply post a link for a video for the benefit (if that is the right word) of one of our DownSprings. If you Readers are as intelligent as you are supposed to be (according to this Doctrine thing), then that is all the explanation necessary.

Share