Month: October 2010 | the Wakefield Doctrine Month: October 2010 | the Wakefield Doctrine

go ahead…think of something, there! what you just thought goes here

Welcome.

This is the blog of the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers). Please make yourself at home. Unlike many blogs on the subject of personality types and theories and description and prediction, here there is no one place to start that is best for learning what we are (trying to offer). You will see what was intended to be a Table of Contents, you will even see the ubiquitous “About” page. These were attempts in the early days of this blog to ‘do it right’, early efforts to organise the information that is contained in the Wakefield Doctrine in a common conventional order. Or something. We did try, you will find Pages devoted to the three ‘personality types’ and they do contain useful information. But if you find your attention wandering, do not be discouraged and definitely do not worry that you will not get the basic premise, the core principles, the basics of this thing of ours. (…roger).

Instead of the well-organised, easy to understand, engaging with easy to use involvement exercises, each well written article followed by insightful and witty Reader Comments, that all the other personality theory blogs have, here at the Wakefield Doctrine, we do things a little bit differently.  Let’s just say the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) took ….the road less travelled  which  (by the looks of it) seems to have been paved, painted with reflective paint on both travel and passing lanes, shoulders wide enough to safely change a tire in with those cell phones on poles that sprang up like weeds along the interstate cause nobody in the Federal Highway design department looked in their pockets and saw a cell phone, and conveniently located rest area, open daily at six, truck to the right, passenger vehicles to the left, no pic-a-nic(-ing)….

…”What we’ve got heah is… failure to ca-mune-a-cate”… What has evolved here is a search for a conversation, a conversation with those of us here at the blog with Readers. The people directly involved in the current form of this blog are all people versed in the Doctrine and if you (the New Reader) were to have the opportunity to ‘hang out’ with any of these folks, you would quickly understand the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers. But much more important than understanding this thing, is getting to know how much fun and how simply useful the Wakefield Doctrine can be!  Very fun. Very useful.

Since none of us are professional writers or blog creators we are constantly searching for the right format/correct form of address as a way to engage the new Reader, talking to people who have the curiosity and/or nerve to come up to one of us and ask, “this Wakefield Doctrine thing of yours, what the heck is that all about?”

So, like a blind man trying to paint or a deaf woman singing…we are all over the place. Because as awkward and clumsy and sometimes strained as these Posts and Comments are, the people writing them are pretty amazing… more than that, these DownSprings and Progenitors and Friends of the Doctrine and CY and that Reader from Pennsylvania, and Doug and them all demonstrate the Wakefield Doctrine. They are the proof of the theory, demonstrating the ridiculous flexibility of intelligence that is sort of necessary to get this Doctrine thing. They can take that totally essential step from knowing what is what to knowing that what might actually be something else entirely.

We are glad to have them with us. And if you read all of these Post and Pages (that’s right! I said all of these Posts)… hey, somebody get scotts keys from him before he can bolt for the door. If you read these things you get the core principles that support the Doctrine, you will then see clarks, and scotts and rogers in your world and it will never be the same. It is actually kind of spooky, how true this theory actually is. I don’t know if I should say it, but even being the Progenitor and all, I am learning new aspects and implications and applications of the Wakefield Doctrine, even as we write these Posts! It is now at the point that I have to put in extra effort to keep up with the damn thing, as everyone else gets comfortable with the theory and are pointing out things about it that have not occurred to me! damn.

Anyway. That’s what the Wakefield Doctrine is all about. Fun. Useful. Productive. Glad to you have you along for the trip.

(And we have photos and music videos and ever thang).

We did say that the Wakefield Doctrine is culture and gender neutral, didn’t we?  As the hats (on our damn heads) clearly indicate, we all are clarkscottrogers,  just mostly clarks or scotts or rogers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixqbc7X2NQY
Share

(“a piece of the action…”)

Lady Downspring here.  I’ve decided to suit up again.  I quite enjoy it on occasion but I digress.  My first and last Post for this blog was about a year ago.  “What is wrong with that?” you may ask.  Everything and nothing at all.  I am, after all, a clark.  It is within my purview to procrastinate, take for granted, lose urgency/energy, be fearful, wonder that there is anything pertinent I can contribute, castigate myself – wait, that’s reserved for my “other” friends…..  to the conversation that is the Wakefield Doctrine, the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers.  So why would I think I have nothing pertinent, nothing of value to say? What is it that keeps me reading but not writing? Could it be connected to how I view the world? (with fear CY – with fear.  the clue to your clarklike nature lies within the domain of fear.)

 The question and subsequent question of the day for the veteran “25” and new readers alike?  “How does one learn to view the world differently?”,  “Can I view the world differently?”  This presupposes the desire (“shh… no, not now…”) to change how one views the world.  First, let us assume the position (no glenn. get up!) that one has identified oneself as predominantly a clark, scott or roger. What would be next?  If you identified yourself as having clarklike “symptoms” not to worry too much (yet). You will continue to read the Wakefield Doctrine as long as it amuses and challenges you, you can learn from it; you do not find yourself distracted by something else.  If on the other hand you recognize your primary status as that of a scott, (no!. all egos must, I repeat must….….. check at the door) then it depends on how hungry you are and whether there is enough to satisfy you.  Thirdly, if you lay claim to being of rogerian descent then it becomes a little more complex.  Assumptions have been made.  If the conversation that is the Wakefield Doctrine aligns with your interpretation, with your world view at the moment, Godspeed.

clarks! This session you may sit.  I will speak of our little scottian friends.  “You!  In the seat by the door!  Go get that roger and drag him back here! ” rogers do not like to be told what to do (unless it is by a scottian female – a male roger will always defer to the scottian female.) For more on how the Wakefield Doctrine can be applied to relationships I will refer you to our very own Ms. AKH.)

 To be scottian is to be dominant or submissive (to another scott only).  One or the other.  There are dominant scotts and lesser scotts. (not in a diminutive way)  Keep in mind: clarks think, scotts act and rogers feel, you will no doubt catch on quickly to the nuances of the many ways a clark views the world, how a scott views the immediate landscape, and how a roger views the world as it should be.  scotts are high energy individuals with a short attention span.  They make decisions quickly (because they are so certain of themselves).  scotts can be quick to anger however they hardly ever hold a grudge.  And why? scotts are of the present.  They like to be the focus of attention. (down boy, almost finished)

scotts are often misunderstood.  There is no delicate way to say it – they are often thought of as assholes.  Many of them are but more often than not scotts possess a soft, tender side.  My advice:  learn the Wakefield Doctrine, the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers and you will learn how to handle not only the scotts in your life but the clarks and rogers as well.  It may take a little time but once you catch on it can not only be fun but it can bring positive results to both your work life and home life.  Who doesn’t want to live a less complicated life?

View the vid clip and take note to the scotts attempting to establish ranking.  Take further note to the ultimate, good natured (but do not test me) roger that is our Capt. Kirk. (“No way like the Federation way”.)  

Next sessionWhere there is a clark there is always a scott/where there is a scott there is always a clark.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIiAtCD-gIM(a piece of the action….”)

 

 

 

Share

Wakefield Doctrine Field Guide

( …”so if we establish the outward more obvious characteristics”… )

Oh, hello!  Did not see you come on line…be right with you  ( …but the “fun factor” got to find a way to present the damn fun of this thing… ) just one more aside and we can get today’s Post started ( good frickin job there, you just telegraphed your last remaining hook… goddamn it… ) Let me just try and put this little journal down. There.

Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)!. This week we are starting to present the whole Doctrine in a simple, logical and easy to understand manner.  ( …sure keep up with the asides…is there nothing you won’t resort to in order to get through one of these Posts?…they know what you are doing, they ‘get’ it, dude…this is so over done…)  Yesterday we started with a clark, as subject of discussion. But let’s keep with the topic a little longer… ( .. ’cause they are sooo interesting… )

clarks are the creative ones and as such…

( …Hola Miguel, ¿qué pasa con el director Clark? No se ve tan bien, y creo que él está hablando a sí mismo … vamos que el hallazgo señorita Sullivan y Britney… )  ( …man! are you so totally shameless!   roll out the ‘Spanish exchange students’, just to keep this Post limping alone?… )

I believe I was suggesting that we continue to look at the personality of clarks. Hell, since this Post insists on slouching towards ( …Yeates, I can’t frickin believe that you are so desperate to get done that you will pad this thing with a literary allusion that a sophomore high school student would be too embarrassed to use… but hey, who am I to criticize… ) Well, let’s get the words on the page, put in some pictures and get the hell out. ( …the way this thing is going you are likely to pander to the scotts and put some frickin childishly exuberant music just to draw a reaction… )

Ahem! as we have said before, the clarklike females are fairly easy to identify. Outlandishly dressed, creative with the make-up (with special attention to the face/eyes) and to a woman,  something fairly strange on their feet. If you are trying to identify which of the three types a person is and you are thinking possible clark, then concentrate on their eyes.  (The eyes) of the female clarks are quite distinctive, mostly in an un-mistakeable ‘not-of-this-world’ intensity. Often (and unfairly) characterized as either the ‘ditsy broad’ or  ‘snooty/aloof/what-does-she-think-she-is-too-good-for-us?’, the clarklike female projects this image simply because they are distracted. A state common to all clarks, there is simply so much going on inside their heads that they barely have time to keep track of what is going on in front of their noses. If you find yourself  talking to a clark, watch their eyes. If you pay attention, you will see as (mentally) they go from topic to idea to implication to ramification (back to the conversation taking place) to how to conclude the interaction to implication…etc  ( …they get it! stop with the word salad… )

In the spirit of turning this trainwreck into a valid Post about identifying clarks, let’s cut and paste some of the characteristics (found on the clarks page) and get some music and get out… after all there is a real world out there and it is totally full of clarks, scotts and rogers. And there is nothing more fun than going out there and seeing the Wakefield Doctrine “demonstrate itself”.
New Readers? It might seem difficult to figure who is which today, but take our word for it, this Doctrine thing is a lot of fun. 

 

Just to get you started, here are some photos of known clarks 

or  or maybe       …ok, we’re sure you get the idea, now get out there and find ’em!

(DS#1 says we should stick with the ‘topic’ of female clarks) because they are out there in the everyday world and you can spot them with only a little practice. And who are we to disagree with the DownSprings? (the DownSprings are the life of this Doctrine, whatever they want they will always get), so let’s try to come up with a “Field Guide”:

Wakefield Doctrine Field Guide

scott
(male):   picture that Tasmanian devil on the cartoons……or Joe Pesci in all of his movies
roger(male):  they’re frickin everywhere, watercooler? check…Fireman? check…look for the easy-going comfortable smile, inviting conversation…
scott(female): Ginger on Gilligan’s Island, the green chick on Star Trek (the 60’s version)
clark(female): read the damn Post! you can find the clarklike females
clark(male):  the office geek except without the marketable technical skills, probably near-employed, very funny, usually interesting (in small doses) cannot do enough for any person who merely recognises their existence, never mind actually be nice to them
roger(female): tough call under the best of circumstances, examples Kathy Bates, most wholesomely attractive women (with an agenda), think Carrie Nation in SUV…

There you  have it, the Wakefield Doctrine  Field Guide (to spotting) clarks, scotts and rogers.

( … “let’s ask our expert Commentator Mel, so, Mel our leading contestant has racked up 2 scotts (male and female) a rogerian male and a pair of clarks…still searching for the elusive rogerian female… but it looks like…what’s this? a female CPA…at a Church social function…being introduced to someone’s  bachelor son!! this could be it!… )  Damn! got away.

Hey, old people!! the 80s never died!  (or was that the 70s, damn….)

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xcuh4n_the-tubes-she-s-a-beauty_music

Share

now that you’ve had your little joke, Mr. Emerson

If a man can write a better book, preach a better sermon, or make a better mousetrap, than his neighbor, though he build his house in the woods, the world will make a beaten path to his door.” Ralph Waldo Emerson

Well, you know…I gotta say that if Mr. Emerson were sitting here, I might have to challenge him on his pithy little, ‘hey-I’m-so-transcen-splendid’…Ground Control to Major Ralph (…huh, huh…he said ralph… ). Now before anyone says, “who said you have a better mousetrap?”, allow me to retort,

“I said we have a better mousetrap”. Stop reading. Click on google search. Type in ‘personality types’. Hit Enter.   What do you get?

Wait, don’t answer…I’ll show you what you get…(cause you scotts did not do anything I suggested), here is what you get:

About 3,600,000 results (0.12 seconds) 
 

Search Results

  1. The Sixteen Personality Types – High-Level

    Back to The Personality Page · Take the Personality Questionnaire · Information About Personality Types · Portraits of the Personality Types · Personality
    www.personalitypage.com/high-level.html – Cached – Similar 
  2. Personalitytype – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Jump to Types vs. traits‎: Furthermore, because personality test scores usually fall on a bell curve rather than in distinct categories,
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_type – Cached – Similar
  3. Four Temperaments – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    In the ideal personality, the complementary characteristics or warm-cool and
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Temperaments – Cached – Similar
    Show more results from wikipedia.org
  4. Images for personality types

     – Report imagesThank you for the feedback. Report another imagePlease report the offensive image. CancelDone

  5. Personality Types

    Sep 29, 2005 Personality type theory aims to classify people into distinct CATEGORIES. i.e. this type or that. Personality types are synonymous with
    wilderdom.com/personality/L6-1PersonalityTypes.html – Cached – Similar
  6. Myers Briggs Personality Test MBTI Personality Types

    A free online personality quiz or test to introduce MBTI Myers Briggs concepts of personality type and cognitive style. Links are provided to many
    www.personalitypathways.com/type_inventory.html – Cached – Similar
  7. Personality Test and Types (Jungian Psychological Typology)

    Personality test and types information based on the research of Isabel Briggs Myers, Katharine Cook Briggs and Jungian psychological typology.
    www.mypersonality.info/personalitytypes/ – Cached – Similar
  8. Personality test based on Jung and Briggs Myers typology

    Online test based on Jung and Briggs Myers personality approach provides your type formula, type description, and career choices.
    www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp – Cached – Similar
  9. Personality Types

    Comparison of many different four type personality systems.
    www.2h.com/articles/personality-tests/personalitytypes.html – Cached – Similar
  10. Personality Types

    Information about personality types, Myers-Briggs personality tests and quizzes and personality profiles from an INTJ.
    www.systemsthinker.com/interests/…/ptypes.shtml – Cached – Similar
  11. Welcome to Personality Type!

    Knowing your type–and learning about the personality types of those around you–can make you happier and more successful in every aspect of your life.
    www.personalitytype.com/ – Cached – Similar

 

 MoreFewer

 
….notice that last entry?…”morefewer”…tell me a clark did not come up with that and they will swear that it is the only word that will do…
 
Point? My Point? You are wondering what all this and Ralph have to do with the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)?
 
I guess my point is that we have not done a good enough job presenting the benefits of our little improved personality/self-understanding/self-improvement/party game mousetrap here. And that is our fault, not yours.
 
So lets start all over again.
 
“Ladies and Gentleman, this is a Wakefield Doctrine”... It is a fun and useful, unique and intriguing, insightful and easy to understand, way to look at the behavior of those people in our lives. With the Wakefield Doctrine, why people act the way they do will finally make sense. With the Wakefield Doctrine you will know more about the other person than they know about themselves. With the Wakefield Doctrine, you and your friend will have hours of fun, at home, at school, at work or just getting about your lives. With the Wakefield Doctrine you will be able to understand yourself in way that will be useful. With the Wakefield Doctrine you can change the things you want to change about yourself and resist the efforts of people who would have you change things about yourself that you would rather not change.
 
In short, the Wakefield Doctrine will make an awful lot of things understandable and put things in a context that you can do something about.
 
And all you have to do is read and imagine. All you have to do is be willing to accept, just for the sake of demonstrating this Doctrine, that everyone you meet today will be living in a reality that might be a little different than yours. All you have to do is be willing to accept that “what you know” might not be the only way. All you have to do is read, understand and have fun.
 
So, for a nearly free hat (for your damn head) who can tell us which our boy Ralph is, a clark or a scott or a roger. (Sorry DownSprings and Progenitors not eligible).
 
 
 
 
Share

I hear you knockin’, go back where you been

 

“…The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness“…(Ezekiel 25:17)

What the hell are you starin at?

oh, yeah …”lets go to that Doctrine thing and see what music videos that have up there…oh, man…look those people are writing in ‘google-spanish’ again, how frickin’  clever of them”…

Hey!  Reader!  Write something!

clarks: those of you who are right now, totally sure they get this Doctrine thing and have the one piece that has been missing to this whole thing and when you write it in, everyone will get this fairly clever thing, but you need to work on the phrasing before you write the Comment…cause…it really is important to get it just right…and hell maybe someday, huh?

scotts: yeah, easy to get huh? you’re not afraid to write a Comment, all those other simps get too complicated..you got this shit down…you know the only thing missing here is more “fucks”…people don’t write Comments cause they haven’t heard you shout it in their face…yeah  we get that

rogers: …not even gonna bother…. you are correct, this is not entirely about you…so there is no reason to give it another thought…maybe another time…having as fuller than full life as you do, it’s a surprise that you are even reading this far…  hey!  fuck you

So why the time? why the electrons glued to your screen? Why I am bothering if this is all such a waste?

Because the the second thing that this Wakefield Doctrinehas, that none of the other frickin theories of frickin personality have is: an accounting for the connection between the different types. By now, we all know what a clark or a scott or a roger  “look like”  and we all remember something about ‘how everyone has all three potential characteristics’…well today’s Post is all about being a CLARKscottroger… yes AKH, just like the hat (on your damn head)

This Post, in and of itself is todays, Wakefield Doctrine  Lesson of the Day:

it takes a clark to create something as unique and non-connected and original as the Wakefield Doctrine…it takes a scott to actually want and enjoy the  shouting it in the face of anyone who gets near and only a roger would take it all this so personally that you will see Posts like this one…so…Readers?

…don’t care if you read this, I know how much everyone enjoys this… and by the way…..fuck you!!!…. (and can you see how this so further validates the whole concept?)

Share