Welcome to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)
A short Post today, just enough to outline the (Doctrine) schedule for the remainder of the month and start our First Annual Outreach Drive. Seeing that the school year at Mill Fill High starts on the first (week)day after Labor Day this year, the first Official Day of Classes is Tuesday September 7th.
The Outreach Drive begins today and ends on the Friday of Labor Day weekend (September 3rd).
Not too late to sign up for the Mill Fill Pep Club (motto: “hey, hey, we are truly enthusiastic”!!)
Wakefield Doctrine 2010 Out Reach Program!
Hats for new Readers! Any new Readers submitting a Comment during the next two weeks will be entitled to a (nearly*) free hat (for your damn head)! Just write a Comment and the rest will be, “tan fácil como caerse de un tronco” as the new Exchange Students from the Autonomous Region of Madrid might say! Speaking of Exchange Students, next time you at the Doctrine, Madridians yo, drop us a note! We could sure use some photos of your regular “High School” (you know the one that stays mainly in the plains, where classes start 8 hours ahead of Mill Fill High.
Other features and creatures in the works: you got any suggestions for Instructional Youtube videos, let us know; school jackets? anyone up for a Wakefield Doctrine Varsity Jacket? might be a bit on the expensive side, but what the hell, huh? (In our demographic we should be spending money, not saving it!)
Hey binyons, get a gander at this:
Now I say that every and any Reader would destroy their hopes for a fulfilling career and satisfying family life in exchange for such a Jacket! Tell me I’m lying, go ahead somebody tell me that I am not telling the truth. Now, don’t get me wrong. We cannot afford to give these away like hats, but seriously, yo who would not be glad to find such apparel in their own damn closets?
Wakefield Doctrine Lesson of the Day That one of the three (clarks, scotts or rogers) did not get into High School sports is too easy to even bother asking. But the follow-up question of who was most likely to wear such clothing, this question…she is not so easy! (In fact, for double points speak to the question of gender. Of the three which of the three: clarklike female, scottian chick or rogerian girlie, which of these dames would be most likely spotted in such jackets….(how they came about wearing it is left as an extra credit question, yo.)
Damn, this is exciting. We ‘ave the hats (our heads are already damned) can it be there are jackets in the future?
(Important buzz kill announcementation: the above seems to cost on the order of $225.00 or so…so some Readers may need to start saving now! other Readers, why they will simply laugh and say (to no one in particular) ” Piffle…I shall order two…one to wear and one to drape on my shoulders…hah!”
To all we say, these can be yours to wear! (Except the part about clarkscottroger and/or the Wakefield Doctrine…all rights reserved, my little babies…in good time…all in good time.)
So let us sing something enjoyable and go out and find an extra job (or some new stock to invest in), or maybe even buy that “Get Rich in Real Estate while appearing to be a transsexual person of indeterminate Gender” Book that the “person” sells on TV while standing in that totally fake looking library room.
(Hey glenn…throw away the first email you are inclined to send in…then (if you can think of something no one has said or thought about the Doctrine in the high school milieu), you are welcome to send it in…)
*nearly free means that you must send in a photo of the hat in front of a recognizable (local) landmark, supporting (damn head) is totally optional.
About clarkscottroger
Have no idea what means “the high school milieu”*. Probably a good name for a rock band. Love the first video. Jerry (gratuitous vulagarity here) Reed. Why was he not a bigger star? Huge talent. Huge personality. A Scott.5. Chet Atkins–a fine clark. Low key..cooperative..trying to fit in..Love the little gesture by Reed with the hat(on his damn guitar) at the end. Nice scottian touch. Even in the midst of a complex musical perrmance, Reed is looking all over the place. Playing that most difficult piece was not enough to capture ALL of his attention. Had to scope out the stage, the lighting, the crew, probably the fucking janitor too. Reed is the kind of guy I would have drank with. I’d let him call me “Son” and “Junior” and all (another gratuitous vulgarity) What a force of nature! Atkins could actually care less if he was attracting any listeners. HE liked what he was doing. It held HIS attention. Just a great example of a clark joining up harmoniously with a scott–to the ultimate betterment of the both of them. Two thirds of TWD is very clearly delineated in that one minute and fifty seconds of video. No rogers. But, hey. (what do you know, a gratuitous…hey! you knew that!). They already run everything. (Here a quick short, totally un-necessary vulgarity here!! Damn this is fun, in a World War II kind of way!) Chet and Jerry don’t need no steenking rogers around anyhow. By the way, good to see Kalamazoo in the heezy. I like to say Kalamazoo.
(As the Reader can see we have decided to accept glenns Comments totally as written, except for the parts that I choose to eliminate) (Hey! he said eliminate).
The question is, are we better for this change or what?
*(thats my damn italics) the answer to the implied question is, since the Post is all about High School, Comments were encouraged in order to get recollections or impressions of the “high school experience” (“rock rock rock rock rock n roll high school”) from the Doctrine perspective. yo.
Cussing is an art form. (Perhaps an example to support your thesis?)
It means nothing to disparage it for being gratuitous. (“it” being cussing, are we to assume?) That’s the ******* point! (You have not made a Point, yet. Unless we assume that the implied lack of value in criticism is the Point you wish to make. But how can a point be made by future inference? huh?)
You didn’t get ALL the cuss words in the damn comment anyway. (I would be happy to double check, perhaps you would help us and specify which word we missed).
Whaddaya doin’? (Did you mean, ‘What are you doing?’)
Every third one? (“One” what, bitch…be a little more specific, you do know how to be specific, don’t you?)
Being the Creator has ****** you all up. (You need to support your contention a little more than that, lol)
You Billy ******* Graham now? Pat ******* Robertson? Language cop. (If I were presuming to be a ‘Language Cop’, don’t you think that I would correct your use of the pronoun ‘you’, which should be ‘you are’?)
Protector of the innocent. (Innocent what?…thoughts/concepts/expressions…how can communication itself be innocent, or by implication guilty? What are you fuckin insane?)
You take out the cuss words its like neutering a ******* cat. (Since you brought it up, there are certain benefits, to wit:
Besides being a birth control method, and being convenient to the owner, neutering/spaying has the following health benefits:
Sexually dimorphic behaviors such as mounting, urine spraying and some forms of male aggression (relating to females in estrus) may be reduced due to the decrease in hormone levels brought about by neutering. This is an especially significant benefit in male cats due to the extreme undesirability of male cat sexual behavior for pet owners. Most animals lose their libido and females no longer experience heat cycles, which are sometimes considered a major nuisance factor
Changes everything. Emaculates the text–and exposes you as an effete, squeamish little school marm. (My mother was a School Teacher, are you talking about my mother now?)
I might just take my ***** to another blog. A MEN’S blog. A no sissies blog.( I believe the technical term for the type of blog you are infering that you would be more comfortable writing in is: gay)
******* guy becomes The Creator and he forgets where he came from. I’m just tryin’ to keep it real, yo. (Urban colloquialism, inappropriate to writer’s race and socio-economic status)
yo